Use these links to rapidly review the documentTABLE OF CONTENTSTable of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | ||
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)) |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
Definitive Additional Materials |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Seagate Technology Public Limited Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required. | ||||
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1)and 0-11. | ||||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: |
September 9, 2016August 30, 2017
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 20162017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Seagate Technology plc, which will be held at 9:30 a.m. local time on Wednesday, October 19, 2016,18, 2017, at the IntercontinentalInterContinental Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Details of the business to be presented at the meeting may be found in the Notice of Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement accompanying this letter.
We hope you are planning to attend the meeting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please submit your proxy as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the 20162017 Annual General Meeting.
On behalf of the Board of Seagate Technology plc, I thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Stephen J. Luczo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
![]() 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
NOTICE OF 20162017 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The 20162017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Seagate Technology plc ("Seagate"(“Seagate” or the "Company"“Company”), a company incorporated under the laws of Ireland, will be held on Wednesday, October 19, 2016,18, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. local time, at the IntercontinentalInterContinental Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.
The purposes of the 20162017 Annual General Meeting are:
General Proposals:
1. | By separate resolutions, to elect as directors the following incumbent directors who shall retire in accordance with the Articles of Association and, being eligible, offer themselves for election and to elect as a director (the “Director Nominees”): |
(a) Stephen J. Luczo | (b) | (c) Michael R. Cannon | ||
(d)Mei-Wei Cheng | (e) William T. Coleman | (f) Jay L. Geldmacher | ||
(g) | (h) Dr. Chong Sup Park | (i) Stephanie Tilenius | ||
(j) Edward J. Zander |
2. | Approve, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers(“Say-on-Pay”). |
3. | Approve, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the frequency of futureSay-on-Pay votes (“Frequency ofSay-on-Pay”). |
4. | Approve an amendment and restatement of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESP Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for issuance. |
5. | Ratify, in anon-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) to set the auditors’ remuneration. |
Irish Law Proposals:
6. | Grant the Board the authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law. |
7 | Grant the Board the authority toopt-out of statutorypre-emption rights under Irish law. |
8. | Determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law. |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Governance Proposals:
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Annual Irish Law Proposals:
Other:
9. | Conduct such other business properly brought before the meeting. |
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR"“FOR” each director nominee included in Proposal 1 and for“FOR” each of Proposals 2 and 4 through 10.8. For Proposal 3, the Board recommends you vote “FOR one year.” The full text of these proposals is set forth in the accompanying proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 86 are ordinary resolutions, requiring the approval of a simple majority of the votes cast at the meeting. Proposal 3 requires an affirmative vote of a plurality of all votes cast at the meeting. Proposals 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 97 and 108 are special resolutions, requiring the approval of not less than 75% of the votes cast.
Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 23, 2016,21, 2017 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the 2017 Annual General Meeting.Please provide your proxy even if you plan on attending the meeting. Instructions on how to vote your proxy isare set forth in the accompanying proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
During the meeting, following a review of Seagate'sSeagate’s business and affairs, management will also present Seagate'sSeagate’s Irish financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016June 30, 2017 and the reports of the directors and auditors thereon.
By order of the Board,
Katherine E. Schuelke
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary
August 30, 2017
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
![]() 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
September 9, 2016
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 19, 2016:
18, 2017
We will be relying on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”) rule that allows companies to furnish Proxy Materials over the Internet instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, we are sending our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice"“Notice”) instead of a paper copy of our Proxy Statement, our Irish financial statements for the Company’s fiscal year 2016,ended June 30, 2017 (“fiscal year 2017”), the proxy card and our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal year 20162017 (collectively, the "Proxy Materials"“Proxy Materials”). The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of the Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our Proxy Materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via email unless you elect otherwise. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form.
IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTEND, SPEAK AND VOTE, THEN YOU ARE ENTITLED TO APPOINT A PROXY OR PROXIES TO ATTEND, SPEAK AND VOTE ON YOUR BEHALF. A PROXY IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A SHAREHOLDER IN THE COMPANY. IF YOU WISH TO APPOINT AS PROXY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUALS SPECIFIED ON THE PROXY CARD, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMPANY SECRETARY AT OUR REGISTERED OFFICE AND ALSO NOTE THAT YOUR NOMINATED PROXY MUST ATTEND THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IN PERSON IN ORDER FOR YOUR VOTES TO BE CAST.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. For more complete information about the topics summarized below, please review Seagate Technology plc'splc’s Annual Report onForm 10-K and the entire Proxy Statement.
20162017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Date and Time: | Wednesday, October | |||
Place: | Simmonscourt Road Dublin 4, Ireland | |||
Record Date: | August 21, 2017 | |||
Voting: | Shareholders as of close of business on | |||
Attendance: | All shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the | |||
Proxy Materials: | The Proxy Materials were first made available to shareholders on or about |
1
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Proposals, voting recommendations and vote required:
The board of directors (the "Board") of Seagate Technology plc ("Seagate" or the "Company")Board recommends that you vote "FOR"“FOR” each of the proposals that will be submitted for shareholder approval at the 20162017 AGM.
Proposals: | Vote required: | Board Recommendation | Page: | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Election of 10 Director Nominees | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR each nominee | 14 | ||||||
2. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | 63 | ||||||
3. | Amend and Restate the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | 64 | ||||||
4. | Approve the Rules of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for Share Awards Granted to Participants in France | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | 78 | ||||||
5. | Ratify the Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | 79 | ||||||
6. | Amend the Company's: | |||||||||
6A. Articles of Association to Make Certain Administrative Amendments; and | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 82 | |||||||
6B. Memorandum of Association to Make Certain Administrative Amendments. | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 83 |
Proposals: | Vote required: | Board Recommendation | Page: | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7. | Amend the Company's Articles of Association to: | |||||||||
7A. Provide for a Plurality Voting Standard in Contested Director Elections; and | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 84 | |||||||
7B. Grant Board Sole Authority to Determine its Size | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 85 | |||||||
8. | Grant Board Authority to Issue Shares | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | 86 | ||||||
9. | Grant Board Authority to Opt-Out of Statutory Pre-emption Rights | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 87 | ||||||
10. | Determine Price Range for the Re-Allotment of Treasury Shares | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | 89 |
Proposals: | Vote required: | Board Recommendation | ||||
1. | Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR each nominee | |||
2. | Advisory Vote onSay-on-Pay | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | |||
3. | Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay | Affirmative Plurality of Votes Cast | FOR one year | |||
4. | Amendment and Restatement of the ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | |||
5. | Ratification of the Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | |||
6. | Grant Board Authority to Allot and/or Issue Shares | Majority of Votes Cast | FOR | |||
7. | Grant Board Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR | |||
8. | Determine the Price Range for theRe-Allotment of Treasury Shares | 75% of Votes Cast | FOR |
During the meeting, following a review of Seagate'sSeagate’s business and affairs, management will also present and the auditors will report to shareholders on, Seagate'sSeagate’s Irish financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016.2017 and the reports of the directors and statutory auditors thereon.
Seagate'sSeagate’s Corporate Governance Highlights
• The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent directors. | • The Board has a lead independent director | |
• Directors must receive a majority of shareholder votes cast to be elected. | • The
| |
• Directors and executive officers are subject to share ownership guidelines. | • Executive officers are subject to a | |
• All directors are elected annually by shareholders. | • The Company maintains ananti-hedging policy for all directors and employees. | |
• The Board and each committee perform a periodicself-evaluation. | • The Board oversees enterprise risk management. | |
• The Board undertakes succession planning for all executive levels, including the |
2
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement
|
Director Nominees
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Director Nominees.
We are asking our shareholders to elect, by separate resolutions, each of the director nomineesDirector Nominees described below:
Nominee | Age |
Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Current Committee Membership | |||||||
Stephen J. Luczo
| 60 | 2000 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seagate Technology plc | No | • None | |||||||
Mark W. Adams
| 53 | 2017 | Chief Executive Officer of Lumileds, Inc. | Yes | • Audit | |||||||
Michael R. Cannon
| 64 | 2011 | Former President, Global Operations, Dell, Inc. | Yes | • Compensation • Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) | |||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng
| 67 | 2012 | FormerNon-Executive Chairman of Pactera Technology International Ltd. | Yes | • Audit • Finance |
3
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Nominee | Age |
Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Current Committee Membership | |||||||
William T. Coleman
| 69 | 2012 | Chief Executive Officer of Veritas Technologies LLC | Yes | • Finance • Nominating and Corporate Governance | |||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher
| 61 | 2012 | Chief Executive Officer of Artesyn Embedded Technologies | Yes | • Compensation | |||||||
William D. Mosley
| 51 | 2017 | President and Chief Operating Officer of Seagate Technology plc | No | • None | |||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park
| 69 | 2006 | Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maxtor Corp. | Yes | • Audit (Chair) • Nominating and Corporate Governance |
Nominee | Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Current Committee Membership | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo![]() | 59 | 2000 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seagate Technology plc | No | • None | |||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr.![]() | 71 | 2005 | Senior Managing Director of WaterView Advisors LLC | Yes | • Compensation • Finance (Chair) | |||||||
Michael R. Cannon![]() | 63 | 2011 | Former President, Global Operations, Dell, Inc. | Yes | • Audit • Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) | |||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng![]() | 66 | 2012 | Non-Executive Chairman of Pactera Technology International Ltd. | Yes | • Audit • Finance | |||||||
William T. Coleman![]() | 68 | 2012 | Chief Executive Officer of Veritas Technologies LLC | Yes | • Finance • Nominating and Corporate Governance |
4
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Nominee | Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Current Committee Membership | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jay L. Geldmacher![]() | 60 | 2012 | Chief Executive Officer of Artesyn Embedded Technologies | Yes | • Compensation | |||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo![]() | 47 | 2015 | Economist and Author | Yes | • Audit • Finance | |||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park![]() | 68 | 2006 | Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maxtor | Yes | • Compensation • Nominating and Corporate Governance | |||||||
Stephanie Tilenius![]() | 49 | 2014 | Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Vida Health, Inc. | Yes | • Finance • Nominating and Corporate Governance | |||||||
Edward J. Zander![]() | 69 | 2009 | Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Motorola, Inc. | Yes | • Compensation (Chair) |
Nominee | Age |
Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Current Committee Membership | |||||||
Stephanie Tilenius
| 50 | 2014 | Chief Executive Officer andCo-Founder of Vida Health, Inc. | Yes | • Finance • Nominating and Corporate Governance | |||||||
Edward J. Zander
| 70 | 2009 | Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Motorola, Inc. | Yes | • Compensation (Chair) |
For further biographical information about our director nomineesDirector Nominees, see pages 14 through 19biographical information starting on page 15 of this Proxy Statement.
Advisory Approval of the Compensation of Our Executives.Say-on-Pay Proposal.
We are asking for your advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (our "NEOs."“NEOs”). as required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the related rules of the SEC. While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.
Before considering this proposal, please read our "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” starting on page 33,36, which explains our executive compensation programs and the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s compensation decisions.
Advisory Approval of the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay Proposal.
We are asking you to indicate how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. This proposal is also referred to as the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay proposal. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) requires that we solicit your advisory vote with respect to the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay every six years. At our 2011 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders indicated that they would preferSay-on-Pay votes to occur annually and we have heldSay-on-Pay votes every year since that time. You may indicate whether you would prefer aSay-on-Pay vote every one year, two years, or three years, or you may abstain from voting on this proposal. The Board believes that continuing to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation annually is aligned with our policy of seeking feedback from you on corporate governance, our compensation policies, practices and philosophy for our NEOs.
5
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing any of the following four options with respect to this proposal: “every one year,” “two years,” “three years,” or “abstain.” We are asking you to vote for a frequency of “every one year.”
While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.
Before considering this proposal, please read our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” starting on page 36, which explains our executive compensation programs and the Compensation Committee’s compensation decisions.
Approval of our Amended and Restated 2012 Equity IncentiveEmployee Stock Purchase Plan.
We are asking you to approve the amendment and restatement of our Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity IncentiveESP Plan, which increases the number of shares reserved for issuance under the current plan by 7,500,000 shares10,000,000 and to make certain administrative updates. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included in Proposal 3, starting on page 64.
Approval of the Rules of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for Share Awards Granted to Participants in France.
We are asking you to approve the Rules of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for Share Awards Granted to Participants in France, so that we may grant tax qualified stock awards in France. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included in Proposal 4, starting on page 78.70.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, and authorization to set auditors'auditors’ remuneration.
We are asking you to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our auditors, and to authorize the Audit Committee to set their remuneration.
Amend our (A) Articles of Association to make certain administrative amendments and (B) Memorandum of Association to make certain administrative amendments.
We are asking you to amend our Articles of Association and Memorandum of Association to make certain administrative updates to ensure that they are not impacted by the introduction of the Companies Act 2014 that took effect in Ireland on June 1, 2015 and to make other related administrative, non-material changes. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included in Proposals 6A and 6B, starting on page 82. Under Irish law the updates must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.
Amend our Articles of Association to (A) provide for a plurality voting standard in the event of a contested director election and (B) grant the Board sole authority to determine its size.
We are asking you to amend our Articles of Association to provide for a plurality voting standard in the context of a contested director election and to provide the Board the sole authority to set its size. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included in Proposals 7A and 7B, starting on page 84. Under Irish law these proposals must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.
Grant the Board authority to allot and/or issue shares.
We are asking you to grant our Board authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland.
Table Under Irish law, this proposal must be approved by ordinary resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of Contentsa simple majority of the votes cast.
Grant the Board authority toopt-out of statutorypre-emption rights.
We are asking you to grant the Board authority to allot and/or issue shares for cash without first offering sharesthem to existing shareholders. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland. Under Irish law, this proposal must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.
Determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares held as treasury shares.
We are asking you to determine the price range at which the Company canre-allot shares held as treasury shares. From time to time, the Company may acquire ordinary shares and hold them as treasury shares. The Company mayre-allot such treasury shares, and under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we mayre-allot any shares held in treasury. Under Irish law this proposal must be approved by special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.
Executive Compensation
Pay for PerformancePay-for-Performance
The general philosophy and structure of our executive compensation programs emphasize strong alignment between executive pay and corporate financial performance. In addition, our compensation
6
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
philosophy is designed to align our executive compensation programs with long term shareholder interests. In the Company'sCompany’s fiscal year ended July 1, 2016 ("fiscal year 2016"),2017, a majority of our long term equity incentive awards were granted in the form of performance basedperformance-based restricted share units, which vest dependent upon the achievement ofpre-established performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share, reflecting a strong emphasis on pay for performancepay-for-performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders. In addition, over 87%at least 86% of our NEO total annual targeted compensation is at risk.
Highlights of fiscal year 2016 financial performance include:
Please review our "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” for additional information and definitions of financial metrics.
20172018 AGM
Deadline for shareholder proposals for inclusion in the | May | |
Period for shareholder nomination of directors: | April | |
Deadline for all other proposals: | July |
For further information, see the section entitled "Shareholder“Shareholder Proposals and Nominations"Nominations” on page 82 of this Proxy.Proxy Statement.
7
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
10 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
21 | ||||
25 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
30 | ||||
33 | ||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 33 | |||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
38 | ||||
38 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
39 | ||||
Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process | 40 | |||
40 | ||||
40 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
46 | ||||
50 | ||||
50 | ||||
51 | ||||
52 | ||||
53 | ||||
54 | ||||
54 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control | 61 | |||
PROPOSAL 2 – AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION –SAY-ON-PAY VOTE | 68 | |||
69 | ||||
70 |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
| ||||
| ||||
Fees Paid to Independent Auditors
| ||||
PROPOSAL 6 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND/OR ISSUE SHARES
| ||||
PROPOSAL 7 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TO OPT-OUT OF STATUTORY PRE-EMPTION RIGHTS
| ||||
| ||||
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
APPENDIX A: | A-1 | |||
APPENDIX B: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY | B-1 |
9
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND | ||||
| ||||
|
PROXY STATEMENT
In this Proxy Statement, "Seagate“Seagate Technology," "Seagate,"” “Seagate,” the "Company," "we," "us"“Company,” “we,” “us” and "our"“our” refer to Seagate Technology plc, an Irish public limited company. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, are first being mailed to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 23, 2016 (the "Record Date")the Record Date on or about September 9, 2016.August 30, 2017.
Following are questions and answers concerning voting and solicitation and other general information.
Why did I receive this Proxy Statement? | We sent you this Proxy Statement or a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials | |
This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on an informed basis. | ||
Why are there two sets of financial statements covering the same fiscal period? | U.S. securities laws require us to send you our | |
What do I need to do to attend the | All shareholders as of the Record Date are invited to attend the |
10
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Who may vote? | You are entitled to vote if you |
How do I vote? | Shareholders of record can cast their votes by proxy by: | ||
• using the Internet and voting at www.proxyvote.com; | |||
• calling 1.800.690.6903 and following the telephone prompts; or | |||
• completing, signing and returning a proxy card by mail | |||
If you have received a Notice, it contains a control number that will allow you to access the Proxy Materials online. If you have received a paper copy of our Proxy Materials, a printed proxy card has been enclosed. If you have not received a paper copy of our Proxy Materials and wish to vote by mail, please follow the instructions included in the Notice to obtain a paper proxy card. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form. | |||
The Notice is not a proxy card and it cannot be used to vote your shares. | |||
Shareholders of record may also vote their shares directly by attending the | |||
| |||
In order to be timely processed, your vote must be received by | |||
May I revoke my proxy? | If you are a registered holder of the | ||
• notifying the Company Secretary in writing: c/o Seagate Technology plc at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland, Attention: Company Secretary; | |||
• submitting another properly signed proxy card with a later date or another Internet or telephone proxy at a later date but prior to the close of voting described above; or | |||
• by voting in person at the |
11
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Merely attending the | ||
If you are not a registered holder but your shares are registered in the name of a nominee, you must contact the nominee to revoke your proxy. Merely attending or attempting to vote in person at the 2017 AGM will not revoke your proxy if your shares are held in the name of a nominee. | ||
How will my proxy get voted? | If your proxy is properly submitted, you are legally designating the person or persons named in the proxy card to vote your shares as you have directed. Unless you name a different person or persons to act as your proxy, | |
If you are a | ||
The following | ||
• Proposal 5 (Ratification of the Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors) | ||
• Proposal 6 (Grant Board Authority to Allot and/or Issue Shares) • Proposal 7 (Grant Board Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights) • Proposal 8 | ||
| ||
However, your bank, broker-dealer brokerage firm, trust or other similar organization or nominee may not vote your shares on | ||
The following | ||
• Proposal | ||
• Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote on • Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay) • Proposal 4 (Amendment and Restatement of the ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance) |
12
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement
|
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
What constitutes a quorum? | The presence (in person or by proxy) of shareholders entitled to exercise a majority of the voting power of the Company on the Record Date is necessary to constitute a quorum to conduct business for the | |
What vote is required to approve each of the proposals? | Majority of Votes Cast Required to Approve: • Proposal 1 (Election of each of the 10 Director Nominees) • Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote on Say-on-Pay) • Proposal ESP Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance) •
Proposal 5 (Ratification of the Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors) • Proposal | |
75% of Votes Cast Required to Approve: • Proposal 7 (Grant the Board the Authority toOpt-out of StatutoryPre-emption Rights) • Proposal 8 (Determine the Price Range for theRe-allotment of Treasury Shares) Affirmative Plurality of Votes Cast Required to Approve: • Proposal 3 (Advisory Vote on the Frequency ofSay-on-Pay) | ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Although abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as |
Who pays the expenses of this | We have hired Morrow | ||
How will voting be counted on any other matters that may be presented at the | Although we do not know of any matters to be presented or acted upon at the | ||
Board recommendations. | The Board recommends that you vote your shares |
13
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Voting procedures and tabulation. | The Board appointed an inspector of elections to act at the |
14
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSALS 1(a) – 1(j) – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Ordinary Resolutions)
The Company uses a majority of votes cast standard for the election of directors. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast "for"“for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "against"“against” that director nominee. Each of the Board nomineesDirector Nominees is being nominated for election for aone-year term beginning at the end of the 20162017 AGM to be held on October 19, 201618, 2017 and expiring at the end of the 20172018 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the "2017 AGM"“2018 AGM”).
Under our Articles of Association, if a director is notre-elected in a director election, then that director will not be appointed and the position on the Board that would have been elected or filled by the director nominee will, except in limited circumstances, become vacant. The Board has the ability to fill the vacancy in accordance with the Articles of Association, subject to approval by the Company'sCompany’s shareholders at the next Annual General Meetingannual general meeting of Shareholders.shareholders.
Notwithstanding the requirement that a director nominee requires a majority of the votes cast, as Irish law requires a minimum of two directors at all times, in the event that an election results in either only one or no directors receiving the required majority vote, either the nominee or each of the two nominees, as appropriate, receiving the greatest number of votes in favor of his or her election shall, in accordance with the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Association, hold office until his or her successor(s) shall be elected.
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" each of the following nominees:THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:
(a) | Stephen J. Luczo—age | Mr. Luczo has been our On October 1, 2017, Mr. Luczo will step down from his position as CEO of Seagate and become our Executive Chairman. |
15
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Expertise:As our CEO, Mr. Luczo brings significant expertise to our Board in financial matters, business development, and operations, along with senior leadership experience, global experience and knowledge of competitive strategy and competition. As CEO, Mr. Luczo has direct responsibility for the |
(b) Mark W. Adams – age 53, Director since 2017 | Mark W. Adams has | ||||
Expertise:Mr. | |||||
(c) Michael R. Cannon—age | Mr. Cannon served as President, Global Operations of Dell Inc. from February 2007 until his retirement in January 2009, and as |
16
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Expertise:Mr. Cannon has extensive industry expertise, including expertise in the disk drive business that is invaluable to our Board. Mr. Cannon brings international, technological, operations, and research and development expertise to our Board through his service as a public company President, CEO, |
(d) Mei-Wei | Mr. Cheng | ||||
Expertise: | |||||
(e) William T. Coleman—age | Mr. Coleman has been CEO | ||||
Mr. Coleman previously founded BEA Systems, Inc., an enterprise application and service infrastructure software provider, where he served as Chairman of the Board from 1995 |
17
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Expertise:As a partner of a private equity firm and | ||||
(f) | Jay L. Geldmacher—age | Since November 2013, Mr. Geldmacher has served as CEO of Artesyn Embedded Technologies, a spin off from the Embedded Computing and Power business of Emerson | ||
Expertise: | ||||
(g) William D. Mosley—age | Mr. Mosley has been our COO since June 2016 and a On October 1, 2017, Mr. Mosley will become our CEO. Expertise: As our COO, Mr. Mosley is directly responsible for | |||
18
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(h) Dr. Chong Sup Park—age | Dr. Chong Sup Park served as Chairman and CEO of Maxtor from November 2004 until May 2006, as Chairman of | ||
Expertise: | |||
(i) Stephanie Tilenius—age | Ms. Tilenius is | ||
Expertise: |
19
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(j) Edward J. Zander—age | Mr. Zander served as Chairman and CEO of Motorola, Inc. from January 2004 until January 2008, when he retired as CEO and continued as Chairman. He resigned as Chairman in May 2008. Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Zander was a Managing Director of Silver Lake Partners, a leading private equity fund focused on investments in technology industries from July 2003 to December 2003. Mr. Zander was President and COO of Sun Microsystems Inc., a leading provider of hardware, software and services for networks, from October 1987 until June 2002. Within the past five years, Mr. Zander has served as a member of the board of directors of NetSuite, Inc. | ||
Expertise: |
There isare no familyfamilial relationships between any of the directors, director nomineesDirector Nominees or our executive officers, nor are any of our directors, director nomineesDirector Nominees or executive officers party to any legal proceedings adverse to us.
20
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, together with the Board committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance of the Company. Following is a summary of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of each of our Board committees, are available on our website at www.seagate.com, under "Investors—Corporate“Investors - Governance."”
Role of the Board
The Board, elected annually by our shareholders, directs and oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company. In this oversight role, the Board serves as the ultimatedecision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to the shareholders.
The Board and its committees have the primary responsibilities of:
Board Leadership Structure
The Board generally believes that the offices of Chairman and CEO should be held by separate persons to aid in the oversight of management, unless it is in the best interests of the Company that the same person holds both offices. The Board believes that having Mr. Luczo serving inWhile the combined role of Chairman and CEO has worked well for the Company, the Board believes that from a strategic and governance perspective, it is in the most effective structure forbest interests of the Company, at this time, to separate the offices of the CEO and Chairman. The Board believes that it has worked well forits succession strategy, with the Company.appointment of William D. Mosley as CEO effective October 1, 2017, and as a director of the Board effective July 25, 2017, will benefit from and be enhanced by Mr. Luczo’s continued service as the Chairman of the Board. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of the CEO and Chairman will ensure an effective implementation of its succession strategy. It is the Board'sBoard’s view that the Company'sCompany’s corporate governance principles, the quality, stature and substantive business knowledge of the members of the Board, as well as the Board'sBoard’s culture of open communication with the CEO and senior management are currently conducive to Board effectiveness with a combinedthe separation of the Chairman and CEO position.positions.
In addition, the Board hascontinues to retain a Lead Independent Director and it believes this role addresses the need for independent leadership and perspective in addition to an organizational structure for
21
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
the independent directors. The Board appoints the Lead Independent Director each year after the AGMannual general meeting for an aone-year term. The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the othernon-employee directors, presides over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present and at each executive session, facilitates the CEO evaluation process, serves as liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors, approves meeting schedules and agendas for the Board, has authority to call meetings of the independent directors, and is available for consultation and direct communication if requested by major shareholders.
Dr. ParkMr. Cannon has served as our Lead Independent Director since October 26, 201119, 2016 having been re-appointedappointed by the Board annually sinceon that date.
Board Risk Oversight
The Board has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for material risks applicable to the Company. The Board and its committees focus on the Company'sCompany’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company and ensure that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The full Board is responsible for considering strategic risks and succession planning, and the committees oversee other categories of risk including:
Finally, as part of its oversight of the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers the impact of the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program and the incentives created by the compensation awards that it administers on the Company'sCompany’s risk profile. In addition, the Company reviews all of its compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking, to determine whether they present a significant risk to the Company. Based on this review, the Company has concluded that its compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Director Compensation and Share Ownership
It is the Board'sBoard’s practice to maintain a fair and straightforward compensation program at the Board level, which is designed to be competitive with compensation programs from comparable companies. The Compensation Committee recommends and administers the policies that govern the level and form of director compensation, with oversight from the independent directors. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of the total director compensation package should be in the form of equity in the Company in order to better align the interests of the Company'sCompany’s directors with thelong-term interests of its shareholders. As such, the directors are subject to a share ownership requirement of four times the annual cash retainer paid to the directors as described in more detail later in this Proxy Statement.
22
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Board Composition
The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent,non-employee directors. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that all members of the standing committees of the Board must be independent directors. The Board has the following four standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Finance Committee. The Board has determined that each member of each of these committees is "independent"“independent” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and that each member of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee meet applicable NASDAQ and SEC independence standards for such committees. Committee memberships and chairs are rotated periodically.periodically and an independence analysis is conducted annually.
Board Diversity
The Board has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the skills, expertise and background of director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks director nominees that would complement and enhance the effectiveness of the existing Board and ensure that its
members are appropriately diverse and consists of members with various and relevant backgrounds, skills, knowledge, perspectives and experience.experiences.
Board Advisors
The Board and its committees may, under their respective charters, retain their own external and independent advisors to carry out their responsibilities. For fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee retained FW Cook as its external and independent advisor.
Executive Sessions
The Company'sCompany’s independent directors meet privately in regularly scheduled executive sessions of the Board and committees, without management present, to consider such matters as the independent directors deem appropriate. These executive sessions are typically held at each Board and Committeecommittee meeting.
Board Evaluation
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in periodically evaluating its performance and the performance of the Board committees. Each committee conducts periodicself-evaluation and the Board conducts periodicpeer-to-peer evaluations. The effectiveness of individual directors is considered each year when the Board nominates directors to stand for election.
Director Orientation and Education
The Company has developed an orientation program for new directors and reimburses directors for continuing education. In addition, the directors are given full access to management and other employees as a means of providing additional information.
Director Nomination Process
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the composition of the full Board to identify the qualifications and areas of expertise needed to further enhance the composition of the Board,
23
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
makes recommendations to the Board concerning the appropriate size and needs of the Board and, on its own, with the assistance of other Board members or management, a search firm or others, identifies candidates with those qualifications. The Board reviews and considers the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendations and determines the Director Nominations. In considering candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, including professional experience, understanding of business and financial issues, ability to exercise sound judgment, diversity, leadership, and achievements, knowledge and experience in matters affecting business and industry. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate'scandidate’s credentials and believes that at a minimum, each nominee should satisfy the following criteria: highest character and integrity, experience and understanding of strategy, sufficient time to devote to Board matters, and no conflict of interest that would interfere with performance as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that the Board is composed of members whose particular expertise, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. Shareholders may recommend candidates for consideration for Board membership by sending the recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Company Secretary. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.
Term Limits and Retirement
The Board does not have a mandatory retirement age for directors and, because the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates director nominees for the following year, the Board has decided not to adopt arbitrary term limits for its directors.
The Board, based on its review and the recommendation of Contents
Director Independence
The Boardthe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that all of our current directors and director nominees,Director Nominees, except Stephen J. Luczo and William D. Mosley, who is an employeeare employees of the Company, are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are consistent with the NASDAQ listing standards. When assessing director independence, the Board considers the various commercial, charitable and employment transactions and relationships known to the Board (including those identified through annual directors questionnaires) that exist between the Company and the entities with which our directors or members of their immediate families are, or have been, affiliated. The Board evaluated certain transactions that arose in the ordinary course of business between the Company and such entities and which occurred on the same terms and conditions available to other customers and suppliers. After reviewing these transactions and such other information as the Board deemed advisable, the Board determined that Messrs. Biondi,Adams, Cannon, Cheng, Coleman, Geldmacher and Zander, Mses. Onken andMs. Tilenius and Drs.Dr. Park and Moyo are independent under both the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the applicable NASDAQ rules.
Director Changes
On October 19, 2016, Ms. Kristen M. Onken currently servingdid not stand forre-election at the 2016 AGM. Mr. Adams was appointed as a member of our Board and of the Audit Committee effective January 19, 2017 and Mr. Mosley was appointed as a member of our Board effective July 25, 2017. The Board believes that the appointments of Messrs. Adams and Mosley enhance the overall effectiveness of the Board.
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo and Mr. Frank J. Biondi, Jr., currently serving as members of our Board, will retirenot stand forre-election to our Board at the 2016conclusion of their terms at the 2017 AGM. This is not due to any disagreement with the Company'sCompany’s management or Board.
24
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Communications with Directors
Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board, thenon-employee directors or any individual director (including our Lead Independent Director and any Committee Chair) may do so by sending a communication to the Board and/or a particular member of the Board, care of the Company Secretary at Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014. Depending upon the nature of the communication and to whom it is directed, the Company Secretary will: (a) forward the communication to the appropriate director or directors; (b) forward the communication to the relevant department within the Company; or (c) attempt to handle the matter directly (for example, a communication dealing with a share ownership matter).
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to the CEO, the CFO, and the principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions ofat Seagate Technology plc. The Code of Ethics is available atwww.seagate.com, under "Investors."“Investors - Governance.” Amendments to, or waivers of the Code of Ethics will be disclosed promptly on our website or on a current report onForm 8-K. No such waivers were requested or granted in the fiscal year 2016.2017.
Securities Trading Policy and Other Restrictions
The Company prohibits its directors and executive officers from (i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities and (ii) engaging in any form ofshort-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan unless the General CounselChief Legal Officer or the Chief Financial Officer providespre-clearance after the director or executive officer clearly demonstrates the financial capability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Our Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions with our directors, director nominees,Director Nominees, executive officers, shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of our shares and immediate family members of such persons (each, a "Related Person"“Related Person”). Pursuant to the policy, if any Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction or potential transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, he or she must promptly report it to the General CounselChief Legal Officer of the Company or her designee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then reviews any such transactions and determines whether or not to approve or ratify them. In doing so, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems to be appropriate, the extent of the Related Person'sPerson’s interest; whether the transaction would interfere with the Related Person'sPerson’s judgment in fulfilling his or her duties to the Company; whether the transaction is fair to the Company and on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances; whether the transaction is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders; and whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.
In addition, if the transaction involves a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider whether such transaction would impact such director'sdirector’s independence under NASDAQ rules or qualifications to serve on committees under the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. The Board has delegated authority to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review and approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount is expected to be less than $1 million. A summary of any new transactions approved by the Chair is provided to the full Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its review at the next scheduled committee meeting after such approval.
Christine Silva, Mr. O'Malley's spouse, is employed as a Senior Staff Program/Project Manager by the Company and receives total annual cash compensation from the Company of approximately $167,936 and is eligible to participate in the Company's general employee benefit plans, including vacation and health plans. In fiscal year 2016, Ms. Silva was granted $40,974 of our restricted share units ("RSUs") that will vest over four years. Ms. Silva's compensation is commensurate with that of other employees in similar positions. The Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has ratified the terms of Ms. Silva's employment and compensation.
Josip Relota, Mr. Luczo's Luczo’sbrother-in-law, has been is employed as a software engineer by one of our subsidiaries since June 24, 2013. On August 21, 2015, such subsidiary became one of our wholly owned subsidiaries (the "Reorganization").the Company. In connection with such employment, Mr. Relota receives a total annual cash compensation of approximately $161,976.$204,186 and a retention bonus of $92,787. In addition, Mr. Relota is eligible to participate in our general employee benefit plans, including vacation and health plans. In fiscal year 2016, Mr. Relota was granted $98,214 of our RSUs that would vest over four years. In connection with the Reorganization, Mr. Relota received $11,632 for his vested equity in such subsidiary, $11,648 for his unvested equity in such subsidiary, which will vest over 3 years conditioned upon his continued employment, $185,000 cash bonus, which will vest over 2 years conditioned upon his continued employment and $120,000 new hire equity grant that will vest over 4 years conditioned upon his continued employment. Mr. Relota's compensation and his treatment in connection with the Reorganization, including the amount received for the liquidation of his vested and unvested equity, his cash bonus and new hire equity grant, are commensurate with that of other employees of such subsidiary in similar positions. The Company'sCompany’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has ratified the terms of Mr. Relota'sRelota’s employment and compensation.
CommitteesOn September 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Board Observer Rights Agreement (the “Observer Rights Agreement”) with ValueAct Capital Master Fund L.P. (“ValueAct”) which beneficially owns more than 5% of the Company’s ordinary shares as of August 11, 2017. Pursuant to the Observer Rights Agreement, ValueAct is entitled to one seat as a board observer provided that it continue to own not less than 2% of the ordinary shares of the Company. This board observer right was granted to ValueAct in connection with ValueAct’s purchase of 9.5 million ordinary shares of the Company. Under the terms of the Observer Rights Agreement, the Board
retains the right to limit access to information and attendance at portions of the Board meetings at the Board’s discretion and ValueAct is required to comply with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement with the Company, which was entered into on the same day. ValueAct was not a related party of the Company at the time the Company entered into these agreements.
26
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Audit Committee
Members: Dr. Chong Sup Park, Chair
Mark W. Adams
Members:Mei-Wei Kristen M. Onken1, ChairMichael R. CannonMei-Wei Cheng
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo
Key Functions:
The Board has determined that all current members of the Audit Committee meet the applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membership on the Audit Committee, and that each of Dr. Park, Mr. Cannon,Adams, Mr. Cheng and Dr. Moyo and Ms. Onken is an audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by rules of the SEC.
A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate“Investors - Governance."”
Compensation Committee
Members: Edward J. Zander, Chair
Frank J. Biondi, Jr.
Michael R. Cannon
Jay L. GeldmacherDr. Chong Sup Park
Key Functions:
27
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
based on this evaluation. The Compensation Committee Chair presents all compensation decisions pertaining to the CEO to the full Board, however, all compensation decisions related to the CEO are determined by the Board’s independent directors. |
The Compensation Committee may form subcommittees composed of two or more of its members for any purpose the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. In addition, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make grants and awards of cash or equity securities to any employee who is not a Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s incentive-compensation or other equity-based plans, provided that such delegation is in compliance with such plan, the Company’s Articles of Association and applicable law.
For a discussion concerning the processes and procedures for determining executive and director compensation and the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of compensation, see "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” and "Compensation“Compensation of Directors,"” respectively.
The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets all applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membership on the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a "Non-Employee Director"“Non-Employee Director” within the meaning ofRule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and an "outside director"“outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"“Code”).
A copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate“Investors - Governance."”
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Members: Michael R. Cannon, Chair
William T. Coleman
Dr. Chong Sup Park
Stephanie Tilenius
Key Functions:
28
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is "independent"“independent” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
A copy of the charter of the NominatingCorporate Governance and Corporate GovernanceNominating Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate“Investors - Governance."
Finance Committee
Members: Frank J. Biondi, Jr., Chair
Mei-Wei Cheng
William T. Coleman
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo
Stephanie Tilenius
Key Functions:
The Board has determined that each member of the Finance Committee is "independent"“independent” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
A copy of the charter of the Finance Committee is available on our website,www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate“Investors - Governance."”
Board, Committee and Annual Meeting Attendance
The Board and its committees held the following number of meetings during the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016:June 30, 2017:
Board | 6 | |||
Audit Committee | 6 | |||
Compensation Committee | 6 | |||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Each incumbent director attended over 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during the fiscal year 2016.2017. The Company's Company’snon-employee directors
29
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
held 4four executive sessions without management present during the fiscal year 2016.2017. It is the Board'sBoard’s general practice to hold an executive session of the independent directors in connection with regularly scheduled Board meetings.
The Company expects all Board members to attend the 2017 AGM, but from time to time other commitments prevent all directors from attending the meeting. All of the Company'sCompany’s directors who served in such capacity on October 19, 2016, attended the most recent AGM (the "2015 AGM"“2016 AGM”), which was held on October 21, 201519, 2016 in Dublin, Ireland.
Our director compensation program is designed to compensatenon-employee directors fairly for work required for a company of our size and scope and align their interests with thelong-term interests of our shareholders. The program reflects our desire to attract, retain and use the expertise of highly qualified people serving on the Company'sCompany’s Board.Employee-directors do not receive any additional compensation for serving as a director.
Our 2016fiscal year 2017 director compensation program fornon-employee directors consisted of the following elements:
Board or Board Committee | Membership | Retainer as of October 19, 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Board | Non-executive Chairperson | $ | 150,000 | |||
Member | $ | 80,000 | ||||
Audit Committee | Chairperson | $ | 35,000 | |||
Member | $ | 15,000 | ||||
Compensation Committee | Chairperson | $ | 30,000 | |||
Member | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Chairperson | $ | 20,000 | |||
Member | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Finance Committee | Chairperson | $ | 20,000 | |||
Member | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Lead Independent Director | $ | 30,000 | ||||
Annual Restricted Share Unit Award | $ | 250,000 |
Board or Board Committee | Membership | Retainer as of October 19, 2016 | ||||
Board | Non-executive Chairperson | $ | 150,000 | |||
Member | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Audit Committee | Chairperson | $35,000 | ||||
Member | $15,000 | |||||
Compensation Committee | Chairperson | $30,000 | ||||
Member | $10,000 | |||||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Chairperson | $20,000 | ||||
Member | $10,000 | |||||
Finance Committee | Chairperson | $20,000 | ||||
Member | $10,000 | |||||
Lead Independent Director | $40,000 | |||||
Annual Restricted Share Unit Award | $ | 275,000 |
Each newly appointed or electednon-employee director (includingnon-employee directors reelectedre-elected at the AGM)annual general meeting) receives an initial restricted share unit award equal in number to $250,000$275,000 divided by the average closing share price for the quarter prior to the award, rounded to the nearest whole share. If the appointment occurred other than in connection with the annual election of directors at an AGMannual general meeting, this dollar amount would bepro-rated for the year of appointment. If, prior to commencement of Board service, the new director was an officer or member of the board of directors of an entity acquired by Seagate, the Board could award a lesser number of RSUs.restricted share units (“RSUs”). The grant date for each such award is the date of the director'sdirector’s election or appointment. Generally, each restricted share unit award will vest on the earlier of, the one year anniversary of the grant date or the day prior to the next election of directors at an AGM.annual general meeting. All restricted share unit awards will become fully vested in the event of a "Change“Change of Control"Control” of Seagate (as such term is defined in the Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2012 Plan"“2012 Plan”)).
30
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
In addition to the cash compensation and equity awards, all members of the Board are reimbursed for their reasonableout-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in attending Board related activities.
Share Ownership Requirement
To align the interests of directors with the Company’s shareholders, the Board adopted a share ownership requirement of four times the annual board cash retainer fornon-executive directors. Until a director satisfies the mandatory ownership level, he or she may not sell more than that number of (i) shares that vest pursuant to any outstanding restricted share award or restricted share unit award or (ii) shares that are obtained upon the exercise of any option as is necessary, in each case, to cover the tax liability associated with the vesting or exercise of the equity award. Once attaining the minimum level of Company share ownership, a director must maintain this minimum level of Company share ownership until his or her resignation or retirement from the Board. In setting the share ownership requirement,
the Board considered the input of the independent compensation consultant, the Company'sCompany’s current share price and the period of time it would take a director to reach the required ownership level. Executive directors are subject to the share ownership requirements described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
20162017 Director Compensation
The compensation paid or awarded to ournon-employee directors for fiscal year 20162017 is summarized in the table below:
| Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 110,000 | 163,544 | 273,544 | |||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 115,000 | 163,544 | 278,544 | |||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 105,000 | 163,544 | 268,544 | |||||||
William T. Coleman | 100,000 | 163,544 | 263,544 | |||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 90,000 | 163,544 | 253,544 | |||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 73,500 | 163,544 | 237,044 | |||||||
Kristen M. Onken | 115,000 | 163,544 | 278,544 | |||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 130,000 | 163,544 | 293,544 | |||||||
Gregorio Reyes(2) | 31,731 | 0 | 31,731 | |||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 100,000 | 163,544 | 263,544 | |||||||
Edward J. Zander | 110,000 | 163,544 | 273,544 |
Fees or Paid in ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total ($) | ||||
Mark W. Adams. | 51,497(2) | 169,898 | 221,395 | |||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 124,011 | 244,757 | 368,768 | |||
Michael R. Cannon | 153,571 | 244,757 | 398,328 | |||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 119,011 | 244,757 | 363,768 | |||
William T. Coleman | 114,011 | 244,757 | 358,768 | |||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 104,011 | 244,757 | 348,768 | |||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 119,011 | 244,757 | 363,768 | |||
Kristen M. Onken(3) | 34,753 | —(3) | 34,753 | |||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 140,618 | 244,757 | 385,375 | |||
Stephanie Tilenius | 114,011 | 244,757 | 358,768 | |||
Edward J. Zander | 124,011 | 244,757 | 368,768 |
(1) | The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards granted in fiscal year 2017 for financial reporting purposes pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Such amounts do not represent amounts paid to or realized by thenon-employee director. See Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 K for fiscal year 2017 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards. Additional information regarding the RSUs awarded to or held by eachnon-employee director on the last day of fiscal year 2017 is set forth in the table below. |
(2) | The amount shown represents thepro-rated amount of fees for fiscal year 2017 paid to Mr. Adams since his appointment to the Board on January 19, 2017. |
(3) | The amount shown represents thepro-rated amount of fees for fiscal year 2017 paid to Ms. Onken for her service on the Board until October 19, 2016. Ms. Onken served as a director until the 2016 AGM held on October 18, 2016, at which time she did not stand forre-election and did not receive RSUs awarded for fiscal year 2017. |
31
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The aggregate number of unvested RSUs and outstanding options for each of ournon-employee directors as of the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016June 30, 2017 is set forth in the table below:
Number of RSUs Granted in fiscal year 2017 | Aggregate Number of RSUs | Aggregate Number of Options | ||||
Mark W. Adams | 5,470(1) | 5,470(1) | — | |||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Michael R. Cannon | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
William T. Coleman | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Stephanie Tilenius | 8,437 | 8,437 | — | |||
Edward J. Zander | 8,437 | 8,437 | — |
(1) | The numbers shown represent thepro-rated number of RSUs granted to Mr. Adams for fiscal year 2017 following his appointment to the Board on January 19, 2017. |
32
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Director | Number of RSUs Granted in fiscal year 2016 | Aggregate Number of RSUs | Aggregate Number of Restricted Shares | Aggregate Number of Options | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | 1,251 | |||||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
William T. Coleman | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Kristen M. Onken | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | — | |||||||||
Edward J. Zander | 5,182 | 5,182 | — | 10,000 |
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares, to file reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. To the Company'sCompany’s knowledge, based solely on its review of such forms received by the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with for the fiscal year 2016.2017.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as of September 1, 2016,August 25, 2017, the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares for fiscal year 2017 by (i) each director and director nominee of the Company, (ii) each executive officer of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group:
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors and named executive officers: | |||||||
Philip G. Brace | 92,266 | (2) | * | ||||
Stephen J. Luczo | 2,334,314 | (3) | * | ||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 10,630 | (4) | * | ||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 29,426 | (5) | * | ||||
William D. Mosley | 392,163 | (6) | * | ||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 684,471 | (7) | * | ||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 578,949 | (8) | * | ||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 29,128 | (9) | * | ||||
Michael R. Cannon | 18,586 | (10) | * | ||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 14,976 | (11) | * | ||||
William T. Coleman | 18,417 | (12) | * | ||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 10,547 | (13) | * | ||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 5,182 | (14) | * | ||||
Kristen M. Onken | 25,595 | (15) | * | ||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 37,917 | (16) | * | ||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 7,892 | (17) | * | ||||
Edward J. Zander | 99,487 | (18) | * | ||||
All directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (18 persons) | 4,494,701 | (19) | 1.50 | % |
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of | Percentage | ||||||
Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers: | ||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | 1,776,126(2) | * | ||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 35,409(3) | * | ||||||
Philip G. Brace | 108,761(4) | * | ||||||
William D. Mosley | 302,148(5) | * | ||||||
James J. Murphy | 410(6) | * | ||||||
Mark W. Adams | -(7) | �� | * | |||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 35,699(8) | * | ||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 25,157(9) | * | ||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 20,718(10) | * | ||||||
William T. Coleman | 18,357(11) | * | ||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 17,118(12) | * | ||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 11,753(13) | * | ||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 37,411(14) | * | ||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 14,463(15) | * | ||||||
Edward J. Zander | 106,058(16) | * | ||||||
All Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers as a group (16 persons) | 2,509,588(17) | *% |
33
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The following table sets forth each shareholder which is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company as of September 1, 2016August 25, 2017 based solely
on the information filed by such shareholder on Schedule 13G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:Act:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned(1) | ||||||
Greater than five percent holders: | ||||||||
Clearbridge Investments, LLC | 30,450,651 | (18) | 10.58 | % | ||||
620 8th Ave. | ||||||||
New York, NY 10018 | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 20,209,803 | (19) | 7.02 | % | ||||
55 East 52nd Street | ||||||||
New York, NY 10055 | ||||||||
FMR LLC | 33,346,960 | (20) | 11.59 | % | ||||
245 Summer Street | ||||||||
Boston, MA 02210 | ||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 29,987,592 | (21) | 10.42 | % | ||||
100 Vanguard Blvd. | ||||||||
Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||||||
ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. | 21,000,000 | (22) | 7.30 | % | ||||
One Letterman Drive, Building D, Fourth Floor | ||||||||
San Francisco, CA 94129 |
* | Less than 1% of Seagate’s ordinary shares outstanding. |
(1) | Percentage of class beneficially owned is based on 287,832,764 ordinary shares outstanding as of August 25, 2017. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017, RSUs and performance share units (“PSUs”) vesting within 60 days of June 26, 2017, and all restricted shares and performance shares are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, RSUs, PSUs, restricted shares and/or performance shares, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or group. |
(2) | Includes 534,780 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017, 1,214,158 ordinary shares held by the Stephen J. Luczo Revocable Trust and 27,188 shares held directly by Mr. Luczo. |
(3) | Includes 25,402 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 10,007 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Morton. |
(4) | Includes 84,652 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 24,109 shares held directly by Mr. Brace. Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities. |
(5) | Includes 149,183 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017 and 152,965 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Mosley. |
(6) | Includes 410 ordinary shares of the Company held directly by Mr. Murphy. |
(7) | As of August 25, 2017, Mr. Adams does not own any ordinary shares of the Company or any ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017. |
(8) | Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Biondi and 23,946 ordinary shares held by the Biondi, Jr. Family Trust. |
(9) | Includes 18,272 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cannon and 6,885 ordinary shares held by the Michael R. Cannon Trust. |
(10) | Includes 20,718 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cheng. |
(11) | Includes 18,357 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Coleman. |
(12) | Includes 17,118 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Geldmacher. |
(13) | Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Dr. Moyo. |
(14) | Includes 11,753 shares held directly by Dr. Park and 25,658 ordinary shares held by the Park Family Trust. |
(15) | Includes 14,463 shares held directly by Ms. Tilenius. |
34
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(16) | Includes 11,753 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Zander, 53,109 ordinary shares held by the Edward and Mona Zander Trust dated 4/19/1993, and 41,196 ordinary shares held by Zanadu Capital Partners, L.P. |
(17) | All directors, Director Nominees and executive officers as a group, directly hold 350,619 ordinary shares, indirectly hold 1,364,952, and hold 794,017 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of June 26, 2017. |
(18) | Based solely on information reported by Clearbridge Investments, LLC (“Clearbridge”) on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 29,615,395 ordinary shares and sole investment power over 30,450,651 ordinary shares. |
(19) | Based solely on information reported by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on the second amendment to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2017, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. BlackRock has sole voting power over 18,309,616 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 20,209,803 ordinary shares. |
(20) | Based solely on information reported by FMR LLC (“FMR”) on the ninth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. FMR has sole voting power over 4,025,098 ordinary shares and sole investment power over 33,346,960 ordinary shares. |
(21) | Based solely on information reported by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2016. Vanguard has sole voting power over 402,336 ordinary shares, shared voting power over 52,485 ordinary shares, sole investment power over 29,540,530 ordinary shares and shared dispositive power over 447,062 ordinary shares. |
(22) | Based solely on information reported by ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. (“ValueAct”) on Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on August 11, 2017, and reporting ownership as July 31, 2017. ValueAct has shared voting and dispositive power over all 21,000,000 ordinary shares that it beneficially owns. |
35
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Class Beneficially Owned(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater than five percent holders: | |||||||
FMR LLC | 38,158,775 | (20) | 12.71 | % | |||
245 Summer Street | |||||||
Boston, MA 02210 | |||||||
Clearbridge Investments, LLC | 32,505,983 | (21) | 10.83 | % | |||
620 8th Ave. | |||||||
New York, NY 10018 | |||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 25,530,175 | (22) | 8.51 | % | |||
100 Vanguard Blvd., | |||||||
Malvern, PA 19355 | |||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 15,467,983 | (23) | 5.15 | % | |||
55 East 52nd Street | |||||||
New York, NY 10055 |
shares held by the Pimentel Family Trust. Mr. Pimentel holds PSUs pursuant to which he is eligible to vest in up to an additional 35,000 ordinary shares within 60 days of September 1, 2016.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
20162017 Executive Compensation Highlights
The key executive compensation decisions for fiscal year 20162017 were as follows:
Fiscal Year 20162017 Company Highlights
On July 22, 2015, Philip G. Brace was appointed PresidentPlease see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the CSSG. Mr. Brace joined the Company on September 2, 2014 as Executive Vice PresidentFinancial Condition and Chief Technology OfficerResults of Silicon Solutions and was subsequently promoted to Interim President of CSES on April 30, 2015 before being appointed President of the CSSG.
On October 6, 2015, Seagate completed its acquisition of Dot Hill and its Assured SAN RealStor™ family of block-level storage RAID systems, which provide hybrid and all-flash storage arrays. Sold through Original Equipment Manufacturers like Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Stratus, Teradata, Quantum, Tektronix, Autodesk and others, this product line enablesOperations” in our partners to offer customized, cost-effective and high-performing solutions, serving both entry level and mid-range storage needs. Dot
Hill's external storage array-based systems and software products will complement and expand Seagate's storage systems offerings and be offered as part of CSSG.
On October 21, 2015, David H. Morton, Jr. was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Morton served as Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer since April 2014. Patrick J. O'Malley, our former Chief Financial Officer will remain with Seagate as Executive Vice President with responsibilitiesAnnual Report for a broad rangemore detailed description of strategic and operational issues.our fiscal year 2017 financial results.
On March 21, 2016, Regan J. MacPherson was appointed Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Prior to her appointment, she had been serving as Interim General Counsel since August 2015 and has served in various roles of increasing responsibility in Seagate's legal department since joining the Company in July 2005.
On June 27, 2016, William D. Mosley, was named President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Mosley served as President, Operations and Technology since October 2013 and as Executive Vice President, Operations from March 2011 until October 2013.
Highlights of the Company'sCompany’s fiscal year 20162017 financial performance include:
The following table presents certain key financial metrics for the past three fiscal years:
(in millions except EPS and exabytes)
| Fiscal 2017
| Fiscal 2016
| Fiscal 2015
| |||||||||
Exabytes shipped | 263 | 233 | 228 | |||||||||
Revenues | $ | 10,771 | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | ||||||
Gross margin | $ | 3,174 | $ | 2,615 | $ | 3,809 | ||||||
Income from operations | $ | 1,054 | $ | 445 | $ | 2,058 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.58 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 5.26 |
36
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(in millions except EPS and exabytes) | Fiscal 2016 | Fiscal 2015 | Fiscal 2014 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exabytes shipped | 233 | 228 | 202 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | $ | 13,724 | ||||
Gross margin | $ | 2,615 | $ | 3,809 | $ | 3,846 | ||||
Income from operations | $ | 445 | $ | 2,058 | $ | 1,776 | ||||
Net income | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 1,570 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.82 | $ | 5.26 | $ | 4.52 |
Executive Compensation Practices for Fiscal Year 2017
Our executive compensation program is heavily weighted towards compensating our executives based on company performance. We have implemented executive compensation policies and practices that reinforce our pay for performancepay-for-performance philosophy and align with commonly viewed best practices and sound governance principles. The following chart summarizes our policies and practices:
What We Do
✓ | Performance-based equity incentives |
✓ | Caps on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation for our NEOs |
✓ | Balance of financial and operating performance metrics in cash incentives and equity incentive plans |
✓ | Significant portion of executive compensation at risk based on corporate performance |
✓ | Clawback on incentive compensation |
✓ | Annual review and approval of our compensation strategy |
✓ | Prohibition on short sales, hedging of share ownership positions and transactions involving derivatives of our ordinary shares |
✓ | Meaningful share ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors |
✓ | 100% independent directors on our Compensation Committee |
✓ | Independent compensation consultant engaged by our Compensation Committee |
✓ | Annual risk assessment of our compensation programs and practices |
What We Don'tDon’t Do
c | No “single trigger” change of control benefits |
c | No employment agreements, guaranteed salary increases or guaranteed bonus payments for our executives in fiscal year 2017 |
c | No defined benefit pension plan or supplemental executive pension plan |
c | No excise tax reimbursements or tax“gross-ups” in connection with a change in control |
c | No post-termination retirement or pension-typenon-cash benefits or perquisites for our executives |
c | Nore-pricing of options without shareholder approval |
c | No dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs and PSUs |
37
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The NEOs for fiscal year 20162017 are:
Name | Job Title | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo(1) | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Philip G. Brace (2) | President, Cloud Systems and Silicon Group | ||||
William D. Mosley (3) | President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||
James J. | |||||
Executive Vice President, |
(1) | Mr. Luczo will step down as the Company’s CEO and transition to the |
(2) |
(3) | Mr. Mosley will transition to the role of CEO beginning October 1, 2017. Mr. Mosley was also appointed to the Board effective July 25, 2017. |
Our Executive Compensation Strategy
Our executive compensation strategy is designed to drive high performance, strengthen our market position, and increase shareholder value. The goals of our executive compensation programs are to:
Our Executive Compensation Programs
Compensation Element | Designed to Reward | Relationship to Compensation Strategy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base Salary | Related job experience, knowledge of | Attract and retain talented executive officers through competitive pay programs | |||||||
Annual Incentive Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan | Achievement of | Motivate executive officers to achieve and exceed annual business objectives Manage total compensation costs in support of financial performance | |||||||
Long-Term Equity Incentives Equity Awards | Increased shareholder value through achievement of long-term strategic goals such as earnings per share, return on invested capital and total shareholder return relative to peers | Align executive officers and shareholder interests to optimize shareholder return Motivate executive officers to achieve and exceed long-term business objectives |
38
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Role of Our Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the design, development and administration of our compensation and benefits policies and programs. The Compensation Committee, which consists of four independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive compensation programs and approvingapproval of all compensation recommendations for our executive officers, including:
The Compensation Committee recommends to the independent directors of the Board the compensation, compensation plans and equity grants specific to our CEO, and the independent directors of the Board determine the overall compensation package of our CEO. Our CEO does not participate in the determination of his own compensation. The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, her staff, and an executive compensation consultant, as described below.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee retained F.W.FW Cook as its own independent consultant, for advice and counsel throughout fiscal year 20162017 to provide an external review of compensation proposals and to help align our compensation decisions to our executive compensation strategy. F.W. Cook'sFW Cook’s consulting during fiscal year 20162017 included oversight on the risk assessment of compensation programs directed by the Compensation Committee, as well as consultation in support of the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s decisions regarding compensation programs involving NEOs, including salary changes, determination of equity awards, annual incentive plan design, and annual review of our severance plan and share ownership guidelines. F.W.FW Cook also developed recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the compensation of our CEO.
F.W.FW Cook also provided advice to the Compensation Committee regardingnon-employee director compensation. F.W.FW Cook is not permitted to provide services to the Company'sCompany’s management except as directed by the Compensation Committee, and did not provide any such services in fiscal year 2016.2017. The Compensation Committee retains sole authority to hire the compensation consultant, approve its compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance and terminate its engagement.
In connection with its engagement of F.W.FW Cook, the Compensation Committee considered various factors in determining F.W. Cook'sFW Cook’s independence including, but not limited to, the amount of fees received by F.W.FW Cook from Seagate as a percentage of F.W. Cook'sFW Cook’s total revenue, F.W. Cook'sFW Cook’s policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest, and the existence of any business or personal relationship that could impact F.W. Cook'sFW Cook’s independence. After reviewing these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined that F.W.FW Cook was independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest.interest pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing rules of NASDAQ.
39
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process
Within the framework of the compensation programs approved by the Compensation Committee and based on management'smanagement’s review of market competitive practices, each year our CEO, Mr. Luczo, recommends the amount of base salary increase (if any), the amount of the annual incentive bonus opportunity and the long-term incentive award value for our executive officers, including the other NEOs. These recommendations are based upon his assessment of each executive officer'sofficer’s performance, as well as the Company'sCompany’s performance as a whole, and individual retention considerations. The Compensation Committee reviews Mr. Luczo'sLuczo’s recommendations and approves our executive officers'officers’ compensation, including any changes to such compensation, as it determines in its sole discretion. Mr. Luczo does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting his own compensation.
Our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, along with members of her staff, assists the Compensation Committee in its review of our executive compensation plans and programs, including providing market data on competitive pay practices, program design and changes in the corporate governance landscape concerning executive compensation matters.
Prior Year'sYear’s Shareholder Advisory Vote
At the 20152016 AGM, the Company'sCompany’s shareholders overwhelmingly approved the advisory proposal regarding the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s NEOs with more than 95% of the votes cast in favor of
our executive compensation programs (excluding abstentions). The Board appreciates the shareholders'shareholders’ continued support of the Company'sCompany’s compensation philosophy and objectives, which reaffirms to the Board the appropriateness and effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation programs, including continued emphasis on programs that reward our executive officers for generating sustainable profitability and delivering long-term value for our shareholders. No significant changes were made to the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation strategy in fiscal year 2016.2017. The Board and the Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results of the Company'sCompany’s shareholder advisory votes when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs. The shareholder advisory vote occurs on an annual basis.
Executive Market Comparison Peer Group
The Compensation Committee reviews NEO assignments and establishes ranges for each element of executive pay after reviewing similar information for a defined group of companies (the "NEO“NEO Peer Group"Group”) that compete for comparable executive talent. The Compensation Committee relies on analyses of disclosures and published surveys of compensation among the NEO Peer Group companies when considering compensation for executive officers in similar roles.
As part of our annual review cycle, the Compensation Committee reviewed the NEO Peer Group and did not make changes to the selection criteria for fiscal year 2016.2017. NEO Peer Group companies were selected based on a similar industry classification (as defined by Global Industry Classification Standard ("GICS" 4520)(“GICS”) 4520 Technology Hardware and Equipment or 4530 Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment, excluding companies that are not subject to U.S. securities reporting requirements and wholesale distributors), having a minimum market value of at least $3 billion and between $4-$4-$35 billion in trailing twelve-month sales.
The Compensation Committee monitors a "watch list"“watch list” of companies to support year-over-year consistency among companies in the NEO Peer Group. Companies identified as part of the "watch list"“watch list” will only be added to the NEO Peer Group after meeting sales and market value criteria for two consecutive years and once added to the NEO Peer Group will only be removed after failing to meet sales and market value criteria for two consecutive years, provided they meet at least 75% of the criteria minimum value.
40
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
| 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
For fiscal year 2016,2017, the NEO Peer Group included the following companies:
Peer Group for Fiscal Year 20162017(1)
| Sales | | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company Name | TTM ($M) | FYE ($M) | Market Value ($M) | |||||||
Amphenol Corp. | $ | 5,165 | $ | 4,615 | $ | 15,902 | ||||
Applied Materials Inc. | $ | 8,796 | $ | 7,509 | $ | 26,914 | ||||
Broadcom Corp.(2) | $ | 8,349 | $ | 8,305 | $ | 24,793 | ||||
Corning Inc. | $ | 9,267 | $ | 7,819 | $ | 26,191 | ||||
EMC Corp. | $ | 24,073 | $ | 23,222 | $ | 58,466 | ||||
Flextronics International Ltd. | $ | 27,079 | $ | 26,109 | $ | 6,315 | ||||
Freescale Semiconductor Ltd.(3) | $ | 4,613 | $ | 4,186 | $ | 6,047 | ||||
Harris Corp. | $ | 4,975 | $ | 5,012 | $ | 7,280 | ||||
Jabil Circuit Inc. | $ | 15,762 | $ | 15,762 | $ | 4,067 | ||||
Juniper Networks Inc. | $ | 4,799 | $ | 4,669 | $ | 10,008 | ||||
Micron Technology Inc. | $ | 16,358 | $ | 16,358 | $ | 35,521 | ||||
Motorola Solutions Inc. | $ | 6,562 | $ | 8,696 | $ | 16,182 | ||||
NCR Corp | $ | 6,493 | $ | 6,123 | $ | 4,660 | ||||
NetApp Inc. | $ | 6,298 | $ | 6,325 | $ | 13,931 | ||||
NVIDIA Corp. | $ | 4,575 | $ | 4,130 | $ | 10,589 | ||||
QUALCOMM Inc. | $ | 26,487 | $ | 26,487 | $ | 131,585 | ||||
SanDisk Corp.(4) | $ | 6,620 | $ | 6,170 | $ | 21,109 | ||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. | $ | 13,912 | $ | 13,912 | $ | 25,018 | ||||
Texas Instruments Inc. | $ | 12,805 | $ | 12,205 | $ | 52,456 | ||||
Western Digital Corp. | $ | 15,269 | $ | 15,130 | $ | 23,019 | ||||
Peer Group Median | $ | 8,573 | $ | 8,062 | $ | 18,645 | ||||
Peer Group Average | $ | 11,413 | $ | 11,137 | $ | 26,003 | ||||
Seagate Technology plc | $ | 14,020 | $ | 13,724 | $ | 20,556 |
Sales | ||||||||||||
Company Name | TTM ($M) | FYE ($M) | Market Value ($M) | |||||||||
Amphenol Corp. | $ | 5,565 | $ | 5,346 | $ | 16,762 | ||||||
Applied Materials Inc. | $ | 9,659 | $ | 9,659 | $ | 20,134 | ||||||
ARRIS Group | $ | 4,960 | $ | 5,323 | $ | 4,143 | ||||||
Corning Inc. | $ | 9,284 | $ | 9,715 | $ | 22,004 | ||||||
EMC Corp.(2) | $ | 24,738 | $ | 24,440 | $ | 50,860 | ||||||
Flextronics International Ltd. | $ | 24,860 | $ | 26,148 | $ | 6,336 | ||||||
Harris Corp. | $ | 5,739 | $ | 5,083 | $ | 9,783 | ||||||
Jabil Circuit Inc. | $ | 17,899 | $ | 17,899 | $ | 4,349 | ||||||
Juniper Networks Inc. | $ | 4,640 | $ | 4,627 | $ | 12,067 | ||||||
Lam Research Corp. | $ | 5,707 | $ | 5,259 | $ | 12,140 | ||||||
Micron Technology Inc. | $ | 16,192 | $ | 16,192 | $ | 17,206 | ||||||
Motorola Solutions Inc. | $ | 5,837 | $ | 5,881 | $ | 12,365 | ||||||
NCR Corp. | $ | 6,461 | $ | 6,591 | $ | 4,519 | ||||||
NetApp Inc. | $ | 5,871 | $ | 6,123 | $ | 10,027 | ||||||
NVIDIA Corp. | $ | 4,860 | $ | 4,682 | $ | 15,291 | ||||||
QUALCOMM Inc. | $ | 25,281 | $ | 25,281 | $ | 93,361 | ||||||
TE Connectivity Ltd. | $ | 12,233 | $ | 12,233 | $ | 25,930 | ||||||
Texas Instruments Inc. | $ | 13,080 | $ | 13,045 | $ | 58,217 | ||||||
Western Digital Corp. | $ | 13,989 | $ | 14,572 | $ | 15,479 | ||||||
Peer Group Median | $ | 9,284 | $ | 9,659 | $ | 15,291 | ||||||
Peer Group Average | $ | 11,413 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 21,630 | ||||||
Seagate Technology plc | $ | 12,878 | $ | 13,739 | $ | 11,381 |
Freescale Semiconductor Ltd.
(1) | The following table is based on information available as of October 31, 2015. |
(2) | Acquired by Dell, Inc. in September 2016 |
ARRIS Group and NVIDIA Corp.Lam Research Corporation were added to the NEO Peer Group from the watch list upon meeting the NEO Peer Group selection criteria for two years. Xerox Corp.Broadcom Limited was removed from the NEO Peer Group due to a change in their GICS (new GICS 4510: Software and Services). ARRIS Group Inc. and Lam Research Corp. were placed on the watch
41
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
list as a potential companiescompany to be added to the NEO Peer Group for fiscal year 20172018 if these companies continuethe company continues to meet the applicable sales and market value criteria.
How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts
Current Named Executive Officers
As discussed above in greater detail under the heading "Role“Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process,"” Mr. Luczo and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources, along with members of her staff, review with the Compensation Committee all compensation elements for our NEOs at least annually, and the Compensation Committee determines the value of each compensation element as described below. The proportion of each pay element value (i.e., the compensation mix)
relative to total compensation varies by individual, although for all NEOs the largest portion of pay is performance based and is variable and contingent on our financial performance. Variations in the compensation mix among NEOs reflect differences in scope of responsibility as well as NEO Peer Group market data. For fiscal year 2016, Mr. Luczo's total annual target compensation was higher than the other NEOs' total annual target compensation, reflecting the significantly greater job scope, level of responsibility and impact on business performance for our CEO compared with other NEOs, as well as the fact that a greater portion of Mr. Luczo's total annual target compensation was "at risk." The Compensation Committee has determined this differential is consistent with that found among our NEO Peer Group companies. As a result, for fiscal year 2016, the mix of total annual target compensation for Mr. Luczo was 10% annual base salary, 15%14% target annual incentivesincentive and 75%76% target long-term equity incentive,incentives, and the average mix of total annual target compensation for Messrs. Brace, Morton, and Mosley and Ms. MacPhersonMurphy was 15%14% annual base salary, 17%16% target annual incentives and 68%70% target long-term equity incentives.
For fiscal year 2017, Mr. Luczo’s total annual actual compensation was lower than the other NEOs’ total annual actual compensation, reflecting the fact that he did not receive an equity award in fiscal year 2017. As a result, for fiscal year 2017, the mix of total annual actual compensation for Mr. Luczo was 38% annual base salary and 62% annual incentive, and the average mix of total annual actual compensation for Messrs. Brace, Morton, Mosley and Murphy was 8% annual base salary, 10% annual incentives and 82% long-term equity incentives.
Total Annual Target Compensation Mix
42
![]() | SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
![]() 2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
We do not benchmark the total annual compensation of our executive officers to a specific market percentile, although the total annual target compensation (including base salary, target annual incentive and target long-term incentives) for the NEOs generally falls near the median for similar positions within the NEO Peer Group. We believe the total executive pay opportunity is appropriate to attract and retain top leadership talent in a competitive labor market in our industry segment, particularly given our size relative to the NEO Peer Group and in light of the uncertainty of the actual amount of pay that each NEO can earn given the volatility of our business. Due to our emphasis on performance-based pay, the
amounts actually received by our NEOs are heavily dependent on the Company'sCompany’s financial performance.
While we consider the pay practices of our NEO Peer Group companies in determining target compensation for our executive officers, we did not compare our performance with the performance of the NEO Peer Group companies when evaluating salary levels or determining the size of particular incentive awards. The target amounts and compensation mix vary for each NEO on the basis of various factors, none of which is specifically weighted, including the importance of the position to our organization, overall retention value, internal pay equity, and projected future value of the total compensation package.
Base salaries are the fixed annual cash amounts paid to our NEOs on a biweekly basis. In reviewing and determining base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers:
The strategic positioning for our NEOs'NEOs’ base salaries is based on a broad range of factors, which include the competitive marketplace, the role of the NEO, skills and performance. Salaries are reviewed annually and may be revised to reflect significant changes in the scope of an NEO'sNEO’s responsibilities and/or market conditions. Our goal is to be competitive with respect to base salary while distinguishing ourselves from the NEO Peer Group by providing a greater emphasis on compensating our executive officers through the use of performance-based incentives that are consistent with our strategy of motivating executive officers to achieve and exceed annual and multi-year business objectives.
43
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
During fiscal year 2016,2017, Mr. Morton's base salary increased from $350,002 to $525,013, Mr. Brace's base salary increased from $500,011 to $600,018 and Ms. MacPherson's base salary increased from $219,294 to $330,013, to recognize Mr. Morton's appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Brace's appointment as President, CSSG and Ms. MacPherson's appointment as Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Subsequently, Mr. Mosley'sMosley’s base salary increased from $600,018 to $800,010 to recognize his appointment as President and Chief Operating OfficerCOO on July 25, 2016. The base salaries of the other NEOs weredid not changedchange during fiscal year 2016.2017.
Executive Officer Performance Bonus
All NEOs participate in our shareholder-approved Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan ("EOPB"(“EOPB”), which is designed to promote achievement of our annual financial and operational goals as approved by the Compensation Committee. The general target bonus for each NEO is based on the competitive marketplace and the NEO'sNEO’s role, as well as taking internal pay equity into consideration. Actual payments under the EOPB may be above or below this level, based on performance results. Individual awards paid to each NEO following the end of the performance period are determined by the Compensation Committee after certifying our financial and operational performance. The Compensation Committee, together with the other independent directors of the Board, determine the
material terms of Mr. Luczo'sLuczo’s bonus opportunity under the EOPB, including the amount of Mr. Luczo'sLuczo’s target bonus opportunity, and the payout level based on performance results.
On July 21, 2015,25 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the performance metrics and funding targets to be used for calculating annual bonus awards for each executive officer for fiscal year 20162017 under the EOPB. Funding of the EOPB for fiscal year 20162017 was determined based on the Company'sCompany’s performance with respect to the following metrics:
• | an independent quality metric, referred to asReliability Quality Competitiveness Best in Class(“RQC BiC”), which is a measure of how our key customers view Seagate’s product quality compared with the product quality of our competitors. |
While we track many operational and strategic performance goals throughout the year, operating margin and revenue together are considered a key measure of our success in achieving profitable growth and were selected for fiscal year 20162017 to continue to align payouts under the EOPB with the Company'sCompany’s profitability year over year.year-over-year. Adjustments to earnings for purposes of determining the operating margin excluded the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not budgeted and/or foreseen at the time the performance targets were established, and included estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable cash compensation. The adjustments are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. RQC BiC was retained as a modifier to the overall bonus funding calculation for fiscal year 2016,2017, because quality is considered a critical part of our overall business performance.
44
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The combination of the three performance metrics noted above was used to determine the applicable percentage of our annual revenuesrevenue that would be allocated to the overall bonus pool to be used for the payment of bonuses to all eligible employees, including to our executive officers under the EOPB. For purposes of illustration, the range of overall bonus funding as a percentage of target for fiscal year 2016,2017, assuming annual revenues of $13$11 billion and the achievement of the minimum level of RQC BiC of 80%, would be as indicated below for the achievement of operating margin at the threshold, target and maximum levels for fiscal year 2016:2017:
Performance Level | Operating Margin | Funding as % of Target | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threshold | 12.0 | % | 50 | % | |||
Target | 16.0 | % | 100 | % | |||
Maximum | 21.0 | % | 200 | % |
Performance Level | Operating Margin | Funding as % of Target | ||||||||||||||
Threshold | 12.6 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||||||
Target | 14.9 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Maximum | 20.0 | % | 200 | % |
Actual funding is determined based on the adjusted operating margin, the level of revenues and RQC BiC actually achieved during fiscal year 2016.2017. Once the Company achieves or exceeds the threshold operating margin, the combination of actual operating margin and revenuesrevenue determines preliminary funding. This amount is then reduced by 1.25% for each of our five key markets each quarter that do not achieve the minimum RQC BiC performance requirement, with up to 25% of the funding subject to quality performance.
The funded amount, once approved by the Compensation Committee, is allocated among eligible participants. Funding for individual bonuses paid to our NEOs is based upon each executive officer'sofficer’s target bonus expressed as a percentage of base salary. For fiscal year 2016,2017, Mr. Luczo had a target bonus equal to 150% of his annual base salary (reflecting that a larger portion of his total annual target cash compensation is subject to performance conditions than is the case for the other NEOs) and
based on their role in the Company, the other NEOs had a target bonus ranging from 75%100% to 125% of their individual annual base salaries. The Compensation Committee, with respect to all NEOs except our CEO, and the independent directors of the Board and with respect to our CEO, retain the discretion to reduce the amount of the bonus payout based on their overall assessment of the Company'sCompany’s performance generally, including factors such as revenues,revenue, profitability, product quality, cost containment and expense management, market share, strategic objectives and legal and regulatory compliance.
Based on our actual performance for fiscal year 2016, we did not achieve2017, funding was set at 107.4% of target, on the minimum thresholdbasis of our adjusted operating margin of 16% or revenue15.8%, revenues of $13 billion. Because we did not achieveapproximately $10.8 billion and an RQC BiC modifier of 96.3%. Based on the minimum threshold none of our NEOs received any cash bonusfunded amount, the Compensation Committee determined to award the following bonuses for fiscal year 2016.2017:
Named Executive Officer | Annual Salary |
Target Bonus Percentage | FY2017 EOPB Funding | FY2017 EOPB Payment | ||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | $ | 1,200,056 | 150 | % | 107.4 | % | $ | 1,933,290 | ||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | $ | 525,013 | 100 | % | 107.4 | % | $ | 563,864 | ||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace(1) | $ | 600,018 | 100 | % | 107.4 | % | $ | 644,419 | ||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | $ | 800,010 | 100 | % | 107.4 | % | $ | 859,210 | ||||||||||||||
James J. Murphy(2) | $ | 575,016 | 100 | % | 107.4 | % | $ | 388,525 |
45
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Named Executive Officer | Annual Salary | Target Bonus Percentage | FY2016 EOPB Funding | FY2016 EOPB Payment | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | $ | 1,200,056 | 150 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | $ | 525,013 | 100 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
Philip G. Brace | $ | 600,018 | 100 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
William D. Mosley | $ | 600,018 | 100 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
Regan J. MacPherson | $ | 330,013 | 75 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
Albert A. Pimentel | $ | 600,018 | 100 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 | |||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | $ | 565,011 | 100 | % | 0 | % | $ | 0 |
(1) | Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities. |
(2) | Mr. Murphy’s EOPB payment is based on his employment with the Company for only a portion of the fiscal year 2017. |
Management-Based Objectives Component of EOPB for Presidents
As part of our strategic performance-based cash incentive program, in fiscal year 20162017, the Compensation Committee approved a cash bonus opportunity for each of our Presidents, Messrs. Mosley and Brace, to earn up to 25% of each executive'sexecutive’s annual base salary based on achievement of key operational goals (the "MBO Bonus"“MBO Bonus”). The payout was based on the level of funding of the EOPB for the Company'sCompany’s fiscal year 2016,2017, up to target, as well as the CEO'sCEO’s assessment of achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each President'sPresident’s organization during the fiscal year 20162017 as follows:
In each case, we did not specify a quantitative target that must be achieved, but we considered the goals aggressive yet attainable within the fiscal year.
Because we did not achieveBased on the minimum thresholdachievement of our adjusted operating margin or revenue for funding the EOPB as stated above, Messrs. Mosleyapplicable goals and Brace did not receive anconsidering the CEO’s assessment of the achievement, the Compensation Committee awarded the following MBO BonusBonuses for fiscal year 2016.2017: Mr. Mosley, $110,661; and Mr. Brace, $67,502.
Long-Term Equity Incentives
In fiscal year 2016,2017, the Compensation Committee awarded equity awards to the NEOs under the terms of the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan is designed to:
Our NEOs'NEOs’ awards are based on the economic value of comparable awards to executive officers in the Company'sCompany’s Peer Group, the NEO'sNEO’s role, individual performance and potential future potential.contributions. Our equity award guidelines and mix of the type of awards granted are based on an analysis of the unvested equity held by an NEO, the practices of NEO Peer Group companies in awarding equity for similar positions (including equity mix and award values), potential impact on earnings, and the pool of available shares. In determining the award for each NEO, the Compensation Committee also considers the Company'sCompany’s goals for retaining the NEO for the long term and the following factors related to each NEO including:
46
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
NEOs are generally awarded equity on an annual basis, typically inmid-September, as part of our annual award cycle. For fiscal year 2016, the annualcycle and these equity awards granted to the NEOs consistedgenerally consist of a mix of time-vesting options, Threshold Performance Share Units and Performance Share Units (each as defined and described more fully below), reflecting a strong emphasis on pay for performancepay-for-performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders.
ForExcept for Mr. Luczo, who did not receive an equity grant for fiscal year 2017, and Mr. Murphy, the equity grants made to each of our NEOs except Mr. Morton and Ms. MacPherson, the mixfor fiscal year 2017 are comprised of long-term equity incentives, 20% options, 30% Threshold Performance Share Units, and 50% Performance Share Units, reflectedreflecting the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s review and assessment of market practices at peerNEO Peer Group companies, as well as its determination that a mix of options and full-value equity awards would provide an appropriate blend of incentives to sustain and improve the Company'sCompany’s financial performance and shareholder value. As part of Mr. MortonMurphy’s new hire package, he received a mix of 25% options, 40% time-based RSUs and 35%50% Threshold Performance Share Units and Ms. MacPherson received a mix of 30% options, 50% time-based RSUs and 20% Performance Share Units. She also received an option award with a target value of $600,000 in recognition of her appointment as Senior Vice President and General Counsel.options.
Options
Options generally vest over four years and have a seven-year term. Options are awarded with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares on the grant date. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares on NASDAQ on the grant date. The grant date and vesting schedule for options granted to our NEOs are generally the same as for other employees receiving options during the annual award process, but may be different in the case of a new hire or change in employment position.
Share Awards
Restricted Share Units
RSUs generally vest in equal annual installments over four years, contingent on continued service. Due to the strong emphasis on pay for performance,pay-for-performance, our CEO, presidents and executive vice presidents are not eligible to receive RSUs. We believe that long-term equity awards made to our executives at these levels should consist only of options and performance-vesting shares or units.units to align with our emphasis onpay-for-performance.
Threshold Performance Share Units
Threshold performance share units ("TPSUs"Performance Share Units (“TPSUs”) are equity awards with a maximum seven-year vesting period, contingent on continued service and the achievement of specified performance goals. Each TPSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares.
For each tranche of a TPSU award that is eligible to vest on a vesting date, vesting is contingent on the Company achieving a threshold adjusted earnings per share ("AEPS"(“AEPS”) goal of $1.00 for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the vesting date occurs. If the threshold goal is not achieved, vesting of that tranche is delayed to the next scheduled vesting date for which the AEPS goal is achieved. Unvested awards from prior years may vest cumulatively on the scheduled vesting date for a future year within the seven-year vesting period if the annual AEPS threshold for that year is achieved. For example, if AEPS performance prior to the first vesting date is below threshold, then vesting will be delayed. If the AEPS threshold is achieved prior to the second vesting opportunity, then 50% of the award will vest (25% from the first vesting date and 25% from the second vesting date due to the cumulative feature of the award). TPSU awards may become fully vested as early as four years from the grant date and, as noted above, remain eligible to vest for up to seven years
47
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
following the grant date. If the AEPS threshold level has not been met by the end of the seven-year period, any unvested TPSUs will be forfeited. Vesting for these awards is uncertain yet considered likely due to the cumulative vesting feature. For market comparison purposes, we compare the value of TPSU awards for our NEOs with time-based restricted shares or RSUs awarded by other companies in the NEO Peer Group. For purposes of the TPSU awards, AEPS is based on diluted earnings per share, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not foreseen at the time the performance target was established, and includes estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable compensation. Under the terms of the TPSU award agreement, no dividend equivalent payment will be made on any of the ordinary shares underlying the TPSUs.
Our AEPS performance for fiscal year 20162017 was above the $1.00 AEPS threshold; therefore, an additional 25% of each of the outstanding TPSU awards will vest on their next scheduled vesting date following the end of fiscal year 2016.2017.
Performance Share Units
Performance share units ("PSUs"(“PSUs”) are performance-based RSUs that vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to continued employment and the achievement of annual return on invested capital ("ROIC"(“ROIC”) over the performance period, modified by a factor based on the Company'sCompany’s relative total shareholder return ("TSR"(“TSR”) percentile compared with a selected peer group, defined below. ROIC was selected as a key metric because of its ability to measure the efficiency of our use of capital and delivery of earnings above investment, considered a critical factor in the Company'sCompany’s long-term success. In addition, the relative TSR metric rewards financial performance as measured by the change in our share price and the dividends declared during the performance period relative to the performance of the select group of peers (as described below). Payout of the targeted number of PSUs will occur if target ROIC is attained over the three-year measurement period and relative TSR is at least at the median of the selected peer group. For PSUs awarded prior to fiscal year 2014, the number of PSUs that will be earned will be determined on the basis of actual ROIC
achieved, calculated by linear interpolation between a preset minimum and maximum, and increased or decreased on the basis of whether the relative TSR achieved is below median, between the 50th to 75th percentile, or above the 75th percentile in relation to the selected peer group. For PSUs awarded beginning in fiscal year 2014, ROIC achieved will be calculated based on a range rather than by linear interpolation between a preset minimum and maximum. The final ROIC metric is calculated as the average annual ROIC over the prior three fiscal years. Annual ROIC is calculated as (i) adjusted operating income multiplied by 1 minus the average tax rate, divided by (ii) (x) net plant, property and equipment plus total current assets minus cash, minus (y) total current liabilities. Adjustments to operating income exclude the impact ofnon-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not foreseen at the time the performance target was established. For fiscal year 2016,2017, the relative TSR modifier is interpolated between 25th to 75th percentiles.
Each PSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares. The Compensation Committee will determine the number of PSUs that will vest at the end of the three-year performance period according to apre-established vesting matrix. For awards granted in fiscal year 2016,2017, assuming the minimum performance threshold is achieved, the actual number of ordinary shares that may vest ranges from 38% of the target number of PSUs (for an ROIC of approximately 65%56% of target and relative TSR below the selected peer group median) to 200% of the target number of PSUs (for an ROIC in excess of approximately 135%139% of target and relative TSR equal to or above the 75th percentile of the selected peer group). The specific ROIC target values for the PSUs are not publicly disclosed at the time of grant due to the proprietary nature and competitive sensitivity of the information. Under the terms of the PSU award agreement, no dividend equivalent payments will be made on any of the ordinary shares underlying the PSUs.
48
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The selected peer group for PSUs awarded in September 20152016 included a broader range of companies than the NEO Peer Group to allow for comparison of our performance against a wider range of technology companies than the companies with whom we frequently compete for executive talent. The selected peer group for purposes of measuring our relative TSR performance consisted of the 2625 companies listed in the table below, meeting the following criteria:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | ||||||
Juniper Networks, Inc. | ||||||
Amphenol Corp. | Lam Research Corp. | |||||
Apple Inc. | Micron Technology Inc. | |||||
Applied Materials Inc. | Motorola Solutions Inc. | |||||
ARRIS International plc | NCR | Corp. | ||||
Cisco Systems, Inc. | NetApp, Inc. | |||||
Corning Inc. | NVIDIA Corp. | |||||
Flextronics International Ltd. | QUALCOMM Inc. | |||||
Harris Corp. | ||||||
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | TE Connectivity | Ltd | ||||
HP Inc. | Texas Instruments Inc. | |||||
Intel Corp. | Western Digital Corp. | |||||
Jabil Circuit Inc. | ||||||
In fiscal year 2013,2014, we granted PSUs to Messrs. Luczo, Morton Mosley, Pimentel and O'MalleyMosley that were eligible to vest after the end of a three-year performance period ending on July 3, 2015,1, 2016, subject to continued employment and the achievement of target ROIC over the performance period, modified by a factor based on our TSR percentile compared with a selected peer group. On September 21, 2015,26, 2016, the Compensation Committee certified the level of achievement of the financial performance metrics for the three-year period, such that the PSUs vested at 157%98% of target based on a three-year average annual ROIC of 64%54%, and relative TSR at the 73rd18th percentile over the three-year period. As a result, the following numbers of ordinary shares were issued to the executive officers:
Named Executive Officer | Target PSUs | FY2013 PSUs Earned | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | 287,790 | 451,830 | |||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 2,800 | 4,396 | |||||
William D. Mosley | 40,000 | 62,800 | |||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 40,000 | 62,800 | |||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 40,000 | 62,800 |
Named Executive Officer | Target PSUs | FY2014 PSUs Earned | ||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 2,160 | 2,117 | ||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 50,000 | 49,000 |
As the certification of our financial performance with respect to the PSUs granted in fiscal year 2014,2015, which have a three-year performance period ending on July 1, 2016,June 30, 2017, could not be completed in advance of the filing date of this Proxy Statement, the vesting of these awards (if any) will be disclosed onForm 8-K within four business days following written certification by the Compensation Committee.
49
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
We established share ownership guidelines to ensure that our NEOs hold a meaningful equity stake in the Company and, by doing so, to link their interests with those of our shareholders. Shares directly or indirectly owned (for example, through a trust), along with unvested RSUs that do not have a performance requirement, are included in the calculation of ordinary shares owned for purposes of the ownership guidelines, but time-based and performance-based options unvested TPS, unvested TPSUs, unvested performance shares, unvested PSUs and unvested TSR PSUsperformance-based awards are not counted until they are exercised or vested, as applicable. NEOs are expected to meet the ownership requirements within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. NEOs are measured against the applicable guideline on the last day of each fiscal year, and the results are reported to the Compensation Committee.
Our NEOs will be required to own shares in an amount equal to an applicable target value based on a multiple of annual salary. Our NEOs were required to meet the guidelines by July 1, 2016, with the exception of Messrs. Morton, and Brace, and Ms. MacPhersonMurphy who are required to meet the guidelines by October 21, 2020, April 30, 2020 and September 1, 2020,November 14, 2021, respectively. The share ownership guidelines are as follows:
Role | Ownership Guideline– Multiple of Salary | Equivalent Dollar Value(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEO | 6x | $ | 7,200,300 | ||||
Presidents | 4x | $ | 2,300,100 | ||||
Executive Vice Presidents | 3x | $ | 1,517,400 | ||||
Other NEOs | 2x | $ | 688,300 |
Role | Ownership Guideline– Multiple of Salary | |
CEO | 6x | |
Presidents | 4x | |
Executive Vice Presidents | 3x |
All of the NEOs have met or are on track to meet ownership guidelines by the applicable deadline.
Benefits and Perquisites
Our NEOs are eligible to participate in a broad range of benefits in the same manner asnon-executive employees. Seagate does not offer separate benefits for executive officers, other than vacation and severance benefits (see "Severance“Severance and Change in Control Benefits,"” below).
We do not generally provide perquisites to our NEOs except that we provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs which may be used for travel with a personal element, provided they fully reimburse us for the aggregate incremental cost of any such usage. We do however consider the value of perquisites, to the extent provided at the NEO Peer Group companies, in assessing the competitiveness of our total compensation package for our NEOs. Messrs.Until January 1, 2017, Mr. Luczo and O'Malley continue to participateparticipated in a group replacement life insurance plan (“GRIP”) that was closed to new participants as of January 2002. Effective January 1, 2017, the GRIP plan was discontinued and Mr. Luczo was enrolled in the Seagate Basic Life plan, which is available to all eligible employees, with a benefit amount of 2x annual salary up to $1,000,000. Mr. Luczo was given the option of transitioning his GRIP coverage to an individual plan at his expense, or canceling it.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
The 2015 Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the "SDCP"“SDCP”) effective January 1, 2015 allows our NEOs (and other eligible employees) whose annual base pay salary is $165,000 or more, or whose target commissions and annual base salary in the aggregate is $165,000 or more to defer on apre-tax basis (i) up to 70% of their base salary, (ii) up to 70% of commissions, and (iii) up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus. Deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on the Company'sCompany’s books as an unfunded obligation of the Company. We do not make any contributions to the SDCP, and notional earnings on deferrals
50
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
are based on the performance of investment funds selected by each participant from a menu of investment options offered pursuant to the SDCP. Deferral amounts, earnings andyear-end balances for our NEOs are set forth in the table below titled "Fiscal“Fiscal Year 20162017 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation."” The SDCP is a successor plan to the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, which became frozen with respect to all deferrals made thereunder on or prior to December 31, 2015.
Severance and Change in Control Benefits
We provide severance benefits to assist in aligning NEO and shareholder interests during the evaluation of an ownership change, to remain competitive in attracting and retaining NEOs and to support organizational changes necessary to achieve our business strategy. The purpose of the Fifth
Amended and Restated Seagate Technology Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the "Severance Plan"“Severance Plan”) is to:
(1) provide for the payment of severance benefits to our NEOs in the event their employment with the Company or any applicable subsidiary is involuntarily terminated;
(1) | provide for the payment of severance benefits to our NEOs in the event their employment with the Company or any applicable subsidiary is involuntarily terminated; |
(2) | encourage our NEOs to continue employment in the event of a potential “change in control” (as such term is defined in the section titled “Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control,” below); and |
(3) | ensure that our NEOs generally receive the same severance benefits in connection with a qualifying termination of employment. |
(2) encourage our NEOs to continue employment in the event of a potential "change in control" (as such term is defined in the section titled "Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," below); and
(3) ensure that our NEOs generally receive the same severance benefits in connection with a qualifying termination of employment.
All of our NEOs receive a level of severance benefits under the terms of the Severance Plan that reflects their level of responsibility within our organization, the strategic importance of their position and a market-competitive level of severance for comparable positions within the NEO Peer Group.
The Severance Plan provisions were developed based on a comparison of severance benefits typically available at the NEO Peer Group companies, in consultation with F.W.FW Cook, following review by the independent directors of the Board. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Severance Plan provides for severance only in the event of an involuntary termination (i.e., a termination by us without "cause"“cause” or by the Executive for "good reason"“good reason”). The Severance Plan includes the following features:
In the event that the benefits payable following a change in control exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we cap benefits at the safe harbor limit if theafter-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than theafter-tax benefit of the full amount (which would otherwise be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code). We do not provide agross-up for any taxes payable on severance benefits and the NEO is responsible for the payment of all personal taxes, including any excise taxes imposed on change in control payments and benefits.
51
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
For further details on the Severance Plan, see the section titled "Compensation“Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control."”
Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations
Impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
The Compensation Committee seeks to qualify NEO compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws to the greatest extent possible. Section 162(m) of the Code (as interpreted by IRS Notice2007-49) places a limit of $1 million on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation in any taxable year to any of the CEO and each of the next three most highly
compensated NEOs employed at the end of the year (other than the Company'sCompany’s CFO), unless such compensation is considered "performance-based"“performance-based” under Section 162(m).
Both the EOPB and the Amended and Restated 2012 Plan have been approved by our shareholders and are administered by the Compensation Committee. Each plan has been structured such that compensation paid or awarded thereunder may qualify as "performance-based"“performance-based” and therefore not be subject to the Section 162(m) limit. We received shareholder approval for the EOPB at the 2013 AGM in order to preserve the Company's ability to pay annual incentive bonuses to our executive officers that may qualify as "performance-based" compensation under Section 162(m). The Amended and Restated Plan, which amends and restates the 2012 Plan, is being submitted for shareholder approval at the 2016 AGM (See Proposal 3) to, among other things preserve the Company's ability to grant equity-based awards to our executive officers that may qualify as "performance- based" compensation under Section 162(m). However, in order to maintain flexibility in compensating our NEOs in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to pay compensation that may not be tax deductible.
Securities Trading
Seagate'sSeagate’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits all employees (including our NEOs) and Board members from taking "short"“short” positions in our securities or engaging in hedging or other monetization transactions with respect to our securities. We discourage ourThe Company prohibits its directors and executive officers from using our shares(i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities and (ii) engaging in any form ofshort-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin accountsaccount or otherwise pledging sharesCompany securities as collateral.collateral for a loan unless the Chief Legal Officer or the Chief Financial Officer providespre-clearance after the director or executive officer clearly demonstrates the financial capability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities. We have also amended our Securities Trading Policy to, among other things, require the first trade under a new plan established pursuant toRule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act take place after a reasonable "seasoning period"“seasoning period” has passed from the time of adoption of the plan; in addition, an insider will only be permitted to useone 10b5-1 plan at a time.
Pay Recovery Policy
Our Pay Recovery Policy is intended to eliminate any reward for fraudulent accounting. It provides standards for recovering compensation from an NEO where such compensation was based on incorrectly reported financial results due to the fraud or willful misconduct of such NEO. The NEO'sNEO’s repayment obligation applies to any bonus paid, share award issued (whether or not vested) or options exercised during the period commencing with the date that is four years prior to the beginning of the fiscal year in which a restatement is announced, and ending on the date recovery is sought. We intend to review our Pay Recovery Policy following the enactment of final rules pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
52
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and the Board. In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for fiscal year 2016.2017.
Respectfully submitted, THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | ||
Edward J. Zander, Chairman Frank J. Biondi, Jr. Michael R. Cannon Jay L. Geldmacher |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2016:2017 was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries at any time during fiscal year 2016,2017, has ever been an executive officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or had a relationship with the Company during that period requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K. No executive officers of the Company served on the compensation committee of any other entity, or as a director of an entity that employed any of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2016.2017.
53
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our Summary Compensation Table below shows the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our NEOs with respect to the fiscal years ending2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. The amounts reported reflect rounding, which may result in slight variations between amounts shown in the Total columnscolumn and the sum of theirits components as reflected in the tables.table.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Option Awards ($)(1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(2)(3) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current CEO and CFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | 2016 | 1,246,212 | 7,339,382 | 1,831,036 | — | 4,215 | 10,420,845 | |||||||||||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 2015 | 1,200,056 | 7,555,140 | 1,732,557 | 1,155,654 | 3,884 | 11,647,291 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 1,153,886 | — | — | 1,458,068 | 3,563 | 2,615,517 | ||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr.(4) | 2016 | 484,625 | 710,240 | 240,927 | — | 4,500 | 1,440,292 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace(5) | 2016 | 610,017 | 2,935,781 | 732,418 | — | 7,974 | 4,286,190 | |||||||||||||||
President, Cloud Systems and Silicon | 2015 | 392,316 | 3,588,650 | 777,129 | 263,901 | 4,500 | 5,026,496 | |||||||||||||||
Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 2016 | 623,095 | 2,935,781 | 732,418 | — | 12,355 | 4,303,649 | |||||||||||||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | 2015 | 600,018 | 2,488,763 | 427,708 | 463,217 | 29,470 | 4,009,176 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 579,561 | 3,080,300 | 494,532 | 573,497 | 4,500 | 4,732,390 | ||||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson(6) | 2016 | 293,317 | 242,954 | 708,158 | — | 5,828 | 1,250,257 | |||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and General Counsel | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 2016 | 586,742 | 1,699,657 | 424,036 | — | 9,058 | 2,719,493 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President | 2015 | 565,011 | 1,422,150 | 244,405 | 362,737 | 23,656 | 2,617,959 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 560,710 | 2,156,210 | 346,172 | 457,659 | 7,860 | 3,528,611 | ||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 2016 | 623,095 | 2,935,781 | 732,418 | — | 4,500 | 4,295,794 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President | 2015 | 600,018 | 2,488,763 | 427,708 | 458,402 | 181,460 | 4,156,351 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 600,018 | 2,156,210 | 346,172 | 583,217 | 23,428 | 3,709,045 |
Name and Principal Position
| Year
| Salary ($)
| Bonus ($)
| Stock Awards ($)(1)
| Option Awards ($)(1)
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(7)
| All Other Compensation ($)(2)(3)
| Total ($)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | 1,200,056 | — | — | — | 1,933,290 | 3,392 | 3,136,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1,246,212 | — | 7,339,382 | 1,831,036 | — | 4,215 | 10,420,845 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1,200,056 | — | 7,555,140 | 1,732,557 | 1,155,654 | 3,884 | 11,647,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr.(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2017 | 525,013 | — | 3,680,010 | 958,517 | 563,864 | 5,700 | 5,733,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 484,625 | — | 710,240 | 240,927 | — | 4,500 | 1,440,292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President, Cloud Systems and Silicon Group | 2017 | 600,018 | — | 3,999,595 | 1,041,748 | 711,921 | 5,354 | 6,358,636 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 610,017 | — | 2,935,781 | 732,418 | — | 7,974 | 4,286,190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 392,316 | — | 3,588,650 | 777,129 | 263,901 | 4,500 | 5,026,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | 2017 | 784,626 | — | 4,922,537 | 1,282,149 | 969,872 | 5,700 | 7,964,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 623,095 | — | 2,935,781 | 732,418 | — | 12,355 | 4,303,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 600,018 | — | 2,488,763 | 427,708 | 463,217 | 29,470 | 4,009,176 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
James J. Murphy(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, Sales & Marketing | 2017 | 353,856 | 1,500,000(6) | 2,803,944 | 3,251,624 | 388,525 | 5,700 | 8,303,649 |
(1) | Stock Awards and Option Awards: These amounts do not reflect the actual value realized by the NEO. In accordance with SEC rules, these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For time-based share units, the grant date fair value was determined using the closing share price of Seagate ordinary shares on the date of grant, adjusted for the present value of expected dividends. For all performance share units whose vesting is subject to performance conditions as defined by ASC 718, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $0 for Mr. Luczo, $6,137,429 for Mr. Morton, $6,670,423 for Mr. Brace, $8,209,675 for Mr. Mosley and $2,803,944 for Mr. Murphy. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. |
54
SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(2) | All Other Compensation: The amounts shown in this column consist of the following: |
Name | Personal Guest Travel ($)(a) | 401k Match ($)(b) | Executive Life Insurance ($) | Total ($) | Personal Guest Travel ($)
| 401k Match ($)(9)
| Company Contribution to HSA ($)
| Executive Life Insurance ($)
| Total ($)
| ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | — | — | 4,215 | 4,215 | — | — | 1,200 | 2,192 | 3,392 | ||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | — | 4,500 | — | 4,500 | — | 4,500 | 1,200 | — | 5,700 | ||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 3,474 | 4,500 | — | 7,974 | — | 4,154 | 1,200 | — | 5,354 | ||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 7,855 | 4,500 | — | 12,355 | — | 4,500 | 1,200 | — | 5,700 | ||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | — | 5,828 | — | 5,828 | |||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | — | �� | 6,327 | 2,731 | 9,058 | ||||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | — | 4,500 | — | 4,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
James J. Murphy | — | 4,500 | 1,200 | — | 5,700 |
(3) | We provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs primarily so that they can travel to business functions and different facilities in the course of their duties. Certain trips taken by our NEOs in fiscal year 2017 may have had a personal element. To the extent that a travel leg has a personal element to it, our NEOs have fully reimbursed the Company for the aggregate incremental cost of such leg to us. Such reimbursement includes the costs of “wheels up time”, a portion of fuel and insurance costs, catering, excise taxes, and crew expenses. |
(4) | Mr. Morton was not an NEO in fiscal year 2015. |
(5) | Mr. Murphy was not an NEO in fiscal years 2015 and 2016. |
(6) | Represents theone-timesign-on bonus amount paid to Mr. Murphy in connection with his employment offer. |
(7) | Represents amounts payable under the EOPB. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Bonus Plan.” |
(8) | Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities. |
(9) | 401(k) match is for the 401(k) Plan contribution provided to all U.S. employees who participate in the 401(k) Plan. The maximum amount is $4,500 per calendar year, but it may be higher or lower for a particular fiscal year depending on the timing and amount of the employee’s contribution. |
55
SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2016
2017
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
| Type of
| Grant Date
| Compensation Committee Action Date
| Threshold ($)
| Target ($)
| Maximum ($)
| Threshold (#)
| Target (#) (2)
| Maximum (#) (2)
| All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
| All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(3)
| Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/ Share)
| Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(5)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Bonus | — | — | 900,042 | 1,800,084 | 3,600,168 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Bonus | — | — | 262,507 | 525,013 | 1,050,026 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 9/9/2016(3) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 148,665 | 36.09 | 958,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 9/9/2016(4) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 76,034(2) | 152,068(2) | — | — | — | 2,457,419(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 9/9/2016(5) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 39,772(2) | — | — | — | — | 1,222,591(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Bonus | — | — | 300,009 | 750,022 | 1,200,035 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 9/9/2016(3) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 161,574 | 36.09 | 1,041,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 9/9/2016(4) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 82,637(2) | 165,274(2) | — | — | — | 2,670,828(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 9/9/2016(5) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 43,226(2) | — | — | — | — | 1,328,767(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Bonus | — | — | 400,005 | 1,000,012 | 1,600,019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 9/9/2016(3) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 198,860 | 36.09 | 1,282,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 9/9/2016(4) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 101,706(2) | 203,412(2) | — | — | — | 3,287,138(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 9/9/2016(5) | 7/25/2016 | — | — | — | — | 53,201(2) | — | — | — | — | 1,635,399(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James J. Murphy(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Bonus | — | — | 180,878 | 361,755 | 723,510 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 12/20/2016(3) | 10/18/2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398,774 | 38.76 | 3,251,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 12/20/2016(5) | 10/18/2016 | — | — | — | — | 83,850(2) | — | — | — | — | 2,803,944(2) |
(1) | Amounts represent the potential range of payments for fiscal year 2017 for the NEOs under the EOPB. This range varied based on the individual’s position and bonus target as a percentage of fiscal year 2017 ending base salary (150% percent of base salary for Mr. Luczo, 100% for Messrs. Brace and Mosley, Morton and Murphy). Each of Messrs. Brace and Mosley have an additional bonus target of 25% of their annual base salary based on the achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each their organization during fiscal year 2017. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled “Annual Bonus Plan.” |
(2) | In accordance with SEC rules, this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all performance share units, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions as defined by ASC 718 at target levels. The aggregate grant-date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $0 for Mr. Luczo, $6,137,429 for Mr. Morton, $6,670,423 for Mr. Brace, $8,209,675 for Mr. Mosley and $2,803,944 for Mr. Murphy. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, “Share-based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. |
(3) | Options awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. 25% of the shares subject to the option vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remaining 75% of the shares subject to option will vest proportionally on a monthly basis for the next three years, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the options, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options.” |
(4) | PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan. These units vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of the applicable performance criteria. For a description of the PSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.” |
(5) | TPSUs awarded during fiscal year 2017 under the 2012 Plan. Vesting is contingent on continuous service and satisfaction of performance vesting requirements. The first tranche vests no sooner than the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date, subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria. The remaining tranches continue to vest annually thereafter subject to the achievement of the subsequent annual performance goals, with the ability tocatch-up vesting each year if a given annual performance goal is not achieved. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. For a description of the TPSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.” |
(6) | Mr. Luczo did not receive any equity awards for fiscal year 2017. |
56
SEAGATE TECHNOLODGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
| | | | | | | Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2) ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Date of Compensation Committee Action | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Type of Award | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | Cash Bonus | 900,042 | 1,800,084 | 3,600,168 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/22/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 194,384 | 50.10 | 1,831,036 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/22/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 101,369 | 202,738 | 4,798,808 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 7/22/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (5) | 56,887 | 2,540,573 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | Cash Bonus | 262,507 | 525,013 | 1,050,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 25,577 | 50.10 | 240,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 7,470 | 14,940 | 353,630 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (6) | 7,985 | 356,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | Cash Bonus | 300,009 | 750,022 | 1,200,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 77,754 | 50.10 | 732,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 40,548 | 81,096 | 1,919,542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (5) | 22,755 | 1,016,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | Cash Bonus | 300,009 | 750,022 | 1,200,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 77,754 | 50.10 | 732,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 40,548 | 81,096 | 1,919,542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (5) | 22,755 | 1,016,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | Cash Bonus | 123,755 | 247,510 | 495,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 11,510 | 50.10 | 108,421 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 1,601 | 3,202 | 75,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (6) | 3,743 | 167,162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 3/6/2016 | 3/21/2016 | (3) | 89,286 | 36.54 | 599,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | Cash Bonus | 282,506 | 565,011 | 1,130,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 45,016 | 50.10 | 424,036 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 23,475 | 46,950 | 1,111,307 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (5) | 13,174 | 588,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | Cash Bonus | 300,009 | 600,018 | 1,200,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Option | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (3) | 77,754 | 50.10 | 732,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (4) | 40,548 | 81,096 | 1,919,542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPSU | 7/21/2015 | 9/9/2015 | (5) | 22,755 | 1,016,238 |
(7) | Mr. Murphy did not receive any PSUs for fiscal year 2017. |
(8) | Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2016
2017
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||||
Name
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
| Option Exercise Price ($)
| Option Expiration Date
| Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
| Market Not
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
| |||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | ||||||||||||||||||
34,375(2)
| —
| —
| 11.07
| 9/13/2017
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
107,922(2)
| —
| —
| 30.23
| 8/1/2019
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
206,300(4)
| —
| —
| 30.23
| 8/1/2019
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 79,700(5)(7)
| 3,088,375
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 23,900(3)(8)
| 926,125
| ||||||||||
87,724(2)
| 39,876
| —
| 60.83
| 9/9/2021
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 42,665(3)(9)
| 1,653,269
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 101,369(5)(10)
| 3,928,049
| ||||||||||
85,043(2)
| 109,341
| —
| 50.10
| 9/9/2022
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||
2,407(2)
| —
| —
| 29.87
| 09/10/2019
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
4,387(2)
| 507
| —
| 40.16
| 09/09/2020
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 1,350(6)(11)
| 52,313(32)
| ||||||||||
5,671(2)
| 2,579
| —
| 60.83
| 09/09/2021
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 2,200(6)(12)
| 85,250
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 3,850(5)(7)
| 149,188
| ||||||||||
11,189(2)
| 14,388
| —
| 50.10
| 09/09/2022
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 20,000(3)(13)
| 775,000
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 5,989(6)(14)
| 232,074
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 7,470(5)(10)
| 289,463
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 76,034(5)(15)
| 2,946,318
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 39,772(3)(16)
| 1,541,165
| ||||||||||
—
| 148,665
| —
| 36.09
| 09/09/2023
| —
| —
| —
| —
|
57
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||||
Name
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
| Option Exercise Price ($)
| Option Expiration Date
| Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
| Market Not
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
| |||||||||
Philip G. Brace(21) | ||||||||||||||||||
44,687(2)
| 20,313
| —
| 55.21
| 10/21/2021
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 32,500(17)
| 1,259,375
| ||||||||||
34,017(2)
| 43,737
| —
| 50.10
| 09/09/2022
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 17,066(9)
| 661,308
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 40,548(10)
| 1,571,235
| ||||||||||
—
| 161,574
| —
| 36.09
| 09/09/2023
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 43,226(16)
| 1,675,008
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 82,637(15)
| 3,202,184
| ||||||||||
William D. Mosley | ||||||||||||||||||
40,000(2)
| —
| —
| 29.87
| 09/10/2019
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
46,875(2)
| 3,125
| —
| 40.16
| 09/09/2020
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 7,500(18)
| 290,625
| ||||||||||
21,656(2)
| 9,844
| —
| 60.83
| 09/09/2021
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 7,875(8)
| 305,156
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 26,250(7)
| 1,017,188
| ||||||||||
34,017(2)
| 43,737
| —
| 50.10
| 09/09/2022
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 17,066(9)
| 661,308
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 40,548(10)
| 1,571,235
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 101,706(15)
| 3,941,108
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 53,201(16)
| 2,061,539
| ||||||||||
—
| 198,860
| —
| 36.09
| 09/09/2023
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
James J. Murphy | ||||||||||||||||||
—
| 398,774
| —
| 38.76
| 12/20/2023
| —
| —
| —
| —
| ||||||||||
—
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| —
| 83,850(19)
| 3,249,188
|
(1) | Value based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on June 30, 2017 of $38.75. |
(2) | Options vest as to 25% of the shares subject thereto one year after the vesting commencement date, and then with respect to 1/48th of the shares subject to monthly thereafter see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options”). |
(3) | These TPSU awards, issued under the 2012 Plan, are subject to both continuous service and the satisfaction of applicable performance vesting requirements. The first tranche may vest no sooner than after the first anniversary of the grant date, with |
58
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Stock Option Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Stock Award Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That have not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested ($)(1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested ($)(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | 9/13/2010 | (2) | 34,375 | — | 11.065 | 9/13/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/1/2012 | (2) | 103,924 | 3,998 | 30.230 | 8/1/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/1/2012 | (4) | 206,300 | — | 30.230 | 8/1/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/1/2012 | (3) | 21,585 | 518,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (2) | 55,824 | 71,776 | 60.830 | 9/9/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (3) | 35,850 | 861,476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (5) | 79,700 | 1,915,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 194,384 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (3) | 56,887 | 1,366,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 101,369 | 2,435,897 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 9/10/2012 | (2) | 1,750 | 657 | 29.870 | 9/10/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (6) | 2,750 | 66,083 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (2) | 2,362 | 2,532 | 40.160 | 9/9/2020 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (6) | 2,700 | 64,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (5) | 2,160 | 51,905 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (2) | 3,609 | 4,641 | 60.830 | 9/9/2021 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (6) | 3,300 | 79,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (5) | 3,850 | 92,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 25,577 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/20/2015 | (3) | 30,000 | 720,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (6) | 7,985 | 191,880 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 7,470 | 179,504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 10/21/2014 | (2) | 29,791 | 35,209 | 55.210 | 10/21/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10/21/2014 | (3) | 48,750 | 1,171,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 77,754 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (3) | 22,755 | 546,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 40,548 | 974,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 9/13/2010 | (2) | 38,581 | — | 11.065 | 9/13/2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (2) | 37,499 | 2,501 | 29.870 | 9/10/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (3) | 6,000 | 144,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (2) | 34,375 | 15,625 | 40.160 | 9/9/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (3) | 15,000 | 360,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (5) | 50,000 | 1,201,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (2) | 13,781 | 17,719 | 60.830 | 9/9/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (3) | 11,812 | 283,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (5) | 26,250 | 630,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 77,754 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (3) | 22,755 | 546,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 40,548 | 974,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 9/10/2012 | (6) | 625 | 15,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (6) | 1,750 | 42,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 11,510 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (6) | 3,743 | 89,944 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 1,601 | 38,472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/21/2016 | (2) | — | 89,286 | 36.540 | 3/21/2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 9/10/2012 | (2) | 16,666 | 2,501 | 29.870 | 9/10/2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (3) | 6,000 | 144,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (2) | 14,583 | 10,938 | 40.160 | 9/9/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (3) | 10,500 | 252,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (5) | 35,000 | 841,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (2) | 7,875 | 10,125 | 60.830 | 9/9/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (3) | 6,750 | 162,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (5) | 15,000 | 360,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 45,016 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (3) | 23,475 | 564,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 13,174 | 316,571 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 10/28/2009 | (2) | 10,000 | — | 14.825 | 10/28/2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/6/2011 | (2) | 597,500 | — | 14.810 | 4/6/2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (2) | 37,499 | 2,501 | 29.870 | 9/10/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/10/2012 | (3) | 6,000 | 144,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (2) | 24,062 | 10,938 | 40.160 | 9/9/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (5) | 35,000 | 841,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2013 | (3) | 10,500 | 252,315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (2) | 13,781 | 17,719 | 60.830 | 9/9/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (3) | 11,812 | 283,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2014 | (5) | 26,250 | 630,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (2) | — | 77,754 | 50.100 | 9/9/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (3) | 22,755 | 546,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/9/2015 | (5) | 40,548 | 974,368 |
vesting subject to satisfying specified performance criteria. The remaining tranches of these awards continue to vest annually thereafter, subject to the achievement of performance requirements. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares underlying the award will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The TPSU awards are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Share Units.” |
(4) | The TSR Options granted to our CEO vest three years following their grant date, contingent on continuous service. The performance condition associated with these options was satisfied as of July 23, 2013 (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options—TSR Performance-Vesting Options” in Seagate’s Proxy Statement filed on September 3, 2014). |
(5) | These PSUs were issued under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share Compensation Plan, as amended (the “2004 SCP”) and the 2012 Plan. The PSUs vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of performance criteria. If the minimum performance threshold is not achieved, no PSUs will vest and the PSUs will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The PSUs are described in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units.” |
(6) | RSUs awarded, issued under the 2012 Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. These units vest 25% annually, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the RSUs, refer to the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Restricted Share Units.” |
(7) | PSUs granted on September 9, 2014; |
(8) | TPSUs granted on September 9, 2014; |
(9) | TPSUs granted on September 9, 2015; |
(10) | PSUs granted on September 9, 2015; |
(11) | RSUs granted on September 9, 2013; |
(12) | RSUs granted on September 9, 2014; |
(13) | TPSUs granted on February 20, 2015; |
(14) | RSUs granted on September 9, 2015; |
(15) | PSUs granted on September 9, 2016; |
(16) | TPSUs granted on September 9, 2016; |
(17) | TPSUs granted on October 21, 2014; |
(18) | TPSUs granted on September 9, 2013; |
(19) | TPSUs granted on December 20, 2016; |
(20) | Mr. Brace will depart the Company effective October 2, 2017, and in the interim will remain with the Company in order to assist with the transition of his responsibilities. |
59
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2016
2017
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
| Option Awards
| Stock Awards
| |||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
| Value Realized on Exercise ($)
| Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
| Value Realized on Vesting ($)
| ||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo | — | — | 662,496 | 31,420,366 | — | — | 47,757 | 1,644,549 | |||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 4,359 | 96,539 | 12,521 | 604,345 | — | — | 19,313 | 809,856 | |||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | — | — | 16,250 | 808,763 | — | — | 21,939 | 756,516 | |||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | — | — | 94,863 | 4,485,471 | 38,581 | 1,397,431 | 72,126 | 2,657,417 | |||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | — | — | 2,000 | 99,070 | |||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | — | — | 341,243 | 16,935,135 | |||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 15,000 | 415,155 | 242,936 | 10,409,026 | |||||||||||||||||
James J. Murphy | — | — | — | — |
NonqualifedNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
Name | Executive Contributions in FY2016 ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) | Aggregate Earnings in FY2016 ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance in FY2016 ($)(a) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 90,003 | — | 4,467 | — | 94,470 | |||||||||||
William D. Mosley | — | — | 4,678 | — | 546,324 | |||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 8,179 | — | 148 | — | 13,814 | |||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 197,754 | — | 33,026 | — | 5,066,399 | |||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | — | — | — | — | — |
Name
| Executive Contributions in FY 2017 ($)
| Registrant Contributions in FY 2017 ($)
| Aggregate Earnings in FY 2017 ($)
| Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)
| Aggregate Balance at FY 17 End ($)(a)
| |||||
Stephen J. Luczo | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Philip G. Brace | 240,007 | — | 32,830 | — | 367,307 | |||||
William D. Mosley | — | — | 22,984 | — | 569,307 | |||||
James J. Murphy | 86,252 | — | 2,634 | — | 88,886 |
(a) | The amounts reported as Executive contributions represent compensation already reported in the Summary Compensation Table, with the exception of earnings on contributions, as such earnings are not considered at above-market rates. |
The SDCP is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan allowing participants to defer on apre-tax basis up to 70% of their base salary, 70% of their commissions and up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus, and to select from several mutual fund investment options used to determine notional earnings on the deferred amounts. The deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on our books as an unfunded obligation of the Company, and remain part of our general assets. A grantor (or rabbi) trust was established for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy our obligations and process payments due under the SDCP for plans in effect for the
performance period through December 31, 2014. A successor SDCP was implemented effective January 1, 2015, which is no longer supported by a grantor (rabbi) trust.
Participants may elect to receive distributions upon retirement or termination of employment or at a specified time while still employed. Participants may elect to receive distributions following retirement or termination in a lump sum or in quarterly installments over 3, 5, 10, or 15 years. Participants may elect to receivein-service distributions in a lump sum or annual installments payable over 2, 3, 4 or 5 years. Upon disability, a participant'sparticipant’s account will be distributed in accordance with his or her retirement/termination distribution elections. Additionally, upon death, a participant'sparticipant’s accounts will be paid to his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries in a cashlump-sum payment payable before the later of the end of the calendar year in which the participant dies, and two andone-half months after the participant dies. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee prior to a change in control, the SDCP will be terminated upon the occurrence of a change in control and the aggregate balance credited to and held in a participant'sparticipant’s account shall generally be distributed to him or her in a lump sum not later than the thirtieth day following the change in control.
60
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control
As discussed above under the heading titled "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Change in Control Benefits,"” the Compensation Committee adopted the Severance Plan to provide, among other things, consistent severance benefits to NEOs who are terminated without cause or resign for good reason, in lieu of severance protections that might otherwise have been included in individually negotiated employmentagreements. agreements. In addition to severance, participating NEOs are entitled to receive payment of deferred amounts in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control, as described under the immediately preceding heading titled "Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified“Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans."”
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside of a Change in Control Period
Under the Severance Plan in effect during fiscal year 2016,2017, if an NEO'sNEO’s employment were to have been terminated by the Company without "cause"“cause” (as defined below) or by the NEO for "good reason"“good reason” (as defined below), the NEO would have been entitled to receive a severance payment equal to apre-determined number of months of base salary, based on the NEO'sNEO’s job level. In the event of such an involuntary termination outside of a "change“change in control period"period” (as defined below), the CEO would be entitled to receive 24 months of base salary, the Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents would be entitled to receive 20 months of base salary, and the Senior Vice Presidents would be entitled to receive 16 months of base salary, as well as apro-rata bonus for the year of termination based on the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the fiscal year until the termination date at the most recent accrued performance level, and, if applicable, the prior year bonus (if earned but unpaid at the time of termination). The severance benefits are generally payable within 20 business days following the "payment“payment confirmation date"date” (as defined in the Severance Plan) in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 50% of the severance benefit and (b) $530,000 (for calendar year 2016)2017), with the remaining amount payable twelve months following the date of termination for CEO, Presidents and Executive Vice PresidentPresidents and 6 months and one day following the date of termination for Senior Vice Presidents. The Company would also provide paid outplacement services for a period of 24 months following termination for the CEO, Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents, and a period of 18 months following termination for the Senior Vice Presidents. The receipt of these severance benefits would generally be subject to the NEO'sNEO’s execution of an effective release of claims against the Company and compliance with certainnon-competition,non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants during the applicable severance period.
Under the Severance Plan, "cause"“cause” means (i) an NEO'sNEO’s continued failure to substantially perform the material duties of his or her office, (ii) fraud, embezzlement or theft by an NEO of Company
property, (iii) the conviction of an NEO of, or plea of nolo contendere by the NEO to, a felony, (iv) an NEO'sNEO’s willful malfeasance or willful misconduct in connection with such NEO'sNEO’s duties or any other act or omission which is materially injurious to the financial condition or business reputation of Seagate, or (v) a material breach by an NEO of any of the provisions of (A) the Severance Plan, (B) anynon-compete,non-solicitation or confidentiality provisions to which such NEO is subject, or (C) any company policy or other agreement to which such NEO is subject; and "good reason"“good reason” means an NEO'sNEO’s resignation of his or her employment with the Company as a result of the occurrence of one or more of the following actions without such NEO'sNEO’s express written consent, which action(s) remain uncured for at least 30 days following written notice from such NEO to the Company describing the occurrence of such action(s) and asserting that such action(s) constitute(s) grounds for a good reason resignation, which notice must be provided by the NEO no later than 90 days after the initial existence of such condition; provided, that such resignation occurs no later than 60 days after the expiration of the cure period: (w) any material diminution in the level of the NEO'sNEO’s level or title, authority or duties; (x) a reduction of 10% or more in the level of the base salary or target bonus opportunity, other than a reduction that is equivalent to the reduction in base salaries and/or target bonus opportunities, as applicable, imposed on all other executives of the Company at a similar level; (y) the relocation of the NEO to a principal place of employment that increases
61
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
his or herone-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (z) the failure of any successor to the business of the Company or to substantially all of the assets and/or business of the Company to assume the Company'sCompany’s obligations under the Severance Plan.
If an NEO is involuntarily terminated for any reason outside a change in control period, the Severance Plan does not provide for any accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards. Instead, the terms of any vesting acceleration are governed by the applicable award agreement. Upon termination of an NEO'sNEO’s continuous service for any reason (other than death or disability): (i) the award agreements (including those evidencing the TPSUs) provide that vesting will cease and, where applicable, Seagate will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration, and (ii) the option agreements provide that all unvested options will be cancelled effective as of the termination date, although NEOs, as all other option holders, would have three months to exercise options that are vested as of the date of termination.
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason During a Change in Control Period
The Severance Plan provides for enhanced severance benefits if an NEO is terminated by the Company without cause or resigns for good reason during a "change“change in control period"period”. This period is defined as the period commencing six months prior to the effective date of a "change“change in control"control” (as defined below) and ending 24 months following such date. In the event of an involuntary termination within a change in control period (often called a "double trigger"“double trigger”), the NEO would be entitled to receive the following: (i) 36 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the CEO, 24 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents or 18 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the Senior Vice Presidents, (ii) a lump sum cash payment equal to two times thebefore-tax annual cost of the applicable COBRA premiums for the NEO and his or her eligible dependents, if any, (iii) paid outplacement services for a period of 24 months for the CEO, Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents and 18 months for the Senior Vice Presidents, and (iv) full vesting of all unvested equity-based awards (whether or not awarded prior to or following the adoption of the Severance Plan). All other rights and obligations imposed under the Severance Plan upon such a termination of employment outside of the context of a change in control (as described above) would also be generally applicable in the event of a termination during a change in control period, except that the severance benefits would generally be payable within 20 business days following the "payment“payment confirmation date"date” in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 100% of the severance benefit and (b) $530,000 (for calendar year 2016)2017), with the remainder, if any, payable six months and one day following the termination date.
Under the Severance Plan, "change“change in control"control” or "CIC"“CIC” means the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events: (i) the sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Seagate to a person or group of related persons; (ii) a merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving Seagate in which the voting securities of Seagate owned by the shareholders of Seagate immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction; (iii) any person or group of related persons is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of Seagate; (iv) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of Seagate was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of Seagate then still in office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office; or (v) a dissolution or liquidation of Seagate.
62
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
In addition, under the terms of our equity award agreements with each NEO and consistent with the treatment of equity awards under the Severance Plan, if a change in control (which is generally defined in a similar manner as under the Severance Plan) occurs and the successor company does not assume or replace the awards with alternatives that preserve both the intrinsic value and the rights and benefits of the award immediately prior to the CIC, then all awards accelerate and become fully vested on the later of (i) the closing date of the CIC, or (ii) the date of the "termination event"“termination event” (as defined in the Severance Plan), based on the Company'sCompany’s performance through the closing date of the CIC. The PSU award agreement further provides that the number of shares that will vest on the later of the closing of a CIC and an NEO'sNEO’s involuntary termination within the change in control period will be based on the Company'sCompany’s performance through the closing date of the CIC, with relative TSR performance measured by using the average closing pricesprice over the30-day trading period preceding the CIC. The vesting of the TSR Options and TSR PSUs issued to our CEO will accelerate in full upon the later of a CIC and a qualifying termination of employment.
In the event that the benefits payable following a CIC exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we cap benefits at the safe harbor limit if theafter-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than theafter-tax benefit of the full amount (which would be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code). We do not provide anygross-up for excise taxes and the NEO is responsible for payment of all personal taxes, including excise taxes.
Termination due to Death or Disability
In the event a termination of employment occurs due to an NEO'sNEO’s death or disability, the NEO would not be entitled to any benefits under the Severance Plan. Under the Severance Plan, "disability"“disability” means that the NEO is physically or mentally incapacitated and therefore unable to substantially perform his duties for six consecutive months or an aggregate of nine months in any consecutive24-month period. However, in the event of termination of employment due to an NEO'sNEO’s death or disability, the Compensation Committee has the discretion under the terms of the EOPB to pay to the NEO or the NEO'sNEO’s estate apro-rated target bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs.
The terms of the restricted shareRSUs and performance share awardTPSUs agreements for our NEOs provide that vesting will cease upon a termination due to disability (as defined above), and the Company will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration. However, for a termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service as of the termination date so that an additional 25% of the award will vest immediately.
Tableimmediately for the purposes of Contentsacceleration for RSUs and TPSUs.
Similarly, the option agreements provide that upon termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service for purposes of determining the portion of an option award that will be vested at termination. For our CEO, both the TSR Option agreement and the TSR PSU award agreement provides that the CEO will vestpro-rata in the option or award based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date upon termination due to death or disability. Additionally, the PSU agreements for our NEOs provide that in the event of a termination due to death or disability, the awards will vestpro-rata based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date, based on actual Company performance, and will be settled in ordinary shares after the end of the performance period.
Finally, for those executive officers who participate in the group replacement life insurance plan, the Company will continue to pay its portion of the insurance premiums through the end of the calendar year in which the Executive becomes disabled.
63
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Potential Payments Upon Termination
Severance Benefits Upon Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason outsideOutside a Change in Control Period; Upon Termination Due to Death; Upon Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason within a Change in Control Period
The following table sets forth the estimated value of the potential payments and severance benefits to each NEO assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on July 1, 2016.
Name | Monthly Base Salary ($) | Months of Base Pay (#) | Prior Year Bonus ($)(1) | Outplacement Benefit ($)(2) | Total ($) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | 100,005 | 24 | — | 15,000 | 2,415,120 | |||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 43,751 | 20 | — | 15,000 | 890,020 | |||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 50,001 | 20 | — | 15,000 | 1,015,020 | |||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 50,001 | 20 | — | 15,000 | 1,015,020 | |||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 27,501 | 16 | — | 15,000 | 455,016 | |||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 47,084 | 20 | — | 15,000 | 956,680 | |||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 50,001 | 20 | — | 15,000 | 1,015,020 |
Severance Benefits Upon Termination Due to Death
The following table sets forthJune 30, 2017; the estimated value as of July 1, 2016June 30, 2017 of the potential payments and severance benefits to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO due to death on such date.
Name | Target Bonus ($)(1) | Vesting of Stock Options ($)(2) | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards ($)(3) | Total ($) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo(4) | 1,800,084 | — | 2,962,172 | 4,762,256 | |||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 525,013 | — | 506,120 | 1,031,133 | |||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 750,022 | — | 790,557 | 1,540,579 | |||||||||
William D. Mosley | 750,022 | — | 2,325,629 | 3,075,651 | |||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 247,510 | — | 68,894 | 316,404 | |||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley(4) | 565,011 | — | 1,561,626 | 2,126,637 | |||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 600,018 | — | 1,933,820 | 2,533,838 |
calculated assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to award the bonus at the NEO's target bonus opportunity for that year. However, the EOPB does not obligate the Compensation Committee to pay a bonus at the target bonus level or otherwise in the event of an NEO's death.
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
Severance Benefits Upon Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason within a Change in Control Period
The following table sets forth the estimated value calculated as of July 1, 2016June 30, 2017 of the potential payments to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on such date in connection with a change in control, during a change in control period, as defined in the Severance Plan.
Name
| Type of Benefit
| Involuntary Termination ($)
| Qualifying Termination Following a ($)
| Separation Due to Death ($)
| ||||
Stephen J. Luczo | ||||||||
Severance | 2,400,112 | 3,600,168 | — | |||||
Outplacement Benefit(1) | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | |||||
Bonus | —(2) | 5,400,252 | 1,800,084(3) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options | — | —(4) | —(5) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units | — | —(6) | —(7) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units | — | 9,595,818(8) | 6,272,685(9) | |||||
Health Care Benefit | — | 43,470 | — | |||||
Total | 2,415,112 | 18,654,708(10) | 8,072,769 | |||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | ||||||||
Severance | 875,022 | 1,050,026 | — | |||||
Outplacement Benefit(1) | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | |||||
Bonus | —(2) | 1,050,026 | 525,013(3) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options | — | 395,449(4) | 173,006(5) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units | — | 369,636(6) | 172,282(7) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units | — | 5,701,133 | 2,265,403 | |||||
Health Care Benefit | — | 43,470 | — | |||||
Total | 890,022 | 8,624,740(10) | 3,135,704 |
64
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Name
| Type of Benefit
| Involuntary Termination ($)
| Qualifying Termination Following a ($)
| Separation Due to Death ($)
| ||||
Philip G. Brace | ||||||||
Severance | 1,000,029 | 1,200,035 | — | |||||
Outplacement Benefit(1) | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | |||||
Bonus | —(2) | 1,500,044 | 750,022(3) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options | — | 429,787(4) | 188,030(5) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units | — | —(6) | —(7) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units | — | 8,369,109 | 3,075,636 | |||||
Health Care Benefit | — | 43,470 | — | |||||
Total | 1,015,029 | 11,557,445(10) | 4,013,688 | |||||
William D. Mosley | ||||||||
Severance | 1,333,349 | 1,600,019 | — | |||||
Outplacement Benefit(1) | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | |||||
Bonus | —(2) | 2,000,024 | 1,000,012(3) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options | — | 528,968(4) | 231,423(5) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units | — | —(6) | —(7) | |||||
Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units | — | 9,848,158 | 4,136,311 | |||||
Health Care Benefit | — | 43,470 | — | |||||
Total | 1,348,349 | 14,035,639(10) | 5,367,746 |
65
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Name
| Type of Benefit
| Involuntary Termination ($)
| Qualifying Termination Following a ($)
| Separation Due to Death ($)
| ||||||||||
James J. Murphy | ||||||||||||||
Severance | 958,360 | 1,150,032 | — | |||||||||||
Outplacement Benefit(1) | 15,000 | 15,000 | — | |||||||||||
Bonus | — | (2) | 1,150,032 | 575,016 | (3) | |||||||||
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options | — | — | (4) | — | (5) | |||||||||
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Share Units | — | — | (6) | — | (7) | |||||||||
Accelerated Vesting of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units | — | 3,249,188 | 812,297 | |||||||||||
Health Care Benefit | — | 44,483 | — | |||||||||||
Total | 973,360 | 5,608,735 | (10) | 1,387,313 |
(1) | Represents the estimated amounts payable for outplacement services for thetwo-year period following termination. |
(2) | Represents full-year bonus earned but unpaid at the time of termination. |
(3) | Amounts represent the bonus component of the death benefit assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to exercise its discretion to pay the NEO’s estate a bonus for the fiscal year in which death occurs. In addition, the amount represented has been calculated assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to award the bonus at the NEO’s target bonus opportunity for that year. However, the EOPB does not obligate the Compensation Committee to pay a bonus at the target bonus level or otherwise in the event of an NEO’s death. |
(4) | Amounts represent the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017, or $38.75 per share, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts represented do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price greater than $38.75 or for options that were already vested as of June 30, 2017. |
(5) | Amounts represent the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017, or $38.75 per share, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts represented do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price equal to or greater than $38.75 or for options that were already vested as of June 30, 2017. Under the terms of the TSR Options issued to our CEO, the same number of options would accelerate in the event of disability as in the event of death because the performance condition was satisfied as of July 23, 2013. |
(6) | Amounts represent the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75 per share. |
(7) | Represents amounts for an additional year of service as of the termination date so that an additional 25% of the unvested award will vest immediately. |
(8) | Amounts represent the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75 per share. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle, except for the TSR PSUs issued to our CEO which would accelerate in full because the performance condition had been satisfied as of July 23, 2013. |
66
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
(9) | Amounts represent the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination assuming that the market price per share of Seagate’s ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 30, 2017 or $38.75 per share. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle. In the event of disability, the NEOs would receive the same number of shares under the terms of the PSU award agreements as in the event of death. In addition, under the terms of the TSR PSUs issued to our CEO, the same number of PSUs would accelerate in the event of disability as in the event of death because the performance condition was satisfied as of July 23, 2013. |
(10) | Calculations do not include the impact of any potential cutback pursuant to the application of the Code Section 280G safe harbor limit under the relevant provisions of the Severance Plan. |
67
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Name | Monthly Base Salary ($) | Monthly Target Bonus ($) | Total Monthly Severance Pay ($) | Months of Pay (#) | Total Severance Pay ($) | Total Health Care Benefit ($) | Outplacement Benefit ($)(1) | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options ($)(2) | Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards ($)(3) | Total ($)(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo | 100,005 | 150,007 | 250,012 | 36 | 9,000,432 | 32,843 | 15,000 | — | 7,098,246 | 16,146,521 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David H. Morton, Jr. | 43,751 | 43,751 | 87,502 | 24 | 2,100,048 | 32,843 | 15,000 | — | 1,446,966 | 3,594,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Philip G. Brace | 50,001 | 62,502 | 112,503 | 24 | 2,700,072 | 32,843 | 15,000 | — | 2,692,634 | 5,440,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||
William D. Mosley | 50,001 | 62,502 | 112,503 | 24 | 2,700,072 | 32,843 | 15,000 | — | 4,141,931 | 6,889,846 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson | 27,501 | 20,626 | 48,127 | 18 | 866,286 | 18,924 | 15,000 | — | 185,488 | 1,085,698 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley | 47,084 | 47,084 | 94,169 | 24 | 2,260,032 | 20,399 | 15,000 | — | 2,640,873 | 4,936,304 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Albert A. Pimentel | 50,001 | 50,001 | 100,003 | 24 | 2,400,048 | 32,457 | 15,000 | — | 3,673,346 | 6,121,851 |
options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts shown do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price greater than $24.03 or for options that were already vested as of July 1, 2016.
PROPOSAL 2 – AN ADVISORY,NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE COMPANY'S
COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
–SAY-ON-PAY VOTE
(Ordinary Resolution)
The Board is presenting the following Proposal,proposal, commonly known as a "Say-on-Pay"“Say-on-Pay” proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse, in an advisory,non-binding vote, the compensation of our NEOs, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC. The Board currently intends to hold such votes annually. Accordingly,annually, although it will consider the nextoutcome of the advisory vote on frequency ofSay-on-Pay described in Proposal 3 below in determining the future frequency of such vote will be held at the Company's 2017 Annual General Meeting.vote. You may endorse or not endorse, respectively, the compensation paid to our NEOs by voting for or against the following resolution:
"“RESOLVED, as an ordinary resolution, that, on an advisory,non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in the Company's proxy statementCompany’s Proxy Statement is hereby approved."”
While our Board intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding, and is advisory in nature.
In considering your vote, please be advised that our compensation program for our NEOs is guided by our design principles, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this Proxy Statement:
• | Cash compensation tied to performance. At least half of the cash compensation opportunity for our NEOs is based on Company and individual performance. The cash compensation of our NEOs has fluctuated from year to year, reflecting the Company’s financial results. In addition, we have implemented a cap on annual bonus funding. |
• | Long-term equity incentive compensation tied to performance. In fiscal year 2017, a majority of ourlong-term equity incentive awards were granted in the form ofperformance-based restricted share units, which vest dependent upon the achievement ofpre-established performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share (as described in further detail in this Proxy Statement). |
• | Compensation unrelated to performance is limited. We do not have executive employment agreements, guaranteed incentive awards, “golden parachutes,” single trigger change of control severance provisions, executive pensions or taxgross-ups for our NEOs. |
• | Share Ownership Guidelines. Our share ownership guidelines for our NEOs directly tie executive performance and retained value from our shares to the value returned to our shareholders. |
Vote Required; Recommendation of the cash compensation opportunity for our NEOs is based on Company and individual performance. The cash compensation of our NEOs has fluctuated from year to year, reflecting the Company's financial results. In addition, we have implemented a cap on annual bonus funding.
A simple majority of our long-term equity incentive awards were grantedall votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the form2017 AGM is required to approve Proposal 2.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY,NON-BINDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, THE ACCOMPANYING COMPENSATION TABLES, AND THE RELATED DISCLOSURE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
68
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 3 – AN ADVISORY,NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE VOTE ON COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – FREQUENCY OFSAY-ON-PAY
(Resolution requiring affirmative plurality of performance-based restricted share units, which vest dependent uponvotes cast)
Every six years, in accordance with the achievementrequirements of pre-established performance objectives, including returnSection 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Act), shareholders are entitled to indicate, on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share (as described in further detail in this Proxy Statement).
anon-binding
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the advisory, non-binding approval ofon the compensation of our NEOsNEOs. Shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer such vote occur every one, two or three years or abstain from voting. While the Board intends to consider carefully the results of this vote, the vote is advisory in nature and is not binding on the Company or the Board. The Board believes that anon-binding vote on executive compensation every year is appropriate for the Company and its shareholders based on a number of considerations, including the views of its shareholders. At our 2011 Annual General Meeting, our shareholders indicated that they would preferSay-on-Pay votes to occur annually and we have heldSay-on-Pay votes every year since that time.
The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal 3 is as follows:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders wish the Company to include an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act every:
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board
The affirmative vote of a plurality of all the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve any of the foregoing choices.
The Board advises you to vote for shareholder review of the Company’s executive compensation policies and procedures every year. We believe that an annual review will give shareholders the most effective voice on executive compensation, since shareholders will be able to provide input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussionour Proxy Statement each year. Since our Board reviews, adjusts and Analysis, the accompanyingapproves our executive compensation tables,programs and the related disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.pay practices on an annual basis, it was determined that annual input from our shareholders would be preferable.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR “ONE YEAR” SHAREHOLDER REVIEW OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.
69
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 34 – APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC 2012EQUITY INCENTIVEPUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
(Ordinary Resolution)
We are seeking the approval by our shareholders of the Second Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity IncentiveEmployee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Amended and Restated Plan"“ESP Plan”), which amends and restates in its entirety the 2012Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Prior ESP Plan”) in the following material respects:
Approval byGeneral
The Board is seeking the approval of our shareholders offor an amendment to the AmendedESP Plan that would provide for an additional 10,000,000 ordinary shares to offer for sale to eligible Seagate employees and Restated Plan will also satisfy the requirement to have the material terms of the permissible performance goals under which compensation may be paid that were included under the 2012 Plan for purposesemployees of certain awards intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" for purposes of Section 162(m) ofSeagate’s subsidiaries. The ESP Plan was adopted by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") re-approved by shareholders at least once every five years. Under Section 162(m), the Company may not deduct certain compensation over $1,000,000 in any year to the CEO or any of the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company, other than the Chief Financial Officer, unless, among other things, this compensation qualifies as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m),Compensation Committee on October 24, 2002 and the material terms of the plan for such compensation are approved by shareholders. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms include (1) the employees eligible to receive compensation, (2) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals are based, and (3) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee during a specified period. Each of these aspects is discussed below.
We are not seeking to make any other changes to the terms of the plan document other than certain technical changes.
The Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Original Plan") was approved by our shareholders on October 26, 2011. On October 22, 2014, our shareholders approvedDecember 3, 2002, and became effective December 10, 2002. Currently, a total of 3,750,770 ordinary shares of Seagate are available for issuance. The maximum number of shares that can be issued under the 2012ESP Plan which amended and restatedover the Original Plan. Upon the recommendationlifetime of the Compensation Committee, our Board unanimously approved the Amended and Restated Plan on July 25, 2016, subject to shareholder approval. We are now seeking shareholder approvalplan is 50,000,000. The full text of the Amended and Restated Plan with respect to the amendments described in this Proposal. If the Amended and RestatedESP Plan is approved by shareholders at the 2016 AGM,included as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement as it will become immediately effective as of the date of the 2016 AGM.
Unless and until the Amended and Restated Plan iswould read if this proposal were to be approved by our shareholders we will continue to grant awards under the 2012 Plan using the shares available for issuance thereunder, and no awards may be granted under the 2012 Plan with respect to the additional 7,500,000 shares reserved for issuance under the Amended and Restated Plan. If the Amended and Restated Plan is not approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan will not become effective, the 2012 Plan will continue in effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the 2012 Plan, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations, using the shares available for issuance thereunder. No awards or contingent awards have been or will be granted utilizing the increased share reserve under the Amended and Restated Plan prior to obtaining shareholder approval for the Amended and Restated Plan.
Background of Amendment to Increase Share Reserve
As of September 1, 2016, grants covering approximately 9,491,044 ordinary shares were outstanding under the 2012 Plan, and 33,128,374 ordinary shares were reserved for issuance and available for future awards under the 2012 Plan. As a result of the limited number of shares remaining available for
issuance under the 2012 Plan, and in order to have an appropriate supply of shares available for future equity awards under the 2012 Plan to recruit, hire, and retain the talent necessary to achieve strong performance in the future, the Compensation Committee determined to recommend that the Board approve the Amended and Restated Plan which includes, among other amendments, an increase in the number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan by an additional 7,500,000 shares. Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board unanimously approved the Amended and Restated Plan on July 25, 2016, subject to shareholder approval.
In its determination to recommend that the Board approve the Amended and Restated Plan, the Compensation Committee analyzed various metrics, including burn rate and dilution, and considered information published by Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS"), as well as the proxy voting guidelines of certain institutional advisors. In particular, the Compensation Committee considered:
Summary of the Amended and Restated Plan
The followingchanges. Below is a summary of the material termscertain key provisions of the Amended and RestatedESP Plan, and is not a complete description thereof. The description in this Proposalwhich is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended and RestatedESP Plan. A copy
The Board is recommending the addition of 10,000,000 shares to the total shares available under the ESP Plan to ensure that eligible employees have the opportunity to invest in Seagate shares in order to take part in our future growth potential.
Description of the AmendedESP Plan
Purpose and RestatedGeneral Information about the ESP Plan. We adopted the ESP Plan to provide employees of Seagate and its designated subsidiaries with an opportunity, during specified periods (“Offering Periods”), to purchase ordinary shares through accumulated payroll deductions. The ESP Plan provides eligible employees (including officers and directors who are employees) of Seagate and certain designated subsidiaries with the right to purchase ordinary shares of Seagate at a discount. For U.S. taxpayers, the ESP Plan is attachedintended to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B and you are advisedsatisfy the requirements to reviewreceive the actual termstax advantages allowed under Section 423 of the Amended and Restated Plan.
Purpose
Internal Revenue Code. The purposeESP Plan is not a qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 401(a) of the AmendedInternal Revenue Code, and Restated Plan is not subject to promote our long-term growth and financial success by providing incentives to our employees, directors, and consultants through grants of share-based awards. These awards are intended to tie the Amended and Restated Plan participants' interests directly to shareholder interests and encourage individual and collective behavior that enhances our success. The provisions of the AmendedU.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Eligibility. Employees of Seagate or a designated subsidiary who are employed as of the first day of a given Offering Period to purchase ordinary shares of Seagate (an “Offering Date”) are eligible provided that they have satisfied the minimum employment period established by the Compensation Committee. Currently, an employee must be actively employed on or before the first Friday of the open enrollment period before an Offering Date in order to be eligible to participate in the Offering Period that commences on that Offering Date. In addition, employees are not eligible to participate in the ESP Plan if they would be deemed to own five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of Seagate shares or the shares of any of its subsidiaries (including shares purchased under the ESP Plan or under any other outstanding options) immediately after such employee is granted a right to purchase shares under the ESP Plan.
70
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Directors who are not employees of a participating employer in the ESP Plan, consultants, independent contractors, temporary workers employed by a third party, and Restatedemployees ofnon-designated subsidiaries of Seagate are not eligible to participate in the ESP Plan.
Administration. The ESP Plan which allowis administered by a committee appointed by the Board. Currently, the ESP Plan is being administered by Seagate’s Benefits Administrative Committee (the “Administrative Committee”). The Administrative Committee has full power, in a manner not inconsistent with the ESP Plan, to adopt, amend and rescind any rules for the grantadministration of various types
of equity-based awards, are also intendedthe ESP Plan, to provide greater flexibilityconstrue and interpret the ESP Plan, to maintain our competitive abilityexercise any and all powers allocated to attract, retainthe Board under the ESP Plan, and motivate participantsto make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the benefitadministration of our shareholdersthe ESP Plan. Members of the Administrative Committee receive no additional compensation for their services in connection with the administration of the ESP Plan. Members of the Administrative Committee will serve for such time as the Board may specify and us.may be removed at any time by the Board or the Compensation Committee.
Corporate GovernanceOffering Periods. The ESP Plan will be implemented by a series of Offering Periods during which shares are purchased through payroll deductions (“Purchase Periods”). Each Offering Period is six months and consists of one Purchase Period that runs concurrently with the Offering Period. The last trading day of each Purchase Period is called a “Purchase Date.”
Purchase of Shares. An employee who has satisfied the eligibility criteria will automatically be granted an option to participate in the ESP Plan Design
We have designedon the Amendedfirst Offering Date on which he or she is eligible. Assuming an eligible employee has appropriately completed the applicable paperwork, payroll deductions will commence with the first payroll following the Offering Date and Restated Planwill end on the last payroll paid on or prior to the last Purchase Date of the Offering Period, unless the employee terminated his or her participation earlier in accordance with currently accepted corporate governance standardsthe ESP Plan. Thereafter, on each Offering Date of each Offering Period, participants are granted an option to buy ordinary shares, which will be exercised automatically on each Purchase Date.
Purchase Price. The purchase price for a Purchase Period will generally be equal to 85% of the designlesser of (a) the closing price for our ordinary shares on the Offering Date or (b) the closing price for our ordinary shares on the Purchase Date.
Securities to be Purchased. The securities to be purchased under the ESP Plan are ordinary shares of Seagate. Ordinary shares are issued directly to an ESP Plan participant from Seagate and implementationare registered with the SEC under a special form of registration statement applicable to employee equity incentive programs.benefit plans.
Plan Amendment and Termination. The Amended and RestatedBoard has the power to terminate or amend the ESP Plan isat any time subject to specified restrictions protecting the sole active plan for providing future equity incentives to eligible employees, directors and consultants;rights of participating employees. Upon a termination of the ESP Plan, the Board believes thatmay, in its discretion, (a) return, without interest, the Amendedpayroll deductions credited to the participants’ accounts to such participants, or (b) set an earlier Purchase Date with respect to the Offering Periods and Restated Plan isPurchase Periods then in progress.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
Generally, participants in the best interestESP Plan will recognize income for purposes of our shareholdersU.S. federal income tax in the year in which they make a disposition of the purchased ordinary shares. The U.S. federal income tax liability will depend on whether such disposition is “disqualifying” or “qualifying.” A disqualifying disposition is any sale or other disposition which is made within two years after the Offering Date or within one year after the Purchase Date. A qualifying disposition will occur if the sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares is made after the participant has held the ordinary shares for more than two years after the Offering Date and Seagate, as itmore than one year after the Purchase Date.
71
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Upon a disqualifying disposition, a participant will assist Seagate in attracting and retaining talented employees, linking employee compensation with our performance and maintaining a culture based on employee share ownership.
The Amended and Restated Plan contains a numberrecognize ordinary income equal to the excess of provisions that the Board believes are consistent with the interests of our shareholders and sound corporate governance principles, as follows:
Upon a qualifying disposition, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of: the amount by which the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the date of grant.
Description of the Plan
Eligibility. All of our employees, including our executive officers, all of the members of the Board, and our consultants may participate in the Amended and Restated Plan.
TypesofAwards. The types of awards that will be available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan are as follows:
Share Reserve. Subject to certain adjustments set forth in the plan, the maximum number of ordinary shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2012 Plan, without giving effect to the Amended and Restated Plan increasing the number of shares available for grant thereunder, is 64,549,079, plus any shares remaining available for grant under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share Compensation Plan, as amended (the "2004 SCP") as of the effective date of the 2012 Plan. If the Amended and Restated Plan is approved by our shareholders, the maximum number of our ordinary shares that may be issued pursuant to awards thereunder will be increased by an additional 7,500,000 shares to an aggregate of 72,049,079 shares.
Shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rights granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will be counted against the share reserve as one share for every one share granted. Each share that is subject to a Full-Value Share Award, such as a restricted share bonus or restricted share unit, granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will count against the share reserve as 2.5 shares for every one share granted.
Shares covered by awards that expire, are canceled or otherwise terminated without having been exercised or redeemed, or are settled for cash rather than shares, will again be available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan. Each share that becomes available for the grant of awards in this manner (including awards under the 2004 SCP) will be added back to the aggregate share reserve under the Amended and Restated Plan as one share if such share was subject to an option or share appreciation right, and according to the applicable ratio described above if such share was subject to a Full-Value Share Award.
However, the following shares will not be added back to the share reserve under the Amended and Restated Plan: (i) shares tendered by the participant or withheld by the Company (if and to the extent permitted by applicable law) to satisfy (A) the exercise price of a share option or share appreciation right and/or (B) tax withholding obligations with respect to an award; (ii) shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the option exercise price; or (iii) shares not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding share option or share appreciation right.
No employee will be eligible to be granted awards under the Amended and Restated Plan covering more than 10 million ordinary shares during any fiscal year or options and/or share appreciation rights covering more than 8 million ordinary shares during any fiscal year.
Adjustments by the Board. In the event of a corporate transaction such as a merger, consolidation, reorganizations, recapitalization, reincorporation, share split, spinoff, share dividend, extraordinary dividend, liquidating dividend, combination or exchange of shares, changes in corporate structure or other transaction in which we do not receive any consideration, the Board will adjust the class, kind and maximum number of shares subject to the plan, the share limits on grants to a participant, and the number of shares and, if applicable, the exercise price of outstanding awards.
Administration of the Plan. The Board has the authority to, and intends to, delegate administration of the Amended and Restated Plan to the Compensation Committee, except that the Board will retain the authority to make grants of equity-based awards to our non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee, or the Board if the delegation of authority to the Compensation Committee is terminated or limited in the future, has the authority to, among other things:
Options. The Amended and Restated Plan provides that share options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to 100% ofamount by which the fair market value of ourthe ordinary shares on the dateOffering Date exceeds the optiondiscounted Offering Price (that amount is granted. To the extent permitted in his or her option agreement, an option holder may exercise an option by payment of the exercise price (1) in cash, (2) according to a deferred payment or similar arrangement, (3) pursuant to a "same day sale" program, (4) by the surrender of shares already owned by the option holder or (5) by a combination approved by the Board. In the event of the option holder's termination, the option holder will generally have up to three months (up to one year if the termination is due to disability and one year for the beneficiary if due to death) from termination to exercise his or her vested options.
Restricted Share Bonuses and Performance Share Bonuses. Restricted share bonuses and performance share bonuses are grants of ordinary shares not requiring the payment of any monetary consideration, but subject to restrictions, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Generally, unless the participant's award agreement provides otherwise, the participant may not sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of the shares issued in the participant's name at the time of grant until those conditions are met. The vesting of restricted share bonus awards will generally be based on the participant's continuous service; the vesting of performance share bonus awards will be based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In the event a participant's continuous service terminates or a participant fails to meet performance criteria, all unvested shares as of the date of termination will be reacquired by us at no cost to us.
Share Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee may grant share appreciation rights independently of or in connection with an option grant. The base price per share of a share appreciation right shall be at least 100% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant. Generally, each share appreciation right will entitle a participant upon redemption to an amount equal to (a) the excess of (1) the fair market value on the redemption date of one ordinary share over (2) the base price, times (b) the number of ordinary shares covered by the share appreciation right
being redeemed. To the extent a share appreciation right is granted concurrently with an option grant, the redemption of the share appreciation right will proportionately reduce the number of ordinary shares subject to the concurrently granted option. Payment shall be made in shares or in cash, or a combination of both, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Phantom Share Units. A phantom share unit is the right to receive the value of one ordinary share, redeemable upon terms and conditions set by the Compensation Committee. Distributions upon redemption of phantom share units may be in shares valued at fair market value on the date of redemption or in cash, or a combination of both, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units. The Compensation Committee may also award restricted share units or performance share units, both of which entitle the participant to receive the value of one ordinary share per unit at the time the unit vests, with delivery of such value (distributed in shares or in cash) on a date chosen by the participant to the extent permitted by law. For restricted share units, vesting will generally be based on the participant's continuous service; for performance share units, vesting will be based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In the event a participant's continuous service terminates or a participant fails to meet performance criteria, all unvested shares as of the date of termination will be forfeited.
Deferred Share Units. Participants who are not non-employee directors may receive deferred share units by electing to defer receipt of restricted share unit awards and performance share unit awards in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and the terms of our deferred compensation plan.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. The Compensation Committee may determine that, subject to complying with Section 409A of the Code and the rules of the Amended and Restated Plan, amounts equal to the dividends that would have been received on the number of shares subject to a Full-Value Share Award if they had been issued shares, shall be paid on the shares subject to such Full-Value Share Award in cash, shares or other property as determined by the Compensation Committee. If the award is a performance-based award, the dividend equivalent rights will be subject to the same performance conditions of the award and the participant shall not be entitled to such dividend equivalent rights unless the performance conditions of the underlying award have been met. The Compensation Committee may also provide that such dividend equivalent rights shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares or otherwise reinvested and may provide that such dividend equivalent rights are subject to the same vesting as the underlying award.
Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Under Section 162(m). The Amended and Restated Plan permits the Compensation Committee to specify that an award or a portion of an award is intended to satisfy the requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code, provided that the performance criteria for such award or portion of an award that is intended by the Compensation Committee to satisfy the requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code will be a measure based on one or more of the performance criteria described below, as selected by the Compensation Committee and specified at the time the award is granted. However, nothing in the Amended and Restated Plan would require that awards granted under it be designated to satisfy the requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for "qualified performance-based compensation," and the Compensation Committee may in its discretion grant or amend awards that may not be deductible by us.
The Amended and Restated Plan permits the Compensation Committee to grant Full-Value Share Awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements of "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m), the grant, vesting or retention of which must be based on any one or more of the performance criteria set forth below. The Compensation Committee may also base the grant, vesting or retention of such awards on derivations of such performance criteria, either individually,
alternatively or in any combination, applied to either Seagate as a whole or to a business unit or subsidiary, and measured either annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years' results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Compensation Committee. The performance criteria to be utilized under the Amended and Restated Plan consist of one or more of the following:
Notwithstanding satisfaction of any performance goals, the number of shares issued under or the amount paid under an award may, to the extent specified in the award agreement, be reduced by the Compensation Committee on the basis of such further considerations as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion shall determine.
In addition, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Plan, the Compensation Committee may determine to adjust any of the performance criteria intended to satisfy the requirements of "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) as follows:
Without giving effect to the Amended and Restated Plan, the permitted adjustments to the performance criteria under the 2012 Plan are generally the same as described above, except with respect to exclusions for the effects of unusual or nonrecurring items as determined under U.S. GAAP, which was newly added pursuant to the Amended and Restated Plan to replace exclusions for the effects of any "extraordinary items" as determined under U.S. GAAP, which FASB eliminated as a permitted exclusion and would correspondingly be read out of the 2012 Plan.
Forfeiture and Recoupment Provisions. The Compensation Committee may specify in an award agreement that a participant's rights, payments and/or benefits with respect to a share award will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain events, including termination for cause, violation of applicable company policies, breach of an agreement between the participant and the company or any other conduct by the participant that is detrimental to our business interests or reputation. All share awards (including vested share awards) will be subject to the terms and conditions, if applicable, of any recoupment policy adopted by the Company from time to time or any recoupment requirement imposed under applicable laws.
Transferability. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee or provided for in a written agreement evidencing an award, awards granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will not be transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
Change of Control. In the event of a "change of control" (as defined in the Amended and Restated Plan, other than a dissolution or liquidation), the Board may provide for the (1) assumption or continuation of any share awards outstanding under the Plan, (2) issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve the terms of any awards, (3) cash payment in exchange for the cancellation of an award or (4) termination of an award upon the consummation of the change of control, but only if the participant has been permitted to exercise or redeem an option or share appreciation right prior to the change of control. Furthermore, at any time the Board may provide for the acceleration of exercisability and/or vesting of an award. In the event of the dissolution of the Company, all outstanding awards will terminate immediately prior to dissolution.
No Repricing without Shareholder Approval. The Amended and Restated Plan prohibits the Board from repricing options or share appreciation rights, or cashing out any such awards other than in connection with a change of control as described above, without first obtaining the approval of our shareholders.
Amendment or Termination. The Board may amend, suspend, or terminate the Amended and Restated Plan in any respect at any time, subject to shareholder approval, if such approval is required by applicable law of stock exchange rules. However, no amendment to the Amended and Restated Plan may materially impair any of the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.
Term. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the Amended and Restated Plan will expire on October 19, 2026. No awards will be granted under the Amended and Restated Plan after that date.
Share Price. On September 1, 2016 the closing price of our ordinary shares on NASDAQ was $33.71 per share.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
We believe that, based on the laws as in effect on the date of this proxy statement, the following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences to participants and to us of options and other awards granted under the Amended and Restated Plan. This summary is not a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences relevant to participants and to us and does not describe tax consequences based on particular circumstances. The laws governing the tax consequences of these awards are highly technical and such laws are subject to change. State, local, and foreign tax laws are not discussed.
Share Options. When a nonstatutory share option is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the option holder or us. When a nonstatutory share option is exercised, in general, the option holder recognizes compensation equal to the excesstypically 15% of the fair market value of the underlyingordinary shares on the Offering Date). Seagate is not entitled to an income tax deduction with respect to such disposition. Any additional gain recognized upon the qualifying disposition will be capital gain. Under current law, the capital gain will be long-term because the ordinary shares were held for more than one year after the Purchase Date. In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate on long-term capital gains is 15%.
Generally, if the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the date of exercise overa qualifying disposition is less than the exercise price. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the option holder for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year in which the option holder recognized the compensation.
When an incentive stock option is granted, there are no income tax consequencespurchase price paid for the option holder or us. When an incentive stock option is exercised,ordinary shares, the option holder doesparticipant will not recognize ordinary income, and we do not receiveany loss recognized will be a deduction. The option holder, however, must treatlong-term capital loss. However, if the loss arises in connection with a disqualifying disposition, the participant may still recognize as ordinary income, and be taxed on, the excess of (a) the fair market value of the underlying ordinary shares on the date of exercisePurchase Date over (b) the optionpurchase price as an item of adjustment for purposes of the alternative minimum tax.
If the option holder disposes of the underlying shares after the option holder has held the shares for at least two years after the incentive stock option was granted and one year after the incentive stock option was exercised, the amount the option holder receives upon the disposition over the exercise price is treated as long-term capital gainpaid for the option holder. We are not entitledordinary shares.
New Plan Benefits
Future issuances of shares under the ESP Plan to a deduction. Ifour employees and the option holder makes a "disqualifying disposition" of the underlying shares by disposing of the shares before they have been held for at least two years after the date the incentive stock option was granted and one year after the date the incentive stock option was exercised, the option holder recognizes compensation income equal to the excess of (1) the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date the incentive option was exercised or, if less, the amount received on the disposition over (2) the exercise price. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the option holder for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year in which the option holder recognized the compensation.
Share Appreciation Rights and Phantom Share Units. When a share appreciation right or phantom share unit is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. When a phantom share unit vests, generally the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or shares received, with the shares valued at fair market value as of the date of receipt. When a share appreciation right is redeemed, the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received upon redemption. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.
Share Units and Restricted Share Awards. Generally, when a share unit (whetherbenefits such employees will receive as a restricted share unit or performance share unit) or a restricted share (whether as a restricted share bonus or performance share bonus) is granted, thereresult are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. Upon the payment to the participant of shares in respect of share units or the lapse of restrictions on restricted share awards, the participant generally recognizes compensation equal to the fair market value of the shares as of the date of delivery or release. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. When a dividend equivalent right is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. When a dividend equivalent right is paid, the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.
Section 162(m) of the Code. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to our CEO and the three most highly paid executive officers other than our CEO and our CFO (collectively, the "covered employees") in a particular year is limited to $1 million per person, except that compensation that constitutes "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) will be excluded for purposes of calculating the amount of compensation subject to this $1 million limitation. Our ability to deduct compensation paid to any executive officer or employee who is not a covered employee is not affected by this provision.
If approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan will permit the Compensation Committee to grant awards which will qualify as "qualified performance-based compensation." Even if approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan allows the Compensation Committee to make awards that would not be performance-based for purposes of the exemption from the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code, and nothing precludes the Compensation Committee from making any payments or granting any awards that do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Section 280G of the Code. Awards that are granted, accelerated or enhanced upon the occurrence of a change in control may give rise, in whole or in part, to excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code to the extent that such payments, when aggregated with other
payments subject to Section 280G of the Code, exceed the limitations contained in that provision. Such excess parachute payments are not deductible by us and are subject to an excise tax of 20% payable by the recipient.
Section 409A of the Code. Certain awards under the Amended and Restated Plan may be considered "non-qualified deferred compensation" for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, which imposes additional requirements on the payment of deferred compensation. Generally, if at any time during a taxable year a non-qualified deferred compensation plan fails to meet the requirements of Section 409A, or is not operated in accordance with those requirements, all amounts deferred under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the current taxable year and all preceding taxable years, by or for any participant with respect to whom the failure relates, are includible in the gross income of the participant for the taxable year to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in gross income. If a deferred amount is required to be included in income under Section 409A, the amount also is subject to an additional income tax equal to 20% of the compensation required to be included in gross income, plus interest.
New Plan Benefits
The number of awards that our employees, officers and consultants may receive under the Amended and Restated Plan is in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and therefore, is not determinable at this time. As described above, pursuant to our director compensation program:
By way of background, please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and related compensation tables for a discussion of our executive compensation philosophy and for information regarding equity awards to our NEOs in fiscal year 2016. In addition, the table below sets forth the estimated awards of all types to be made under the Amended and Restated Plan during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.benefits.
Except with respect to the annual grants to our non-employee directors, awards under the Amended and Restated Plan are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has not made any determination with respect to future grants to any individuals under the Amended and Restated Plan as of the date of this proxy statement. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the future benefits that will be received by participants, except for the annual non-employee director grants.
New Plan BenefitsUnder Amended and Restated Planin 2016 Fiscal Year
Name | Dollar Value ($) | Number of Shares/Units Covered by Awards | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo, | (1) | (1) | |||||
Chairman and CEO | |||||||
David H. Morton, Jr., | (1) | (1) | |||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
Philip G. Brace, | (1) | (1) | |||||
President, Cloud Systems and Solutions | |||||||
William D. Mosley, | (1) | (1) | |||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | |||||||
Regan J. MacPherson, | (1) | (1) | |||||
Senior Vice President and General Counsel | |||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley, | (1) | (1) | |||||
Executive Vice President | |||||||
Albert A. Pimentel, | (1) | (1) | |||||
Executive Vice President | |||||||
All Current Executive Officers as a Group | (1) | (1) | |||||
All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group | $ | 2,500,000 | (2) | (1) | |||
All Employees Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group | (1) | (1) |
Grants under the 2012 Plan
As of September 1, 2016, awards covering 20,335,561 shares of the Company's ordinary shares had been granted under the 2012 Plan (including awards granted under the Original Plan) since the inception of the Original Plan on October 27, 2011 (which, applying the formula pursuant to which each Full-Value Share Award counts as 2.1 or 2.5 shares for each one share granted as RSUs or PSUs, representsThrough August 3, 2017 we have issued a total of 37,237,635 ordinaryapproximately 46,249,230 shares grantedto employee participants under the 2012 Plan asESP Plan.
Vote Required; Recommendation of such date). The following table shows information regarding the grants of such awards among the persons and groups identified below.
Table of ContentsBoard
Awards Granted under the Original Plan and 2012 PlanSince Inception Through September 1, 2016
Name and Position | Number of Shares Underlying Option Grants | Number of Shares Underlying PSUs/ RSUs Grants | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen J. Luczo, | 720,144 | 936,057 | |||||
Chairman and CEO | |||||||
David H. Morton, Jr., | 52,427 | 76,661 | |||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
Philip G. Brace, | 142,754 | 128,303 | |||||
President, Cloud Systems and Solutions | |||||||
William D. Mosley | 199,254 | 272,103 | |||||
President and Chief Operating Officer | |||||||
Regan J. MacPherson, | 100,796 | 11,344 | |||||
Senior Vice President and General Counsel | |||||||
Patrick J. O'Malley, | 138,016 | 203,449 | |||||
Executive Vice President | |||||||
Albert A. Pimentel, | 184,254 | 248,103 | |||||
Executive Vice President | |||||||
All Current Executive Officers as a Group | 1,597,237 | 1,943,394 | |||||
All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group | — | 290,386 | |||||
Each Nominee for Election as a Director: | |||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | — | 39,322 | |||||
Michael R. Cannon | — | 39,322 | |||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | — | 25,461 | |||||
William T. Coleman | — | 27,655 | |||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | — | 27,655 | |||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | — | 5,182 | |||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | — | 39,322 | |||||
Stephanie Tilenius | — | 9,417 | |||||
Edward J. Zander | — | 39,322 |
As required under Irish law, the resolution in respect of Proposal 3 is an ordinary resolution that requires the affirmative vote of aA simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the votes cast.Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve Proposal 4.
The Board of Directors recommendsbelieves that you vote "FOR"it is in the approval of the Amended and Restated Plan.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information concerning the Company's equity compensation plans as of July 1, 2016.
Equity compensation plans | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | 5,414,002 | (1) | $ | 34.91 | (2) | 40,477,486 | (3) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | — | — | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | 5,414,002 | $ | 34.91 | 40,477,486 |
PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL OF THE RULES OF THE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLICLIMITED COMPANY 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR SHARE AWARDS GRANTED TOPARTICIPANTS IN FRANCE(Ordinary Resolution)
We are seeking the approval by our shareholders of the Rules of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan For Share Awards Granted To Participants In France (the "French Sub-Plan"). The French Sub-Plan operates under the 2012 Plan (or, if approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan).
As required under applicable French law, we are asking our shareholders to approve the French Sub-Plan for purposes of qualification in France under the French "law on growth, activity, and equality of economic chances" (as adopted on July 10, 2015, the "Macron Law"), so that equity grants that are made under the French Sub-Plan to individuals who are subject to taxation under French law may qualify as "free grants of shares" under French tax law, if so designated by the Compensation Committee (such grants, including, but not limited to, certain grants previously approved by the Compensation Committee and described in this proxy statement, are referred to as "Free Share Grants"). Any such Free Share Grants will be satisfied from the existing share reserve of the 2012 Plan (or, if approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan) and will have terms consistent with the existing terms of the 2012 Plan (or, if approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan).
The Company or its subsidiaries employ individuals who are subject to taxation under French law. Due to the recent enactment of the Macron Law, certain equity compensation awards granted under the French Sub-Plan may qualify as Free Share Grants, assuming that shareholders approve the French Sub-Plan. Such shareholder approval would allow these grants to qualify as Free Share Grants, thereby resulting in lower income taxation and social taxes for the individuals and lower social taxes for the Company.
In the event that the French Sub-Plan is not approved by shareholders, the Company may still grant equity awards to employeesbest interests of the Company orand its subsidiaries who are subjectshareholders to taxation under French law; however,continue to provide employees with the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in that event, it is possible that such grants would not benefit from the provisions of the Macron Law relating to Free Share Grants.
Only individuals who, on the grant date, are resident for tax purposes in France and/or subject to the French social security contributions regime and either are employed by the French subsidiary of the Company or are a managing director of such a subsidiary are eligible to participatethrough their participation in the French Sub-Plan. Subject to shareholder approval, we expect to make grants of Free Share Grants to certainESP Plan and thereby more closely align their interests with those of our Frenchshareholders and to provide employees as well as those we may hire over time.with a valuable retention incentive.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN.
A Free Share Grant will generally vest 50% after two years and then 25% over the next two years conditioned upon continued employment. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of the death of a participant.
72
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
The shares held by a French participant pursuant to a Free Share Grant may not be sold by the participant during certain closed periods described in the French Sub-Plan.
On July 25, 2016, the Board adopted, subject to shareholder approval, the French Sub-Plan described above. The above summary of the French Sub-Plan, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the French Sub-Plan, which is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement.
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the approval of the French Sub-Plan.
PROPOSAL 5 – ANON-BINDING RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND BINDING AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET AUDITORS'AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION
(Ordinary Resolution)
At the 20162017 AGM, shareholders will be asked to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017,29, 2018, and to authorize the Audit Committee of our Board to set the independent auditors'auditors’ remuneration. Ernst & Young LLP has been acting as our independent auditorsauditor for many years and, both by virtue of its long familiarity with the Company'sCompany’s affairs and its ability, is considered best qualified to perform this important function.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the 20162017 AGM and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.
TheVote Required; Recommendation of the Board recommends a vote "FOR"
A simple majority of all votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the proposalRecord Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM is required to approve the appointment of ErnstProposal 5.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YoungYOUNG LLP as independent auditors of the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board to set the auditors' remuneration.AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY AND TO AUTHORIZE THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD TO SET THE AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION.
73
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Audit Committee Report
Our management is responsible for preparing and presenting our financial statements, and our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are responsible for performing an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and for auditing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year. One of the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s responsibilities is to monitor and oversee these processes. In connection with the preparation of the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016,June 30, 2017, the Audit Committee performed the following tasks:
(1) | reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2017 with management and with Ernst & Young LLP; |
(2) | reviewed and discussed with management its assessment and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, which it made based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO Criteria); |
(3) | reviewed and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, which report was included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017; |
(4) | discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by the PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with Audit Committees (AS16)”, including Ernst & Young LLP’s judgment about the quality, in addition to the acceptability, of our accounting principles and underlying estimates in our financial statements; and |
(5) | received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence. |
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended, and the Board approved, that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016,June 30, 2017, for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully submitted, THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | ||
Dr. Chong Sup Park, Chair Mark W. Adams
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo |
74
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Fees Paid to Independent Auditors
The aggregate fees paid or accrued by us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016 and July 3, 2015 are set forth below.
| Fiscal Year | Fiscal Year
| |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | 2017
| 2016
| |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 5,586 | $ | 6,170 | $5,542 | $5,586 | |||||||||
Audit-Related Fees | 502 | 331 | 231 | 502 | |||||||||||
Tax Fees | 90 | 46 | 103 | 90 | |||||||||||
All Other Fees | 3 | 18 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,181 | $ | 6,565 | $5,881 | $6,181 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
|
Audit Fees. This category consists of professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of our unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements, and audit services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. The fees for fiscal year 2017 included services in connection with our debt offering, and in fiscal year 2016 included audit activities related to the acquisition of Dot Hill and in fiscal year 2015 included audit activities related to the acquisition of LSI's flash business and services in connection with our debt offerings.Systems Corp.
Audit-RelatedAudit-Related Fees. This category consists of assurance and related services provided by Ernst & Young LLP that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and which are not reported above under "Audit Fees"“Audit Fees”. For fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, this category includes: pension plan and grant or similar audits, agreed upon procedures, engagements, and advisement on accounting matters that arose during those years in connection with the preparation of our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statementsstatements; and in 2016, fees related to due diligence procedures.
Tax Fees. This category consists primarily of professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP primarily for tax compliance for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015.2016.
All Other Fees. This category consists of fees for the use of Ernst & Young LLP'sLLP’s online accounting research tool for fiscal years 20162017 and 20152016 and iXBRL tagging services performed for fiscal year 2015.2017.
In fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, all audit, audit related, tax and all other fees werepre-approved by the Audit Committee. Under the SEC rules, subject to certain permitted de minimis criteria,pre-approval is required for all professional services rendered by the Company'sCompany’s principal accountant. We are in compliance with these SEC rules. In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2017,2018, the Audit Committee considered whether the services provided to us by Ernst & Young LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP from us. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of these services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining that independence.
75
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Pre-Approval of Services by Independent Auditors
The Audit Committeepre-approves all audit and other permittednon-audit services provided to us by our independent auditors. These services may include audit services,audit-related services, tax services and other permissiblenon-audit services. The Audit Committee may alsopre-approve particular services on acase-by-case basis. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to grantpre-approvals to the Audit Committee Chair when the full Audit Committee is unable to do so. Thesepre-approvals are reviewed by the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. Our independent auditors and senior management periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSALS NO. 6A AND 6B – VOTE TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S: (A) ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION TO MAKE CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS; AND (B) MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION TO MAKE CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS(Special Resolutions)
Background
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Proposal 6A sets out certain proposed amendments to our Articles of Association, and Proposal 6B sets out certain proposed amendments to our Memorandum of Association. Under Irish law, any amendment to a public company's Articles of Association must be voted on separately from any amendment to a public company's Memorandum of Association. For that reason, we are asking shareholders to separately vote on Proposals 6A and 6B; however, given the inextricable link between Proposals 6A and 6B, each proposal is subject to the other being approved by shareholders, and as a result, both proposals will fail if either proposal does not pass.
Proposal 6A: Proposed Amendments to the Company's Articles of Association.
Set out below is background information on the proposed amendments to our Articles of Association. The description of the following proposed amendments is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the proposed amendments, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix D. We urge you to read Appendix D in its entirety before casting your vote.
Amendments in Connection with Recent Changes in Irish Law
On June 1, 2015, the Companies Act 2014 (the "Act") took effect in Ireland. The purpose of the Act is to consolidate and modernize company law in Ireland. Although the changes to Irish company law will not impact our day-to-day operations, we must make some administrative updates to our Articles of Association to ensure that they are not impacted or affected by the introduction of this new law. We do not believe that any of the updates to our Articles of Association proposed to be made in connection with the Act will materially change the rights of our shareholders.
As an example, the Act will automatically apply certain sections of the Act to Seagate unless we explicitly opt out of those sections. Given many of these sections either address matters that are already covered by our existing Articles of Association or are not applicable to us, we are proposing to amend our Articles of Association to explicitly opt out of certain provisions, as permitted by the Act. For example, the Act includes a provision regarding the appointment of directors, which is already covered by existing provisions in our Articles of Association and we therefore recommend opting out of that provision.
Attached as Appendix E to this proxy statement is a table that sets out a summary of the optional provisions from which we propose to opt out and a summary of the optional provision from which we propose not to opt out, as well as certain other administrative amendments that we propose to make to our Articles of Association to address the adoption of the Act.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to Proposal 6A is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes cast. In addition, Proposal 6A is subject to Proposal 6B being adopted. Therefore, unless shareholders approve Proposal 6B, Proposal 6A will fail.
THE TEXT OF THE RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 6A IS AS FOLLOWS:
"RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that, subject to and conditional upon Proposal 6B being passed, the Articles of Association be and are hereby amended and restated in the manner and form set forth in Appendix D of this proxy statement."
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the amendment of the Company's Articles of Association set forth in this Proposal 6A.
Proposal 6B: Proposed Amendments to the Company's Memorandum of Association.
Set out below is background information on the proposed amendments to our Memorandum of Association. The description of the following proposed amendments is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference of the complete text of the proposed amendments, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix D. We urge you to read Appendix D in its entirety before casting your vote.
As described above, on June 1, 2015, the Act took effect in Ireland. In addition to the proposed amendments described above to our Articles of Association to accommodate the adoption of the Act, we must also make certain corresponding administrative amendments to our Memorandum of Association to account for the adoption of the Act. We do not believe that any of the updates to our Memorandum of Association proposed to be made in connection with the Act will materially change the rights of our shareholders. The proposed amendments to our Memorandum of Association are each specifically described in the text of the resolution below, as required under Irish law.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to Proposal 6B is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes cast. In addition, Proposal 6B is subject to Proposal 6A being adopted. Therefore, unless shareholders approve Proposal 6A, Proposal 6B will fail.
THE TEXT OF THE RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 6B IS AS FOLLOWS:
"RESOLVED, as a special resolution that, subject to and conditional upon Proposal 6A being passed, the following amendments, as shown in Appendix D, be made to the Memorandum of Association:
"The Company is a public limited company deemed to be a PLC to which Part 17 of the Companies Act 2014 applies.";
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the amendment of the Company's Memorandum of Association set forth in this Proposal 6B.
PROPOSALS 7A AND 7B – VOTE TO AMEND THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION TO: (A) PROVIDE FOR A PLURALITY VOTING STANDARD IN THE EVENT OF A CONTESTED DIRECTOR ELECTION; AND (B) GRANT THE BOARD SOLE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE ITS SIZE(Special Resolutions)
Background
Proposal 7A sets out proposed amendments to our Articles of Association to provide for a plurality voting standard in the context of a contested director election (i.e., a director election in which the number of director nominees exceeds the number of directorships set by the Board). Proposal 7B sets out proposed amendments to our Articles of Association to provide the Board the sole authority to set its size. Under Irish law, unless the Board is granted sole authority to set its size, the plurality voting standard would not achieve its desired results. For example, unless the Board is granted sole authority to set its size, all director nominees who receive a simple majority of votes cast will be elected to the Board, which could result in a significant increase in Board size if both the Company's director nominees and the challenging director nominees are elected. In contrast, in the United States, under a plurality voting standard, only those directors who receive the most votes for the available seats are elected. Given the link between Proposals 7A and 7B, each proposal is subject to the other being approved by shareholders, and as a result, both proposals will fail if either proposal does not pass.
The description of the following proposed amendments is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the proposed amendments, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix F. We urge you to read Appendix F in its entirety before casting your vote.
Proposal 7A: Plurality Voting in a Contested Election
Today, Seagate has a majority voting standard for both uncontested and contested director elections. However, in the context of contested director elections, we believe that a plurality voting standard is more appropriate for a number of reasons, including to avoid the risk of a failed election (i.e., where no director nominees or an insufficient number of director nominees receive a majority vote).
In the United States, under a plurality voting standard, the director nominees receiving the highest number of votes for the available seats are elected as directors (regardless of whether the director nominees receive a majority of the votes cast in their election). In the United States, proxy advisory firms generally support this view as well and best practice calls for a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections, and a plurality voting standard in contested director elections. In recent years, as corporate governance practices have evolved, there has been a shift in the United States to director elections based on a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections and the plurality standard in contested director elections.
In light of the Board's continual review of governance standards, the Board recommends that shareholders approve an amendment to our Articles of Association to provide for a plurality voting standard solely in the case of a contested director election. If adopted, this amendment would provide that where the number of director nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, only those directors receiving the most votes for the available seats would be elected. The Board believes it is in the best interests of our shareholders to adopt the plurality voting standard in the case of contested director elections, while maintaining the Company's majority voting standard in the case of uncontested elections. Accordingly, Proposal 7A seeks shareholder approval to amend our Articles of Association to provide for plurality voting in a contested director election.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to Proposal 7A is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes cast. In addition, Proposal 7A
is subject to Proposal 7B being adopted. Therefore, unless shareholders approve Proposal 7B, Proposal 7A will fail.
THE TEXT OF THE RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 7A IS AS FOLLOWS:
"RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that, subject to and conditional upon Proposal 7B being passed, the Articles of Association be and are hereby amended in the manner provided in Appendix E of this proxy statement."
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the amendment of the Company's Articles of Association set forth in this Proposal 7A to provide for plurality voting in the event of a contested election.
Proposal 7B: Setting the Size of the Board
Our Board is also proposing to amend our Articles of Association to provide that the size of the Board be set solely by resolution of the Board. This amendment is necessary in order for the plurality voting mechanism described above to function effectively in Ireland. As discussed above, unless the Board is granted sole authority to set its size, all director nominees (including the Company's director nominees) who receive a simple majority of votes cast are elected to the Board, even if those nominees receive fewer votes than the director nominees that otherwise fill the available seats. Accordingly, in order for plurality (as described under Proposal 7A above) to operate effectively, the Board must have sole authority to set its size and a plurality voting standard must be applied in the context of contested elections.
As with plurality voting in contested elections, granting the Board sole authority to set its size is a common governance practice in the United States. Accordingly, Proposal 7B seeks shareholder approval to amend our Articles of Association to grant the Board sole authority to set its size within the parameters established in our Articles of Association.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to Proposal 7B is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes cast. In addition, Proposal 7B is subject to Proposal 7A being adopted. Therefore, unless shareholders approve Proposal 7A, Proposal 7B will fail.
THE TEXT OF THE RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 7B IS AS FOLLOWS:
"RESOLVED, as a special resolution that, subject to and conditional upon Proposal 7A being passed, the Articles of Association be and are hereby amended in the manner provided in Appendix E of this proxy statement."
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the amendment of the Company's Articles of Association set forth in this Proposal 7B to grant the Board sole authority to determine its size.
PROPOSAL 86 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND/OR ISSUE SHARES
(Ordinary Resolution)
Under Irish law, directors of an Irish company must have authority from its shareholders to allot and/or issue any of its authorized but unissued share capital. Because our current authority will expire on JanuaryJuly 1, 2017,2018, we are presenting this Proposal 86 to renew the Board'sBoard’s authority to allot and/or issue our authorized shares on the terms set forth below.
We are seeking approval to authorize our Board, effective upon expiration of our existing authority noted above, to issue up to 33%, or 66% pursuant to a fullypre-emptive rights issue, of our issued ordinary share capital as of the latest practicable date before this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, for a period expiring 18 months from JanuaryJuly 1, 2017,2018, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked.
Granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. This authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares, including in connection with our equity compensation plans (where required) and, if applicable, funding acquisitions and raising capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital or to approve a specific issuance of shares. Instead, approval of this proposalProposal 6 will only grant the Board the authority to issue shares that are already authorized under our articlesArticles of Association upon the terms below. In addition, we note that, because we are a NASDAQ Global Select Market ("NASDAQ"(“NASDAQ”) listed company, our shareholders continue to benefit from the protections afforded to them under the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ and SEC, including those rules that limit our ability to issue shares in specified circumstances. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law only and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely place us on par with NASDAQ-listed companies incorporated in the United States.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to Proposal 8 is an ordinary resolution that requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast.
The text of this resolution is as follows:
"“RESOLVED, as an ordinary resolution, that the directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorized pursuant tosub-section (1) of Section 1021 of the Companies Act 2014 with effect from the passing of this resolution to exercise all powers of the Company to allot and/or issue relevant securities (within the meaning of section 1021(12)sub-section (12) of Section 1021 of the Companies Act 2014) up to an aggregate nominal amount of $990.36 (99,035,911$949.81 (94,981,463 shares) (being equivalent to approximately 33% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of September 1, 2016August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement)Proxy Statement)), and pursuant to a fullypre-emptive rights issue, up to an aggregate of $1,980.72 (being$1,899.63 (189,962,927 shares being equivalent to approximately 66% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of September 1, 2016August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement)Proxy Statement)), and the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot relevant securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired."”
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal 6 is an ordinary resolution that requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” GRANTING THE BOARD AUTHORITY TO ALLOT AND/OR ISSUE SHARES.
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" granting the Board authority to issue shares.
77
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 97 – GRANT BOARD AUTHORITY TOOPT-OUT OF STATUTORYPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS
(Special Resolution)
Under Irish law, unless otherwise authorized, when an Irish company issues shares for cash, it is required first to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to existing shareholders of the company on apro-rata basis (commonly referred to as the statutorypre-emption right). Because our current authority will expire on JanuaryJuly 1, 2017,2018, we are presenting this Proposal 97 to renew the Board'sBoard’s authority toopt-out of thepre-emption right on the terms set forth below. Our directors may issue shares for cash in pursuance of any offer or agreement under our current authority until its expiry.
We are seeking shareholder approval to authorize our Board, upon expiration of our existing authority, toopt-out of the statutorypre-emption rights provision in the event of (1) the allotment of shares for cash in connection with any rights issue, and (2) the allotment of shares for cash, if the allotment is limited to up to 10% of our issued ordinary share capital as of September 1, 2016August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement)Proxy Statement), provided that any amount above 5% is to be used for the purposes of an acquisition or a specified capital investment and, provided further that, in each case, such authorities commence as of JanuaryJuly 1, 20172018 and be limited to a period expiring 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked.
Granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. Similar to the authorization sought for Proposal 8,6, this authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares under our equity compensation plans (where required) and if applicable, will facilitate our ability to fund acquisitions and otherwise raise capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital. Instead, approval of this Proposal 7 will only grant the Board the authority to issue shares in the manner already permitted under our articles upon the terms below. Without this authorization, in each case where we issue shares for cash, we would first have to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to all of our existing shareholders. This requirement could undermine the operation of our compensation plans and cause delays in the completion of acquisitions and capital raising for our business. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely help us compete with other NASDAQ-listed companies.
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.
"“RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that, subject to the passing of the resolution with respect to Proposal 96 as set out above and with effect as of JanuaryJuly 1, 2017,2018, the directors be and are hereby empowered pursuant to section 1023(3)Section 1023 of the Companies Act 2014 to allot equity securities (as defined in sectionSection 1023 of that Act) for cash, pursuant to the authority conferred by Proposal 86 as if sub-section (1) of sectionSection 1022 did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall be limited to:
a) | the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue in favor of the holders of ordinary shares (including rights to subscribe for, or convert into, ordinary shares) where the equity securities respectively attributable to the interests of such holders are proportional (as nearly as may be) to the respective numbers of ordinary shares held by them (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem necessary or expedient to deal with fractional entitlements that would otherwise arise, or with legal or practical problems under the laws of, or the requirements of any recognized regulatory body or any stock exchange in, any territory, or otherwise); and |
b) | the allotment (otherwise than pursuant tosub-paragraph (a) above) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal value of $287.82 (28,782,262 shares) (being equivalent to |
78
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
approximately 10% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy statement)) provided that any such issuance above 5% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 16, 2017 (the latest practicable date before this Proxy Statement) is to be used for the purposes of an acquisition or a specified capital investment; |
and, in each case, the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless otherwise renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired."”
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" grantingVote Required; Recommendation of the Board authority
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to opt-outthis Proposal 7 is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of statutory pre-emption rights.at least 75% of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2017 AGM.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” GRANTING THE BOARD AUTHORITY TOOPT-OUT OF STATUTORYPRE-EMPTION RIGHTS.
79
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
PROPOSAL 108 – DETERMINE THE PRICE RANGE AT WHICH THE COMPANY
CANRE-ALLOT SHARES HELD AS TREASURY SHARES
(Special Resolution)
Ouropen-market share repurchases and other share buyback activities, all effected by way of redemptions in accordance with our Articles of Association, may result in ordinary shares being acquired and held by the Company as treasury shares. We mayre-allot treasury shares that we may acquire through our various share buyback activities including in connection with our executive and director compensation programs.
Under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we mayre-allot any shares held in treasury. In this Proposal 8, that price range is expressed as a minimum and maximum percentage of the closing market price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted. Under Irish law, this authorization must expire no later than 18 months after its passing unless renewed.
"“RESOLVED, as a special resolution, that for purposes of Section 1078 of the Companies Act 2014, there-allotment price at which any treasury shares (as defined by Section 106(1) of the Companies Act of 2014) held by the Company may be re-allotted off-marketre-allottedoff-market shall be as follows:
(a) The maximum price at which a treasury share may be re-allotted off-marketre-allottedoff-market shall be an amount equal to 120% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted by Seagate.
(b) The minimum price at which a treasury share may bere-allotted shall be the nominal value of the share where such a share is required to satisfy an obligation under an employees'employees’ share scheme (as defined under Section 64(1) of the Companies Act 2014) or any share incentive plan operated by Seagate or, in all other cases, an amount equal to 90% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share isre-allotted by Seagate.
(c) There-allotment price range as determined by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall expire eighteen18 months from the date of the passing of this resolution, unless previously varied, revoked or renewed in accordance with the provisions of Section 109 and/or Section 1078 (as applicable) of the Companies Act 2014 (an/(and/or any corresponding provision of any amended or replacement legislation) and is without prejudice or limitation to any other authority of the Company tore-allot treasury shareson-market."”
TheVote Required; Recommendation of the Board
As required under Irish law, the resolution with respect to this Proposal 8 is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of not less thanat least 75% of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares on the Record Date represented in person or by proxy at the 2016 AGM is necessary to approve Proposal 10 regarding2017 AGM.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO DETERMINE THE PRICE AT WHICH THE COMPANY CANRE-ALLOT SHARES HELD AS TREASURY SHARES.
80
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information concerning the price range at which Seagate may re-allot any treasury shares in off-market transactions.Company’s equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2017.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to determine the price at which the Company can re-allot shares held as treasury shares.
Equity compensation plans | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | 5,665,250(1) | $39.24(2) | 31,589,031(3) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | 5,665,250 | $39.24 | 31,589,031 |
(1) | This number includes 39,766 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under our Seagate Technology plc 2001 Share Option Plan (the “SOP”), 99,238 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under the 2004 SCP, 5,084,652 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of shares options granted under the 2012 Plan, and 441,594 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of shares options granted under the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. |
(2) | This value is calculated based on the exercise price of options outstanding under the SOP, the 2004 SCP and the 2012 Plan. |
(3) | This number includes 30,761,435 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the 2012 Plan, 827,596 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the Dot Hill 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. |
81
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS
Any proposal by a shareholder intended to be included in our proxy statementProxy Statement for the 20172018 AGM must be received by the Company at its registered office at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland, Attn: Company Secretary, no later than May 3, 2017.2, 2018. Any such proposal must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC, includingRule 14a-8, to be eligible for inclusion in our 2017 proxy statement.2018 Proxy Statement.
The Company'sCompany’s Articles of Association set forth procedures to be followed by shareholders who wish to nominate candidates for election to the Board in connection with annual general meetings of shareholders or who wish to bring other business before a shareholders'shareholders’ general meeting. All such nominations must be accompanied by certain background and other information specified in the Articles of Association. A shareholder wishing to nominate a director for the 20172018 AGM must provide written notice to the Company Secretary of their intention to make such nomination no earlier than April 3, 20172, 2018 and no later than May 3, 2017,2, 2018, that is by a date not less than 120 nor more than 150 days before the dateanniversary of the proxy statementmailing of the Proxy Statement for our prior year'syear’s annual general meeting.meeting and if such date occurs on a public holiday or a weekend, the next business day following such date. If the date of the 20172018 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20162017 AGM, then the written notice must be provided to the Company Secretary earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of the 20172018 AGM and not later than the later of the 120th day prior to the date of the 20172018 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.
Unless a shareholder who wishes to bring business before the 20172018 AGM outside the processes ofRule 14a-8 (other than a nomination as outlined above, and subject to applicable rules) provides written notice of such business received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, no later than July 17, 2017,16, 2018, the Company designatedCompany-designated proxy holders will have discretionary authority to vote on any such proposal at the 20172018 AGM with respect to all proxies submitted to us, even when we do not include in our proxy statementProxy Statement advice on the nature of the matter and how the Company designatedCompany-designated proxy holders intend to exercise their discretion to vote on the matter. If the date of the 20172018 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 20162017 AGM, then such notice must be received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, not later than the later of the 75th day prior to the date of the 20172018 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The notice must include a description of the proposed item and the reasons the proposing Shareholdershareholder believes its position concerning the item. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in our 2017 proxy statement.2018 Proxy Statement.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all shareholder recommendations for candidates for Board membership, which should be sent to that Committee, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above. In addition to considering candidates recommended by shareholders, the Committee considers potential candidates recommended by current directors, Seagate officers, employees and others. As stated in the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all candidates for Board membership are selected based upon their professional experience, recognized achievement in his or her respective field, willingness to make the commitment of time and effort required, good judgment, strength of character, reputation for integrity and personal and professional ethics, and an independent mind. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.
Irish law provides that any shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 50% of thepaid-up share capital of the Company carrying voting rights may convene an extraordinary general meeting of the Company. Irish law provides any shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 10% of thepaid-up share capital of the
82
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
Company carrying voting rights may requisition the directors to call an extraordinary general meeting at any time. The shareholders who wish to requisition an extraordinary
general meeting must deposit a written notice at Seagate'sSeagate’s registered office, which is signed by the shareholders requisitioning the meeting and states the objects of the meeting. If the directors do not within 21 days of the date of deposit of the requisition proceed to convene a meeting to be held within two months of that date, those shareholders (or any of them representing more than half of the total voting rights of all of them) may themselves convene a meeting but any meeting so convened cannot be held after the expiration of three months from the date of deposit of the requisition. These provisions of Irish law are in addition to, and separate from, the requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the proxy statementProxy Statement under the rules of the SEC.
If a shareholder wishes to communicate with the Board for any other reason, all such communications should be sent in writing, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above.
IRISH COMPANIES ACT 2014DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS
New Irish company legislation, the Act, came into force on June 1, 2015. We have conducted a review to determine what changes should be made to our constitutional documents following the commencement of the Act. This review led to the conclusion that we should make certain administrative amendments to our Articles of Association and Memorandum of Association, as discussed in more detail in Proposals 6A and 6B in this proxy statement.
Persons holding an interest in our shares should be aware of a change to the previous law with respect to the notification of interests. Under the Irish Companies Act 2014, persons must notify us if, as a result of a transaction, they will become interested in 3% or more of our shares or, if as a result of a transaction, the person who was interested in 3% or more of our shares ceases to be so interested. Where a person is interested in 3% or more of our shares, that person must notify us of any alteration in his or her interest that brings his or her total interest through the nearest whole percentage, whether an increase or a reduction. The relevant percentage figure is calculated by reference to the aggregate nominal value of our issued share capital (or any such class of share capital in issue). Where the percentage level of that person'sperson’s interest does not amount to a whole percentage, this figure may be rounded down to the next whole number. We must be notified within five business days of the transaction or alteration of the person'sperson’s interests that gave rise to the notification requirement. If a person fails to comply with these notification requirements, the person'sperson’s interest with respect to any of our ordinary shares that it holds will not be enforceable, either directly or indirectly. However, such person may apply to the Irish High Court to have the rights attaching to such shares reinstated.
To the extent that this Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled "Report“Report of the Compensation Committee"Committee” and "Report“Report of the Audit Committee"Committee” (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in that other filing.
Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement and is not deemed incorporated by reference hereunder for any purpose.
A copy of our Annual Report onForm 10-K (excluding exhibits) and our Irish Statutory Accounts, both for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016,June 30, 2017, accompany this Proxy Statement. A printed copy of either document, including exhibits, will be furnished without charge to beneficial shareholders or shareholders of record upon request to Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014, or upon calling 1+ +1(408) 658-1222.
SEC rules permit a single set of annual reports and proxy statements to be sent to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each shareholder
83
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure is referred to as householding.“householding.” While the Company does not household in mailings to its shareholders of record, a number of brokerage firms with account holders who are Company shareholders have instituted householding. In these cases, a single proxy statementProxy Statement and annual reportAnnual Report will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once a shareholder has received notice from his or her broker that the broker will be householding communications to the shareholder'sshareholder’s address, householding will continue until the shareholder is notified otherwise or until the shareholder revokes his or her consent. If at any time a shareholder no longer wishes to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, he or she should notify his or her broker. Any shareholder can receive a copy of the Company's proxy statementCompany’s Proxy Statement and annual reportAnnual Report by contacting the Company at Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014. Shareholders who hold their shares through a broker or other nominee who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statementProxy Statement and annual reportAnnual Report at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.
By Order of the Board, | ||
![]() | Katherine E. Schuelke Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and CompanySecretary |
August 30, 2017
September 9, 2016
84
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT |
APPENDIX A: DIRECTORS’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2017
APPENDIX B: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Seagate Technology plc | ||||
Directors’ Report and Financial Statements | ||||
For the Year Ended |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLCDIRECTORS'
DIRECTORS’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1 JULY 2016
30 June 2017
Company Information | A-3 | |||
| A-4 | |||
Independent | ||||
Consolidated Profit and Loss Account | ||||
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet | ||||
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | ||||
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | ||||
Parent Company Statement of Comprehensive Income | ||||
Parent Company Statement of Financial Position | ||||
Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity | ||||
Notes to the Parent Company |
COMPANY INFORMATION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1 JULY 2016
30 June 2017
DIRECTORS | ||||
Mark W. Adams (United States) | ||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. (United States) | ||||
Michael R. Cannon (United States) | ||||
Mei-Wei Cheng (United States) | ||||
William Coleman (United States) | ||||
Jay L. Geldmacher (United States) | ||||
Stephen J. Luczo (United States) | ||||
Dr. | ||||
Willam D. Mosley (United States) | ||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo (United States) | ||||
Stephanie Tilenius (United States) | ||||
Edward J. Zander (United States) | ||||
SECRETARY | Katherine E. Schuelke | |||
REGISTERED OFFICE | 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, | |||
Dublin 2, Ireland. | ||||
REGISTERED NUMBER OF INCORPORATION | 480010 | |||
SOLICITORS | Arthur Cox, | |||
Ten Earlsfort Terrace, | ||||
Dublin 2 | ||||
D02 T380. | ||||
AUDITORS | Ernst & Young, | |||
Chartered Accountants, | ||||
Ernst & Young Building, | ||||
Harcourt Centre, | ||||
Harcourt Street, | ||||
Dublin 2. |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLCDIRECTORS'
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1 JULY 2016
30 June 2017
The directors present herewith their report and audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 1 July 2016.30 June 2017.
In this Directors'Directors’ Report, unless the context indicates otherwise, as used herein, the terms "we," "us," "Seagate,"“we,” “us,” “Seagate,” the "Company"“Company” and "our"“our” refer to the Seagate Group.
REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
We are a leading provider of electronic data storage technology and solutions. Our principal products are hard disk drives, commonly referred to as disk drives, hard drives or HDDs. In addition to HDDs, we produce a broad range of electronic data storage products including solid state drives (“SSD”) and their related controllers, solid state hybrid drives ("SSHD"(“SSHD”), solid state drives ("SSD"), PCIe cards and SATA controllers. Our storage technology portfolio also includes storage subsystems, and high performance computing ("HPC") solutions.subsystems.
Hard disk drives are devices that store digitally encoded data on rapidly rotating disks with magnetic surfaces. Disk drives continue to be the primary medium of mass data storage due to their performance attributes, high quality and cost effectiveness. Complementing existing data center storage architecture, solid-state storage devices use integrated circuit assemblies as memory to store data, and most SSDs use NAND-based flash memory. In addition to HDDs and SSDs, SSHDs combine the features of SSDs and HDDs in the same unit, containing a large hard disk drive and an SSD cache to improve performance of frequently accessed data.
Our products are designed for mission critical and nearline applications in enterprise servers and storage systems; client compute applications, where our products are designed primarily for desktop and mobile computing; and clientnon-compute applications, where our products are designed for a wide variety of end user devices such as digital video recorders ("DVRs"), personal data backup systems, portable external storage systems, surveillance systems, network-attached storage (“NAS”), digital mediavideo recorders (“DVRs”) and gaming consoles.
Our cloud systems and surveillance systems.
Our Cloud Systems and Solutions builds on the Seagate legacy tosolutions extend innovation from the device into the information infrastructure, onsite and in the cloud. Our approach to data management supports HPC, open source and software-defined solutions. Our portfolio includes HPC storage solutions, modular original equipment manufacturers ("OEM"manufacturer (“OEM”) storage systems andscale-out storage systems.servers.
Industry Overview
Electronic Data Storage Industry
The electronic data storage industry is comprised of companies that manufacture components or subcomponents designed for electronic data storage devices and companies that provide storage solutions, software and services for enterprise cloud, big data and computing platforms.
Markets
The principal markets served by the electronic data storage industry are:
Enterprise Storage.We define enterprise storage as dedicated storage area networks and hyperscale cloud storage environments. Enterprise data centers run solutions which are designed for mission critical performance and nearline high capacity applications.
Mission critical applications are defined as those that are vital to the operation of large-scale enterprise work loads,workloads, requiring high performance and high reliability storage solutions. We expect the
market for mission
critical enterprise storage solutions to continue to be driven by enterprises utilizing dedicated storage area networks. Our storage solutions are comprised principally of high performance enterprise class disk drives with sophisticated firmware and communications technologies.
Nearline applications are defined as those which require high capacity and energy efficient storage solutions. We expect such applications, which include storage for cloud computing, content delivery and backup services, will continue to grow and drive demand for solutions designed with these attributes. With the increased requirements for storage driven by the creation and consumption of media-rich digital content, we expect the increased exabyte demand will require furtherbuild-out of data centers by cloud service providers and other enterprises which utilize high capacity nearline devices.
Enterprise SASserial attached SCSI (“SAS”) SSDs are designed to deliver superior performance, reliability and enterprise features to meet the demands ofI/O-intensive applications, with potential for substantial power savings. PCIe acceleratorNon-Volatile Memory Express (“NVMe”) SSDs andadd-in cards are designed to optimize enterprise applications with a persistent, high-performance, high-capacity memory design. Accelerated flashThey also targetsleverage flash and software to accelerate any server virtualized deployment and moves any big data to the realm of real time. From industry solutions perspective, PCIe cards are changing the storage architecture in many industries including the financial sector, government, telecommunications and media and entertainment.
Client Compute.We define client compute applications as solutions designed for desktop and mobile compute applications ranging from traditional laptops, tablets and convertible systems. We believe that the demand resulting from the proliferation of digital content will continue to maintain demand for the client compute market. As the storage of digital content in the cloud becomes more prominent and accessible, some client compute applications rely less onbuilt-in storage, which is supplemented by cloud computing solutions and branded external hard drives.
Client Client Non-Compute. We define clientnon-compute applications as solutions designed for consumer electronic devices and disk drives used for external storage and network attached storage ("NAS").storage. Disk drives designed for consumer electronic devices are primarily used in applications such as DVRssurveillance systems, NAS and surveillance systemsDVRs that require a higher capacity, lowcost-per-gigabyte storage solution. Disk drives for external storage and NAS devices areis designed for purposes such as personal data backup and portable external storage, and to augment storage capacity in the consumer'sconsumer’s current desktop, notebook, tablet or DVR devices. We believe the proliferation and personal creation of media-rich digital content will continue to create increasing consumer demand for higher capacity storage solutions.
Cloud Systems and Solutions. We define cloud systems and solutions as applications that provide cloud based solutions to businesses for the purpose of HPC, scale-out storage solutions and modular systems. Systems can contain HDDs and SSDs and can offer file management systems, software, and even compute power.
Participants in the electronic data storage industry include:
Major subcomponent manufacturers.Companies that manufacture components or subcomponents used in electronic data storage devices or solutions include companies that supply spindle motors, heads and media, application specific integrated circuits ("ASICs"(“ASICs”).
Hardware storage solutions manufacturers. Companies that transform components into storage products include disk drive manufacturers and semiconductor storage manufacturers which include integrating flash memory into storage products such as SSDs.
System integrators. Companies, such as OEMs, that bundle and package storage solutions into client compute, clientnon-compute or enterprise applications as well as enterprise storage solutions. Distributors that integrate storage hardware and software intoend-user applications and Cloud Service
Providers ("CSP"(“CSP”) that provide cloud based solutions to businesses for the purpose of HPC, scale-out storage solutions and modular systems that are also included in this category.
Storage services. Companies that provide and host services and solutions, which include storage, backup, archiving, recovery and discovery of electronic data.
Hyperscale Data Centers.
Demand for Electronic Data Storage
The continued advancement of the cloud, the proliferation of a variety of mobile devices globally, development of the Internet of Things ("IoT"(“IoT”), increasingly pervasive use of video surveillance, evolution of consumer electronic devices, and enterprise use of big data analytics are driving the growth of digital content. Factors contributing to thisthe growth of digital content include:
As a result of these factors, the nature and volume of content being created requires greater storage, which is more efficiently and economically facilitated by higher capacity storage devices in order to store, manage, distribute, analyze and backup such content. We expect this to support the growth in demand for electronic data storage solutions in developed and emerging economies well into the future.
The amount of data created as well as where and how data is stored continues to evolve with the proliferation of mobile devices, the growth of cloud computing, and the evolving IoT. In addition, the economics of storage infrastructure are also evolving with the utilization of public and private hyper-scale storage and open-source solutions reducing the total cost of ownership of storage while increasing the speed and efficiency with which customers can leverage massive computing and storage devices. Accordingly, we expect these trends will continue to create significant demand for electronic data storage solutions going forward.
Demand Trends for Disk Drives
We believe that continued growth in digital content requires increasingly higher storage capacity in order to store, aggregate, host, distribute, analyze, manage, backup and use such content. We also believe that as architectures evolve to serve the growing commercial and consumer user base
throughout the world, the manner in which hard drives are delivered to market and utilized by our customers will evolve as well.
We believe that in the foreseeable future the traditional enterprise and client compute markets that require high capacityhigh-capacity storage solutions, and the data intensive clientnon-compute markets will continue to be best served by hard disk drives due to the industry'sindustry’s ability to deliver the most cost effective, reliable and energy efficient mass storage devices.devices although the advance of solid state technology in the above markets is expected to increase as well. Furthermore, the increased use of clientnon-compute devices that both consume media-rich digital content streamed from the cloud and create rich digital content that is stored in the cloud, increases the demand for high capacity hard disk drives in enterprise Nearlinenearline applications.
We also believe that as hard disk drive capacities continue to increase, unit demand does not reflect the increase in Exabytesexabytes demand. In recent years, this trend has resulted in demand for fewer units, but with higher average capacity per drive.
Industry Supply Balance
From time to time the HDD industry has experienced periods of imbalance between supply and demand. To the extent that the disk drive industry builds or maintains capacity based on expectations of demand that do not materialize, price erosion may become more pronounced. Conversely, during periods where demand exceeds supply, price erosion is generally muted.
Our Business
Disk Drive Technology
The design and manufacturing of disk drives depends on highly advanced technology and manufacturing techniques and therefore requires high levels of research and development spending and capital equipment investments. We design, fabricate and assemble a number of the most important components found in our disk drives, including read/write heads and recording media. Our design and manufacturing operations are based on technology platforms that are used to produce various disk drive products that serve multiple data storage applications and markets. Our core technology platforms are focused around the areal density of media and read/write head technologies. Using an integrated platform design and manufacturing leverage approach allows us to deliver a portfolio of disk drive products to service a wide range of electronic data storage applications and industries.
Disk drives that we manufacture are commonly differentiated by the following key characteristics:
Areal density is a measure ofmeasured by storage capacity per square inch on the recording surface of a disk. The storage capacity of a disk drive is determined by the number of disks it contains as well as the areal density capability of these disks. We have been pursuing, and will continue to pursue, a number of technologies to increase areal densities across the entire range of our products for expanding disk drive capacities and reducing the number of disks and heads per drive to further reduce product costs.
Manufacturing
We design and produce our own read/write heads and recording media, which are critical technologies for disk drives. This integrated approach enables us to lower costs and to improve the functionality of components so that they work together efficiently.
We believe that because of our vertical design and manufacturing strategy, we are well suited to take advantage of the opportunities to leverage the close interdependence of components for disk drives. Our manufacturing efficiency and flexibility are critical elements of our integrated business strategy. We continuously seek to improve our manufacturing efficiency and reduce manufacturing cost by:
A vertically integrated model, however, tends to have less flexibility when demand moderates as it exposes us to higher unit costs as capacity utilization is not optimized.
Components and Raw Materials
Disk drives incorporate certain components, including a head disk assembly and a printed circuit board mounted to the head disk assembly, which are sealed inside a rigid base and top cover containing the recording components in a contamination controlled environment. We maintain a highly integrated approach to our business by designing and manufacturing a significant portion of the components we view as critical to our products, such as recording heads and media.
Read/Write Heads.The function of the read/write head is to scan across the disk as it spins, magnetically recording or reading information. The tolerances of recording heads are extremely demanding and requirestate-of-the-art equipment and processes. Our read/write heads are manufactured with thin-film and photolithographic processes similar to those used to produce semiconductor integrated circuits, though challenges in magnetic film properties and topographical structures are unique to the disk drive industry. We perform all primary stages of design and manufacture of read/write heads at our facilities. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced read/write heads, the mix of which varies based on product mix, technology and our internal capacity levels.
Media.Information is written to the media, or disk, as it rotates at very high speeds past the read/write head. The media is made fromnon-magnetic material, usually aluminum alloy or glass, and is coated with thin layers of magnetic materials. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced finished media and aluminum substrates, the mix of which varies based on product
mix, technology and our internal capacity levels. We purchase all of our glass substrates from third parties.
Printed Circuit Board Assemblies.The printed circuit board assemblies ("PCBAs"(“PCBAs”) are comprised of standard and custom ASICs and ancillary electronic control chips. The ASICs control the movement of data to and from the read/write heads and through the internal controller and interface, which communicates with the host computer. The ASICs and control chips form electronic circuitry that delivers instructions to a head
positioning mechanism called an actuator to guide the heads to the selected track of a disk where the data is recorded or retrieved. Disk drive manufacturers use one or more industry standard interfaces such as serial advanced technology architecture ("SATA"(“SATA”); small computer system interface ("SCSI"(“SCSI”); serial attached SCSI ("SAS");SAS; or Fibre Channel ("FC"(“FC”) to communicate to the host systems. We outsource to third parties the manufacture and assembly of the PCBAs used in our disk drives. We do not manufacture any ASICs, but we participate in their proprietary design.
Head Disk Assembly.The head disk assembly consists of one or more disks attached to a spindle assembly powered by a spindle motor that rotates the disks at a high constant speed around a hub. Read/write heads, mounted on an arm assembly, similar in concept to that of a record player, fly extremely close to each disk surface and record data on and retrieve it from concentric tracks in the magnetic layers of the rotating disks. The read/write heads are mounted vertically on anE-shaped assembly ("E-block"(“E-block”) that is actuated by a voice-coil motor to allow the heads to move from track to track. TheE-block and the recording media are mounted inside the head disk assembly. We purchase spindle motors from outside vendors and from time to time participate in the design of the motors that go into our products. We use a combination of internally manufactured and externally sourced head disk assemblies.
Disk Drive Assembly.Following the completion of the head disk assembly, it is mated to the PCBA, and the completed unit goes through extensive defect mapping and testing prior to packaging and shipment. Disk drive assembly and test operations occur primarily at facilities located in China and Thailand. We perform subassembly and component manufacturing operations at our facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore, Thailand and in the United States. In addition, third parties manufacture and assemble components and disk drive assemblies for us in various countries worldwide.
Suppliers of Components and Industry Constraints.There are a limited number of independent suppliers of components, such as recording heads and media, available to disk drive manufacturers. Vertically integrated disk drive manufacturers, who manufacture their own components, are less dependent on external component suppliers than less vertically integrated disk drive manufacturers.
Commodity and Other Manufacturing Costs.The production of disk drives requires rare earth elements, precious metals, scarce alloys and industrial commodities, which are subject to fluctuations in prices and the supply of which has at times been constrained. In addition to increased costs of components and commodities, volatility in fuel costs may also increase our costs related to commodities, manufacturing and freight. As a result, we may increase our use of ocean shipments to help offset any increase in freight costs.
Products
We offer a broad range of storage solutions for the enterprise, data center, client compute and clientnon-compute applications. We offer more than one product within each product category and differentiate products on the basis of price, performance, form factor, capacity, interface, power consumption efficiency, security features, and other customer integration requirements. Our industry is characterized by continuous and significant advances in technology which contribute to rapid product life cycles. We list our main current product offerings below.
Enterprise Storage
Enterprise Performance HDDs.Our 10,000 and 15,000 RPM Enterprise Performance disk drives feature increased throughput and improved energy efficiency, targeted at high random performance server application needs. Performance 10,000 RPM HDDs ship in storage capacities ranging from 300GB to 1.8TB,2.4TB, and our 15,000 RPM HDDs ship in storage capacities ranging from 146GB to 600GB.900GB.
Enterprise Capacity and Archive HDDs.Our Enterprise Capacity disk drives ship in2.5-inch and3.5-inch form factors and in storage capacities of up to 10TB12TB that mainly rotate at a speed of 7,200 RPM speeds.RPM. These products
are designed for bulk data storage and server environments that require high capacity, enterprise reliability, energy efficiency, integrated security, and SATA and SAS interfaces. Our Archive HDDs provide up to 8TB oflow-cost storage designed specifically for active archive storage environments in cloud data centers where very low cost and power are paramount.
Enterprise SSDs. Available Our SAS SSD are available in capacities up to 3.8TB the SSD featuresand feature 12GB per second SAS, and deliversinterface to deliver the speed and consistency needed for demanding enterprise storage and server applications. We also offer a wide range of NVMe and SATA interface SSDs andadd-in cards in our Nytro family of accelerator cards with capacities up to 4TB.7.7TB.
Client Compute
Desktop HDDs and SSHDs. Our3.5-inch Our 3.5-inch desktop drives ship in both traditional HDD and SSHD configurations and offer up to 8TB10TB of capacity. Desktop drives are designed for applications such as personal computers and workstations.
Mobile HDDs and SSHDs. Our family of2.5-inch laptop drives ship in a variety of form factors (5mm to 9.5mm drive height), capacities (up to 4TB)5TB) and technologies (HDD and SSHD) to support mobile needs. Used in applications ranging from traditional laptops, convertible systems and external storage, our drives are built to address a range of performance needs and sizes for affordable, high capacity storage.
ClientNon-Compute
Video HDDs. Our Video HDDs are used in video applications like DVR's and media centers. These disk drives are optimized for video streaming in always-on applications with capacities up to 4TB to support leading-edge digital entertainment.
Surveillance HDDs. Our surveillance drives are built to support the high-write workload of analways-on, always-recording video surveillance system. These surveillance optimized drives are built to support the growing needs of the surveillance market with support for multiple hard drive ("HD"(“HD”) streams and capacities up to 10TB.
NAS HDDs. Our NAS drives are built to support the performance and reliability demanded by small and medium businesses, and incorporate interface software with custom-built error recovery controls, power settings, and vibration tolerance. Our NAS HDD solutions are available in capacities up to 10TB.
Video HDDs. Our Video HDDs are used in video applications like DVR’s and media centers. These disk drives are optimized for video streaming inalways-on applications with capacities up to 4TB to support leading-edge digital entertainment.
Gaming HDDs. Gaming HDDs are specifically optimized for console gaming usage. These products are designed to enhance gaming experience during game-load and game-play and are available in capacities up to 2TB.
Branded Solutions. Our external backup storage solutions are shipped under the Backup Plus and Expansion product lines, as well as under the Maxtor and LaCie brand names. These product lines are available in capacities up to 48TB, respectively. Our Seagate and LaCie Wireless drives provide tablet and smartphone users with additional storage for media content, with capacities up to 2TB. Our NAS and Personal Cloud solutions provide centralized network storage in capacities up to 32TB and secure, anywhere file access for users on-the-go.
Table of Contents120TB.
Customers
We sell our products to major OEMs, distributors and retailers.
The following table summarizes our HDD revenue by channel and by geography:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Revenues by Channel (%) | |||||||
OEM | 70 | % | 71 | % | |||
Distributors | 16 | % | 17 | % | |||
Retail | 14 | % | 12 | % | |||
Revenues by Geography (%)(1) | |||||||
Americas | 29 | % | 28 | % | |||
EMEA | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||
Asia Pacific | 54 | % | 55 | % |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||
Revenues by Channel (%) | ||||||||
OEM | 67 | % | 69 | % | ||||
Distributors | 18 | % | 17 | % | ||||
Retail | 15 | % | 14 | % | ||||
Revenues by Geography (%)(1) | ||||||||
Americas | 31 | % | 29 | % | ||||
EMEA | 17 | % | 17 | % | ||||
Asia Pacific | 52 | % | 54 | % |
(1) | Revenue is attributed to countries based on the shipping location. |
OEM customers typically enter into master purchase agreements with us. These agreements provide for pricing, volume discounts, order lead times, product support obligations and other terms and conditions including sales programs offered to promote selected products. Deliveries are scheduled only after receipt of purchase orders. In addition, with limited lead-time, customers may defer most purchase orders without significant penalty. Anticipated orders from many of our customers have in the past failed to materialize or OEM delivery schedules have been deferred or altered as a result of changes in their business needs.
Our distributors generally enter intonon-exclusive agreements for the resale of our products. They typically furnish us with anon-binding indication of their near-term requirements and product deliveries are generally scheduled accordingly. The agreements and related sales programs typically provide the distributors with limited right of return and price protection rights. In addition, we offer sales programs to distributors on a quarterly and periodic basis to promote the sale of selected products in the sales channel.
Our retail channel consists of our branded storage products sold to retailers either by us directly or by our distributors. Retail sales made by us or our distributors typically require greater marketing support, sales incentives and price protection periods.
In fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, Dell Inc. accounted for approximately 12%10% and 14%12% of consolidated revenue, respectively. In fiscal year 2015, Hewlett-Packard Company accounted for approximately 12% of consolidated revenue. In fiscal year 2016, HP Inc., formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, completed its separation with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, and each company accounted for less than 10% of our consolidated revenue.revenue in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016. See "Principal“Principal Risks and Uncertainties-Risks Related to Our Business-WeUncertainties-We may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced, delayed or canceled purchases by, one or more of our larger customers."major customers”
Competition
We compete primarily with manufacturers of hard drives used in the enterprise, client compute and clientnon-compute applications. We are also a supplier of Enterprise SSDs, PCIe acceleratorNVMeadd-in cards, cloud storage solutions HDD test equipment, and storage subsystems through our acquisitions. The markets that we participate in are highly competitive. Disk drive manufacturers compete for a limited number of major disk drive customers but also compete with other companies in the electronic
data storage industry that provide SSDs and PCIeNVMeadd-in technology. Some of the principal factors used by customers to differentiate among electronic data storage solutions manufacturers are storage capacity, product performance, product quality and reliability, price per unit and price per gigabyte,time-to-market andtime-to-volume leadership, storage/retrieval access times, data transfer rates, form factor,
product warranty and support capabilities, supply continuity and flexibility, power consumption, total cost of ownership, and brand. While different markets and customers place varying levels of emphasis on these factors, we believe that our products are competitive with respect to many of these factors in the markets that we currently address.
Principal Disk Drive Competitors. There are three companies in the electronic data storage industry that manufacture disk drives:
Other Competition.We are seeing direct competition from SSD'sSSD’s that is adversely impacting demand for HDD in some markets including Notebook and Enterprise Mission Critical. We expect that this trend will continue although we believe both product types will be required in the market to satisfy the growing demand for electronic data storage.
Price Erosion. Historically, our industry has been characterized by price declines for disk drive products with comparable capacity, performance and feature sets ("(“like-for-like products" products”). Price declines forlike-for-like products ("(“price erosion"erosion”) have beentend to be more pronounced during periods of:
Disk drive manufacturers typically attempt to offset price erosion with an improved mix of disk drive products characterized by higher capacity, better performance and additional feature sets and product cost reductions.
We believe the HDD industry experienced increasedmodest price erosion in fiscal years 20152017 and 2016.
Product Life Cycles and Changing Technology. Success in our industry has been dependent to a large extent on the ability to balance the introduction and transition of new products withtime-to-volume, performance, capacity and quality metrics at a competitive price, level of service and support that our customers expect. Generally, the drive manufacturer that introduces a new product first benefits from improved product mix, favorable profit margins and less pricing pressure until comparable products are introduced. Changing technology also necessitateson-going investments in research and development, which may be difficult to recover due to rapid product life cycles and economic declines. Further, there is a continued need to successfully execute product transitions and new product introductions, as factors such as quality, reliability and manufacturing yields continue to be of significant competitive importance.
Seasonality
The disk drive industry traditionally experiences seasonal variability in demand with higher levels of demand in the second half of the calendar year. This seasonality is driven by consumer spending in
theTable of Contentsback-to-school
the back-to-school season from late summer to fall and the traditional holiday shopping season from fall to winter. We believe fiscal year 2015 reflected seasonality consistent with historical patterns. In fiscal year 2016, beyond traditional seasonality, variability of sales was a reflection of more cyclical demand from CSPs based on the timing of large systems installations and the shift of the underlying technology. We believe fiscal year 2017 reflected seasonality consistent with historical patterns.
Research and Development
We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology focused towards new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies to our product development teams as well as allowing us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, we had product development expenses of approximately $1,237$1,232 million and $1,353$1,237 million respectively, which represented 11% and 10%11% of our consolidated revenue, respectively.
Patents and Licenses
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we had approximately 5,000 U.S.5,600 US patents and 1,300 patents issued in various foreign jurisdictions as well as approximately 1,500 U.S.1,100 US and 1,200900 foreign patent applications pending. The number of patents and patent applications will vary at any given time as part of our ongoing patent portfolio management activity. Due to the rapid technological change that characterizes the electronic data storage industry, we believe that, in addition to patent protection, the improvement of existing products, reliance upon trade secrets, protection of unpatented proprietaryknow-how and development of new products are also important to our business in establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage. Accordingly, we intend to continue our efforts to broadly protect our intellectual property, including obtaining patents, where available, in connection with our research and development program.
We have patent licenses with a number of companies. Additionally, as part of our normal intellectual property practices, we may be engaged in negotiations with other major electronic data storage companies and component manufacturers with respect to patent licenses.
The electronic data storage industry is characterized by significant litigation arising from time to time relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. Because of rapid technological development in the electronic data storage industry, some of our products have been, and in the future could be, alleged to infringe existing patents of third parties. From time to time, we receive claims that our products infringe patents of third parties. Although we have been able to resolve some of those claims or potential claims by obtaining licenses or rights under the patents in question without a material adverse affecteffect on us, other claims have resulted in adverse decisions or settlements. In addition, other claims are pending, which if resolved unfavorably to us could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. For more information on these claims, see "Note“Note 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies."” The costs of engaging in intellectual property litigation in the past have been, and in the future may be, substantial, irrespective of the merits of the claim or the outcome.
Table of ContentsBacklog
Backlog
In view of industry practice, whereby customers may cancel or defer orders with little or no penalty, we believe backlog in the disk drive industry is of limited indicative value in estimating future performance and results.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to U.S.US and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of our operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities.
We have established environmental management systems and continually update environmental policies and standard operating procedures for our operations worldwide. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. We budget for operating and capital costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental laws. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.
Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the "Superfund"“Superfund” law) and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the site at the time of the release of hazardous substances or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. We have been identified as a potentially responsible party at several sites. At each of these sites, we have an assigned portion of the financial liability based on the type and amount of hazardous substances disposed of by each party at the site and the number of financially viable parties. We have fulfilled our responsibilities at some of these sites and remain involved in only a few at this time.
While our ultimate costs in connection with these sites is difficult to predict with complete accuracy, based on current estimates of cleanup costs and our expected allocation of these costs, we do not expect costs in connection with these sites to be material.
We may be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union ("EU"(“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after 1 July 2006. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China, Japan and others. The European Union REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern ("SVHCs"(“SVHCs”) in products.
Employees
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we employed approximately 45,50041,000 employees and temporary employees worldwide, of which approximately 36,10033,000 were located in our Asian operations. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees at all levels. We believe that our employee relations are good.
REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BUSINESS
Fiscal Year 20162017 Summary
During the fiscal year 2016,2017, we shipped 169 million units totaling 233263 exabytes, generating revenue of $11.2$10.8 billion and gross marginsmargin of 23% of revenue.29%. Our operating cash flow was $1.7$1.9 billion. We repurchased approximately 2412 million of our ordinary
shares during the year for approximately $1.1 billion,$460 million. We issued $750 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500 million of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024 and paid dividends during$316 million for the yearredemption and repurchase of $727 million, and completed our acquisition of Dot Hill Systems Corp. ("Dot Hill"), a supplier of software and hardware storage systems for $674outstanding debt, as well as paid $561 million in cash.dividends in fiscal year 2017.
Results of Operations
We list in the tables below summarized information from our Consolidated Profit and Loss Account by dollars and as a percentage of revenue:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Revenue | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | |||
Cost of revenue | 8,545 | 9,930 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | 2,615 | 3,809 | |||||
Product development | 1,237 | 1,353 | |||||
Marketing and administrative | 635 | 857 | |||||
Amortization of intangibles | 123 | 129 | |||||
Restructuring and other, net | 175 | 32 | |||||
Gain on arbitration award, net | — | (620 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Operating earnings | 445 | 2,058 | |||||
Other income and charges, net | (171 | ) | (88 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Income before taxes | 274 | 1,970 | |||||
Income tax expense | 26 | 228 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Revenue | $ | 10,771 | $ | 11,160 | ||||
Cost of revenue | 7,597 | 8,545 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Gross profit | 3,174 | 2,615 | ||||||
Product development | 1,232 | 1,237 | ||||||
Marketing and administrative | 606 | 635 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 104 | 123 | ||||||
Restructuring and other, net | 178 | 175 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating earnings | 1,054 | 445 | ||||||
Other income and charges, net | (239) | (171) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income before taxes | 815 | 274 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 43 | 26 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
|
|
|
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(as a percentage of Revenue) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Revenue | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Cost of revenue | 77 | 72 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | 23 | 28 | |||||
Product development | 11 | 10 | |||||
Marketing and administrative | 6 | 7 | |||||
Amortization of intangibles | 1 | 1 | |||||
Restructuring and other, net | 2 | — | |||||
Gain on arbitration award, net | — | (5 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Operating earnings | 4 | 15 | |||||
Other income and charges, net | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Income before taxes | 2 | 14 | |||||
Income tax expense | — | 2 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net income | 2 | % | 12 | % | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Revenue Cost of revenue Gross profit Product development Marketing and administrative Amortization of intangibles Restructuring and other, net Operating earnings Other income and charges, net Income before taxes Income tax expense Net income Table of Contents Fiscal Years Ended (as a percentage of Revenue) 30 June
2017 1 July 2016 100% 100% 71 77 29 23 11 11 5 6 1 1 2 2 10 4 (2) (2) 8 2 1 — 7% 2%
The following table summarizes HDD information regarding average drive selling prices ("ASPs"(“ASPs”) excluding storage systems; drive volume shipments,, exabytes shipped, and revenues by channel and geography:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In millions, except percentages exabytes and ASPs) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Unit Shipments: | |||||||
Enterprise | 32 | 36 | |||||
Client Compute | 93 | 132 | |||||
Client Non-Compute | 44 | 44 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total Units Shipped | 169 | 212 | |||||
ASPs (US Dollars per unit) | $ | 61 | $ | 61 | |||
Exabytes Shipped | 233 | 228 | |||||
Revenues by Channel (%) | |||||||
OEMs | 70 | % | 71 | % | |||
Distributors | 16 | % | 17 | % | |||
Retailers | 14 | % | 12 | % | |||
Revenues by Geography (%) | |||||||
Americas | 29 | % | 28 | % | |||
EMEA | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||
Asia Pacific | 54 | % | 55 | % |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||
ASPs (US Dollars per unit) | $ | 66 | $ | 61 | ||||
Exabytes Shipped | 263 | 233 | ||||||
Revenues by Channel (%) | ||||||||
OEMs | 67% | 69% | ||||||
Distributors | 18% | 17% | ||||||
Retailers | 15% | 14% | ||||||
Revenues by Geography (%) | ||||||||
Americas | 31% | 29% | ||||||
EMEA | 17% | 17% | ||||||
Asia Pacific | 52% | 54% |
Revenue
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Revenue | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | $ | (2,579 | ) | (19 | )% |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 10,771 | $ | 11,160 | $ (389) | (3)% |
Revenue in fiscal year 20162017 decreased approximately 19%3% or $2.6$0.4 billion, from fiscal year 2015,2016, as a result of a decrease in shipments by 43 million units and price erosion which were due to lower demand in the client compute market and reduced demand for mission critical HDD enterprise products, partially offset by improved product mix.an increase in exabytes shipped.
Gross Profit
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Cost of revenue | $ | 8,545 | $ | 9,930 | $ | (1,385 | ) | (14 | )% | ||||
Gross profit | $ | 2,615 | $ | 3,809 | $ | (1,194 | ) | (31 | )% | ||||
Gross profit percentage | 23 | % | 28 | % |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenue | $ | 7,597 | $ | 8,545 | $ | (948) | (11)% | |||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 3,174 | $ | 2,615 | $ | 559 | 21 % | |||||||||
Gross profit percentage | 29% | 23% |
For fiscal year 2016,2017, gross profitmargin as a percentage of revenue decreasedincreased by 500600 basis points compared to the prior fiscal year due to price erosiona favorable product mix and reduced demand in legacy hard drivesimproved factory utilization resulting in underutilization of certain factories,from cost savings due to our ongoing workforce reductions and manufacturing consolidation activities, partially offset by improved product mix in the second half of fiscal year 2016.price erosion.
Operating Expenses
| Fiscal Years Ended | Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | % Change | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Product development | $ | 1,237 | $ | 1,353 | $ | (116 | ) | (9 | )% | $ | 1,232 | $ | 1,237 | $ | (5) | — % | |||||||||||||
Marketing and administrative | 635 | 857 | (222 | ) | (26 | )% | 606 | 635 | (29) | (5)% | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 123 | 129 | (6 | ) | (5 | )% | 104 | 123 | (19) | (15)% | |||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other, net | 175 | 32 | 143 | 447 | % | 178 | 175 | 3 | 2 % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on arbitration award, net | — | (620 | ) | 620 | (100 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | $ | 2,170 | $ | 1,751 | $ | 419 | $ | 2,120 | $ | 2,170 | $ | (50) | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Product Development Expense.20162017 decreased from fiscal year 20152016 primarily due to a $102 million decrease in salaries and related benefits as a result of an increase in operational efficiencies in our business and the restructuring of our workforce in the prior periods, offset by a $71 million increase in variable compensation and share-based compensation driven by better financial performance and a $26 million increase in impairment charges related to the closure of our Korea design center.
Marketing and Administrative Expense. Marketing and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2017 decreased from fiscal year 2016 primarily due to a decrease in salaries and other employeerelated benefits of $63$52 million as a result of the restructuring of our workforce beginning in the second half of fiscal year 2015,prior periods, a $29$28 million decrease in variable compensation, and other cost reduction efforts, partially offset by the consolidation of Dot Hillresulting from an increase in fiscal year 2016operational efficiencies in our business and LSI's Flash Business in fiscal year 2015.
Marketing and Administrative Expense. Marketing and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2016 decreased from fiscal year 2015 primarily due to a decrease in salaries and other employee benefits of $82 million as a result of a restructuring of our workforce beginning in the second half of fiscal year 2015, a $45 million decrease in variable compensation and stock-based compensation, a $33 million reduction in advertising due to the completion of certain promotional and branding activities in fiscal year 2016, partially offset by a $51 million increase in variable compensation and increased operational efficiencies in our business.share-based compensation driven by better financial performance.
Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles for fiscal year 20162017 decreased by $6$19 million, as compared to fiscal year 2015, as a result of2016, due to certain intangible assets reaching the end of their useful lives, partially offset by the amortization of intangibles acquired from the Dot Hill acquisition in fiscal 2016.life.
Restructuring and Other, net. Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2017 was comprised primarily of restructuring charges recorded during the September 2016 wasquarter and March 2017 quarter to reduce our workforce by approximately 6,800 employees, as we continue to consolidate our global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas.
Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2016 comprised of restructuring charges recorded during the September 2015 quarter, March 2016 quarter and June 2016 quarter, to reduce our workforce by approximately 4,600 employees and align our manufacturing footprint with current macroeconomic conditions.
Restructuring and other, net for fiscal year 2015 was due to charges to reduce our workforce as a result of our ongoing focus on cost efficiencies in all areas of our business.
Gain on arbitration award, net. Gain on arbitration award, net for fiscal year 2015 was related to the final award amount of $630 million, less litigation and other related costs of $10 million, in the Company's case against Western Digital for the misappropriation of the Company's trade secrets.
Other income and charges, net
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Other income and charges, net | $ | (171 | ) | $ | (88 | ) | $ | (83 | ) | 94 | % |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Other income and charges, net | $ | (239) | $ | (171) | $ | (68) | 40% |
Other income and charges, net for fiscal year 20162017 increased by $83$68 million, as compared to fiscal year 20152016 primarily due to the absence$33 million of partial receiptother income associated with the final payment of $143 million forunpaid interest accrued on the final arbitration award amount in the Company'sCompany’s case against Western Digital in fiscal year 2015 compared to $33 million2016 which did not recur in fiscal year 2016,2017, a $12 million increase from impairment of certain strategic investments and a $33$24 million change in foreign currency
Tableinterest expense on the issuance of Contents
remeasurement related to net gains and losses from changes in foreign exchange rates, which were more pronounced in the prior year, partially offset by $74$750 million of losses from the early redemptions4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and repurchases$500 million of debt in4.875% Senior Notes due 2024.
Income Taxes
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 43 | $ | 26 | $ | 17 | 65% |
We recorded an income tax expense of $43 million for fiscal year 20152017 compared to a $3 million gain from the early redemptions and repurchases of debt in fiscal year 2016.
Income Taxes
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 26 | $ | 228 | $ | (202 | ) | (89 | )% |
We recorded an income tax expense of $26 million for fiscal year 2016 compared to an2016. Our fiscal year 2017 income tax expense included approximately $2 million of $228 million for fiscal year 2015.net tax expense associated with variousnon-recurring items. Our fiscal year 2016 income tax expense included approximately $22 million of income tax benefits primarily associated with the release of tax reserves due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation. Our fiscal year 2015 income tax expense included approximately $193 million of net income tax expense due to the final audit assessment received from the Jiangsu Province State Tax Bureau of the People's Republic of China (China assessment) for calendar years 2007 through 2013.
Our Irish tax resident parent holding company owns various U.S.US and non-U.S.non-US subsidiaries that operate in multiplenon-Irish income tax jurisdictions. Our worldwide operating income is either subject to varying rates of income tax or is exempt from income tax due to tax holiday programs we operate under in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. These tax holidays are scheduled to expire in whole or in part at various dates through 2024.
Our income tax provisionexpense recorded for fiscal year 20162017 differed from the provision for income taxestax expense that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related to non-U.S.non-US earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax holidays or tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland, (ii) a decrease in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets, and (iii) permanent differences. Our income tax expense recorded for fiscal year 2016 differed from the income tax expense that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related tonon-US earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax holidays or tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland, (ii) tax benefits associated with the reversal of previously recorded taxes, and (iii) a decrease in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. The acquisition of Dot Hill System Corporation did not have a material impact on our effective tax rate. Our income tax provision recorded for fiscal year 2015 differed from the provision for income taxes that would be derived by applying the Irish statutory rate of 25% to income before income taxes, primarily due to the net effect of (i) tax benefits related to non-U.S. earnings generated in jurisdictions that are subject to tax holidays or tax incentive programs and are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland, (ii) tax expense associated with the China assessment recorded during the December 2014 quarter, and (iii) an increase in valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets. The acquisition of LSI's Flash Business did not have a material impact on our effective tax rate.
On 18 December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes ("PATH") Act of 2015 was enacted. Among, other provisions, the PATH Act retroactively reinstated and permanently extended the federal Research and Development ("R&D") tax credit from 31 December 2014. The permanent extension of the R&D credit had no immediate impact on our income tax provision due to valuation allowances on our U.S. deferred tax assets. None of the other PATH Act changes had a material impact on our income tax provision.
Based on our non-U.S.non-US ownership structure and subject to (i) potential future increases in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; and (ii) a future change in our intention to indefinitely reinvest earnings from our subsidiaries outside of Ireland, we anticipate that our effective tax rate in future periods will generally be less than the Irish statutory rate.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was approximately $984$966 million.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we had net deferred tax assets of $606 million.$602 million, excluding $2 million of deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions. The realization of most of these deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on our ability to generate sufficient U.S.US and certain non-U.S.non-US taxable income in future periods. Although realization is not assured, we believe that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, may increase or decrease in subsequent periods when were-evaluate the underlying basis for our estimates of future U.S.US and certain non-U.S.non-US taxable income.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, approximately $677$560 million and $101 million of our U.S.total US net operating lossesloss and $99 million of our tax credit carryforwards, respectively, are subject to annual limitations from $1 million to $45 million pursuant to U.S.US tax law.
As of 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015, we had approximately $70 million and $83 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate are $70 million and $83 million as of 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015, respectively, subject to certain future valuation allowance offsets.
It is our policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes on our Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2016, we recognized a net income tax benefit for interest and penalties of $8 million as compared to a net income tax expense for interest and penalties of $26 million during fiscal year 2015. As of 1 July 2016, we had $12 million of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits compared to $20 million in fiscal year 2015.
During the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016, our unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties decreased by approximately $13 million primarily due to (i) reductions associated with the expiration of certain statutes of limitation of $27 million, (ii) increases in current year unrecognized tax benefits of $11 million, (iii) net increases in prior years' unrecognized tax benefits of $4 million, (iv) net reductions from other activity, including non-U.S. exchange gains, of $1 million.
During the 12 months beginning 2 July 2016, we expect that our unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $16 million as a result of the expiration of certain statutes of limitation.
We are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions globally and are required to file U.S.US federal, U.S.US, state, and non-U.Snon-US income tax returns. On 4 April 2016, the IRS approved the audit settlement reached in December 2015 regarding all disputed issues associated with our U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010. This audit settlement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
We are no longer subject to tax examination of U.S.US federal income tax returns for years prior to fiscal year 2013.2014. With respect to U.S.US state and non-U.S.non-US income tax returns, we are generally no longer subject to tax examination for years ending prior to fiscal year 2005.2006.
The Company generated a net income of $248$772 million and $1,742$248 million for the fiscal years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, respectively. These amounts have been transferred to reserves.
PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Company'sCompany’s operations expose it to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
If we fail to predict demand accurately for our products in any quarter, we may not be able to recapture the cost of our investments.investments which may materially adversely affect our financial results and the results of our operations.
Our industry operates primarily on quarterly purchasing cycles, with much of the order flow in any given quarter typically coming at the end of that quarter. Our quarterly results are subject to substantial fluctuations
and can be difficult to predict. Our manufacturing process requires us to
make significant product-specific investments in inventory in each quarter for that quarter'squarter’s production. Since we typically receive the bulk of our orders late in a quarter after we have made our investments, there is a risk that our orders will not be sufficient to allow us to recapture the costs of our investment before the products resulting from that investment have become obsolete. We cannot assure youprovide any assurance that we will be able to accurately predict demand in the future.
Our revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent upon customer orders in that quarter. We attempt to project future orders based in part on estimates from our major customers. Our customers'customers’ estimated requirements are not always accurate and we therefore cannot predict our quarterly revenues with any degree of certainty. In addition, we derive a portion of our revenues in each quarter from a number of relatively large orders. If one or more of our major customers decide to defer a purchase order or delays product acceptance in any given quarter, this is likely to result in reduced total revenues for that quarter.
The difficulty in forecasting demand also increases the difficulty in anticipating our inventory requirements, which may cause us to over-produce finished goods, resulting in inventory write-offs,increased working capital requirements, or under-produce finished goods, adversely affecting our ability to meet customer requirements and maintain our market share. Additionally, the risk of inventory write-offs could increase if we were to continue to hold higher inventory levels. Our uneven sales cycle makes inventory management challenging and future financial results less predictable. We cannot be certain that we will be able to recover the costs associated with increased inventory.
Other factors that may negatively impact our ability to recapture the cost of investments in any given quarter include:
In addition, the demand for clientnon-compute products can be even more volatile and unpredictable than the demand for client compute products. In some cases, our products manufactured for clientnon-compute applications are uniquely configured for a single customer'scustomer’s application, which creates a risk of unwanted and unsellable inventory if the anticipated volumes are not realized. This potential for unpredictable volatility is
increased by the possibility of competing alternative storage technologies like flash memory meeting the customers'customers’ cost and capacity metrics, resulting in a rapid shift in demand from our products and disk drive technology, generally, to alternative storage technologies. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our products or rapid shifts in demand from our products to alternative storage technologies in new clientnon-compute applications could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.
Market acceptance of new product introductions cannot be accurately predicted, and our results of operations will suffer if there is less demand for our new products than is anticipated.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and technology enhancements, uncertain product life cycles and changes in customer demand. The success of our new product introductions is dependent on a number of factors, including market acceptance, our ability to manage the risks associated with product transitions, the effective management of inventory levels in line with anticipated product demand and the risk that our new products will have quality problems or other defects in the early stages of introduction that were not anticipated in the design of those products. Accordingly, we cannot accurately determine the ultimate effect that our new products will have on our results of operations. Failure to accurately anticipate customers’ need and accurately identify the shift in technological changes could materially adversely affect our long-term financial results.
Historically, our results of operations have substantially depended upon our ability to be among the first-to-maturityfirst-to-market with new product offerings. We may face technological, operational and financial challenges in developing new products. In addition, our investments directed toward new product development may not yield the anticipated benefits. Our market share and results of operations in the future may be adversely affected if we fail to:
In addition, the success of our new product introductions is dependent upon our ability to qualify as a primary source of supply with our OEM customers. In order for our products to be considered by our customers for qualification, we must be among the leaders intime-to-market with those new products. Once a product is accepted, any failure or delay in the qualification process or a requirement that we requalify can result in our losing sales to that customer until new products are introduced. The limited number of high-volume OEMs magnifies the effect of missing a product qualification opportunity. These risks are further magnified because we expect competitive pressures to result in declining sales, eroding prices, and declining gross margins on our current generation products. If the delivery of our products is delayed, our OEM customers may use our competitors'competitors’ products to meet their production requirements. We cannot assure that we will be among the leaders intime-to-market with new products or that we will be able to successfully qualify new products with our customers in the future.
We face the related risk that consumers and businesses may wait to make their purchases if they want to buy a new product that has been shipped or announced but not yet released. If this were to occur, we may be unable to sell our existing inventory of products that may be less efficient and cost effective compared to new products. As a result, even if we are among the first-to-maturityfirst-to-market with a given product, subsequent introductions or announcements by our competitors of new products could cause
us to lose revenue and not achieve a positive return on our investment in existing products and inventory.
If we cannot successfully deliver competitive products, our future results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our industries are highly competitive and our failure to anticipate and respond to technological and market developments could harm our ability to compete.
We operate in markets that are highly competitive and subject to rapid change and that are significantly affected by new product introductions, substantial price erosion and lower prices as part of a strategy to gain or retain market share and customers. Should these practices continue, we may need to continually reduce our prices for existing products to retain our market share, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our ability to offset the effect of price erosion through new product introductions at higher average prices is diminished to the extent competitors introduce products into particular markets ahead of our similar, competing products. Our ability to offset the effect of price erosion is also diminished during times when supply exceeds demand for a particular product.
Market share for our products can be negatively affected by our customers'customers’ diversifying their sources of supply as our competitors enter the market for particular products, as well as by our ability to ramp volume production of new product offerings. When our competitors successfully introduce product offerings that are competitive with our recently introduced products, our customers may quickly diversify their sources of supply. Any significant decline in our market share in any of our principal market applications would adversely affect our results of operations.
Our principal sources of competition include:
We also experience competition from other companies that produce alternative storage technologies like flash memory, where increasing capacity, decreasing cost, energy efficiency and improvements in performance ruggedness have resulted in competition with our lower capacity, smaller form factor disk drives. This competition has traditionally been in the markets for handheld consumer electronics applications and now it also includes solid state drives ("SSDs")SSDs for tablet, notebook and enterprise compute applications. Certain customers for both notebook and enterprise compute applications are adopting SSDs as alternatives to hard drives in certain applications. Further adoption of these alternative storage technologies may impact the competitiveness of our product portfolio and reduce our market share and adversely affect our results of operation.
The markets for our data storage system products are also characterized by technological change driven in part by the adoption of new industry standards. These standards provide mechanisms to ensure technology component interoperability can occur and may reduce our capability for differentiation or innovation and our affected products would revert to commodity status. This could lower the barriers to entry to our market away from our specialist research and development skills and
enable entry for the general-purpose design skills found in some large EMS and CEM companies. Commodity markets are driven by extremely low margins and very aggressive competitive pricing. If our market becomes more commoditized and we fail to deliver innovative value-added alternatives to our customers, we will have difficulty competing against the larger EMS and CEM companies. If we are unable to compete successfully against our current and future competitors, we could experience profit margin reductions or loss of market share, which could significantly harm our financial condition.
We may be unable to effectively plan and make strategic changes in our business which may materially adversely affect our financial and business results. Additionally, we may not achieve the intended benefits of our strategic change efforts.
We may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investment opportunities, to successfully acquire and integrate companies that provide complementary products or technologies or to realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions.
Our growth strategy involves pursuing strategic alliances with, making acquisitions of, forming joint ventures with or making investments in other companies that are complementary to our business. There is substantial competition for attractive strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture and investment candidates. Additionally, the current trend of consolidation in the data storage industry may materially adversely affect our business and financial results and our future growth prospects. Accordingly, we may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisition, joint venture, or investment candidates. Even if we can identify them, we cannot assure you that we will be able to partner with, acquire or invest in suitable candidates, or integrate acquired technologies or operations successfully into our existing technologies and operations. Moreover, our ability to finance potential strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments may be limited by our leverage level, the covenants contained in the instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, and any agreements governing any other debt we may incur.
If we are successful in forming strategic alliances or acquiring, forming joint ventures or making investments in other companies, any of these transactions may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly while the operations of an acquired business are being integrated. It is also likely that integration of acquired companies would lead to the loss of key employees from those companies or the loss of customers of those companies. In addition, the integration of any acquired companies would require substantial attention from our senior management, which may limit the amount of time available to be devoted to ourday-to-day operations or to the execution of our strategy. Growth by strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment involves an even higher degree of risk to the extent we combine new product offerings and enter new markets in which we have limited experience, and no assurance can be given that acquisitions of entities with new or alternative business models will be successfully integrated or achieve their stated objectives. There can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment that we make or, if we do, how long it will take to achieve such benefits.
Furthermore, the expansion of our business involves the risk that we might not manage our growth effectively, that we would incur additional debt to finance these acquisitions or investments, that we may have impairment of goodwill or acquired intangible assets associated with these acquisitions and that we would incur substantial charges relating to thewrite-off ofin-process research and development. Each of these items could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we could issue additional ordinary shares in connection with future strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments. Issuing shares in connection with such transactions would have the effect of diluting your ownership percentage of the ordinary shares and could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.
If we do not develop products in time to keep pace with technological changes, our results of operations will be adversely affected.
Our customers have demandeddemand new generations of disk drive products as advances in computer hardware and software have created the need for improved storage products, with features such as increased storage capacity, improved performance and reliability and lower cost. We, and our competitors, have developed improved products, and we will need to continue to do so in the future. Such product development requires significant investments in research and development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the design or introduction of new products in a timely manner, that we will be able to manufacture new products in sufficient volumes with acceptable manufacturing yields, that we will be able to successfully
market these new products or that these products will perform to specifications on a long-term basis. In addition, the impact of slowing areal density growth may adversely impact our ability to be successful.
When we develop new products with higher capacity and more advanced technology, our results of operations may decline because the increased difficulty and complexity associated with producing these products increases the likelihood of reliability, quality or operability problems. If our products suffer increases in failures, are of low quality or are not reliable, customers may reduce their purchases of our products and our manufacturing rework and scrap costs and service and warranty costs may increase. In addition, a decline in the reliability of our products may make us less competitive as compared with other disk drive manufacturers or competing technologies.
We may fail to successfully anticipate technological shifts, business opportunities and market demand. Additionally, the barriers to entry in developing NAND flash memory products and SSDs may materially adversely affect our future growth prospects. We may fail to develop new products, identify business strategies and introduce competitive product offerings to meet those technological shifts which may materially adversely affect our ability to compete effectively and may impact our future financial results.
Servicing our indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.
We are leveraged and have significant debt service obligations. Our significant debt and debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities and reduce our options for capital allocation. For example, our high level of debt presents the following risks:
In the event that we need to refinance all or a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as the terms of our existing debt or refinance our existing debt at all. If prevailing interest rates or other factors existing at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to the refinanced debt would increase. Furthermore, if any rating agency changes our credit rating or outlook, our debt and equity securities could be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing debt or raise additional capital.
In addition, our business may not generate cash flow in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay the principal of, or interest on, our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, including working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances and other general corporate requirements.
Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that:
If we cannot fund our liquidity needs, we will have to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements. We cannot assure you that any of these remedies could, if necessary, be effected on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that they would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition if we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our substantial leverage, including the risk that we will be unable to service our debt or generate enough cash flow to fund our liquidity needs, could intensify.
Changes in demand for computer systems and storage subsystems may in the future cause a decline in demand for our products.
Our products are components in computers, data storage systems, and consumer electronics devices. The demand for these products has been volatile. Unexpected slowdowns in demand for computer systems, storage subsystems or consumer electronics devices generally cause sharp declines in demand for our products. Declines in consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations.
While sales to ClientNon-Compute and Cloud Systems and Solutions markets are becoming a more significant source of revenue, sales to the Client Compute market remain an important part of our business. The Client Compute market, however, has been, and we expect it to continue to be, adversely affected by the growth of tablet computers, smart phones and similar devices and that perform many of the same capabilities as computers, the lengthening of product life cycles and macroeconomic conditions. We believe that the deterioration of the Client Compute market has accelerated recently, and that this accelerated deterioration may continue or further accelerate, which could cause our operating results to suffer. Additionally, if demand in the Client Compute market is worse than expected as a result of these or other conditions, demand for our products in the Client Compute market may decrease at a faster rate and our operating results may be adversely affected.
The Enterprise Storage market has been adversely affected by the growth of the utilization of NAND flash in mission critical applications. This deterioration of the Enterprise Storage market could cause our operating results to suffer.
Table The potential migration of Contentsthe Enterprise Storage market to NAND flash memory products and an acceleration of the pace of migration may materially adversely affect our financial results.
Causes of declines in demand for our products in the past have included weakness in macroeconomic environments, announcements or introductions of major new operating systems or semiconductor
improvements or changes in consumer preferences, such as the shift to mobile devices. We believe these announcements and introductions have from time to time caused consumers to defer their purchases and made inventory obsolete. Whenever an oversupply of our products causes participants in our industry to have higher than anticipated inventory levels, we experience even more intense price competition from other manufacturers than usual.usual which may materially adversely affect our financial results.
Increases in the areal density of disk drives may outpace customers'customers’ demand for storage capacity.
The rate of increase in areal density, or storage capacity per square inch on a disk, may be greater than the increase in our customers'customers’ demand for aggregate storage capacity, particularly in certain market applications like client compute. As a result, our customers'customers’ storage capacity needs may be satisfied with lower priced, low capacity disk drives. These factors could decrease our sales, especially when combined with continued price erosion, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We may not be successful in our efforts to grow our cloud systems and solutions business.silicon group.
We have made and are continuing to make investments to expand and develop our cloud systemsCloud Systems and solutions business.Silicon group. Our cloud systemsCloud Systems and solutions businessSilicon group is subject to the following risks:
Our results of operations and share price may be adversely affected if we are not successful in our efforts to grow our cloud computing business as anticipated. In addition, our growth in this sector may bring us into closer competition with some of our customers or potential customers, which may decrease their willingness to do business with us.
Changes in the macroeconomic environment have negatively impacted, and may continue to, negatively impact our results of operations.
Due to the continuing uncertainty about current macroeconomic conditions affecting consumer and enterprise spending, we believe our customers may postpone spending in response to tightervolatility in credit unemployment,and equity markets, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products. Continuing high unemployment rates, low levels of consumer liquidity, risk of default on sovereign debt and volatility in credit and equity markets have weakened consumer confidence and decreased consumer andAdditionally, enterprise spending continues to remain cautious in many regions around the world. Other factors that could influence demand include conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor andmarket, healthcare costs, access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and on our financial condition and operating results.
TableMacroeconomic developments like the ongoing withdrawal of Contentsthe United Kingdom from the European Union, the debt crisis in certain countries in the European Union and slowing economies in parts of Asia and South America could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition which, in turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A general weakening of, and related declining corporate confidence in, the global economy or the curtailment in government or corporate spending could cause current or potential customers to reduce their IT budgets or be unable to fund hardware systems, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products or cause customers not to pay us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services.
Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period, and may cause our share price to decline.
In the past, ourOur quarterly revenue and results of operations have fluctuated,may fluctuate, sometimes significantly, from period to period. These fluctuations, which we expect to continue, may be occasioned by a variety of factors, including:
As a result, we believe thatquarter-to-quarter and year-over-year comparisons of our revenue and results of operations may not be meaningful, and that these comparisons may not be an accurate indicator of our future performance. Our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fail to meet the expectations of investment research analysts or investors, which could cause an immediate and significant decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares.
Because we experience seasonality in the sales of our products, our results of operations will generally be adversely impacted during the second half of our fiscal year.
Sales of computer systems, storage subsystems and consumer electronics tend to be seasonal, and therefore we expect to continue to experience seasonality in our business as we respond to variations in our customers'customers’ demand for our products. In particular, we anticipate that sales of our products will continue to be lower during the second half of our fiscal year. In the client compute and clientnon-compute market applications of our disk drive business, this seasonality is partially attributable to
the historical trend in our results derived from our customers'customers’ increased sales of desktop computers, notebook computers, and consumer electronics during theback-to-school and winter holiday season. In the enterprise market our sales are seasonal because of the capital budgeting and purchasing cycles of our end users. Since our working capital needs peak during periods in which we are increasing production in anticipation of orders that have not yet been received, our results of operations will fluctuate seasonally even if the forecasted demand for our products proves accurate. Furthermore, it is difficult for us to evaluate the degree to which this seasonality may affect our business in future periods because of the rate and unpredictability of product transitions and new product introductions, particularly in the clientnon-compute market, as well as macroeconomic conditions.
We have a long and unpredictable sales cycle for enterprise data storage solutions.
Our enterprise data storage solutions are technically complex and we typically supply them in high quantities to a small number of customers. Many of our products are also tailored to meet the specific requirements of individual customers, and are often integrated by our customers into the systems and products that they sell. Factors that affect the length of our sales cycle include:
As a result, our sales cycle for enterprise data storage solutions is often in excess of one year, and the length of our sales cycle is frequently unpredictable. In addition, the emerging and evolving nature of the market for the products that we sell may lead prospective customers to postpone their purchasing decisions. We invest resources and incur costs during this cycle that may not be recovered if we do not successfully conclude sales. These factors lead to difficulty in matching revenues with expenses, and to increased expenditures which together may adversely impact our results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced, delayed or canceled purchases by, one or more of our largermajor customers.
Some of our key customers account for a large portion of our disk drive revenue. While we have longstanding relationships with many of our customers, if any of our key customers were to significantly reduce their purchases from us, our results of operations would be adversely affected. While sales to major customers may vary from period to period, a major customer that permanently discontinues or significantly reduces its relationship with us could be difficult to replace. In line with industry practice, new customers usually require that we pass a lengthy and rigorous qualification process at the customer'scustomer’s cost. Accordingly, it may be difficult or costly for us to attract new major customers. Additionally, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations or other significant transactions involving our customers generally entail risks to our business. If a significant transaction involving any of our key customers results in the loss of or reduction in purchases by these key customers, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We are dependent on sales to distributors and retailers, which may increase price erosion and the volatility of our sales.
A substantial portion of our sales has been to distributors of disk drive products. Certain of our distributors may also market other products that compete with our products. Product qualification programs in this distribution channel are limited, which increases the number of competing products that are available to satisfy demand, particularly in times of lengthening product cycles. As a result, purchasing decisions in this channel are based largely on price, terms and product availability. Sales volumes through this channel are also less predictable and subject to greater volatility than sales to our OEM customers. In addition, deterioration in business and economic conditions could exacerbate price erosion and volatility as distributors lower prices to compensate for lower demand and higher inventory levels. Our distributors'distributors’ ability to access credit for purposes of funding their operations may also affect purchases of our products by these customers.
If distributors reduce their purchases of our products or prices decline significantly in the distribution channel or if distributors experience financial difficulties or terminate their relationships with us, our revenues and results of operations would be adversely affected.
We believe that industry demand for storage products in the long-term is increasing due to the proliferation of media-rich digital content in consumer applications and is fueling increased consumer demand
for storage. This has led to the expansion of our branded solutions such as external storage products to provide additional storage capacity and to secure data in case of disaster or system failure, or to provide independent storage solutions for multiple users in home or small business environments. Consumer spending on retail sales of our branded solutions has deteriorated in some markets and may continue to do so if poor global economic conditions continue and higher levels of unemployment persist. This could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, such retail sales of our branded solutions traditionally experience seasonal variability in demand with higher levels of demand in the first half of our fiscal year driven by consumer spending in theback-to-school season from late summer to fall and the traditional holiday shopping season from fall to winter. Additionally, our ability to reach such consumers depends on us maintaining effective working relationships with major retailers and distributors. Failure to anticipate consumer demand for our branded solutions as well as an inability to maintain effective working relationships with retail and online distributors may adversely impact our future results of operations.
Our international sales and manufacturing operations subject us to risks related to disruptions in foreign markets, currency exchange fluctuations, longer payment cycles, seasonality, limitations imposed by a variety of legal and regulatory regimes, potential adverse tax consequences, increased costs, our customers'customers’ credit and access to capital, health-related risks, and access to personnel.
We have significant sales and manufacturing operations in foreign countries, including manufacturing facilities, sales personnel and customer support operations. We have manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore and Thailand, in addition to those in the United States. A substantial portionAdditionally, the manufacturing of some of our client compute diskproducts is concentrated in certain geographical locations. The production of certain drive assembly occurssubassemblies are limited to Thailand and the production of media is limited to Singapore. Disruptions in the economic, environmental, political, legal or regulatory landscape in these countries may have a material adverse impact on our facility in China.manufacturing operations.
Our international operations are subject to economic risks inherent in doing business in foreign countries, including the following:
• | Disruptions in Foreign Markets. Disruptions in financial markets and the deterioration of the underlying economic conditions in the past in some countries, including those in Asia, United Kingdom and the European Union have had an impact on our sales to customers located in, or whoseend-user customers are located in, these countries. |
• | Fluctuations in Currency Exchange Rates. Prices for our products are denominated predominately in US dollars, even when sold to customers that are located outside the United States. An increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside of the US where we sell in dollars. This could adversely impact our sales and market share in such areas or increase pressure on us to lower our price, and adversely impact our profit margins. A weakened dollar could increase the cost of expenses such as payroll, utilities, tax, and marketing expenses, as well as overseas capital expenditures. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We may attempt to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes by, among other things, entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts. However, these contracts may not cover our full exposure and subject us to certain counterparty credit risks. See “Financial Risk Management disclosures” of this report for additional information about our foreign currency exchange risk. |
applicable to corporate multinationals along with potential changes in accounting and other laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles, and interpretations could increase the risk of double taxation, cause increased tax audit activity, and could impact our effective tax rate.
• | Longer Payment Cycles. Our customers outside of the United States are sometimes allowed longer time periods for payment than our US customers. This increases the risk of nonpayment due to the possibility that the financial condition of particular customers may worsen during the course of the payment period. |
• Seasonality. Seasonal reductions in the business activities of our customers during the summer months, particularly in Europe, and the impact of international holidays like the Chinese New Year, typically result in lower earnings during those periods. • Legal and Regulatory Limitations. Our international operations are affected by limitations on imports, tariffs, duties, currency exchange control regulations, price controls, export control laws, antitrust matters including the trade and economic sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, and other restraints on trade. In addition, China, Malaysia, Northern Ireland, Singapore and Thailand, in which we have significant operating assets, and the European Union have exercised and continue to exercise significant influence over many aspects of their domestic economies including, but not limited to, fair competition, tax practices, anti-corruption, antitrust, price controls and international trade. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate these or other applicable laws, rules and regulations to which we may be subject. Violations of these laws and regulations could lead to significant penalties, restraints on our export or import privileges, monetary fines, government investigations, disruption of our operating activities, criminal proceedings and regulatory or other actions that could materially adversely affect our results of operations. • Potential Adverse Tax Consequences. Our international operations create a risk of potential adverse tax consequences, including imposition of withholding or other taxes on payments by our subsidiaries. In addition, our taxable income in any jurisdiction is dependent upon acceptance of our operational practices and intercompany transfer pricing by local tax authorities as being on an arm’s length basis. Due to inconsistencies in application of the arm’s length standard among taxing authorities, as well as a lack of adequate treaty-based protection, transfer pricing challenges by tax authorities could, if successful, substantially increase our income tax expense. We are subject to tax audits around the world, and are under audit in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income tax against us. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits could be materially different from our recorded income tax provisions and accruals. The ultimate results of an audit could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made and could result in increases to our overall tax expense in subsequent periods. In light of the ongoing fiscal challenges many countries are facing, various levels of government are increasingly focused on tax reform and other legislative action to increase tax revenue. In addition, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting recommendations are reshaping international tax rules in numerous countries. These actual and potential changes in the relevant tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals along with potential changes in accounting and other laws, regulations, administrative practices, principles, and interpretations could increase the risk of double taxation, cause increased tax audit activity, and could impact our effective tax rate. • Increased Costs. The shipping and transportation costs associated with our international operations are typically higher than those associated with our US operations, resulting in decreased operating margins in some foreign countries. • Credit and Access to Capital Risks. Our international customers could have reduced access to working capital due to higher interest rates, reduced bank lending resulting from contractions in the money supply or the deterioration in the customer’s or its bank’s financial condition, or the inability to access other financing. • Global Health Outbreaks. The occurrence of a pandemic disease may adversely impact our operations, and some of our key customers. Such diseases could also potentially disrupt the timeliness and reliability of the distribution network we rely on.
• | Tariffs or Other Restrictions on Foreign Imports. The US government could impose tariffs or other restrictions on foreign imports. The implementation of a border tax, tariff or higher customs duties on our products manufactured abroad or components that we import into the US, or any potential corresponding actions by other countries in which we do business, could negatively impact our financial performance. |
• | Access to Personnel. There is substantial competition for qualified and capable personnel in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, including China, which may make it difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified employees in sufficient numbers. Increased difficulty in recruiting or retaining sufficient and adequate personnel in our international operations may lead to increased manufacturing and employment compensation costs, which could adversely affect our results of operations. |
We could suffer a loss of revenue and increased costs, exposure to significant liability including legal and regulatory consequences, reputational harm, and other serious negative consequences if we sustainencounter cyber-attacks, ransomware or other data security breaches that disrupt our operations or result in the dissemination of proprietary or confidential information about us or our customers or other third-parties.
Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment and the electronic data stored in our databases from damage by, among other things, earthquake, floods, fire, natural disasters, accidents, power disruptions, telecommunications failures, acts of terrorism or war, employee misconduct, physical or electronicbreak-ins, cyber-attacks, ransomware, system security breaches or similar events or disruptions. We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our operations. In addition, our outsourcing services and cloud computing businesses routinely process, store, and transmit large amounts of data for our customers and vendors, including sensitive and personally identifiable information. As our operations become more automated and increasingly interdependent, our exposure to the risks posed by these types of events will increase. We have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, cyber-attacks, or other computer-related attempts to breach the information technology ("IT"(“IT”) systems we use for these purposes. We may also be subject to IT system failures and network disruptions due to these factors. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate or compromise our confidential information or that of third-parties, create system disruptions, or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our products or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities of our products. In addition, sophisticated hardware and operating system software and applications that we produce or procure from third-parties may contain defects in design or manufacture, including "bugs"“bugs” and other problems that could unexpectedly interfere with the operation of the system.
The costs to us to eliminate or address the foregoing security problems and security vulnerabilities before or after a cyber-incident could be significant. System redundancy may be ineffective or inadequate, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, or cessation of
service, and loss of existing or potential customers that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution, or other critical functions. We could lose existing or potential customers for outsourcing services or other IT solutions in connection with any actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products. In addition, breaches of our security measures and the unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data about us or our customers or other third-parties, could expose us, our vendors and customers, or other third-parties affected to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our brand and reputation, or otherwise harm our business. In addition, we rely in certain limited capacities on third-party data management providers whose possible security problems and security vulnerabilities may have similar effects on us.
We are subject to laws, rules, and regulations in the U.S.US, UK, European Union and other countries relating to the collection, use, and security of user data. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, and among us, our subsidiaries and other parties with which we have commercial relations. Our ability to execute transactions and to possess and use personal information and data in conducting our business subjects us to legislative and regulatory burdens that may require us to notify vendors, customers or employees of a data security breach. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant expenses to comply with mandatory privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards, or contractual obligations. These laws, protocols and standards continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing international requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state or international privacy-related or data protection laws we may be subject to proceedings by governmental entities and incur penalties or significant legal liability.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, which may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various legal, regulatory or administrative investigations, negotiations or proceedings arising in the normal course of business.
In the event of litigation, government investigations or governmental proceedings, we are subject to the inherent risks and uncertainties that may result if outcomes differ from our expectations. In the event of adverse outcomes in any litigation, investigation or government proceeding, we could be required to pay substantial damages, fines or penalties, and cease certain practices or activities, which could materially harm our business.
The costs associated with litigation and government investigations can also be unpredictable depending on the complexity and length of time devoted to such litigation or investigation. Litigation, investigations or government proceedings may also divert the efforts and attention of our key personnel, which could also harm our business.
If we do not control our fixed costs, we will not be able to compete effectively in our industry.
We continually seek to make our cost structure and business processes more efficient. We are focused on increasing workforce flexibility and scalability, and improving overall competitiveness by leveraging our global capabilities, as well as external talent and skills, worldwide. Our strategy involves, to a substantial degree, increasing revenue and product volume while at the same time controlling operating expenses. If we do not control our operating expenses, our ability to compete in the marketplace may be impaired. In the past, activities to reduce operating costs have included closures and transfers of facilities, significant personnel reductions, restructuring efforts and efforts to increase automation. Our restructuring efforts may not yield the intended benefits and may be unsuccessful or disruptive to our business operations which may materially adversely affect our financial results.
If we experience shortages or delays in the receipt of, or cost increases in, critical components, equipment or raw materials necessary to manufacture our products, we may suffer lower operating margins, production delays and other material adverse effects.
The cost, quality and supply of components, subassemblies, certain equipment and raw materials used to manufacture our products and key components like recording media and heads are critical to our success. The equipment we use to manufacture our products and components is frequently custom made and comes from a few suppliers and the lead times required to obtain manufacturing equipment can be significant. Particularly
important for our products include read/write heads, aluminum or glass substrates for recording media, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, and suspension assemblies.
We rely on sole suppliers or a limited number of suppliers for some or all of these components that we do not manufacture, including aluminum and glass substrates, read/write heads, ASICs, spindle motors, printed circuit boards, and suspension assemblies. Many of such component suppliers are geographically concentrated in particular, in Thailand, which makes our supply chain more vulnerable to regional disruptions such as the severe flooding in Thailand in October 2011,weather, acts of terrorism and unpredictablegeo-political climate which hadmay have a material impact on
the production and availability of many components. If our vendors for these components are unable to meet our cost, quality, and supply requirements, continue to remain financially viable or fulfill their contractual commitments and obligations, we could experience a shortage in supply or an increase in production costs, which would materially adversely affect our results of operations.operations and our financial results.
Certain rare earth elements are critical in the manufacture of our products. We purchase components that contain rare earth elements from a number of countries, including the People'sPeople’s Republic of China. We cannot predict whether any nation will impose regulations, quotas or embargoes upon the rare earth elements incorporated into our products that would restrict the worldwide supply of such metals or increase their cost. We have experienced increased costs and production delays when we were unable to obtain the necessary equipment or sufficient quantities of some components, and/or have been forced to pay higher prices or make volume purchase commitments or advance deposits for some components, equipment or raw materials that were in short supply in the industry in general. If any major supplier were to restrict the supply available to us or increase the cost of the rare earth elements used in our products, we could experience a shortage in supply or an increase in production costs, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
Consolidation among component manufacturers has resulted and may continue to result in some component manufacturers exiting the industry or not making sufficient investments in research to develop new components.
If there is a shortage of, or delay in supplying us with, critical components, equipment or raw materials, then:
We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain critical components in a timely and economic manner.
We often aim to lead the market in new technology deployments and leverage unique and customized technology from single source suppliers who are early adopters in the emerging market. Our options in supplier selection in these cases are limited and the supplier based technology may consequently be single sourced until wider adoption of the technology occurs and any necessary licenses become available. In such cases any technical issues in the supplier'ssupplier’s technology may cause us to delay shipments of our new technology deployments and therefore harm our financial position.
If revenues fall or customer demand decreases significantly, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments to certain suppliers.
From time to time, we enter into long-term,non-cancelable purchase commitments or make largeup-front investments with certain suppliers in order to secure certain components or technologies for the production of our products or to supplement our internal manufacturing capacity for certain components. If our actual revenues in the future are lower than our projections or if customer demand decreases significantly below our projections, we may not meet all of our purchase commitments with
these suppliers. As a result, it is possible that our revenues will not be sufficient to recoup ourup-front investments, in which case we will have to shift output from our internal manufacturing facilities to these suppliers or make penalty-type payments under these contracts.
Conflict minerals regulations may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.
In August 2012, the SEC adopted rules establishing additional disclosure and reporting requirements regarding the use of specified minerals, or conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. These rules will require us to determine, disclose and report whether or not such conflict minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country. The most recent report was filed on 27 May 2016. These rules could affect our ability to source certain materials used in our products at competitive prices and could impact the availability of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers of "conflict free"“conflict free” minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Our customers, including our OEM customers, may require that our products be free of conflict minerals, and our revenues and margins may be harmed if we are unable to procure conflict free minerals at a reasonable price, or at all, or are unable to pass through any increased costs associated with meeting these demands. Additionally, we may face reputational challenges with our customers and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement. We may also face challenges with government regulators and our customers and suppliers if we are unable to sufficiently verify that the metals used in our products are conflict free. We expect that there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs related to possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification and disclosure requirements. Additionally, the regulatory and compliance framework for conflict minerals may undergo changes which may further increase the cost of compliance. Our stakeholders and customers may place increased demands on our compliance framework which may in turn negatively impact our relationships with our suppliers.
The loss of key executive officers and employees could negatively impact our business prospects.
Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued service of key members of management as well as marketing, sales and product development personnel. The loss of one or more of our key personnel may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and further motivate highly skilled management, marketing, sales and product development personnel. We have experienced intense competition for personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining personnel in the future.
Due to the complexity of our products, some defects may only become detectable after deployment.
Our products are highly complex and are designed to operate in and form part of larger complex networks and storage systems. Defects in our products, or in the networks and systems of which they form a part, directly or indirectly, have resulted in and may in the future result in:
Defects in our products could also result in legal actions by our customers for property damage, injury or death. Product liability claims could exceed the level of insurance coverage that we have obtained to cover defects in our products. Any significant uninsured claims could significantly harm our financial condition.
Political events, war, terrorism, natural disasters, public health issues and other circumstances could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
War, terrorism, geopolitical uncertainties, natural disasters, public health issues, and other business interruptions have caused and could cause damage or disruption to international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on our business, our suppliers, logistics providers, manufacturing vendors and customers. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes, fire,fires, power shortages, terrorist attacks, other hostile acts, labor disputes, public health issues, and other events beyond our control. Such events could decrease demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible for us to make and deliver products to our customers, or to receive components from our suppliers, and create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain. In the event of a natural disaster, losses and significant recovery time could be required to resume operations and our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected. Should major public health issues, including pandemics, arise, we could be negatively affected by stringent employee travel restrictions, additional limitations in freight services, governmental actions limiting the movement of products between regions, delays in production ramps of new products, and disruptions in our operations and some of our key customers.
Macroeconomic developments like the withdrawal of United Kingdom from the European Union, the debt crisis in certain countries in the European Union and slowing economies in parts of Asia and South America could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition which, in turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A general weakening of, and related declining corporate confidence in, the global economy or the curtailment in government or corporate spending could cause current or potential customers to reduce their IT budgets or be unable to fund hardware systems, which could cause customers to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products or cause customers not to pay us or to delay paying us for previously purchased products and services.
Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The sale and manufacturing of products in certain states and countries may subject us and our suppliers to state, federal and international laws and regulations governing protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, restrictions on the presence of certain substances in electronic products and the responsibility for environmentally safe disposal or recycling. We endeavor to ensure that we and our suppliers comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, however, compliance may increase our operating costs and otherwise impact future financial results. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on us in the future, we could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures. If we fail to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations, initiatives, or standards of conduct, our customers may refuse to purchase our products and we could be subject to fines, penalties and possible prohibition of sales of our products into one or more states or countries, liability to our customers and damage to our
reputation, which could result in a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations.
Any cost reduction initiatives that we undertake may not deliver the results we expect, and these actions may adversely affect our business.
On 27 June 2016 and 11 July 2016From time to time, we announcedengage in restructuring plans to be substantially completed by the endthat may result in workforce reduction and consolidation of fiscal year 2017.our real estate facilities and our manufacturing footprint. In addition, management will continue to evaluate our global footprint and cost structure, and additional restructuring plans are expected to be formalized. As a result of our restructuring, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge, disruptions to our operations and/or inefficiency during transitional periods. Any cost-cutting measures could impact employee retention. In addition, we cannot be sure that the cost reduction and global footprint consolidation will be successful in reducing our overall expenses as we expect or that additional costs will not offset any such reductions or global footprint consolidation. If our operating costs are higher than we expect or if we do not maintain adequate control of our costs and expenses, our result of operations may suffer.
Our ability to use our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards might be limited.
The use of a portion of our U.S.US net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is subject to annual limitations pursuant to U.S.US tax law. Section 382 of the U.S.US Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in ownership. As a result, future changes in ownership could put further limitations on the availability of our net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards.
Deterioration in global credit and financial market conditions could negatively impact the value of our current portfolio of cash equivalents or short-term investments and our ability to meet our financing objectives.
Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. Our short-term investments consist primarily of readily marketable debt securities with remaining maturities of more than 90 days at the time of purchase. Our investment policy has as its principal objectives the preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity. We mitigate default risk by investing in high-quality investment grade securities, limiting the time to maturity and by monitoring the counter-parties and underlying obligors closely.
While as of the date of this filing, we are not aware of any material downgrades, losses, or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash equivalents or short-term investments, no assurance can be given that future deterioration in conditions of the global credit and financial markets would not negatively impact our current portfolio of cash equivalents or short-term investments or our ability to meet our financing objectives.
We are at times subject to intellectual property legal proceedings and claims which could cause us to incur significant additional costs or prevent us from selling our products, and which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject fromtime-to-time to legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us, or our customers, in connection with their use of our products. Intellectual property litigation can be expensive and time-consuming, regardless of the merits of any claim, and could divert our management'smanagement’s attention from operating our business. In addition, intellectual property lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, which may
cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Patent litigation has increased due to the current uncertainty of the law and the increasing competition and overlap of product functionality in the field. Some of the actions that we face fromtime-to-time seek injunctions against the sale of our products and/or substantial monetary damages, which if granted or awarded, could materially harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We may not be aware of currently filed patent applications that relate to our products or technology. If patents are later issued on these applications, we may be liable for infringement. If our products were found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products in one or more geographic locations, expend significant resources to developnon-infringing technology, discontinue the use of specific processes or obtain licenses to the technology infringed. We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms, or at all, or be able to reengineer our products successfully to avoid infringement. Any of the foregoing could cause us to incur significant costs and prevent us from selling our products, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. See "NoteNote 14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies"Contingencies” contained in this report for a description of pending intellectual property proceedings.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our IP rights. In the past, we have been involved in significant and expensive disputes regarding our IP rights and those of others, including claims that we may be infringing patents, trademarks and other IP rights of third-parties. We expect that we will be involved in similar disputes in the future.
There can be no assurance that:
In addition, our competitors may be able to design their products around our patents and other proprietary rights. Enforcement of our rights often requires litigation. If we bring a patent infringement action and are not successful, our competitors would be able to use similar technology to compete with us. Moreover, the defendant in such an action may successfully countersue us for infringement of their patents or assert a counterclaim that our patents are invalid or unenforceable.
Furthermore, we have significant operations and sales in foreign countries where intellectual property laws and enforcement policies are often less developed, less stringent or more difficult to enforce than in the United States.
We may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investment opportunities, to successfully acquire and integrate companies that provide complementary products or technologies or to realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions.
Our growth strategy involves pursuing strategic alliances with, making acquisitions of, forming joint ventures with or making investments in other companies that are complementary to our business. There is substantial competition for attractive strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture and investment candidates. Accordingly, we may not be able to identify suitable strategic alliances, acquisition, joint venture, or investment candidates. Even if we can identify them, we cannot assure you that we will be able to partner with, acquire or invest in suitable candidates, or integrate acquired technologies or operations successfully into our existing technologies and operations. Moreover, our ability to finance potential strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments will be limited by our high degree of leverage, the covenants contained in the instruments that govern our outstanding indebtedness, and any agreements governing any other debt we may incur.
If we are successful in forming strategic alliances or acquiring, forming joint ventures or making investments in other companies, any of these transactions may have an adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly while the operations of an acquired business are being integrated. It is also likely that integration of acquired companies would lead to the loss of key employees from those companies or the loss of customers of those companies. In addition, the integration of any acquired companies would require substantial attention from our senior management, which may limit the amount of time available to be devoted to our day-to-day operations or to the execution of our strategy. Growth by strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment involves an even higher degree of risk to the extent we combine new product offerings and enter new markets in which we have limited experience, and no assurance can be given that acquisitions of entities with new or alternative business models will be successfully integrated or achieve their stated objectives. There can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any strategic alliance, acquisition, joint venture or investment that we make or, if we do, how long it will take to achieve such benefits.
Furthermore, the expansion of our business involves the risk that we might not manage our growth effectively, that we would incur additional debt to finance these acquisitions or investments, that we may have impairment of goodwill or acquired intangible assets associated with these acquisitions and that we would incur substantial charges relating to the write-off of in-process research and development, similar to that which we incurred in connection with several of our prior acquisitions. Each of these items could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we could issue additional ordinary shares in connection with future strategic alliances, acquisitions, joint ventures or investments. Issuing shares in connection with such transactions would have the effect of diluting your ownership percentage of the ordinary shares and could cause the price of our ordinary shares to decline.
Servicing our indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.
We are leveraged and have significant debt service obligations. Our significant debt and debt service requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. For example, our high level of debt presents the following risks:
In the event that we need to refinance all or a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as the terms of our existing debt or refinance our existing debt at all. If prevailing interest rates or other factors existing at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to the refinanced debt would increase. Furthermore, if any rating agency changes our credit rating or outlook, our debt and equity securities could be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our ability to refinance existing debt or raise additional capital.
In addition, our business may not generate cash flow in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay the principal of, or interest on, our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, including working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances and other general corporate requirements.
Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that:
If we cannot fund our liquidity needs, we will have to take actions such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, product development efforts, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances, and other general corporate requirements. We cannot assure you that any of these remedies could, if necessary, be effected on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that they would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition if we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our substantial leverage, including the risk that we will be unable to service our debt or generate enough cash flow to fund our liquidity needs, could intensify.
The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and could decline significantly.
The stock market, in general, and the market for technology stocks in particular, has recently experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of companies. If these market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our ordinary shares could decline significantly independent of our actual operating performance, and you could lose all or a
substantial part of your investment. The market price of our ordinary shares could fluctuate significantly in response to several factors, including among others:
Any decision to reduce or discontinue the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our previously announced share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly.
Although we have announced targeted regular cash dividend amounts and a share repurchase program, we are under no obligation to pay cash dividends to our shareholders in the future at the announced targeted levels or at all or to repurchase our ordinary shares at any particular price or at all. The declaration and payment of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and our previously announced share repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Our payment of quarterly cash dividends and the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program are subject to, among other things, our financial position and results of operations, available cash and cash flow, capital and regulatory requirements, market and economic conditions, our ordinary share price, and other factors. Any reduction or discontinuance by us of the payment of quarterly cash dividends or the repurchase of our ordinary shares pursuant to our share repurchase program could cause the market price of our ordinary shares to decline significantly. Moreover, in the event our payment of quarterly cash dividends or repurchases of our ordinary shares are reduced or discontinued, our failure to resume such activities at historical levels could result in a persistent lower market valuation of our ordinary shares.
Significant fluctuations in the market price of our ordinary shares could result in securities class action claims against us.
Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to the publicly traded securities of technology companies. The price of our ordinary shares is likely to be volatile in the future. In the past, following periods of decline in the market price of a company'scompany’s securities, class action lawsuits have often been pursued against that company. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management'smanagement’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our balance sheet and cash flows, contractual obligations, and other commitments on our liquidity and capital resources. Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase. Our short-term investments consist primarily of money market funds, time deposits and certificates of deposits.deposit. The principal objectives of our investment policy are the preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity. We believe our cash equivalents and short-term investments are liquid and accessible. We operate in some countries that have restrictive regulations over the movement of cash and/or foreign exchange across their borders. However, these restrictionswe believe our sources of cash have not impededbeen and will continue to be sufficient to meet our ability to conduct our business, nor do we expect them to incash needs for the next 12 months. We are not aware of any downgrades, losses or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash equivalents or short-term investments and we do not believe the fair value of our short-term investments has significantly changed from the values reported as of 1 July 2016.30 June 2017.
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
| As of | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,125 | $ | 2,479 | $ | (1,354 | ) | |||
Investments | 6 | 6 | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 1,131 | $ | 2,485 | $ | (1,354 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of | ||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,539 | $ | 1,125 | $ | 1,414 | ||||||
Investments | — | 6 | (6) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 2,539 | $ | 1,131 | $ | 1,408 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cash and cash equivalents and investments decreasedincreased from 31 July 20152016 as a result of net cash provided by operating activities and the proceeds from the issuance of $750 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2022 and $500 million of 4.875% Senior Notes due 2024. These cash inflows were partially offset by net cash outflows for the acquisitioncapital expenditures of Dot Hill$434 million, dividends paid to our shareholders of $674$561 million, repurchase of our ordinary shares of $1.1 billion, dividends paid to our shareholders$460 million and early redemption and repurchase of $727 million,debt of which $163 million was disclosed in our fiscal year 2015 consolidated financial statements, and capital expenditures of $587$316 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by our net cash provided by operating activities. The following table summarizes results from the statement of cash flows for the periods indicated:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Net cash flow provided by (used in): | |||||||
Operating activities | $ | 1,680 | $ | 2,647 | |||
Investing activities | (1,211 | ) | (1,287 | ) | |||
Financing activities | (1,820 | ) | (1,495 | ) | |||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates | (3 | ) | (20 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (1,354 | ) | $ | (155 | ) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Net cash flow provided by (used in): | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 1,916 | $ | 1,680 | ||||
Investing activities | (459) | (1,211) | ||||||
Financing activities | (46) | (1,820) | ||||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates | — | (3) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 1,411 | $ | (1,354) | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2017 was approximately $1.9 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted fornon-cash items including depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, and:
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2016 was approximately $1.7 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted fornon-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock-basedshare-based compensation, and:
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2015 was approximately $2.6 billion and includes the effects of net income adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation. Net income includes:
Cash Used in Investing Activities
In fiscal year 2017, we used $459 million for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of tangible assets of approximately $434 million.
In fiscal year 2016, we used $1.2 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $587 million and the acquisition of Dot Hill, net of cash acquired for $634 million.
In fiscal year 2015, we used $1.3 billion for net cash investing activities, which was primarily due to payments for the purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of approximately $747 million and the acquisition of LSI's Flash Business for $450 million.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities of $46 million for fiscal year 2017 was primarily attributable to the following activities:
Net cash used in financing activities of $1.8 billion for fiscal year 2016 was primarily attributable to the following activities:
Net cash used in financing activities of $1.5 billion for fiscal year 2015 was primarily attributable to the following activities:Dividends
Dividends
From the closing of our initial public offering in December 2002 through 2016,2017, we have paid dividends, pursuant to our dividend policy then in effect, totaling approximately $3.8$4.9 billion in the aggregate.
Liquidity Sources
Our primary sources of liquidity as of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, consisted of: (1) approximately $1.1$2.5 billion in cash and cash equivalents, (2) a $700 million senior revolving credit facility and investments, (2)(3) cash we expect to generate from operations and (3) a $700 million senior revolving credit facility.operations.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, no borrowings had been drawn under the revolving credit facility or had been utilized for letters of credit issued under this credit facility. The line of credit is available for borrowings through 15 January 2020, subject to compliance with financial covenants, and other customary conditions to borrowing.
Table of Contentsborrowing and investment grade ratings. If the Company does not have investment grade ratings (as defined in the revolving credit facility) on 15 August 2018, then the maturity date will be August 16, 2018 unless certain extension conditions have been satisfied.
The credit agreement that governs our revolving credit facility, as amended, contains certain covenants that we must satisfy in order to remain in compliance with the credit agreement, as amended. The agreement includes three financial covenants: (1) minimum cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities; (2) a fixed charge coverage ratio; and (3) a net leverage ratio. Onratio on 28 April 2016, the Revolving Credit Agreement was
amended in order to increase the allowable net leverage ratio to adjust for our current financial liquidity position. We were in compliance with the modified covenants as of 1 July 201630 June 2017 and expect to be in compliance for the next 12 months.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, cash and cash equivalents held bynon-Irish subsidiaries was $1.1$2.5 billion. This amount is potentially subject to taxation in Ireland upon repatriation by means of a dividend into our Irish parent. However, it is our intent to indefinitely reinvest earnings ofnon-Irish subsidiaries outside of Ireland and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate such earnings by means of a taxable Irish dividend. Should funds be needed in the Irish parent company and should we be unable to fund parent company activities through means other than a taxable Irish dividend, we would be required to accrue and pay Irish taxes on such dividend.
We believe that our sources of cash will be sufficient to fund our operations and meet our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Cash Requirements and Commitments
Our liquidity requirements are primarily to meet our working capital, product development and capital expenditure needs, to fund scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness, and to fund our quarterly dividend. Our ability to fund these requirements will depend on our future cash flows, which are determined by future operating performance, and therefore, subject to prevailing global macroeconomic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
On 2 August 2016,25 July 2017, our Board of Directors approveddeclared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 54 October 20162017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2120 September 2016.2017.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. Based on our current outlook, we expect to be in compliance with the covenants of our debt agreements over the next 12 months.
The carrying value of our long-term debt as of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015 was $4.1$5.0 billion and $4.2$4.1 billion, respectively. The table below presents the principal amounts of our outstanding long-term debt:
| As of | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Change | |||||||
3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 | $ | 800 | $ | 800 | $ | — | ||||
7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021 | 158 | 158 | — | |||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 | 990 | 1,000 | (10 | ) | ||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 | 995 | 1,000 | (5 | ) | ||||||
4.875% Senior Notes Due June 2027 | 700 | 700 | — | |||||||
5.75% Senior Notes Due December 2034 | 490 | 500 | (10 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 4,133 | $ | 4,158 | $ | (25 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of | ||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | Change | |||||||||
3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 | $ | 710 | $ | 800 | $ | (90) | ||||||
7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021 | — | 158 | (158) | |||||||||
4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022 | 750 | — | 750 | |||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 | 951 | 990 | (39) | |||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024 | 500 | — | 500 | |||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 | 975 | 995 | (20) | |||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027 | 697 | 700 | (3) | |||||||||
5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034 | 490 | 490 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | 5,073 | $ | 4,133 | $ | 940 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time we may repurchase any of our outstanding ordinary shares through private, open market, tender offers, broker assisted purchases or other means. During fiscal year 2016,2017, we repurchased approximately 2413 million of our ordinary shares.shares including statutory tax withholdings related to vesting of employee equity awards. As of 1 July 2016, $1.830 June 2017, $1.3 billion remained
available for repurchase under our existing repurchase authorization limit. All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Association.
For fiscal year 2017,2018, we expect capital expenditures to be below our long-term targeted range of 6% to 8%less than 5% of revenue. We require substantial amounts of cash to fund any increased working capital requirements, future capital expenditures, scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness future capital expenditures and any increased working capital requirements.payments of dividends. We will continue to evaluate and manage the retirement and replacement of existing debt and associated obligations, including evaluating the issuance of new debt securities, exchanging existing debt securities for other debt securities and retiring debt pursuant to privately negotiated transactions, open market purchases, tender offers or other means or otherwise. In addition, we may selectively pursue strategic alliances, acquisitions and investments, which may require additional capital.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, have been summarized in the table below:
| | Fiscal Year(s) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Total | 2017 | 2018- 2019 | 2020- 2021 | Thereafter | |||||||||||
Contractual Cash Obligations: | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 4,133 | $ | — | $ | 800 | $ | — | $ | 3,333 | ||||||
Interest payments on debt | 1,761 | 198 | 381 | 334 | 848 | |||||||||||
Purchase obligations(2) | 713 | 713 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Operating leases(1) | 168 | 27 | 38 | 21 | 82 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 110 | 110 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Other funding requirements(3) | 44 | 12 | 24 | 8 | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | 6,929 | 1,060 | 1,243 | 363 | 4,263 | |||||||||||
Commitments: | ||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit or bank guarantees | 108 | 108 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 7,037 | $ | 1,168 | $ | 1,243 | $ | 363 | $ | 4,263 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Total | 2018 | 2019-2020 | 2021-2022 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Cash Obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 5,073 | $ | — | $ | 710 | $ | 750 | $ | 3,613 | ||||||||||
Interest payments on debt | 1,848 | 241 | 433 | 420 | 754 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(1) | 1,484 | 959 | 525 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases(2) | 135 | 19 | 26 | 15 | 75 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 107 | 107 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other funding requirements(3) | 30 | 12 | 18 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Subtotal | 8,677 | 1,338 | 1,712 | 1,185 | 4,442 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit or bank guarantees | 106 | 106 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,783 | $ | 1,444 | $ | 1,712 | $ | 1,185 | $ | 4,442 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Purchase obligations are defined as contractual obligations for the purchase of goods or services, which are enforceable and legally binding on us, and that specify all significant terms. |
(2) | Includes total future minimum rent expense undernon-cancelable leases for both occupied and vacated facilities (rent expense is shown net of sublease income). |
(3) | Consists of funding requirements related to strategic commitments. |
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for the payment of related interest totaling $13$15 million, none of which is expected to be settled within one year. Outside of one year, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when cash settlement with a taxing authority will occur.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, we did not have any materialoff-balance sheet arrangements.
Financial Risk Management
We have exposure to market risks due to the volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit rating changes, equity and bond markets. A portion of these risks aremay be hedged, but fluctuations could impact our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Additionally, we have exposure to downgrades in the credit ratings of our counterparties as well as exposure related to our credit rating changes.
Interest Rate Risk.1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company had no material available-for-sale securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The Company determined no material available-for-sale securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 1 July 2016.30 June 2017. We currently do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
We have fixed rate debt obligations. We enter into debt obligations for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures and working capital needs.
The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted-average interest rates by year of maturity for our investment portfolio and debt obligations as of 1 July 2016.30 June 2017.
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions, except percentages) | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value at 30 June 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 1,178 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,178 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 1.21% | 1.21% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total fixed income | $ | 1,178 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,178 | ||||||||||||||||
Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | — | $ | 710 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 750 | $ | 3,613 | $ | 5,073 | $ | 5,159 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.75% | 4.25% | 4.93% | 4.66% |
(US Dollars in millions, except percentages) | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value at 1 July 2016 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 762 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 762 | $ | 762 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.35 | % | 0.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 10.69 | % | 3.08 | % | 9.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed income | $ | 767 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 768 | $ | 768 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.42 | % | 3.08 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 800 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,333 | $ | 4,133 | $ | 3,491 | |||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.75 | % | 5.03 | % | 4.78 | % |
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We From time to time, we may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to manage exposure related to certain foreign currency commitments and anticipated foreign currency denominated expenditures. Our policy prohibits us from entering into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. At this time, we have not identified any material exposure associated with the changes as a result of the British vote to exit the European Union.
We also hedge a portionportions of our foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions with foreign currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The changes in fair value of these hedges are recognized in earnings in the same period as the gains and losses from the remeasurement of the assets and liabilities. These foreign currency forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging. All these The Company has no outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts mature within 12 months.as of 30 June 2017.
We evaluate hedging effectiveness prospectively and retrospectively and record any ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in Cost of revenue on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. We did not have any material net gains (losses) recognized in Cost of revenue for cash flow hedges due to hedge ineffectiveness or discontinued cash flow hedges during the fiscal years 20162017 and 2015.2016.
The table below provides information as of 1 July 2016 about our foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The table is provided in U.S. dollar equivalent amounts and presents the notional
amounts (at the contract exchange rates) and the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rates.
(US Dollars in millions, except average contract rate) | Notional Amount | Average Contract Rate | Estimated Fair Value(1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts: | ||||||||||
British Pound Sterling | $ | 57 | 1.42 | $ | (3 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 57 | $ | (3 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other Market Risks. We have exposure to counterparty credit downgrades in the form of credit risk related to our foreign currency forward exchange contracts and our fixed income portfolio. We monitor and limit our credit exposure for our foreign currency forward exchange contracts by performing ongoing credit evaluations. We also manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any one counterparty, and we maintain limits on maximum tenor of contracts based on the credit rating of the financial institution. Additionally, the investment portfolio is diversified and structured to minimize credit risk. As of 1 July 2016, we had no material credit exposure related to our foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Changes in our corporate issuer credit ratings have minimal impact on our financial results, but downgrades may negatively impact our future transaction costs and our ability to execute transactions with various counterparties.
We are subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by ourits employees as part of ouritsNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the "SDCP"“SDCP”). In fiscal year 2014, the Company entered into a Total Return Swap ("TRS"(“TRS”) in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCP liabilities. The Company pays a floating rate, based on LIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liability due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees.
LIKELY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
We are committed to developing new component technologies, products and alternative storage technologies. Our research and development focus is designed to bring new products to market in high volume, with quality attributes that our customers expect, before our competitors. Part of our product development strategy is to leverage a design platform and/or subsystem within product families to serve different market needs. This platform strategy allows for more efficient resource utilization, leverages best design practices, reduces exposure to changes in demand, and allows for achievement of lower costs through purchasing economies. Our advanced technology integration effort focuses disk drive and component research on recording subsystems, including read/write heads and recording media; market-specific product technology; and technology focused towards new business opportunities. The primary purpose of our advanced technology integration effort is to ensure timely availability of mature component technologies to our product development teams as well as allowing us to leverage and coordinate those technologies in the design centers across our products in order to take advantage of opportunities in the marketplace. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, we had product development expenses of approximately $1,237$1,232 million and $1,353$1,237 million, respectively, which represented 11% and 10%11% of our consolidated revenue, respectively.
DIRECTORS
The directors are as listed on page A-3. Mr. Gregorio Reyes3. Ms. Kristen M. Onken resigned from the board on 2119 October 2015 and2016. Mr. Mark W. Adams was replaced by Dr. Dambisa Moyoappointed as a director on the same date.
Table of Contents19 January 2017. Mr. William D. Mosley was appointed as a director on 25 July 2017.
SECRETARY
Mr. Kenneth M. MassaroniMs. Regan J. MacPherson resigned as the secretary effective 2 June 2017. Ms. Katherine E. Schuelke was appointed as the secretary on 21 October 2015 and was replaced by Ms. Regan J. MacPherson on the same date.26 June 2017.
DIRECTORS'DIRECTORS’ AND SECRETARY'SSECRETARY’S INTERESTS IN SHARES
Details of directors'directors’ and secretary'ssecretary’s interests in the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc as at 30 June 2017 were as follows:
Interests held as at 30 June 2017(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Director | Shares | Vested options | Unvested options | Restricted share units | Restricted shares | |||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo(2) | 1,251,346 | 521,364 | 149,217 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 27,262 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Mark W. Adams(3) | — | — | — | 5,470 | — | |||||||||||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 16,720 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 12,281 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
William T. Coleman | 9,920 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 8,681 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo | 3,316 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 28,974 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 6,026 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Edward J. Zander | 97,621 | — | — | 8,437 | — | |||||||||||||||
Secretary | ||||||||||||||||||||
Katherine E. Schuelke | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | All interests declared are in the ordinary shares of $0.00001 par value of Seagate Technology plc. |
(2) | Mr. Luczo’s interests held as at 30 June 2017 excludes 247,634 unvested awards that contain certain performance and market conditions. |
(3) | Mr. Adams’ interests held at the date of appointment consisted of 5,470 restricted share units. |
Details of directors’ and secretary’s interests in the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc as at 1 July 2016, were as follows:
| Interests held as at 1 July 2016(1) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Director | Shares | Vested options | Unvested options | Restricted share units | Restricted shares | |||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo(2) | 1,826,969 | 400,423 | 270,158 | — | — | |||||||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 23,946 | 1,251 | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 13,404 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 9,794 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
William Coleman | 13,235 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 5,365 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Kristen M. Onken | 20,413 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
C.S. Park | 32,735 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Dambisa F. Moyo(3) | — | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Edward J. Zander | 67,996 | 10,000 | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 2,710 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||
Secretary | ||||||||||||||||
Regan J. MacPherson(4) | 5,078 | — | 100,796 | 6,118 | — |
Details of directors' and secretary's interests in the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc as at 3 July 2015, or subsequent date of appointment, were as follows:
| Interests held as at 3 July 2015(1) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Director | Shares | Vested options | Unvested options | Restricted share units | Restricted shares | |||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo(2) | 1,218,320 | 90,334 | 179,563 | — | — | |||||||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 34,155 | 1,251 | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 10,694 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
Mei Wei Cheng | 7,762 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
William Coleman | 10,525 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 2,655 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
Kristen M. Onken | 17,703 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
C.S. Park | 32,125 | — | — | 4,235 | — | |||||||||||
Edward J. Zander | 54,795 | 65,000 | — | 4,235 | ||||||||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | — | — | — | 4,235 | — |
Interests held as at 1 July 2016(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Director | Shares | Vested options | Unvested options | Restricted share units | Restricted shares | |||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Luczo(2) | 1,826,969 | 400,423 | 270,158 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Frank J. Biondi, Jr. | 23,946 | 1,251 | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Michael R. Cannon | 13,404 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Mei-Wei Cheng | 9,794 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
William T. Coleman | 13,235 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Jay L. Geldmacher | 5,365 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo(3) | — | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Dr. Chong Sup Park | 32,735 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Stephanie Tilenius | 2,710 | — | — | 5,182 | — | |||||||||||||||
Edward J. Zander | 67,996 | 10,000 | — | 5,182 | ||||||||||||||||
Secretary | ||||||||||||||||||||
Katherine E. Schuelke | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | All interests declared are in the ordinary shares of $0.00001 par value of Seagate Technology plc. |
(2) | Mr. Luczo’s interests held as at 1 July 2016 excludes 295,391 unvested options and awards that contain certain performance and market conditions. |
(3) | Dr. Moyo’s interests held at the date of appointment includes 5,182 restricted share units. |
The directors and the company secretary had no interests in any other group company as required to be disclosed in accordance with Section 329 of the Companies Act 2014.
IMPORTANT EVENTS SINCE THE PERIOD END
Dividends
On 2 August 2016,25 July 2017, our Board of Directors approveddeclared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 54 October 20162017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2120 September 2016.2017.
July 20162017 Restructuring Plan
On 11 July 2016,25, 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the "July 2016 Plan"“July 2017 Plan”) for continued consolidation ofto reduce its global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas.cost structure. The July 20162017 Plan included reducing worldwidethe Company’s global headcount by approximately 6,500600 employees. The July 20162017 Plan, which the Company expects to be largelysubstantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2017,2018, is expected to result in total pretaxpre-tax charges of approximately $164$50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.2018. These charges are expected to consistbe comprised of cash expenditures on severance and employee-related costs.
Planned Leadership Transition
On July 25, 2017 the Company’s Board of approximately $82 millionDirectors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of employee termination coststhe Company effective October 1, 2017. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as a director of the Company, effective July 25, 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as a director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders when he is expected to stand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On July 25, 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with the Company in the role of Executive Chairman effective October 1, 2017 and $51 millionwill continue to serve as Chairman of other exit costs, as well as other non-cash chargesthe Board of approximately $31 million.Directors.
As previously announced on June 2, 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Cloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On July 20, 2017, the Company and Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of his departure will be October 2, 2017.
POLITICAL DONATIONS
During the year ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, the Company made no political donations.
BRANCHES OUTSIDE THE STATE
InAs required to be disclosed in accordance with Section 326 of the Companies Act 2014, the Companygroup has established branches, within the meaning of EUEuropean Communities Council Directive 89/666/EEC in Brazil, China, Russia, the Netherlands, Singapore, Northern Ireland (Springtown), India, Korea and Thailand.
ACCOUNTING RECORDS
The directors are responsible for ensuring that adequate accounting records, as outlined in Sections 281 to 285 of the Companies Act 2014, are kept by the Company. To achieve this, the directors have appointed experienced bookkeepers who are professionally qualified, who report to the Chief Financial Officer and ensure that the requirements of Sections 281 to 285 of the Companies Act 2014 are complied with.
The books and accounting records are maintained at the Company'sCompany’s principal accounting offices at 10200 South De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California, United States of America, and are open at all reasonable times to inspection by the directors. Accounts and returns relating to the business dealt with in the accounting records are kept in order to disclose with reasonable accuracy the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company. These records are returned to the Company'sCompany’s registered office at intervals not exceeding six months.
RELEVANT AUDIT INFORMATION
The directors believe that they have taken all steps necessary to make themselves aware of any relevant“relevant audit informationinformation” (as defined in Section 330(2) of the Companies Act 2014) and have established that the Group'sGroup’s statutory auditors are aware of that information. In so far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group'sGroup’s statutory auditors are unaware.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
TheIn accordance with Section 167(3) of the Companies Act 2014, the Group has established an Audit Committee with responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process, the audit process, the system of internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations.
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS'DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
Company law in the Republic of Ireland requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Parent Company and of the Group and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period.
In preparing the financial statements of the Group, the Directors are required to:
The considerations set out above for the Group are also required to be addressed by the Directors in preparing the financial statements of the Parent Company (which are set out on pages A-108A-109 to A-115)A-116), in respect of which the applicable Irish law and accounting standards are those which are generally accepted in the Republic of Ireland.
The Directors have elected to prepare the Parent Company'sCompany’s financial statements in accordance with accounting standards issued by the Financial Reporting Council and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, including FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland).
The Directors are responsible for keeping accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the Parent Company and which enable them to ensure that the financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with applicable US generally accepted accounting principles and comply with the provisions of the Companies Acts 2014. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
As required by Section 225 (2) of the Companies Act 2014, of Ireland, the directors acknowledge that they are responsible for securing the Company'sCompany’s compliance with its "relevant obligations"“relevant obligations” (as defined in that legislation)Section 225 of Companies Act 2014). The directors further confirm that a compliance policy statement has been drawn up in accordance with Section 225(3)(a) of the Companies Act 2014, and that appropriate arrangements and structures have been put in place that are, in the directors'directors’ opinion, designed to secure material compliance with the relevant obligations. A review of those arrangements and structures has been conducted in the financial year to which this report relates.
AUDITORS
Ernst & Young, Chartered Accountants, have expressed their willingness to continue in office in accordance with the Section 383(2) of the Companies Act 2014.
Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 1925 August 20162017
/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZO | /s/ CHONG SUP PARK | |
Stephen J. Luczo |
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'SAUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
Report on the audit of the financial statements
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Seagate Technology plc (the ‘parent company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘group’) for the year ended 1 July 201630 June 2017 which comprise the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Balance Sheet, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Parent Company Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Parent Company Statement of Financial Position, the Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the related notes 1 to 2120 in respect of the groupGroup financial statements and the related notes 1 to 109 in respect to the parent company financial statements.statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies set out in note 1. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the groupGroup financial statements is Irish law and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), as defined in section 279 of Part 6 of the Companies Act 2014, to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of that Part of the Companies Act 2014 and for2014. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the parent company financial statements in accordance withis applicable Irish law and accounting standards issued by the Financial Reporting Council and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland), including FRS 102
This report is made solely to the company's members, as a body, in accordance with section 391 of the Companies Act 2014. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company's members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors' Responsibilities set out on page A-47, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements giving a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with Irish law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board's Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the group's and parent company's circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the directors' report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect or materially inconsistent with the knowledge acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC (Continued)
Companies Act 2014, to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of that Part of the Companies Act 2014, of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Group as at 1 July 2016 and of the profit for the Group for the year then ended;2014;
• | the parent company statement of financial position gives a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the parent company as at 30 June 2017, and has been properly prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP, including FRS 102The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland; and |
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (Ireland) (ISAs (Ireland)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group and the parent company in accordance with ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of financial statements in Ireland, including the Ethical Standard issued by the Irish Accounting and Auditing Supervisory Authority (IAASA), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Revenue recognition—Sales incentive program rebates and discounts
Reported revenue is a key financial statement metric of higher importance to users of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As disclosed by the Company in note 1Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, revenue is measured taking into account sales incentive program rebates and price protection discounts earned by customers on the Group’s sales to original equipment manufacturers and distributors. Revenue is recognised when the criteria in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605 (ASC 605) have been met, including upon the transfer of the risk and rewards of the underlying products to the customer and when the related fee is fixed or determinable. There are varying levels of judgment in the calculation of sales program rebates and discounts, including estimating the number of products qualifying for the same and the level of customer attainment of available incentive rebates. Higher levels of judgment are required to estimate future price erosion for quantities of inventory to be sold by the Company’s distributor customers in future periods, which could have a material impact on the financial statements. There is a risk that revenue may be overstated because of fraud resulting from the existence of undisclosed special terms or side agreements or other customer compensatory elements resulting from management feeling the pressure to meet performance targets at the period end, which are not accounted for in the financial statements.
Our audit procedures included testing the Company’s revenue recognition accounting policies relating to sales program rebates and discounts under applicable accounting standards, and assessing the Company’s compliance with those policies. We tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the completeness and accuracy of sales program rebates and discounts computations, and correct timing of revenue recognition.
In addition, our audit procedures addressing sales programs included the following:
Deferred income Taxes
As disclosed by the Company in note 7 Income Taxes, at 30 June 2017, the Company has gross deferred tax assets of $1,640 million, partially offset by a valuation allowance of $966 million. The Company operates
across a number of income tax jurisdictions and undertakes a high level of cross-border transactions. The Group also has significant recognised and unrecognised deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses in its U.S. income tax jurisdiction. Deferred income tax positions were significant to our audit because the assessment process, which includes forecasting future taxable profits in the U.S., involves inherent uncertainty, is complex, and the amounts involved are material to the financial statements as a whole.
We performed audit procedures on the completeness and accuracy of the amounts recognised as current and deferred income tax expense, including managements’ assessment of the tax impact of changes in the Company’s business due to ongoing restructuring activities, correspondence with tax authorities and the evaluation of tax exposures. In addition, in respect of deferred tax assets, we assessed and tested the Company’s analysis and assumptions supporting the probability that deferred tax assets recognised in the balance sheet will be recovered through taxable income in future years. As part of our procedures, we inspected and tested, among other things, management’s budgets, forecasts and assessments of the impact of tax laws on current and deferred income taxes. In addition, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s assumptions by comparing prior period forecasts to actual current period results. We also evaluated the design and performed tests of the operating effectiveness of controls in this area. In conducting our procedures, we involved local and international tax specialists to analyse the Company’s tax positions and to test the assumptions used to determine tax positions. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements.
Provisions for product warranties
As disclosed by the Company in note 16Guarantees, at 30 June 2017 the provisions for product warranties amounted to $233 million. The Company issues various types of product warranties under which the performance of products delivered is generally guaranteed for a certain period or term. The reserve for product warranties includes estimates regarding product failure rates, the timing of returns during the warranty period, and the cost to repair or replace products under warranty. We focused on this area because changes in these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the levels of provisions recorded in the financial statements due to the higher estimation uncertainty around the Company’s product return rates.
We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process for estimating reserves related to product warranties, evaluated the design of, and performed tests of the operating effectiveness of controls in this area. Our focus included evaluating and testing the basis for the assumptions developed and used in the determination of the warranty provisions by performing retrospective reviews of the prior return rates used by the Company and any changes to current rates, by performing sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of changes to the warranty provision based on changes in product return rates, and testing the validity, completeness and accuracy of the data used in the calculations. This included testing, on a sample basis, the historical product return and current period shipments data used by the Company in the warranty provision calculation, and comparison to relevant available industry data. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements.
Restructuring activities and related accrued liabilities
As disclosed by the Company in note 5Restructuring and Exit Costs,restructuring charges of $178 million were recorded during the year ended 30 June 2017 in relation to the Company’s ongoing manufacturing facilities consolidation. Management judgment is required in relation to the recognition, measurement and disclosure of these restructuring expenses, including estimates of fair value of land and buildings no longer held for use and/or held for sale and related impairment charges.
We have tested management’s assumptions used to identify direct and incremental costs of restructuring activities, primarily relating to asset impairment charges, severance payments and other costs incurred to close manufacturing facilities arising as a result of the restructuring activities. Our audit work included:
For those exit and impairment charges classified as restructuring and other within operating expenses, we have tested the classification based on the nature and timing of such amounts. We further assessed the adequacy of the disclosure in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements.
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the audit and in forming our audit opinion.
Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.
We determined materiality for the Group to be $40 million, which is approximately 5% of Group profit before tax. We believe that profit before tax is a key performance indicator for the Group. We therefore considered Profit before tax to be the most appropriate performance metric on which to base our materiality calculation as we consider it to be the most relevant performance measure to the stakeholders of the Group. During the course of our audit, we reassessed initial materiality and the only change in final materiality was to reflect the actual reported performance of the Group in the year.
Performance materiality
The application of materiality at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.
On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group’s overall control environment, our judgement was that performance materiality should be set at 75% of our planning materiality, namely $30 million. We have set performance materiality at this percentage due to our past history of misstatements, our ability to assess the likelihood of misstatements, both corrected and uncorrected, the effectiveness of the control environment and other factors affecting the entity and its financial reporting.
Audit work at component locations for the purpose of obtaining audit coverage over significant financial statement accounts is undertaken based on a percentage of total performance materiality. The performance materiality set for each component is based on the relative scale and risk of the component to the Group as a whole and our assessment of the risk of misstatement at that component. In the current year, the range of performance materiality allocated to components was $6 million to $24 million.
Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of $2 million, which is set at approximately 5% of planning materiality, as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.
Audit Scope
An overview of the scope of our audit
Tailoring the scope
Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determine our audit scope for each entity within the Group. Taken together, this enables us to form an opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In assessing the risk of material misstatement to the Group financial statements, and to ensure we had adequate quantitative coverage of significant accounts in the financial statements, we selected 10 components covering entities across the Americas, Asia and Europe, which represent the principal business units within the Group.
Of the 10 components selected, one was characterised as all U.S. locations for which we reviewed all of the relevant financial information (‘full scope component’) which was selected based on its size or risk characteristics. For the remaining 9 components (‘specific scope components’), we performed audit procedures on specific accounts within that component that we considered had the potential for the greatest impact on the significant accounts in the financial statements either because of the size of these accounts or their risk profile.
The reporting components where we performed audit procedures accounted for 99% of the Group’s profit before tax, 100% of the Group’s Revenue and 99% of the Group’s Total Assets.
Revenue recognition, including our procedures to addressSales incentive program rebates and discounts, a key audit matter, was subject to full audit procedures in each of the full and specific scope locations with significant revenue streams. For the current year, the full scope component contributed 39% of the Group’s profit before tax, 35% of the Group’s Revenue and 91% of the Group’s Total Assets. The specific scope components contributed 60% of the Group’s Profit before tax, 65% of the Group’s Revenue and 8% of the Group’s Total Assets. The audit scope of these components may not have included testing of all significant accounts of the component but will have contributed to the coverage of significant risks tested for the Group.
The remaining components together represent 1% of the Group’s profit before tax and therefore none are individually greater than 5% of profit before tax used to establish materiality. For these components, we performed other procedures, including analytical review, testing of consolidation journals and intercompany eliminations and foreign currency translation recalculations to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Conclusions relating to going concern
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which ISA 570 (Ireland) ‘Going concern’ requires us to report to you where;
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the annual report other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Matters on which we are required to report by the Companies ActsAct 2014
In our opinion, based solely on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
Based on our knowledge and understanding of the company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the directors’ report.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of Sections 305 to 312 of the Companies Act 2014 which require us to report to you if, in our opinion, the disclosures of directors'directors’ remuneration and transactions specified by law are not made.
Respective responsibilities
19Responsibilities of directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement set on page A-47, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair
view, and for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (Ireland) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the IAASA’s website at:http://www.iaasa.ie/getmedia/b2389013-1cf6-458b-9b8f-a98202dc9c3a/Description_of_auditors_ responsiblities_for_audit.pdf. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe our responsibilities
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 391 of the Companies Act 2014. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
/s/ DERMOT DALY
Dermot Daly
For and on behalf of Ernst & Young
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Audit Firm
Dublin
25 August 20162017
CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
| | Fiscal Years Ended | Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | Note | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | $ | 10,771 | $ | 11,160 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue | 8,545 | 9,930 | 7,597 | 8,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 2,615 | 3,809 | 3,174 | 2,615 | ||||||||||||||||||
Product development | 1,237 | 1,353 | 1,232 | 1,237 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and administrative | 635 | 857 | 606 | 635 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 4 | 123 | 129 | 4 | 104 | 123 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other, net | 5 | 175 | 32 | 5 | 178 | 175 | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on arbitration award, net | 14 | — | (620 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
2,170 | 1,751 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
2,120 | 2,170 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating earnings | 445 | 2,058 | 1,054 | 445 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 3 | 6 | 12 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (193 | ) | (207 | ) | (222) | (193) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income and charges, net | 19 | 113 | (29) | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Income before taxes | 274 | 1,970 | 815 | 274 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 7 | 26 | 228 | 7 | 43 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Seagate Technology plc ordinary shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 12 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 5.38 | 12 | $ | 2.61 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 12 | 0.82 | 5.26 | 12 | 2.58 | 0.82 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of shares used in per share calculations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 12 | 299 | 324 | 12 | 296 | 299 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 12 | 302 | 331 | 12 | 299 | 302 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Net income | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||
Cash flow hedges | |||||||
Change in net unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges | (4 | ) | (11 | ) | |||
Less: reclassification for amounts included in net income | 2 | 13 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net change | (2 | ) | 2 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Marketable securities | |||||||
Net change | — | — | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Post-retirement plans | |||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on post-retirement plans | 8 | (5 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Net change | 8 | (5 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (1 | ) | (25 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 5 | (28 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | 253 | 1,714 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income attributable to Seagate Technology plc | $ | 253 | $ | 1,714 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | ||||||||
Cash flow hedges | ||||||||
Change in net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges | (3) | (4) | ||||||
Less: reclassification for amounts included in net income | 4 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net change | 1 | (2) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Post-retirement plans | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on post-retirement plans | — | 8 | ||||||
Less: reclassification for amounts included in net income | 2 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net change | 2 | 8 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 5 | (1) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | 8 | 5 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Comprehensive income | 780 | 253 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Fixed assets: | ||||||||||
Goodwill | 4 | $ | 1,237 | $ | 874 | |||||
Intangible assets | 4 | 448 | 370 | |||||||
Tangible assets | 2 | 2,160 | 2,278 | |||||||
Financial assets | 9 | 113 | 120 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
3,958 | 3,642 | |||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||
Inventories | 2 | 868 | 993 | |||||||
Trade debtors | 2 | 1,318 | 1,735 | |||||||
Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year | 2 | 216 | 355 | |||||||
Investments | 2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 | 1,125 | 2,479 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
3,533 | 5,568 | |||||||||
Other debtors—amounts falling due after one year | 2 | 761 | 635 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | $ | 8,252 | $ | 9,845 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||||
Capital and reserves: | ||||||||||
Share capital | 10 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Share premium | 10 | 5,509 | 5,430 | |||||||
Other reserves | 10 | 395 | 274 | |||||||
Profit and loss account | 10 | (4,311 | ) | (2,686 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
1,593 | 3,018 | |||||||||
Provisions for liabilities: | ||||||||||
Taxation | 7 | 31 | 49 | |||||||
Other provisions | 2 | 269 | 267 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
300 | 316 | |||||||||
Creditors—amounts falling due within one year: | ||||||||||
Debt | 9 | — | — | |||||||
Trade creditors | 1,517 | 1,540 | ||||||||
Other creditors | 2 | 560 | 643 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
2,077 | 2,183 | |||||||||
Creditors—amounts falling due after one year: | ||||||||||
Debt | 9 | 4,130 | 4,155 | |||||||
Other creditors | 152 | 173 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | $ | 8,252 | $ | 9,845 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Fixed assets: | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | 4 | $ | 1,238 | $ | 1,237 | |||||||
Intangible assets | 4 | 281 | 448 | |||||||||
Tangible assets | 2 | 1,950 | 2,160 | |||||||||
Financial assets | 9 | 125 | 113 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
3,594 | 3,958 | |||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||
Inventories | 2 | 982 | 868 | |||||||||
Trade debtors | 2 | 1,199 | 1,318 | |||||||||
Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year | 2 | 246 | 216 | |||||||||
Investments | 2 | — | 6 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 | 2,539 | 1,125 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
4,966 | 3,533 | |||||||||||
Other debtors - amounts falling due after one year | 2 | 708 | 722 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 9,268 | $ | 8,213 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Capital and reserves: | ||||||||||||
Share capital | 10 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Share premium | 10 | 5,595 | 5,509 | |||||||||
Other reserves | 10 | 540 | 395 | |||||||||
Profit and loss account | 10 | (4,771) | (4,311 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
1,364 | 1,593 | |||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Taxation | 7 | 30 | 31 | |||||||||
Other provisions | 2 | 276 | 269 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
306 | 300 | |||||||||||
Creditors - amounts falling due within one year: | ||||||||||||
Trade creditors | 1,626 | 1,517 | ||||||||||
Other creditors | 2 | 840 | 560 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
2,466 | 2,077 | |||||||||||
Creditors - amounts falling due after one year: | ||||||||||||
Debt | 9 | 5,021 | 4,091 | |||||||||
Other creditors | 111 | 152 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 9,268 | $ | 8,213 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 1925 August 20162017
/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZO | /s/ CHONG SUP PARK | |||
Stephen J. Luczo | Dr. Chong Sup Park |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| Fiscal Years Ended | Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 815 | 841 | 749 | 815 | |||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 120 | 137 | 137 | 120 | |||||||||||
(Gain) loss on redemption and repurchase of debt | (3 | ) | 74 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sale of tangible assets | — | 2 | |||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on redemption and repurchase of debt | 7 | (3) | |||||||||||||
Impairment of other long-lived assets | 26 | — | 42 | 26 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (2 | ) | 2 | 3 | (2) | ||||||||||
Other non-cash operating activities, net | 12 | (9 | ) | 20 | 12 | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | — | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Trade debtors | 464 | (2 | ) | 122 | 464 | ||||||||||
Inventories | 145 | 29 | (114) | 145 | |||||||||||
Trade creditors | (24 | ) | (58 | ) | 121 | (24) | |||||||||
Accrued employee compensation | (78 | ) | (40 | ) | 53 | (78) | |||||||||
Accrued expenses, income taxes and warranty | (42 | ) | (112 | ) | 47 | (42) | |||||||||
Vendor non-trade debtors | — | 47 | |||||||||||||
Other assets and liabilities | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (43) | (1) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,680 | 2,647 | 1,916 | 1,680 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition of tangible assets | (587 | ) | (747 | ) | (434) | (587) | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of financial assets | 1 | — | |||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | — | (5 | ) | (37) | — | ||||||||||
Sales of investments | — | 4 | |||||||||||||
Maturities of investments | — | 19 | 6 | — | |||||||||||
Cash used in acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | (634 | ) | (453 | ) | — | (634) | |||||||||
Other investing activities, net | 9 | (105 | ) | 6 | 10 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,211 | ) | (1,287 | ) | (459) | (1,211) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — | 1,196 | 1,232 | — | |||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (22 | ) | (1,026 | ) | |||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (316) | (22) | |||||||||||||
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards | (56 | ) | — | (27) | (56) | ||||||||||
Repurchases of ordinary shares | (1,090 | ) | (1,087 | ) | (460) | (1,090) | |||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | (727 | ) | (664 | ) | (561) | (727) | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares under employee stock plans | 79 | 98 | 86 | 79 | |||||||||||
Other financing activities, net | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | — | (4) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (1,820 | ) | (1,495 | ) | (46) | (1,820) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (3 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,354 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 2,479 | 2,634 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | $ | 1,125 | $ | 2,479 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | — | (3) | |||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 1,411 | (1,354) | |||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the year | 1,132 | 2,486 | |||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the year | $ | 2,543 | $ | 1,132 | |||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | |||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 200 | $ | 216 | $ | 172 | $ | 200 | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds | $ | 40 | $ | 285 | $ | 33 | $ | 40 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Seagate Technology plc became the parent company in the Seagate group following a reorganization that took place in 2010.
This transaction was accounted for in these consolidated financial statements as a merger between entities under common control; accordingly, the historical consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology for periods prior to this transaction are considered to be the historical consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology plc. No changes in consolidated assets or liabilities resulted from this transaction, other than Seagate Technology plc has provided a guarantee of amounts due under certain borrowing arrangements as described in Note 6. See Note 10 for a discussion of the capital structure of Seagate Technology plc.
Accounting convention and basis of preparation of financial statements
In the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, unless the context indicates otherwise, as used herein, the terms “Seagate” and the “Company” refer to the Seagate Group.
The directors have elected to prepare the consolidated financial statements of Seagate Technology plc (the "Company"“Company”) in accordance with Section 279 of the Companies Act 2014, which provides that a true and fair view of the state of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss may be given by preparing the financial statements in accordance with US accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP),standards, as such term is defined in Section 279(1) of the Companies Act 2014 (“US GAAP”), to the extent that the use of those principles in the preparation of the financial statements does not contravene any provision of Part 6 of the Companies ActsAct 2014. In producing consolidated financial statements at this level, the Company has taken advantage of the audit exemption for certain of its UK subsidiaries by virtue of s479A of UK Companies Act 2006, see Note 2120 for further detail.
These financial statements therefore were prepared in accordance with Irish Company Law, to present to the shareholders of the Company and file with the Companies Registration Office in Ireland. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements include presentation and additional disclosures required by the Republic of Ireland's Companies Act 2014 in addition to those disclosures required under U.S.US GAAP.
In addition, in these financial statements, terminology typically utilized in a set of U.S.US GAAP financial statements has been retained for the benefit of those users of these financial statements who also access our 10-K U.S.the Company’s US GAAP financial statements as filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Form10-K, rather than utilizing the terminology set out under Irish Company Law. Accordingly, references to revenue, cost of revenue, interest income, interest expense, income tax expense and net income having the same meaning as references to turnover, cost of sales, other interest receivable and similar income, interest payable and similar charges, tax on profit on ordinary activities and profit on ordinary activities after taxation under Irish Company Law. Additionally, references to Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) refer to a component of Other Reserves.
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.US generally accepted accounting principles also requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company's
Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
in applying its most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial statements. Certain prior years amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to June 30.30 June. Accordingly, fiscal yearyears 2017 and 2016 waswere comprised of 52 weeks and ended on 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016. Fiscal year 2015 was comprised of 53weeks and ended on 3 July 2015.2016, respectively. All references to years in these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted. Fiscal year 20172018 will be 52 weeks and will end on 3029 June 2017.2018.
In these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, unless the context indicates otherwise, as used herein, the terms "we," "us," "Seagate," the "Company" and "our" refer to the Seagate Group. In these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, references to Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) refer to a component of Other Reserves.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company'sCompany’s investments are primarily comprised of money market funds, certificates oftime deposits and other interest-bearing bankcertificates of deposits. The Company has classified its marketable securities asavailable-for-sale and they are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),loss, which is a component of Other Reserves. The Company evaluates theavailable-for sale securities in an unrealized loss position for other-than-temporary impairment. Realized gains and losses are included in Other income and charges, net. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
Restricted Cash and Investments.Restricted cash and investments represent cash and cash equivalents and investments that are restricted as to withdrawal or use for other than current operations.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for uncollectible trade debtors based upon expected collectability. This reserve is established based upon historical trends, global macroeconomic conditions and an analysis of specific exposures. The provision for doubtful accounts is recorded as a charge to Marketing and administrative expense.
Inventory. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (using thefirst-in,first-out method) or market. Market value is based upon an estimated average selling price reduced by estimated cost of completion and disposal.
Tangible Assets. Tangible assets are stated at cost. Equipment and buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. The costs of additions and substantial improvements to tangible assets, which extend the economic life of the underlying assets, are capitalized. The cost of maintenance and repairs to tangible assets are expensed as incurred.
Assessment of Goodwill and Other Long-lived Assets for Impairment.Irish Company law requires that goodwill is written off over a period of time which does not exceed its useful economic life. However, the Company does not believe this gives a true and fair view because not all goodwill declines in value. In addition, since goodwill that does decline in value rarely does so on a straight-line basis, straight-line amortization of goodwill over an arbitrary period does not reflect the economic reality. Consistent with U.S.US GAAP, Seagate considers goodwill an indefinite-lived intangible asset that
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
is not amortized over an arbitrary period. Rather, the Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"(“ASC”) Topic 350 ("(“ASC 350"350”),Intangibles—Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. Therefore in order to present a true and fair view of the economic
reality under US GAAP, goodwill is considered indefinite-lived and is not amortized. The Company is not able to reliably estimate the impact on the financial statements of the true and fair override on the basis that the useful economic life of goodwill cannot be predicted with a satisfactory level of reliability nor can the pattern in which goodwill diminishes be known. During fiscal year 2012,2017, the Company adopted ASU Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”)No. 2011-08,2017-04,Intangibles—Intangibles - Goodwill and Other ("ASC(ASC Topic 350")—Testing350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill for Impairment. The Company performs a qualitative assessment in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If it is determined in the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not below its carrying amount, including goodwill, then the Company performswill perform a quantitative two-step impairment test. The first step, identifying a potentialquantitative goodwill impairment comparestest is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Ifamount. Any excess in the carrying value of thea reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step would need to be conducted. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the reporting unitunit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Any excess of the reporting unit goodwill carrying value over its implied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.loss, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
The Company tests other tangible assets, including tangible assets and other intangible assets subject to amortization, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company performs a recoverability test to assess the recoverability of an asset group. If the recoverability test indicates that the carrying value of the asset group is not recoverable, the Company will estimate the fair value of the asset group and the excess of the carrying value over the fair value is allocated pro rata to derive the adjusted carrying value of assets in the asset group. The adjusted carrying value of each asset in the asset group is not reduced below its fair value.
The Company tests other intangible assets not subject to amortization whenever events occur or circumstances change, such as declining financial performance, deterioration in the environment in which the entity operates or deteriorating macroeconomic conditions that have a negative effect on future expected earnings and cash flows that could affect significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset.
Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company applies the requirements of ASC Topic 815 ("(“ASC 815"815”),Derivatives and Hedging. ASC 815 requires that all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships (see note 8).
Establishment of Warranty Accruals. The Company estimates probable product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The Company generally warrants its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company'sCompany’s warranty provision considers estimated product failure rates and trends (including the timing of product returns during the warranty periods), and estimated repair or replacement costs related to product quality issues, if any. The Company also exercises judgment in estimating its ability to sell certain repaired products. Should actual experience in any future period differ significantly from its estimates, the Company'sCompany’s future results of operations could be materially affected.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition, Sales Returns and Allowances, and Sales Incentive Programs. The Company'sCompany’s revenue recognition policy complies with ASC Topic 605 (ASC 605)(“ASC 605”),Revenue Recognition. Revenue from sales of products, including sales to distribution customers, is generally recognized when title and risk of loss has passed to the buyer, which typically occurs upon shipment from the Company or third partyparty’s warehouse facilities, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, including a fixed or determinable price to the buyer, and when collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales of products to certain direct retail customers and to customers in certain indirect retail channels is recognized on a sell-through basis.
The Company records estimated product returns at the time of shipment. The Company also estimates reductions to revenue for sales incentive programs, such as price protection, and volume incentives, and
records such reductions when revenue is recorded. The Company establishes certain distributor and OEM sales programs aimed at increasing customer demand. For OEM sales, rebates are typically based on an OEM customer'scustomer’s volume of purchases from Seagate or other agreed upon rebate programs. For the distribution channel, these programs typically involve rebates related to a distributor'sdistributor’s level of sales, order size, advertising or point of sale activity and price protection adjustments. The Company provides for these obligations at the time that revenue is recorded based on estimated requirements. Marketing development programs are recorded as a reduction to revenue.
Product Development Costs.Product development costs, which includes both research and development costs, are recognized as expense.
Distribution Costs. The Company includes distribution costs, which includes shipping and handling, in Cost of revenue for all periods presented. These costs amount to $132$116 million and $143$132 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Restructuring Costs. The Company records restructuring activities including costs forone-time termination benefits in accordance with ASC Topic 420 ("(“ASC 420"420”),Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. The timing of recognition for severance costs accounted for under ASC 420 depends on whether employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits. If employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits, a liability is recognized ratably over the future service period. Otherwise, a liability is recognized when management has committed to a restructuring plan and has communicated those actions to employees. Employee termination benefits covered by existing benefit arrangements are recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 712,Non-retirementNon-retirement Postemployment Benefits. These costs are recognized when management has committed to a restructuring plan and the severance costs are probable and estimable.
Advertising Expense. The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were approximately $31$16 million and $64$31 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Stock-BasedShare-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock-basedshare-based compensation under the provisions of ASC Topic 718 (ASC 718),Compensation-Stock Compensation. The Company has elected to apply thewith-and-without method to assess the realization of related excess tax benefits.
Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC Topic 740 ("(“ASC 740"740”),Income TaxesTaxes.. In applying ASC 740, the Company makes certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, recognition of income and deductions and calculation of specific tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for income tax and financial statement purposes, as well as tax liabilities associated with
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
uncertain tax positions. The calculation of tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax rules and the potential for future adjustment of the Company'sCompany’s uncertain tax positions by the Internal Revenue Service or other tax jurisdictions. If estimates of these tax liabilities are greater or less than actual results, an additional tax benefit or provision will result. The deferred tax assets the Company records each period depend primarily on the Company'sCompany’s ability to generate future taxable income in the United States and certain non-U.S.non-US jurisdictions. Each period, the Company evaluates the need for a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets and, if necessary, adjusts the valuation allowance so that net deferred tax assets are recorded only to the extent the Company concludes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized. If the Company'sCompany’s outlook for future taxable income changes significantly, the Company'sCompany’s assessment of the need for, and the amount of, a valuation allowance may also change.
Comprehensive Income.
Foreign Currency Remeasurement and Translation. The U.S.US dollar is the functional currency for the majority of the Company'sCompany’s foreign operations. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured into the functional currency of the subsidiary at the balance sheet date. The gains and losses from the remeasurement of foreign currency denominated balances into the functional currency of the subsidiary are included in Other income and charges, net on the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Company had $1$4 million and $0 million in remeasurement losses in fiscal yearyears 2017 and 2016, and $33 million in remeasurement gains in fiscal year 2015.respectively.
The Company translates the assets and liabilities of its non-U.S.non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S.US dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period. Gains and losses from these translations are recognized in foreign currency translation included in Other reserves, which is a component of shareholders'shareholders’ equity. The Company'sCompany’s subsidiaries that use the U.S.US dollar as their functional currency remeasure monetary assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the end of each period, and inventories, property, and nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates. Gains and losses from these remeasurements were not significant and have been included in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
Concentrations
Concentration of Credit Risk.The Company'sCompany’s customer base for disk drive products is concentrated with a small number of OEMs and distributors. The Company does not generally require collateral or other security to support trade debtors. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on its customers'customers’ financial condition. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information. Hewlett-Packard Company and Dell Inc. each accounted for more than 10%than10% of the Company'sCompany’s trade debtors as of 1 July 2016 .30 June 2017.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments and foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The Company further mitigates concentrations of credit risk in its investments through diversification, by limiting its investments in the debt securities of a single issuer, and investing in highly ratedhighly-rated securities.
In entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts, the Company assumes the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
counterparties to these contracts are major multinational commercial banks, and the Company has not incurred and does not expect any losses as a result of counterparty defaults.
Supplier Concentration. Certain of the raw materials, components and equipment used by the Company in the manufacture of its products are available from a sole supplier or a limited number of suppliers.single-sourced vendors. Shortages could occur in these essential materials and components due to an interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry. If the Company were unable to procure certain materials, components or equipment at acceptable prices, it would be required to reduce its manufacturing operations, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. In addition, the Company may make prepayments to certain suppliers.suppliers or enter into minimum volume commitment agreements. Should these suppliers be unable to deliver on their obligations or experience financial difficulty, the Company may not be able to recover these prepayments.
RecentRecently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, August 2015, April 2016, May 2016 and MayDecember 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued ASU2014-09 (ASC Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers,ASU2015-14 ASU 2015-14 (ASC
Topic 606)Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date,ASU2016-10 ASU 2016-10 (ASC Topic 606)Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU2016-12, and ASU 2016-12 (ASC Topic 606)Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,and ASU2016-20 respectively. ASC (ASC Topic 606)Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,respectively.ASC Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial statements users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The amendmentsCompany is required to adopt the guidance in these ASUs are effective forthe first quarter of fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after 15 December 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after 15 December 2016.2019. This standard may be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or retrospectively with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings, which is a component of the Profit and Loss Account on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, in the year of adoption. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact, if any,adoption (“modified retrospective transition approach”). Based on its consolidated financial statements andassessment, the Company plans to adopt the new revenue standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, utilizing the modified retrospective transition approach.method of transition.
While management has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of adopting this new standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company expects the adoption of the new standard will result in the recognition of revenues generally upon shipment In April 2015(sell-in basis) for sales of products to certain direct retail customers and August 2015,customers in certain indirect retail channels which are currently being recognized on a sell-through basis. Accordingly, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03 (ASC Subtopic 835-30),Interest-Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs and ASU 2015-15 (ASC Subtopic 835-30),Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements—AmendmentsCompany will need to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at 18 June 2015 EITF Meeting, respectively. The ASUs require that debt issuance costsestimate variable consideration (e.g. rebates) related to a recognized debt liability, with the exception of those related to line-of-credit arrangements, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The amendments incustomer incentives on these ASUsarrangements. These changes are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after 15 December 2015. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-11 (ASC Topic 330),Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments in this ASU require inventory measurement at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The amendmentsCompany is required and intends to adopt the guidance in this ASU are effective forthe first quarter of fiscal years beginning after 15 December 15 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted by all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period.2018. The Company is indoes not expect the process of assessing the impact, if any, of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16 (ASC Topic 805),Business Combinations Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The amendments in this update require that an acquirer recognize measurement period adjustments in the period in which the adjustments are determined. The income effects of such measurement period adjustments are to be recorded in the same period's financial statements but calculated as if the accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date. The impact of measurement period adjustments to earnings that relate to prior period financial statements are to be presented separately on the income statement or disclosed by line item. The amendments in this update are for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after 15 December 15 2015. Early adoption is permitted for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The adoption of this new guidance is not expectedASU to have a material impact on the Company'sits consolidated financial statements and disclosures.statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 (ASC Topic 740),Income Taxes Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after 15 December 15 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted by all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company early adopted this ASU for the December 2015 quarter on a prospective basis. See "Note 7. Income Taxes" for disclosure of the financial statement impact of this adoption.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01 (ASC Subtopic825-10),Financial Instruments—Instruments - Overall Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.The amendments in this ASU require entities to measure all investments in equity securities at fair value with changes recognized through net income. This requirement does not apply to investments that qualify for the equity method of accounting, to those that result in consolidation of the investee, or for which the entity meets a practicability exception to fair value measurement. Additionally, the amendments eliminate certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost and add disclosures related to the measurement categories of financial assets and financial liabilities. The amendmentsCompany is required to adopt the guidance in this ASU are effective forthe first quarter of fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2019. Early adoption is permitted for only certain portions of the ASU. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact if any,of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02 (ASC Topic 842),LeasesLeases.. The ASU amends a number of aspects of lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize operating leases with a term greater than one year on their balance sheet as aright-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, measured at the present value of the lease payments. The amendmentsCompany is required to adopt the guidance in this ASU are effective forthe first quarter of fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-09 (ASC Topic 718718),), Stock Compensation—Compensation - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this ASU are intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax consequences, classification on the consolidated statement of cash flows and treatment of forfeitures. The Company is
required and intends to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Upon adoption, the Company anticipates that this ASU will result in an increase in deferred tax assets relating to net operating losses of approximately $0.5 billion, offset by an equivalent increase in the valuation allowance. This guidance, however, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, Statements of Profit and Loss or Cash Flows.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-16 (ASC Topic 740),Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendments in this ASU require the recognition of the income tax consequences for intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Under current GAAP, current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers are effective for annual periods beginning after 15 December 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.not recognized until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact if any, of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-01 (ASC Topic 805),Business Combination: Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments in this ASU change the definition of a business to assist with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09 (ASC Topic 718),Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this ASU provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The Company is required to adopt the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2015 and August 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-03 (ASC Subtopic835-30), Interest-Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs and ASU2015-15 (ASC Subtopic835-30),Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated withLine-of-Credit Arrangements- Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting, respectively. The ASUs require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability, with the exception of those related toline-of-credit arrangements, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. ASU2015-03 became effective and was adopted by the Company in the September 2016 quarter on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a reduction to Other debtors-due after one year, and Debt due to creditors after one year by $39 million, within the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 1 July 2016. ASU2015-15 became effective and was adopted by the Company in the September 2016 quarter on a retrospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-16 (ASC Topic 805),Business Combinations Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The amendments in this update require that an acquirer recognize measurement period adjustments in the period in which the adjustments are determined. The income effects of such measurement period adjustments are to be recorded in the same period’s financial statements but calculated as if the accounting had been completed as of the acquisition date. The impact of measurement period adjustments to earnings that relate to prior period financial statements are to be presented separately on the income statement or disclosed by line item. The amendments in this update are for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after 15 December 2015. This ASU became effective and was adopted by the Company in the September 2016 quarter on a prospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-18 (ASC Topic 230),Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. The amendments in this update provide guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the total beginning and ending balances for the periods presented on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after 15 December 2017. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the December 2016 quarter on a retrospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The Company classifies restricted cash within Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year in the consolidated balance sheet.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04 (ASC Topic 350),Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendments in this ASU eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test, which requires entities to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, determined in step 1. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the March 2017 quarter on a prospective basis with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-15 (ASC Topic 230), Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this ASU are intended to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payment are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt this ASU in the June 2017 quarter on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
2. Balance Sheet Information
Investments
The following table summarizes, by major type, the fair value and amortized cost of the Company'sCompany’s investments as of 1 July 2016:30 June 2017:
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 318 | $ | — | $ | 318 | ||||
Corporate bonds | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||
Certificates of deposit | 444 | — | 444 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 768 | $ | — | $ | 768 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1) | $ | 755 | ||||||||
Included in Investments | 6 | |||||||||
Included in Other current assets | 7 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 768 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) | Fair Value(2) | |||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 594 | $ | — | $ | 594 | ||||||
Time deposits and certificates of deposit | 584 | — | 584 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 1,178 | $ | — | $ | 1,178 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1) | $ | 1,174 | ||||||||||
Included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year | 4 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,178 | ||||||||||
|
|
(1) | Amount does not include $1,365 million of cash held in banks. |
(2) | Represents the Company’s investments that are listed with the exception of Time deposits and certificates of deposit. |
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company'sCompany’s Other current assetsdebtors - amounts falling due within one year included $7$4 million in restricted cash and investments held as collateral at banks for various performance obligations.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company had no materialavailable-for-sale securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The Company determined noavailable-for-sale securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 1 July 2016.30 June 2017.
The fair value and amortized cost of the Company'sCompany’s investments classified asavailable-for-sale at 1 July 201630 June 2017 by remaining contractual maturity was as follows:
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Due in less than 1 year | $ | 767 | $ | 767 | |||
Due in 1 to 5 years | 1 | 1 | |||||
Due in 5 to 10 years | — | — | |||||
Thereafter | — | — | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 768 | $ | 768 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
Due in less than 1 year | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,178 | ||||
Due in 1 to 5 years | — | — | ||||||
Due in 6 to 10 years | — | — | ||||||
Thereafter | — | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 1,178 | $ | 1,178 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Equity securities which do not have a contractual maturity date are not included in the above table.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)The Company reclassified demand deposits from certificates of deposit and money market funds to cash as of 1 July 2016 in the table below to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification did not result in any change to the cash and cash equivalents balance as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows for all periods presented.
The following table summarizes, by major type, the fair value and amortized cost of the Company'sCompany’s investments as of 31 July 2015:2016:
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) | Fair Value(2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 1,203 | $ | — | $ | 1,203 | ||||
Certificates of deposit | 867 | — | 867 | |||||||
Corporate bonds | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 2,076 | $ | — | $ | 2,076 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1) | $ | 2,063 | ||||||||
Included in Investments | 6 | |||||||||
Included in Other current assets | 7 | |||||||||
Included in Financial assets | — | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 2,076 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain/(Loss) | Fair Value (2) | |||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 232 | $ | — | $ | 232 | ||||||
Corporate bonds | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 5 | — | 5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 243 | $ | — | $ | 243 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Included in Cash and cash equivalents(1) | $ | 230 | ||||||||||
Included in Investments | 6 | |||||||||||
Included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year | 7 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 243 | ||||||||||
|
|
(1) | Amount does not include $895 million of cash held in banks. |
(2) | Represents the Company’s investments that are listed with the exception of Certificates of deposit. |
As of 31 July 2015,2016, the Company'sCompany’s Other current assetsdebtors - amounts falling due within one year included of $7 million in cash and investments held as collateral at banks for various performance obligations.
As of 31 July 2015,2016, the Company had noavailable-for-sale securities that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for a period greater than 12 months. The Company determined noavailable-for-sale securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of 31 July 2015.2016.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheet that reconciles to the corresponding amount in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash included in Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the Statements of Cash Flows Trade Debtors(Dollars in millions) June 30
2017 1 July
2016 3 July
2015 $ 2,539 $ 1,125 $ 2,479 4 7 7 2,543 $ 1,132 2,486
The following table provides details of the trade debtors balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trade Debtors | $ | 1,327 | $ | 1,744 | |||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 1,318 | $ | 1,735 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Trade Debtors | $ | 1,204 | $ | 1,327 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (5) | (9) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 1,199 | $ | 1,318 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
(US Dollars in millions) | Balance at Beginning of Period | Charges to Profit and Loss | Deductions(1) | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal year ended 3 July 2015 | $ | 12 | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 9 | ||||
Fiscal year ended 1 July 2016 | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 9 |
(US Dollars in millions) | Balance at Beginning of Period | Charges to Profit and Loss | Deductions(1) | Balance at End of Period | ||||||||||||
Fiscal year ended 1 July 2016 | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | $ | (1) | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Fiscal year ended 30 June 2017 | $ | 9 | $ | (4) | $ | — | $ | 5 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1) | Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
Inventories
The following table provides details of the inventory balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw materials and components | $ | 307 | $ | 352 | |||
Work-in-process | 297 | 239 | |||||
Finished goods | 264 | 402 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 868 | $ | 993 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Raw materials and components | $ | 350 | $ | 307 | ||||
Work-in-process | 257 | 297 | ||||||
Finished goods | 375 | 264 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 982 | $ | 868 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Other Debtors—Debtors - amounts falling due within one year
The following table provides details of the other debtors—amounts falling due within one year balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor non-trade debtors | $ | 66 | $ | 66 | |||
Deferred income taxes | — | 122 | |||||
Other | 150 | 167 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 216 | $ | 355 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Other debtors include non-trade debtors from certain manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of components to these vendors who manufacture completed sub-assemblies or finished goods for the Company. The Company does not reflect the sale of these components in revenue and does not recognize any profits on these sales. The costs of the completed sub-assemblies are included in inventory upon purchase from the vendors.
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Vendornon-trade debtors | $ | 96 | $ | 66 | ||||
Other | 150 | 150 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 246 | $ | 216 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Other Debtors—Debtors - amounts falling due after one year
The following table provides details of the other debtors—debtors - amounts falling due after one year balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deferred income taxes | $ | 616 | $ | 496 | |||
Other | 145 | 139 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 761 | $ | 635 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | $ | 609 | $ | 616 | ||||
Other | 99 | 106 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 708 | $ | 722 | |||||
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Tangible Assets
The following table provides details of the tangible assets balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | Land | Equipment | Buildings and Leasehold Improvements | Construction in Progress | Total | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Useful lives (years) | 3 - 5 | Up to 48 | ||||||||||||||
Cost: | ||||||||||||||||
At 27 June 2014 | $ | 45 | $ | 7,159 | $ | 1,452 | $ | 323 | $ | 8,979 | ||||||
Additions | 1 | 235 | 20 | 576 | 832 | |||||||||||
Disposals | — | (157 | ) | (13 | ) | (9 | ) | (179 | ) | |||||||
Reclassifications | — | (6 | ) | 5 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
CIP Reclassifications | 2 | 209 | 131 | (342 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 48 | $ | 7,440 | $ | 1,595 | $ | 547 | $ | 9,630 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions | 2 | 117 | 34 | 414 | 567 | |||||||||||
Disposals | — | (261 | ) | (26 | ) | — | (287 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassifications | — | 4 | 1 | (31 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||
CIP Reclassifications | 19 | 381 | 296 | (696 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 69 | $ | 7,681 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 234 | $ | 9,884 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Depreciation: | ||||||||||||||||
At 27 June 2014 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (6,064 | ) | $ | (774 | ) | $ | — | $ | (6,843 | ) | ||
Additions | — | (580 | ) | (104 | ) | (8 | ) | (692 | ) | |||||||
Disposals | — | 157 | 13 | 8 | 178 | |||||||||||
Reclassifications | (1 | ) | 4 | 2 | — | 5 | ||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 3 July 2015 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (6,483 | ) | $ | (863 | ) | $ | — | $ | (7,352 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions | — | (531 | ) | (110 | ) | — | (641 | ) | ||||||||
Disposals | — | 245 | 24 | — | 269 | |||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (6,769 | ) | $ | (949 | ) | $ | — | $ | (7,724 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Book Value: | ||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 42 | $ | 957 | $ | 732 | $ | 547 | $ | 2,278 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 63 | $ | 912 | $ | 951 | $ | 234 | $ | 2,160 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Land (a) | Equipment | Buildings and Leasehold Improvements(a) | Construction in Progress (CIP) | Total | |||||||||||||||
Useful lives (years) | 3 - 5 | Up to 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 48 | $ | 7,440 | $ | 1,595 | $ | 547 | $ | 9,630 | ||||||||||
Additions | 2 | 117 | 34 | 414 | 567 | |||||||||||||||
Disposals | — | (261) | (26) | — | (287) | |||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | 4 | 1 | (31) | (26) | |||||||||||||||
CIP Reclassifications | 19 | 381 | 296 | (696) | — | |||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 69 | $ | 7,681 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 234 | $ | 9,884 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Additions | — | 49 | 13 | 360 | 422 | |||||||||||||||
Disposals | (10) | (484) | (49) | (1) | (544) | |||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | 10 | 6 | 16 | (12) | 20 | |||||||||||||||
CIP Reclassifications | — | 290 | 142 | (432) | — | |||||||||||||||
Impairments | (4) | (6) | (31) | — | (41) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | 65 | $ | 7,536 | $ | 1,991 | $ | 149 | $ | 9,741 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Accumulated Depreciation: | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | (6) | $ | (6,483) | $ | (863) | $ | — | $ | (7,352) | ||||||||||
Additions | — | (531) | (110) | — | (641) | |||||||||||||||
Disposals | — | 245 | 24 | — | 269 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
At 1 July 2016(a) | $ | (6) | $ | (6,769) | $ | (949) | $ | — | $ | (7,724) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Additions | — | (456) | (125) | — | (581) | |||||||||||||||
Disposals | — | 483 | 49 | — | 532 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | (9) | (9) | — | (18) | |||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | (6) | $ | (6,751) | $ | (1,034) | $ | — | $ | (7,791) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Book Value: | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 63 | $ | 912 | $ | 951 | $ | 234 | $ | 2,160 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | 59 | $ | 785 | $ | 957 | $ | 149 | $ | 1,950 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Company classified certain land and buildings with a net book value of $75 million as assets held for sale in fiscal year 2017.
Interest on borrowings related to eligible capital expenditures is capitalized as part of the cost of the qualified assets and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company capitalized interest of $4 million and $13 million, and $15 million, respectively.
During
In fiscal year endedyears 2017 and 2016, the Company determined it would discontinue the use of certain manufacturing property and equipment in the short-term, and that certain other buildings, land and manufacturing property and equipment waswere permanently impaired, and asimpaired. As a result, the company recognized a chargecharges of $72 million and $53 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively, from thewrite-off and accelerated depreciation of of these fixed assets. Thisassets, including $35 million impairment on land and buildings in fiscal year 2017, classified as held for sale under tangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Please refer to Note 9.FairValuefor more details. In fiscal year 2017, total charges of $35 million, $35 million and $2 million was recorded to Cost of revenue, Product development and Marketing and administrative, respectively, in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. In fiscal year 2016, the entire amount was recorded in
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cost cost of revenue in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Company did not record any material impairment charges in fiscal year 2015.
Other Provisions
The following table provides details of the other provisions balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrued warranty | 16 | $ | 206 | $ | 248 | |||||
Accrued restructuring | 5 | 63 | 19 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 269 | $ | 267 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||
Accrued warranty | 16 | $ | 233 | $ | 206 | |||||||
Accrued restructuring | 5 | 43 | 63 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 276 | $ | 269 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Other Creditors—Creditors - amounts due within one year
The following table provides details of the other creditors—creditors - amounts falling due within one year balance sheet item:
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrued expenses | $ | 358 | $ | 366 | |||
Deferred income | 18 | 21 | |||||
Accrued employee compensation | 184 | 256 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 560 | $ | 643 | ||||
| | | | | | | ��� |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | $ | 364 | $ | 358 | ||||
Dividend payable | 184 | — | ||||||
Deferred income | 55 | 18 | ||||||
Accrued employee compensation | 237 | 184 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 840 | $ | 560 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI"(“AOCI”), a component of Other Reserves
The components of AOCI, net of tax, were as follows:
(US Dollars in millions) | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities(1) | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on post- retirement plans | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 27 June 2014 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (2 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (11 | ) | — | (5 | ) | (25 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | 13 | — | — | — | 13 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 2 | — | (5 | ) | (25 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 3 July 2015 | 1 | — | (15 | ) | (16 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (4 | ) | — | 8 | (1 | ) | 3 | |||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (2 | ) | — | 8 | (1 | ) | 5 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Securities(1) | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on post- retirement plans | Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balance at July 3, 2015 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (4) | — | 8 | (1) | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (2) | — | 8 | (1) | 5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at July 1, 2016 | (1 | ) | — | (7 | ) | (17 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (3) | — | — | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | 4 | — | 2 | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 1 | — | 2 | 5 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (17 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(1) | The cost of a security sold or the amount reclassified out of AOCI into earnings was determined using the specific identification method. |
3. Acquisitions
Dot Hill Systems Corp.
On 6 October 2015, , the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Dot Hill Systems Corp. ("(“Dot Hill"Hill”), a supplier of software and hardware storage systems. The Company paid $9.75 per share, or $674 million, in cash for the acquisition. The acquisition of Dot Hill further expands the Company's Company’sOEM-focused cloud storage systems business and advances the Company'sCompany’s strategic efforts.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
(Dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 40 | ||
Trade debtors | 48 | |||
Inventories | 21 | |||
Other current and non-current assets | 7 | |||
Tangible Assets | 10 | |||
Intangible assets | 252 | |||
Goodwill | 364 | |||
| | | | |
Total assets | 742 | |||
| | | | |
Trade creditors | (42 | ) | ||
Other creditors | (26 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Total liabilities | (68 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Total | $ | 674 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 40 | ||
Trade debtors | 48 | |||
Inventories | 21 | |||
Other current andnon-current assets | 7 | |||
Tangible Assets | 10 | |||
Intangible assets | 252 | |||
Goodwill | 364 | |||
| ||||
Total assets | 742 | |||
Trade creditors | (42) | |||
Other creditors | (26) | |||
Total liabilities | (68) | |||
Total | $ | 674 | ||
The following table shows the fair value of the separately identifiable intangible assets at the time of acquisition and the period over which each intangible asset will be amortized:
(Dollars in millions) | Fair Value | Weighted- Average Amortization Period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing technology | $ | 164 | 5.0 years | ||
Customer relationships | 71 | 7.0 years | |||
Trade names | 3 | 5.0 years | |||
| | | | | |
Total amortizable intangible assets acquired | 238 | 5.5 years | |||
In-process research and development | 14 | ||||
| | | | | |
Total acquired identifiable intangible assets | $ | 252 | |||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | Fair Value | Weighted- Average Amortization Period | ||||||
Existing technology | $ | 164 | 5.0 years | |||||
Customer relationships | 71 | 7.0 years | ||||||
Trade names | 3 | 5.0 years | ||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets acquired | 238 | 5.5 years | ||||||
In-process research and development | 14 | |||||||
Total acquired identifiable intangible assets | $ | 252 | ||||||
The recognized goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, is primarily attributable to cost synergies expected to arise after the acquisition and the benefits the Company expects to derive from enhanced market opportunities.
The expenses related to the acquisition of Dot Hill for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016, which are included within Marketing and administrative expense in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account,Account, are not significant.
The amounts of revenue and earnings of Dot Hill included in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account from the acquisition date were not significant.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
LSI's Flash Business
On 2 September 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of LSI Corporation's ("LSI") Accelerated Solutions Division and Flash Components Division (collectively, the "Flash Business") from Avago Technologies Limited for $450 million in cash. The transaction is expected to strengthen Seagate's strategy to deliver a full suite of storage solutions, providing Seagate with established enterprise PCIe flash and SSD controller capabilities to deliver solutions for the growing flash storage market.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
(US Dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Inventories | $ | 37 | ||
Tangible assets | 22 | |||
Intangible assets | 141 | |||
Other debtors | 6 | |||
Goodwill | 337 | |||
| | | | |
Total assets | 543 | |||
| | | | |
Liabilities | (93 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Total liabilities | (93 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Total | $ | 450 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
The following table shows the fair value of the separately identifiable intangible assets at the time of acquisition and the weighted-average period over which intangible assets within each category will be amortized:
(US Dollars in millions) | Fair Value | Weighted- Average Amortization Period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing technology | $ | 84 | 3.5 years | ||
Customer relationships | 40 | 3.8 years | |||
Trade names | 17 | 4.5 years | |||
| | | | | |
Total acquired identifiable intangible assets | $ | 141 | |||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to the benefits the Company expects to derive from enhanced market opportunities, and is not deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company incurred approximately $1 million of expenses related to the acquisition of LSI's Flash Business in fiscal year 2015, which are included within Marketing and administrative expense on the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
The amounts of revenue and earnings of LSI's Flash Business included in the Company's Consolidated Profit and Loss Account from the acquisition date through the end of fiscal year ended 3 July 2015 were not significant.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Goodwill and Other Long-lived Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
(US dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance as of 27 June 2014 | $ | 537 | ||
Goodwill acquired | 339 | |||
Foreign currency translation effect | (2 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Balance as of 3 July 2015 | 874 | |||
Goodwill acquired | 364 | |||
Goodwill disposed | (1 | ) | ||
Foreign currency translation effect | — | |||
| | | | |
Balance as of 1 July 2016 | $ | 1,237 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
(US dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
Balance as of 3 July 2015 | $ | 874 | ||
Goodwill acquired | 364 | |||
Goodwill disposed | (1) | |||
Balance as of 1 July 2016 | 1,237 | |||
Goodwill acquired | — | |||
Goodwill disposed | — | |||
Foreign currency translation effect | 1 | |||
Balance as of June 30 2017 | $ | 1,238 | ||
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist primarily of existing technology, customer relationships in-process research and development ("IPR&D") and trade names acquired in business combinations. WithDuring fiscal year 2017, the exceptionin-process research and development (“IPR&D”) of IPR&D, acquired intangibles$14 million was completed and reclassified to existing technology. Intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization is charged to Operating expenses in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. IPR&D has been determined to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstance indicate that the asset might be impaired. If the carrying amount of IPR&D exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. There were no impairment charges recognized for IPR&D. Upon completion of the IPR&D, the related assets will be accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset, and will be amortized over its useful life.
The carrying value of other intangible assets subject to amortization, excluding fully amortized intangible assets, as of 30 June 2017, is set forth in the following table:
(US Dollars in millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life | ||||||||||||
Existing technology | $ | 280 | $ | (112) | $ | 168 | 3.6 years | |||||||||
Customer relationships | 487 | (395) | 92 | 3.4 years | ||||||||||||
Trade name | 27 | (19) | 8 | 2.1 years | ||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 29 | (16) | 13 | 2.6 years | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total amortizable other intangible assets | $ | 823 | $ | (542) | $ | 281 | 3.4 years | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of other intangible assets subject to amortization, excluding fully amortized intangible assets, as of 1 July 2016 is set forth in the following table:
(US Dollars in millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing technology | $ | 297 | $ | (79 | ) | $ | 218 | 4.1 years | |||
Customer relationships | 510 | (328 | ) | 182 | 3.2 years | ||||||
Trade name | 29 | (14 | ) | 15 | 2.6 years | ||||||
Other intangible assets | 29 | (10 | ) | 19 | 3.2 years | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total amortizable other intangible assets | $ | 865 | $ | (431 | ) | $ | 434 | 3.6 years | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life | ||||||||||||
Existing technology | $ | 297 | $ | (79) | $ | 218 | 4.1 years | |||||||||
Customer relationships | 510 | (328) | 182 | 3.2 years | ||||||||||||
Trade name | 29 | (14) | 15 | 2.6 years | ||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 29 | (10) | 19 | 3.2 years | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total amortizable other intangible assets | $ | 865 | $ | (431) | $ | 434 | 3.6 years | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of IPR&D not subject to amortization was $14 million on 1 July 2016.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The carrying value of other intangible assets subject to amortization as of 3 July 2015 is set forth in the following table:
(US Dollars in millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing technology | $ | 191 | $ | (69 | ) | $ | 122 | 4.1 years | |||
Customer relationships | 487 | (282 | ) | 205 | 2.4 years | ||||||
Trade name | 27 | (7 | ) | 20 | 3.2 years | ||||||
Other intangible assets | 27 | (4 | ) | 23 | 4.2 years | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total amortizable other intangible assets | $ | 732 | $ | (362 | ) | $ | 370 | 3.1 years | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The carrying value of IPR&D not subject to amortization was $0 million on 3 July 2015.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, expected amortization expense for other intangible assets for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
(US Dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | $ | 166 | ||
2018 | 106 | |||
2019 | 68 | |||
2020 | 50 | |||
2021 | 23 | |||
Thereafter | 21 | |||
| | | | |
$ | 434 | |||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Amount | |||
2018 | $ | 108 | ||
2019 | 71 | |||
2020 | 53 | |||
2021 | 25 | |||
2022 | 17 | |||
Thereafter | 7 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 281 | |||
|
|
The carrying values of intangible assets were $448$281 million and $370$448 million as of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, respectively. In fiscal year 2017 amortization expense for other intangible assets was $168 million, of which $64 million was included in Cost of revenue and 3 July 2015, respectively.$104 million was included in Amortization of intangibles in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account. In fiscal year 2016, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $174 million, of which $51 million was included in Cost of revenue and $123 million was included in Amortization of intangibles in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account. In fiscal year 2015, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $152 million, of which $23 million was included in
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(US dollars in millions) | Existing Technology | Customer Relationships | Trade Names | In-process Research and Development | Other Intangible Assets | Total (a) | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 354 | $ | 499 | $ | 30 | $ | — | $ | 35 | $ | 918 | ||||||||||||
Additions | 164 | 71 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 253 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | (181) | (47) | — | — | — | (228) | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 337 | $ | 523 | $ | 33 | $ | 14 | $ | 36 | $ | 943 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Additions | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | (2) | (2) | — | — | — | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | 14 | — | — | (14) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | 349 | $ | 521 | $ | 33 | $ | — | $ | 37 | $ | 940 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Accumulated Amortization: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | (232) | $ | (294) | $ | (10) | $ | — | $ | (12) | $ | (548) | ||||||||||||
Additions | (68) | (94) | (8) | — | (5) | (175) | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | 181 | 47 | — | — | — | 228 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | (119) | $ | (341) | $ | (18) | $ | — | $ | (17) | $ | (495) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Additions | (64) | (90) | (7) | — | (7) | (168) | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | (181) | $ | (429) | $ | (25) | $ | — | $ | (24) | $ | (659) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net Book Value: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 218 | $ | 182 | $ | 15 | $ | 14 | $ | 19 | $ | 448 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | 168 | $ | 92 | $ | 8 | $ | — | $ | 13 | $ | 281 | ||||||||||||
|
|
Cost of revenue and $129 million was included in Amortization of intangibles in the Consolidated Profit and Loss account.
(a) | The carrying value of intangible assets subject to amortization includes fully amortized intangible assets for the period presented. |
(US dollars in millions) | Existing Technology | Customer Relationships | Trade Names | In-process Research and Development | Other Intangible Assets | Total | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost: | |||||||||||||||||||
At 27 June 2014 | $ | 231 | $ | 462 | $ | 13 | $ | 39 | $ | 11 | $ | 756 | |||||||
Additions | 84 | 40 | 17 | — | 24 | 165 | |||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Reclassifications | 39 | — | — | (39 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | (3 | ) | — | — | — | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 354 | $ | 499 | $ | 30 | $ | — | $ | 35 | $ | 918 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions | 164 | 71 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 253 | |||||||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | (181 | ) | (47 | ) | — | — | — | (228 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 337 | $ | 523 | $ | 33 | $ | 14 | $ | 36 | $ | 943 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||
At 27 June 2014 | $ | (181 | ) | $ | (204 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (397 | ) | ||
Additions | (51 | ) | (91 | ) | (6 | ) | — | (4 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | 1 | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 3 July 2015 | $ | (232 | ) | $ | (294 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | — | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (548 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions | (68 | ) | (94 | ) | (8 | ) | — | (5 | ) | (175 | ) | ||||||||
Disposals/Retirements | 181 | 47 | — | — | — | 228 | |||||||||||||
Reclassifications | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | (119 | ) | $ | (341 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | $ | — | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (495 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Book Value: | |||||||||||||||||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 122 | $ | 205 | $ | 20 | $ | — | $ | 23 | $ | 370 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 218 | $ | 182 | $ | 15 | $ | 14 | $ | 19 | $ | 448 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5. Restructuring and Exit Costs
During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $175$178 million and $32$175 million, respectively, comprised primarily of charges related to employee terminationworkforce reduction costs and facility exit costs associated with restructuring of ourits workforce during each fiscal year. The Company'sCompany’s significant restructuring plans are described below. All restructuring charges are reported in Restructuring and Other income and charges, net on the Consolidated profitProfit and loss account.Loss Account.
March 2017 Plan - On 9 March 2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the “March 2017 Plan”) in connection with the continued consolidation of TableContents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)July 2016 Plan- On 11 July 2016, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the “July 2016 Plan”) for continued consolidation of its global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas. The July 2016 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 6,500 employees. The July 2016 Plan, was largely completed by the end of fiscal year 2017.
June 2016 Plan—- On 27 June 2016, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the "June“June 2016 Plan"Plan”) as part of the Company'sCompany’s efforts to reduce its cost structure to align with the then current macroeconomic conditions. The June 2016 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 1,600 employees. The June 2016 Plan is expected to be largely completed by the end of the September 2016 quarter. During fiscal year 2016, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of approximately $69 million related to the June 2016 Plan, comprised of employee termination costs. The Company made cash payments of $24 million in fiscal year 2016, comprised of employee termination costs related to the June 2016 Plan.
February 2016 Plan—On 15 February 2016, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the "February 2016 Plan") intended to align our manufacturing footprint with current macroeconomic conditions. The February 2016 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 2,000 employees. The February 2016 Plan was largely completed by the fiscal quarter ended 1 April 2016. During30 December 2016 with no material future costs expected to be incurred.
The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring activities under all of the Company’s active restructuring plans for fiscal year 2016, the Company recorded total restructuring chargesyears 2017 and made cash payments of approximately $15 million related to the February 2016 Plan, comprised primarily of employee termination costs.
September 2015 Plan—On 4 September 2015, the Company committed to a restructuring plan (the "September 2015 Plan") intended to realign its cost structure with the current macroeconomic business environment. The September 2015 Plan included reducing worldwide headcount by approximately 1,000 employees. The September 2015 Plan was largely completed by the fiscal quarter ended 1 January 2016. During fiscal year 2016, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of approximately $65 million related to the September 2015 Plan, comprised of approximately $57 million for employee termination costs and $8 million facility exit costs, respectively. The Company made cash payments of $59 million, comprised primarily of employee termination costs related to the September 2015 Plan.
Fiscal 2015 Plan—During fiscal year 2015, the Company recorded employee termination costs of $25 million and made cash payments of $16 million associated with a reduction in the workforce. The 2015 Plan was largely completed by fiscal year 2015. The Company did not record any material restructuring charges related to the 2015 Plan during fiscal year 2016.
Other Restructuring and Exit Costs—During fiscal year 2016, the Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately $26 million, comprised of approximately $12 million for employee termination costs and $14 million facility exit costs. The Company made cash payments of $33 million, comprised of approximately $19 million for employee termination costs and $14 million facility exit costs related to other restructuring plans.
(US Dollars in millions) | Post- Employment Benefits | Operating Leases | Other Exit Costs | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Restructuring Activities | |||||||||||||
Accrual balances at 27 June 27 2014 | $ | 2 | $ | 12 | $ | — | $ | 14 | |||||
Restructuring charges | 23 | 3 | 4 | 30 | |||||||||
Cash payments | (17 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||
Adjustments | 3 | (1 | ) | — | 2 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrual balances at 3 July 2015 | $ | 11 | $ | 8 | $ | — | $ | 19 | |||||
Restructuring charges | 151 | 14 | 10 | 175 | |||||||||
Cash payments | (113 | ) | (8 | ) | (10 | ) | (131 | ) | |||||
Adjustments | 1 | (1 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrual balances at 1 July 2016 | $ | 50 | $ | 13 | $ | — | $ | 63 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)2016:
March 2017 Plan | July 2016 Plan | June 2016 Plan | Other Plans | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Workforce Reduction Costs | Facilities and Other Exit Costs | Workforce Reduction Costs | Facilities and Other Exit Costs | Workforce Reduction Costs | Facilities and Other Exit Costs | Workforce Reduction Costs | Facilities and Other Exit Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Restructuring Activities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Accrual balances at 3 July 2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | — | — | — | — | 69 | — | 82 | 24 | $ | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash payments | — | — | — | — | (24) | — | (89) | (18) | $ | (131) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | (1) | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Accrual balances at 1 July 2016 | — | — | — | — | 45 | — | 5 | 13 | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 28 | 3 | 72 | 20 | — | 1 | 31 | 12 | $ | 167 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash payments | (29) | (3) | (57) | (18) | (41) | (1) | (33) | (16) | $ | (198) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments | 1 | 7 | — | (1) | — | — | 4 | $ | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Accrual balances at 30 June 2017 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 22 | $ | 2 | $ | 3 | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 13 | $ | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total costs incurred to date as of 30 June 2017 | $ | 29 | $ | 3 | $ | 79 | $ | 20 | $ | 68 | $ | 1 | $ | 158 | $ | 49 | $ | 407 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total expected costs to be incurred as of 30 June 2017 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 1 | $ | 13 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accrued restructuring balance is included in Other provisions in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated Balance Sheet for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015.2016.
6. Debentures and Bank Loans
Short-Term Borrowings
The credit agreement entered into by the Company and its subsidiary Seagate HDD Cayman on 18 January 2011 and subsequently amended (the "Revolving“Revolving Credit Facility"Facility”) provides the Company with a $700 million
senior secured revolving credit facility. The term of the Revolving Credit Facility is through 15 January 15, 2020, provided that if the Company does not have Investment Grade Ratings (as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility) on 15 August 2018, then the maturity date will be 16 August 2018 unless certain extension conditions have been satisfied. The loans made under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a variable margin that will be determined based on the corporate credit rating of the Company. The Company and certain of its material subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility is available for cash borrowings, subject to compliance with certain covenants and other customary conditions to borrowing, and for the issuance of letters of credit up to asub-limit of $75 million.
The Revolving Credit Facility, as amended, includes three financial covenants: (1) minimum cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities; (2) a fixed charge coverage ratio; and (3) a net leverage ratio. On 27 April 2016, the Revolving Credit Agreement was amended in order to increase the allowable net leverage ratio to allow for higher net leverage levels. The Company werewas in compliance with the modified covenants as of 1 July 201630 June 2017 and expectexpects to be in compliance for the next 12 months.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, no borrowings had been drawn or letters of credit utilized under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Long-Term Debt
$600 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 6.8% Senior Notes due October 2016 (the "2016 Notes"). On September 20, 2006, the Company's subsidiary, Seagate Technology HDD Holdings, completed the sale of $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Notes, in a private placement exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The interest on the 2016 Notes is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The issuer under the 2016 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2016 Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company's significant subsidiaries. The 2016 Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part, on not less than 30, nor more than 60 days notice, at a "make-whole" premium redemption price. The "make-whole" redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2016 Notes being redeemed, discounted at the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury rate plus 50 basis points. During the December 2014 quarter, the 2016 Notes were fully extinguished through repurchase and redemption for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss on the repurchase and redemption of approximately $34 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Consolidated profit and loss account.
$800$800 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 (the "2018 Notes"“2018 Notes”).On 5 November 2013, Seagate HDD Cayman, issued $800 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Notes, which mature on 15 November 2018, in a private placement. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on 15 May and 15 November of each year. The Notes are redeemable at the option of Seagate HDD Cayman in whole or in part, on not less than 30,
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
nor more than 60 days'days’ notice, at a "make-whole"“make-whole” premium redemption price. The "make-whole"“make-whole” premium redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining schedule payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted at the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury rate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company on a senior unsecured basis.
$600 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due May 2020 (the "2020 Notes"). On 13 May 2010, During fiscal year 2017, the Company's subsidiary, Seagate HDD Cayman, completed the sale of $600Company repurchased $90 million aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes, in a private placement exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The obligations under the 2020 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. The interest on the 2020 Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The 2020 Notes were redeemable any time prior to 1 May 2015 at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus an "applicable premium" and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. The "applicable premium" was equal to the greater of (1) 1% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes, or (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the present value of the redemption price on 1May 2015 plus interest payments due through 1 May 2015, discounted at the applicable Treasury rate as of the redemption date plus 50 basis points; over (b) the principal amount of such note. The 2020 Notes are redeemable at any time on or after 1 May 2015 at various prices expressed as a percentage of principal amount, as set forth in the indentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. The issuer under the 2020 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2020 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2014, the Company repurchased $66 million aggregate principal amount of its 20202018 Notes for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss on the repurchase of approximately $7$3 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company's Consolidated profitProfit and loss account. During fiscal year 2015, the 2020 Notes were fully extinguished through repurchase and redemption for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a loss on the repurchase of approximately $26Loss Account.
$600 million which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company's Consolidated profit and loss account.
$600 million Aggregate Principal Amount of7.00%Senior Notes due November 2021 (the "2021 Notes"“2021 Notes”). On 18 MayOn18May 2011, the Company'sCompany’s subsidiary, Seagate HDD Cayman, completed the sale of $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes, in a private placement exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The obligations under the 2021 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. The interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 January and 1 and July 1 of each year. The 2021 Notes are redeemable any time prior to 1 May 2016 at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus an "applicable premium"“applicable premium” and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. The "applicable premium"“applicable premium” will be equal to the greater of (1) 1% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes, or (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the present value of the redemption price on 1 May 2016 plus interest payments due through 1 May 2016, discounted at the applicable Treasury rate as of the redemption date plus 50 basis points; over (b) the principal amount of such note. The 2021 Notes are redeemable at any time on or after 1 May 2016 at various prices expressed as a percentage of principal amount, as set forth in the indentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, any time before 1 May 2014, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the principal amount with the net cash proceeds from permitted sales of the Company'sCompany’s stock at a
redemption price of 107% of the principal amount plus
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
accrued interest to the redemption date. The issuer under the 2021 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman and the obligations under the 2021 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2014,years 2016 and 2015, the Company repurchased $349$1 million and $93 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount of its 2021 Notes for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. TheFor fiscal year 2016, the loss recorded on the repurchase was immaterial and for fiscal year 2015, the Company recorded a loss on the repurchase of approximately $54$13 million, which were included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017, the 2021 Notes were fully extinguished through redemption for cash at a premium to their principal amount of $158 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. For fiscal year 2017, the Company recorded a loss on the redemption of approximately $5 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2015, the Company repurchased $93
$750 million Aggregate Principal Amount of4.25% Senior Notes due March 2022 (the “2022 Notes”).On 3 February, 2017, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $750 million in aggregate principal amount of its 20214.25% Senior Notes for cashwhich will mature on 1 March, 2022. The interest on the 2022 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 March and 1 September of each year, commencing on 1 September, 2017. At any time before 1 February, 2022, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes at a premium to their principal amount,‘make whole’ redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest.interest, if any. The Company recorded a loss on‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the repurchase of approximately $13 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company's Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $1 million aggregate principal amount of its 2021the 2022 Notes for cashredeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2022 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a premiumrate equal to their principal amount,the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 40 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest. The loss recordedinterest, if any, on the repurchase was immaterial, which2022 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (b) the principal amount of the 2022 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2022 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2022 Notes is included in Other incomeSeagate HDD Cayman, and charges, net in the Company's Consolidated profitobligations under the 2022 Notes are fully and loss account.unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company.
$1 $1 billionAggregate Principal Amount of4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 (the "2023 Notes"“2023 Notes”).On 22 May 2013, Seagate HDD Cayman, issued $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes, which mature on 1 June 1, 2023, in a private placement. The obligations under the 2023 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. The interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 and December 1 of each year. The 2023 Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company in whole or in part, on not less than 30, nor more than 60 daysdays’ notice, at a "make-whole"“make-whole” premium redemption price. The "make-whole"“make-whole” redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2023 Notes being redeemed, discounted at the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury rate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $10 million aggregate principal amount of its 2023 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The loss recorded on the repurchase was immaterial, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated profitProfit and Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $39 million aggregate principal amount of its 2023 Notes for cash at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The loss account.recorded on the repurchase was immaterial, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
$500 $1million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024 (the “2024 Notes”). On 3 February 2017, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes which will mature on 1 March 2024. The interest on the 2024 Notes is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing on 1 September 2017. At any time
before 1 January 2024, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the 2024 Notes at a ‘make whole’ redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2024 Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the 2024 Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 45 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2024 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (b) the principal amount of the 2024 Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the 2024 Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2024 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2024 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company.
$1 billion Aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 (the "2025 Notes"“2025 Notes”). On 28 May 2014, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Notes due 2025, which mature on 1 January 1, 2025. The interest on the Notes will be payable in cash semiannually on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing on 1 January 2015. At any time, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days'days’ notice, Seagate HDD may redeem some or all of the Notes at a "make-whole"‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price. The "make-whole"‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, and (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points. Accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company on a senior unsecured basis. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $5 million aggregate principal amount of its 2025 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The gain recorded on the repurchase was immaterial, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated profitProfit and loss account.Loss Account. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $20 million aggregate principal amount of the 2025 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a gain on the repurchase of approximately $1 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
$700 $500million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due June, 2027 (the “2027 Notes”). On 14 May 2015, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes, which mature on 1 June 2027. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 December of each year, commencing on 1 December 2015. At any time before 1 March 2027, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the Notes at a “make-whole” redemption price. The ‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 40 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after 1 March, 2027, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2027 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2027 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased $4 million aggregate principal amount of the 2027 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded an immaterial gain on the repurchase, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
$500 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due December, 2034 (the "2034 Notes"“2034 Notes”). On 2 December 2014, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes, which mature on 1 December, 1, 2034.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on 1 June and 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on 1 June 2015. At any time before 1 June, 1, 2034, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the Notes at a "make-whole"“make-whole” redemption price. The "make-whole"‘‘make-whole’’ redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after 1 June, 1, 2034, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2034 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2034 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company. During fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased $10 million aggregate principal amount of its 2034 Notes for cash at a discount to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recorded a gain on the repurchase of approximately $3 million, which is included in Other income and charges, net in the Company'sCompany’s Consolidated profitProfit and loss account.Loss Account.
$700 million Aggregate Principal Amount of 4.875% Senior Notes due June, 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). On 14 May 2015, Seagate HDD Cayman issued, in a private placement, $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.875% Senior Notes, which mature on June 1, 2027. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on 1 December 2015. At any time before March 1, 2027, Seagate HDD Cayman may redeem some or all of the Notes at a "make-whole" redemption price. The "make-whole" redemption price will be equal to (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus (2) the excess, if any of (x) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a rate equal to the sum of the Treasury Rate plus 40 basis points, minus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date over (y) the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed, plus (3) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after March 1, 2027, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The issuer under the 2027 Notes is Seagate HDD Cayman, and the obligations under the 2027 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by the Company.
Interest charges shown in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account are related to the Company'sCompany’s debentures.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, future principal payments on long-term debt were as follows (in millions):
Fiscal Year | Amount | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | $ | — | ||
2018 | — | |||
2019 | 800 | |||
2020 | — | |||
2021 | — | |||
Thereafter | 3,333 | |||
| | | | |
$ | 4,133 | |||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Fiscal Year | Amount | |||
2018 | $ | — | ||
2019 | 710 | |||
2020 | — | |||
2021 | — | |||
2022 | 750 | |||
Thereafter | 3,613 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 5,073 | |||
|
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. Income Taxes
The provision for liabilities and charges related to taxation as reported in the Balance Sheet consisted of the following:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Accrued income taxes falling due within one year | $ | 7 | $ | 10 | |||
Deferred income tax liabilities due within one year | — | — | |||||
Accrued income taxes falling due after one year | 14 | 33 | |||||
Deferred income tax liabilities due after one year | 10 | 6 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 31 | $ | 49 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes falling due within one year | $ | 9 | $ | 7 | ||||
Deferred income tax liabilities due within one year | — | — | ||||||
Accrued income taxes falling due after one year | 15 | 14 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities due after one year | 6 | 10 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 30 | $ | 31 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Current tax expense (benefit): | |||||||
U.S. Federal | $ | 1 | $ | — | |||
U.S. State | 2 | 4 | |||||
Non-U.S. | 25 | 222 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total Current | 28 | 226 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit): | |||||||
U.S. Federal | — | (6 | ) | ||||
U.S. State | — | (2 | ) | ||||
Non-U.S. | (2 | ) | 10 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Total Deferred | (2 | ) | 2 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 26 | $ | 228 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Current tax expense (benefit): | ||||||||
US Federal | $ | — | $ | 1 | ||||
US State | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Non-US | 39 | 25 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Current | 40 | 28 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit): | ||||||||
US Federal | (5) | — | ||||||
US State | — | — | ||||||
Non-US | 8 | (2) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Deferred | 3 | (2) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 43 | $ | 26 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes consisted of the following:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
U.S. | $ | — | $ | 101 | |||
Non-U.S | 274 | 1,869 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 274 | $ | 1,970 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
On 18 December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes ("PATH") Act of 2015 was enacted. Among, other provisions, the PATH Act retroactively reinstated and permanently extended the federal Research and Development ("R&D")
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
US | $ | (22) | $ | — | ||||
Non-US | 837 | 274 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 815 | $ | 274 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded no excess tax credit from 31 December 2014. The permanent extension of the R&D credit had no immediate impact on the Company's income tax provision due to valuation allowances on its U.S. deferred tax assets. None of the other PATH Act changes had a material impact on the Company's income tax provision.
benefits associated with stock option deductions in fiscal year 2017. The Company recorded $0.6 million and $2.0 million of excess tax benefits associated with stock option deductions in fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively.year 2016.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The significant components of the Company'sCompany’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | |||||||
Accrued warranty | $ | 74 | $ | 88 | |||
Inventory valuation accounts | 32 | 43 | |||||
Debtor reserve | 11 | 16 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 85 | 106 | |||||
Depreciation | 173 | 171 | |||||
Restructuring accruals | 14 | 4 | |||||
Other accruals and deferred items | 50 | 31 | |||||
Net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards | 1,252 | 1,099 | |||||
Other assets | 2 | 5 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax assets | 1,693 | 1,563 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (984 | ) | (929 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax assets | 709 | 634 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||
Unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. entities | (11 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
Acquisition-related items | (92 | ) | (15 | ) | |||
Other liabilities | — | (1 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | |
Total Deferred tax liabilities | (103 | ) | (22 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total Net Deferred tax assets | $ | 606 | $ | 612 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
As Reported on the Balance Sheet | |||||||
Deferred income taxes—included in Other debtors falling due within one year | $ | — | $ | 122 | |||
Deferred income taxes—included in Other debtors falling due after one year | 616 | 496 | |||||
Deferred income taxes liabilities—included in Provision for taxation | (10 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total Net Deferred income taxes | $ | 606 | $ | 612 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Consistent with the intent of ASU 2015-17 to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the Company elected to adopt ASU 2015-17 on a prospective basis as of the second quarter, fiscal year 2016. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. As a result of this change in accounting principle, the Company's current deferred tax assets were reclassified to non-current.
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | ||||||||
Accrued warranty | $ | 85 | $ | 74 | ||||
Inventory valuation accounts | 43 | 32 | ||||||
Debtor reserve | 19 | 11 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 99 | 85 | ||||||
Depreciation | 109 | 173 | ||||||
Restructuring accruals | (1) | 14 | ||||||
Other accruals and deferred items | 51 | 50 | ||||||
Net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards | 1,224 | 1,252 | ||||||
Other assets | 11 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total deferred tax assets | 1,640 | 1,693 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (966) | (984) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net deferred tax assets | 674 | 709 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||
Unremitted earnings of certainnon-US entities | (7) | (11) | ||||||
Acquisition-related items | (65) | (92) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Deferred tax liabilities | (72 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions | $ | 2 | $ | — | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Net Deferred tax assets | $ | 604 | $ | 606 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
As Reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes - included in Other debtors falling due after one year | 609 | 616 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes liabilities - included in Provision for taxation | (5) | (10) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Net Deferred income taxes | $ | 604 | $ | 606 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The deferred tax asset valuation allowance decreased by $18 million in fiscal year 2017 and increased by $55 million and $41 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company recorded $606$602 million of net deferred tax assets.assets, excluding $2 million of deferred taxes on intra-entity transactions. The realization of most of these deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on the Company'sCompany’s ability to generate sufficient U.S.US and certain non-U.S.non-US taxable income in future periods. Although realization is not assured, the Company'sCompany’s management believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
realized. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, may increase or decrease in subsequent periods when the Company reevaluates the underlying basis for its estimates of future U.S.US. and certain non-U.S.non-US. taxable income.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company had U.S.US federal, state and non-U.S.non-US tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3.4 billion, $2.1$2.0 billion and $121.0$173 million, respectively, which will expire at various dates beginning in fiscal year 2018, if not utilized. U.S. state netNet operating loss carryforwards of approximately $104$68 million are scheduled to expire in fiscal year 2017.2018. At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company had U.S.US. federal and state tax credit
carryforwards of $437$444 million and $96$105 million, respectively, which will expire at various dates beginning in fiscal year 2018, if not utilized.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, approximately $677$560 million and $101 million of the Company's U.S.Company’s total US net operating lossesloss and $99 million of its tax credit carryforwards, respectively, are subject to annual limitations ranging from $1 million to $45 million pursuant to U.S.US. tax law.
For the purposes of the reconciliation between the income tax expenseexpenses at the rate and the effective tax rate applicable to the Company in Ireland, and the effective tax rate, the rate applicable to the Company of 25% was applied as follows:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Income tax expense at statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland | $ | 69 | $ | 493 | |||
Net U.S. federal and state income taxes | 3 | 7 | |||||
Permanent differences | 10 | 2 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (1 | ) | 15 | ||||
Non-U.S. losses with no tax benefits | 1 | 2 | |||||
Non-U.S. earnings taxed at less than statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland | (37 | ) | (463 | ) | |||
Audit assessment | — | 173 | |||||
Reversal of previously recorded taxes | (19 | ) | (5 | ) | |||
Other individually immaterial items | — | 4 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | $ | 26 | $ | 228 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Income tax expense at statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland | $ | 204 | $ | 69 | ||||
Net US. federal and state income taxes | 1 | 3 | ||||||
Permanent differences | 19 | 10 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (11) | (1) | ||||||
Non-US. losses with no tax benefits | 17 | 1 | ||||||
Non-US. earnings taxed at less than statutory rate applicable to the Company in Ireland | (186) | (37) | ||||||
Reversal of previously recorded taxes | (4) | (19) | ||||||
Other individually immaterial items | 3 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income tax expense | $ | 43 | $ | 26 | ||||
|
|
|
|
A substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s operations in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand operate under various tax holiday programs, which expire in whole or in part at various dates through 2024. Certain of the tax holidays may be extended if specific conditions are met. The net impact of these tax holiday programs was to increase the Company'sCompany’s net income by approximately $163 million in fiscal year 2017 ($0.54 per share, diluted) and to increase the Company’s net income by approximately $67 million in fiscal year 2016 ($0.22 per share, diluted) and to increase the Company's net income by approximately $349 million in fiscal year 2015 ($1.05 per share, diluted).
The Company consists of an Irish tax resident parent holding company with various U.S.US and non-U.S.non-US subsidiaries that operate in multiplenon-Irish taxing jurisdictions. The amount of temporary differences (including undistributed earnings) related to outside basis differences in the stock ofnon-Irish resident subsidiaries considered indefinitely reinvested outside of Ireland for which Irish income taxes have not been provided as of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, was approximately $1.6$1.5 billion. If such amount were remitted to Ireland as a dividend, it is likely that tax at 25% or approximately $400$375 million would result.
As of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, the Company had approximately $70$74 million and $83$76 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties. The amount of unrecognized
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is $70$74 million and $83$76 million as of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, respectively, subject to certain future valuation allowance offsets.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company'sCompany’s gross unrecognized tax benefits:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year | $ | 83 | $ | 115 | |||
Gross increase for tax positions of prior years | 12 | 12 | |||||
Gross decrease for tax positions of prior years | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | |||
Gross increase for tax positions of current year | 11 | 9 | |||||
Gross decrease for tax positions of current year | — | — | |||||
Settlements | — | (45 | ) | ||||
Lapse of statutes of limitation | (27 | ) | (3 | ) | |||
Non-U.S. exchange gain | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the year | $ | 70 | $ | 83 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year | $ | 76 | $ | 89 | ||||
Gross increase for tax positions of prior years | 2 | 12 | ||||||
Gross decrease for tax positions of prior years | (7) | (8) | ||||||
Gross increase for tax positions of current year | 16 | 11 | ||||||
Gross decrease for tax positions of current year | — | — | ||||||
Settlements | — | — | ||||||
Lapse of statutes of limitation | (13) | (27) | ||||||
Non-US. exchange gain | — | (1) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the year | $ | 74 | $ | 76 | ||||
|
|
|
|
It is the Company'sCompany’s policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxestax expense on the Consolidated Profit and lossLoss Account. During fiscal year 2016,2017, the Company recognized net income tax benefit for interest and penalties of $8$1 million as compared to net income tax expense of $26$8 million during fiscal year 2015.2016. As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company had $12$4 million of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits compared to $20$6 million in fiscal year 2015.2016.
During the 12 months beginning 21 July 2016,2017, the Company expects that its unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $16$14 million as a result of the expiration of certain statutes of limitation.
The Company is subject to taxation in many jurisdictions globally and is required to file U.S.US federal, U.S.US state and non-U.S.non-US income tax returns. On 4 April 2016, the IRS approved the audit settlement reached in December 2015 regarding all disputed issues associated with the Company's U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010. This audit settlement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
The Company is no longer subject to examination of its U.S.US federal income tax returns for years prior to fiscal year 2013.2014. With respect to U.S.US state and non-U.S.non-US income tax returns, the Company is generally no longer subject to tax examination for years ending prior to fiscal year 2005.2006.
The following table shows the activity in the deferred tax liability balance for fiscal year 2016:2017:
(US Dollars in millions) | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 3 July 2015 | $ | 6 | ||
Unremitted earnings of certain non-U.S. entities | 4 | |||
| | | | |
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | 10 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | 10 | ||
Unremitted earnings of certainnon-US entities | (4) | |||
Balance at 30 June 2017 | $ | 6 | ||
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate, and to a lesser extent, equity pricemarket risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The Company enters into foreign currency
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
forward exchange contracts in order to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted expenses denominated in foreign currencies and to mitigate the remeasurement risk of certain foreign currency denominated liabilities.currencies. The Company'sCompany’s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are classified as designated ornon-designated hedging instruments. The Company records all derivatives in the Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet at fair value. The changes in the fair value of the effective portions of designated cash flow hedges are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a component of Other Reserves, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments and the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges are adjusted to fair value through earnings. The Company has no outstanding cash flow hedges as of 30 June 2017. The amount of net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges was $2 million as of 1 July 2016 and the amount of net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges was $1 million as of 3 July 2015.2016.
The Company dedesignatesde-designates its cash flow hedges when the forecasted hedged transactions are realized or it is probable the forecasted hedged transactions will not occur in the initially identified time period. At such time, the associated gains and losses deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, which is a component of Other Reserves, are reclassified immediately into earnings and any subsequent changes in the fair value of such derivative instruments are immediately reflected in earnings. The Company did not recognize any material net gains or losses related to the loss of hedge designation on discontinued cash flow hedges during fiscal years 2016year 2017 and 2015. did not recognize any material amounts during fiscal year 2016.
As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the Company's existingCompany does not have outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts mature within 12 months. The deferred amount currently recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be recognized into earnings over the next 12 months is immaterial.
contracts. The following tables show the total notional value of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts as of 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015:2016:
| As of 1 July 2016 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Contracts Designated as Hedges | Contracts Not Designated as Hedges | |||||
British Pound Sterling | 47 | 10 |
As of 1 July 2016 | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Contracts Designated as Hedges | Contracts Not Designated as Hedges | ||||||
British Pound Sterling | $ | 47 | $ | 10 |
| As of 3 July 2015 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Contracts Designated as Hedges | Contracts Not Designated as Hedges | |||||
Thai Baht | $ | 18 | $ | 48 | |||
Singapore Dollars | 23 | 42 | |||||
Chinese Renminbi | 5 | 16 | |||||
Euro | — | 13 | |||||
British Pound Sterling | 35 | — | |||||
Malaysian Ringgit | 12 | 15 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 93 | $ | 134 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The Company is subject to equity market risks due to changes in the fair value of the notional investments selected by its employees as part of itsNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan—the Seagate Deferred Compensation Plan (the "SDCP"“SDCP”). In the quarter ended 27 December 2013,fiscal year 2014, the Company entered into a Total Return Swap ("TRS"(“TRS”) in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCP liabilities. The Company pays a floating rate, based on LIBOR plus an interest rate spread, on the notional amount of the TRS. The TRS is designed to substantially offset changes in the SDCP liability due to changes in the value of the investment options made by employees. As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the notional investments underlying the TRS amounted to $94$105 million. The contract term of the TRS is through January 20162018 and is settled on a monthly basis, therefore limiting counterparty performance risk. The Company renewed the contract term through January 2017
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
under materially the same terms. The Company did not designate the TRS as a hedge. Rather, the Company records all changes in the fair value of the TRS to earnings to offset the market value changes of the SDCP liabilities.
As of 30 June 2017, the Company has no outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the gross fair value of the TRS reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is immaterial.
The following tables show the Company'sCompany’s derivative instruments measured at gross fair value as reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetsSheet as of 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015:2016:
| As of 1 July 2016 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | |||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | $ | — | Other creditors | $ | (2 | ) | ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | — | Other creditors | (1 | ) | ||||||
Total return swap | Other debtors | 3 | Other creditors | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | $ | 3 | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
As of 1 July 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Asset | Derivatives Liability | |||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | $ | — | Other creditors | $ | (2) | ||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | — | Other creditors | (1) | ||||||||||||
Total return swap | Other debtors | 3 | Other creditors | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total derivatives | $ | 3 | $ | (3) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| As of 3 July 2015 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | |||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | $ | 2 | Other creditors | $ | (1 | ) | ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other debtors | — | Other creditors | (3 | ) | ||||||
Total return swap | Other debtors | 1 | Other creditors | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total derivatives | $ | 3 | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The following tables show the effect of the Company's derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016:
(US Dollars in millions) Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)(a) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | (4 | ) | Cost of revenue | $ | (2 | ) | Cost of revenue | $ | — |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other income and charges, net | $ | (5 | ) | ||
Total return swap | Operating expenses | $ | (1 | ) |
The following tables show the effect of the Company'sCompany’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 3 July 2015:30 June 2017:
(US Dollars in millions) Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)(a) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ | (11 | ) | Cost of revenue | $ | (13 | ) | Cost of revenue | $ | 1 |
(US Dollars in millions) Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)(a) | |||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ (3) | Cost of revenue | $ (4) | Cost of revenue | $ | — |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other income and charges, net | $ | (4 | ) | ||
Total return swap | Operating expenses | $ | — |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other income and charges, net | $ | 1 | |||
Total return swap | Operating expenses | $ | 10 |
(a) | The amounts of gain or (loss) recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were less than $1 million for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2017. |
The following tables show the effect of the hedging relationships were immaterialCompany’s derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the fiscal year ended 31 July 2015. The amount of gains recognized in income related to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness was $1 million for the fiscal year ended 3 July 2015.
(US Dollars in millions) Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) (a) | |||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | $ (4) | Cost of revenue | $ (2) | Cost of revenue | $ | — |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives | ||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | Other income and charges, net | $ (5) | ||||
Total return swap | Operating expenses | $ (1) |
(a) | The amounts of gain or (loss) recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and to the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were less than $1 million for the fiscal year ended 1 July 2016. |
9. Fair Value
Measurement of Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
Fair Value Hierarchy
A fair value hierarchy is based on whether the market participant assumptions used in determining fair value are obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) or reflects the Company'sCompany’s own assumptions of market participant valuation (unobservable inputs). A financial instrument'sinstrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Level 2—Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive; quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; or
Level 3—Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company considers an active market to be one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, and views an inactive market as one in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers. Where appropriate the Company'sCompany’s or the counterparty's counterparty’snon-performance risk is considered in determining the fair values of liabilities and assets, respectively.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the Company'sCompany’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, as of 30 June 2017:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 592 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 592 | ||||||||
Time deposits | — | 582 | — | 582 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total cash equivalents and investments | 592 | 582 | — | 1,174 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Restricted cash and investments: | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits and certificates of deposit | — | 3 | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 593 | $ | 585 | $ | — | $ | 1,178 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 592 | $ | 582 | $ | — | $ | 1,174 | ||||||||
Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year | 1 | 3 | — | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 593 | $ | 585 | $ | — | $ | 1,178 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reclassified demand deposits from certificates of deposit and money market funds to cash as of 1 July 2016:
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 316 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 316 | |||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 439 | — | 439 | |||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash equivalents and investments | 316 | 445 | — | 761 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash and investments: | |||||||||||||
Money market funds | 2 | — | — | 2 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 5 | — | 5 | |||||||||
Derivative assets | — | 3 | — | 3 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 318 | $ | 453 | $ | — | $ | 771 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table2016 in the table below to conform to the current year’s presentation. This reclassification did not result in any change to the cash and cash equivalents balance as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of ContentsCash Flows for all periods presented.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 316 | 439 | $ | — | $ | 755 | |||||||
Investments | — | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||
Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year | 2 | 8 | — | 10 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 318 | $ | 453 | $ | — | $ | 771 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Other creditors | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table presentstables present the Company'sCompany’s assets and liabilities, by financial instrument type and balance sheet line item that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, as of 31 July 2015:
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 1,201 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,201 | |||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 862 | — | 862 | |||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash equivalents and investments | 1,201 | 868 | — | 2,069 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Cash and Investments: | |||||||||||||
Money market funds | 2 | — | — | 2 | |||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 5 | — | 5 | |||||||||
Derivative assets | — | 3 | — | 3 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,203 | $ | 876 | $ | — | $ | 2,079 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table of Contents2016:
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | |||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,201 | $ | 862 | $ | — | $ | 2,063 | |||||
Investments | — | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||
Other debtors—amounts falling due within one year | 2 | 8 | — | 10 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 1,203 | $ | 876 | $ | — | $ | 2,079 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Other creditors | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 230 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 230 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | 6 | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total cash equivalents and investments | 230 | 6 | — | 236 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Restricted Cash and Investments: | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | 2 | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 5 | — | 5 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets | — | 3 | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 232 | $ | 14 | $ | — | $ | 246 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3) | $ | — | $ | (3) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3) | $ | — | $ | (3) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Balance | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 230 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 230 | ||||||||
Investments | — | 6 | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
Other debtors - amounts falling due within one year | 2 | 8 | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 232 | $ | 14 | $ | — | $ | 246 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Other creditors - amounts falling due within one year | $ | — | $ | (3) | $ | — | $ | (3) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | — | $ | (3) | $ | — | $ | (3) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company classifies items in Level 1 if the financial assets consist of securities for which quoted prices are available in an active market.
The Company classifies items in Level 2 if the financial asset or liability is valued using observable inputs. The Company uses observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include: agency bonds, corporate bonds, commercial paper, municipal bonds, U.S.US Treasuries, time deposits and certificates of deposits.deposit. These debt investments are priced using observable inputs and valuation models which vary by asset class. The Company uses a pricing service to assist in determining the fair values of
all of its cash equivalents and investments. For the cash equivalents and investments in the Company'sCompany’s portfolio, multiple pricing sources are generally available. The pricing service uses inputs from multiple industry standard data providers or other third party sources and various methodologies, such as weighting and models, to determine the appropriate price at the measurement date. The Company corroborates the prices obtained from the pricing service against other independent sources and, as of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, has not found it necessary to make any adjustments to the prices obtained. The Company'sCompany’s derivative financial instruments are also classified within Level 2. The Company'sCompany’s derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the TRS. The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in its consolidated financial statements at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of these instruments by considering the estimated amount it would pay or receive to terminate these agreements at the reporting date.
As of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, wethe Company had no Level 3 assets.assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Items Measured at Fair Value on aNon-Recurring Basis
TheFrom time to time, the Company enters into certain strategic investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. StrategicThese strategic investments in equity securitiesprimarily include cost basis investments representing those where the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence overas well as equity method investments representing those where the investees,Company does have the ability to exercise significant influence but does not have control. These investments are included in Financial assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are recorded at costSheet, and are periodically analyzed to determine whether or not there are indicators of impairment. The carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s strategic investments at 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015 totaled $113$125 million and $120$113 million, respectively, and consisted primarily of privately held equity securities without a readily determinable fair value.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company determined that certain of its equity investments accounted for under the cost method were other-than-temporarily impaired, and recognized charges of $13$25 million and $7$13 million, , respectively, in order to write down the carrying amount of the investmentinvestments to its estimated fair value. These amounts were recorded in Other income and charges, net in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. Since there was no active market for the equity securities of the investee, the Company estimated fair value of the investee by analyzing the underlying cash flows and future prospects of the investee. These amounts were recorded in Other income and charges, net in the Company’s Consolidated Profit and Loss Account.
In connection with the Company’s manufacturing footprint reduction, the Company has $75 million and $2 million held for sale assets included in Tangible assets and Other debtors, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 30 June 2017. These assets primarily consisted of $37 million of land and building in Korea and $26 million of land and building in China, with the remainder of the balance comprised of property at other locations (collectively, the “properties”). The respective properties to be sold met the criteria to be classified as held for sale during the June 2017 and March 2017 quarters. Depreciation related to the properties ceased as of the date these were determined to be held for sale. During fiscal year 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $35 million in order to write down the carrying amount of such properties to their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The impairment charges were recorded in the Operating expenses in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The fair values were measured with the assistance of third-party valuation models which used inputs such as market comparable data for similar land sale transactions adjusted for difference to indicate value of the subject properties and the cost approach valuation techniques for buildings as part of the analysis. The fair value measurement was categorized as Level 3 as significant unobservable inputs were used in the valuation analysis.
The following table shows the activity in the Financial assets for fiscal yearyears 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively:
(US Dollars in millions) | Strategic Investments | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 27 June 2014 | $ | 46 | $ | 46 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Additional investments | 85 | 85 | |||||
Sales and settlements | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||
Impairments | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Balance at 3 July 2015 | $ | 120 | $ | 120 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Additional investments | 6 | 6 | |||||
Impairments | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | |
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | 113 | $ | 113 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Strategic Investments | Total | ||||||
Balance at 3 July 2015 | $ | 120 | $ | 120 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Additional investments | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Impairments | (13) | (13) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | 113 | $ | 113 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Additional investments | 37 | 37 | ||||||
Impairments | (25) | (25) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at 30 June 2017 | $ | 125 | $ | 125 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The Company'sCompany’s debt is carried at amortized cost. The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s debt is derived using the closing price of the same debt instruments as of the date of valuation, which takes into account the yield curve, interest rates and other observable inputs. Accordingly, these fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2. The following table presents the fair value and amortized cost of the Company'sCompany’s debt in order of maturity:
| 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||
3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 | $ | 800 | $ | 804 | $ | 800 | $ | 828 | |||||
7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021 | 158 | 164 | 158 | 170 | |||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 | 990 | 857 | 1,000 | 1,016 | |||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 | 995 | 795 | 1,000 | 995 | |||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027 | 698 | 514 | 698 | 675 | |||||||||
5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034 | 489 | 357 | 499 | 491 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4,130 | 3,491 | 4,155 | 4,175 | ||||||||||
Less short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 4,130 | $ | 3,491 | $ | 4,155 | $ | 4,175 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | ||||||||||||
3.75% Senior Notes due November 2018 | $ | 710 | $ | 726 | $ | 800 | $ | 804 | ||||||||
7.00% Senior Notes due November 2021 | — | — | 158 | 164 | ||||||||||||
4.250% Senior Notes due March 2022 | 748 | 765 | — | — | ||||||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due June 2023 | 951 | 987 | 990 | 857 | ||||||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due March 2024 | 497 | 511 | — | — | ||||||||||||
4.75% Senior Notes due January 2025 | 975 | 984 | 995 | 795 | ||||||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due June 2027 | 695 | 698 | 698 | 514 | ||||||||||||
5.75% Senior Notes due December 2034 | 489 | 488 | 489 | 357 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
5,065 | 5,159 | 4,130 | 3,491 | |||||||||||||
Less: debt issuance costs | (44) | — | (39) | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs | $ | 5,021 | $ | 5,159 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 3,491 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. Capital and Reserves
Share Capital
The Company'sCompany’s authorized share capital is€ 40,000 and $13,500 and consists of 1,250,000,000 ordinary shares, par value $0.00001, of which 298,572,217291,799,561 shares were outstanding as of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, and 100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.00001, of which none were issued or outstanding as of 1 July 201630 June 2017 and 40,000 deferred shares of par value €1€ 1 of which 40,000 shares were outstanding as of 1 July 2016.30 June 2017.
Ordinary shares—- Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Company'sCompany’s board of directors (the "Board“Board of Directors"Directors”). Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, after required payments are made to holders of preferred shares, any remaining assets of the Company will be distributed ratably to holders of the preferred and ordinary shares. Holders of shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote, including the election of directors.
Preferred shares—- The Company may issue preferred shares in one or more series, up to the authorized amount, without shareholder approval. The Board of Directors is authorized to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series, and to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions. The Board of Directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of a series, but not below the number of shares of that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by the shareholders.
The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of preferred shares with voting or conversion rights that could harm the voting power or other rights of the holders of the ordinary shares. The issuance of preferred shares, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and might harm the market price of its ordinary shares and the voting and other rights of the holders of ordinary shares.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
On 24 July 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional $2.5 billion of its outstanding ordinary shares.
On 22 April 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an additional $2.5 billion of its outstanding ordinary shares.
All repurchases are effected as redemptions in accordance with the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Association.
As of 1 July 2016, $1.830 June 2017, $1.3 billion remained available for repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization limit.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares during fiscal years 20162017 and 2015:2016:
(US Dollars in millions) | Number of Shares Repurchased | Dollar Value of Shares Repurchased | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cumulative repurchased through 27 June 2014 | 285 | $ | 7,398 | ||||
Repurchased in fiscal year 2015 | 19 | 1,087 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Cumulative repurchased through 3 July 2015 | 304 | 8,485 | |||||
Repurchased in fiscal year 2016(a) | 24 | 1,146 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Cumulative repurchased through 1 July 2016 | 328 | $ | 9,631 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Number of Shares Repurchased | Dollar Value of Shares Repurchased | ||||||
Cumulative repurchased through 3 July 2015 | 304 | $ | 8,485 | |||||
Repurchased in fiscal year 2016(a) | 24 | 1,146 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cumulative repurchased through 1 July 2016 | 328 | 9,631 | ||||||
Repurchased in fiscal year 2017(a) | 13 | 487 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cumulative repurchased through 30 June 2017 | 341 | $ | 10,118 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | For fiscal years 2017 and 2016, including net share settlement of $27 million and $56 million, for 1 million and 1 million shares in connection with tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units, respectively. |
Reserves
| Seagate Technology plc Ordinary Shareholders | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Ordinary Shares | Share Premium | Profit and Loss Account | Other Reserves | Total Equity | |||||||||||
| (In millions) | (US Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at 27 June 2014 | 327 | $ | 5,332 | $ | (2,677 | ) | $ | 177 | $ | 2,832 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income for the period | 1,742 | 1,742 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | (19 | ) | (1,087 | ) | (1,087 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | 7 | 98 | 98 | |||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | (664 | ) | (664 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 137 | 137 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | (28 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 3 July 2015 | 315 | $ | 5,430 | $ | (2,686 | ) | $ | 274 | $ | 3,018 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income for the period | 248 | 248 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | (23 | ) | (1,090 | ) | (1,090 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | (1 | ) | (56 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | 8 | 79 | 79 | |||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | (727 | ) | (727 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 120 | 120 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Other | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at 1 July 2016 | 299 | $ | 5,509 | $ | (4,311 | ) | $ | 395 | $ | 1,593 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Ordinary Shares | Share Premium | Profit and Loss Account | Other Reserves | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (US Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 3 July 2015 | 315 | $ | 5,430 | $ | (2,686) | $ | 274 | $ | 3,018 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income for the period | 248 | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | (23) | (1,090) | (1,090) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | (1) | (56) | (56) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | 8 | 79 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | (727) | (727) | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 120 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | (4) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at 1 July 2016 | 299 | $ | 5,509 | $ | (4,311) | $ | 395 | $ | 1,593 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income for the period | 772 | 772 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | (12) | (460) | (460) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | (1) | (27) | (27) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | 6 | 86 | 86 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | (745) | (745) | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 137 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at 30 June 2017 | 292 | $ | 5,595 | $ | (4,771) | $ | 540 | $ | 1,364 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Redemption Reserve Fund
Other reserves includes an amount of $2,960$3,090 and $2,720$2,960 for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, representing a Capital Redemption Reserve Fund.
Table of Contents11. Share-based Compensation
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Compensation
Stock-BasedShare-Based Compensation Plans
The Company's stock-basedCompany’s share-based compensation plans have been established to promote the Company'sCompany’s long-term growth and financial success by providing incentives to its employees, directors, and consultants through grants of share-based awards. The provisions of the Company's stock-basedCompany’s share-based benefit plans, which allow for the grant of various types of equity-based awards, are also intended to provide greater flexibility to maintain the Company'sCompany’s competitive ability to attract, retain and motivate participants for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders.
Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "EIP"“EIP”). On 26 October 2011, the shareholders approved the EIP and authorized the issuance of up to a total of 27.0 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, plus any shares remaining available for grant under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share
Compensation Plan (the "SCP"“SCP”) as of the effective date of the EIP (which was equal to 11.0 million ordinary shares as of the effective date of the EIP and which will increase by such additional number of shares as will be returned to the share reserve in respect of awards previously granted under the SCP) (together, the "Share Reserve"“Share Reserve”). On 22 October 2014, the shareholders authorized the issuance from the EIP of an additional 25 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share. Any shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rights granted under the EIP will be counted against the Share Reserve as one share for every one share granted, and any shares that are subject to restricted share bonus awards, restricted share units, performance share bonus awards or performance share awards (collectively, "Full-Value“Full-Value Share Awards"Awards”) will generally be counted against the Share Reserve as two and five-tenths shares for every one share granted. On 19 October 2016, the shareholders authorized the issuance from the EIP of an additional 7.5 million ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share. As of 1 July 201630 June 2017, there were approximately 32.730.8 million ordinary shares available for issuance under the EIP.
Dot Hill Systems 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the "DHEIP"“DHEIP”). Seagate Technology plc acquired the Dot Hill Systems 2009 Equity Incentive Plan effective 6 October 2015. The Company assumed the remaining authorized but unused share reserve of approximately 2 million shares, based on the conversion ratio, from the DHEIP on the acquisition date. Any shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rights granted under the DHEIP will be counted against the Share Reserve as one share for every one share granted, and any shares that are subject to restricted share bonus awards, restricted share units, performance share bonus awards or performance share awards (collectively, "Full-Value“Full-Value Share Awards"Awards”) will generally be counted against the Share Reserve as one and five-tenths shares for every one share granted. As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, there were approximately 1 million ordinary shares available for issuance under the DHEIP.
Seagate Technology plc Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"“ESPP”). There are 50.0 million ordinary shares authorized to be issued under the ESPP. In no event shall the total number of shares issued under the ESPP exceed 75.0 million ordinary shares. The ESPP consists of asix-month offering period with a maximum issuance of 1.5 million ordinary shares per offering period. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions generally at 85% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares. As of 1 July 201630 June 2017 there were approximately 6.84.8 million ordinary shares available for issuance under the ESPP.
Equity Awards
Full-Value Share Awards (e.g. restricted share units)units, “RSU”) generally vest over a period of three to four years, with cliff vesting of a portion of each award occurring annually.annually, subject to continuous employment with the Company through the vesting date. Options generally vest as follows: 25% of the options will vest on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remaining 75% will vest ratably each month thereafter over the next 36 months. Options granted under
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the EIP and SCP have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s ordinary shares on the grant date. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares on date of grant.NASDAQ on the grant date.
The Company granted performance awards of performance-based share units (“PSU”) to its senior executive officers under the SCP and the EIP where vesting is subject to both the continued employment of the participant by the Company and the achievement of certain performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors, including market basedmarket-based performance goals. A single awardPSU represents the right to receive a single ordinary share of the Company. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company granted 0.6 million and 0.4 million and 0.3 million performance awards,PSUs, respectively, where performance is measured based on a three-year average return on invested capital ("ROIC"(“ROIC”) goal and a relative total shareholder return ("TSR"(“TSR”) goal, which is based on the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares measured against a benchmark TSR of a peer group over the same three-year period (the "TSR/ROIC"“TSR/ ROIC” awards). These awards vest after the end of the performance period of three years from the grant date. A percentage of these units may vest only if at least the minimum ROIC goal is met regardless of whether the TSR goal is met. The number of stockshare units to vest will range from 0% to 200% of the targeted units. In evaluating the fair value of these units, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation on the
grant date, taking the market-based TSR goal into consideration. Compensation expense related to these units is only recorded in a period if it is probable that the ROIC goal will be met, and it is to be recorded at the expected level of achievement.
The Company also granted 0.2 million and 0.40.2 million performance awardsPSUs during fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015,respectively, to its senior executive officers which are subject to a performance goal related to the Company'sCompany’s adjusted earnings per share (the "AEPS"“AEPS” awards). These awards have a maximum seven-year vesting period, with 25% annual vesting starting on the first anniversary of the grant date. If the performance goal is not achieved, vesting is delayed to a following year in which the AEPS goal is achieved. Any unvested awards from prior years may vest cumulatively in a future year within the seven-year vesting period if the annual AEPS goal is achieved during a subsequent year. If the AEPS goal has not been met by the end of the seven year period, any unvested shares will be forfeited.
During fiscal year 2016 and 2015, the Company did not grant any performance-based options and performance based restricted share units to its CEO.
Determining Fair Value of Seagate Technology Stock Plans
Valuation and amortization method—- The Company estimates the fair value of stock options, RSU and performance awards subject to an AEPS condition granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model and a single optionshare award approach. This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period or the remaining service (vesting) period.
Expected Term—- Expected term represents the period that the Company's stock-basedCompany’s share-based awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-basedshare-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of its stock-basedshare-based awards.
Expected Volatility—- The Company uses a combination of the implied volatility of its traded options and historical volatility of its share price.
Expected Dividend—- The Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model calls for a single expected dividend yield as an input. The dividend yield is determined by dividing the expected per share dividend during the coming year by the grant date share price. The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company'sCompany’s current expectations about its anticipated dividend policy. Also, because the expected dividend yield should reflect marketplace participants'participants’ expectations, the Company does not incorporate
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
changes in dividends anticipated by management unless those changes have been communicated to or otherwise are anticipated by marketplace participants.
Risk-Free Interest Rate—- The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S.US Treasuryzero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. Where the expected term of the Company's stock-basedCompany’s share-based awards do not correspond with the terms for which interest rates are quoted, the Company performed a straight-line interpolation to determine the rate from the available term maturities.
The fair value of the Fair Value—Company's nonvested awards and performance awards subject to an AEPS condition for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, is the price of the Company's shares on the grant date. The weighted average grant date fair value of awards granted are as follows:
| Fiscal Years | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | |||||
Nonvested awards: | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 41.47 | $ | 58.93 | |||
Performance awards: | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 42.09 | $ | 59.51 |
The fair value of the Company'sCompany’s shares related to options and RSU granted to employees, shares issued from the ESPP and performance awardsPSU subject to TSR/ROIC or AEPS conditions for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, were estimated using the following assumptions:
Fiscal Years | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Options | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) | 4.2 | 2.1 - 4.2 | ||||||
Volatility | 38 - 42% | 33 - 48% | ||||||
Weighted-average volatility | 39% | 36% | ||||||
Expected dividend rate | 4.9 - 6.4% | 4.6 - 11.0% | ||||||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 6.3% | 5.6% | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.1 - 1.8% | 0.6 - 1.5% | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 6.83 | $ | 12.28 | ||||
RSU | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||||||
Expected dividend rate | 4.6 - 7.7% | 4.6 - 11.0% | ||||||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 6.4% | 5.16% | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 30.85 | $ | 41.47 | ||||
ESPP | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||
Volatility | 36 - 49% | 28 - 46% | ||||||
Weighted-average volatility | 43% | 39% | ||||||
Expected dividend rate | 5.6 - 7.8% | 4.6 - 8.3% | ||||||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 6.8% | 6.9% | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.4 - 0.6% | 0.2 - 0.5% | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 9.78 | $ | 9.08 | ||||
PSUs subject to market condition | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) | 3.0 | 3.0 | ||||||
Volatility | 41 - 42% | 30% | ||||||
Weighted-average volatility | 41% | 30% | ||||||
Expected dividend rate | 6.3 - 7.0% | 4.3% | ||||||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 7.0% | 4.3% | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.9 - 1.3% | 1.1% | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 32.41 | $ | 47.34 | ||||
PSUs subject to an AEPS condition | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||||||
Expected dividend rate | 5.9 - 6.4% | 4.6 - 7.3% | ||||||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 6.2% | 5.9% | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value | $ | 31.61 | $ | 42.09 |
| Fiscal Years | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | ||
Options | ||||
Expected term (in years) | 2.1 - 4.2 | 4.2 | ||
Volatility | 33 - 48% | 33 - 35% | ||
Weighted-average volatility | 36% | 34% | ||
Expected dividend rate | 4.6 - 11.0% | 2.9 - 4.0% | ||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 5.6% | 3.0% | ||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.6 - 1.5% | 1.1 - 1.5% | ||
Weighted-average fair value | $12.28 | $12.98 | ||
ESPP | ||||
Expected term (in years) | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
Volatility | 28 - 46% | 28 - 29% | ||
Weighted-average volatility | 39% | 28% | ||
Expected dividend rate | 4.6 - 8.3% | 3.0 - 3.8% | ||
Weighted-average expected dividend rate | 6.9% | 3.4% | ||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
Weighted-average fair value | $9.08 | $12.21 | ||
Performance restricted share awards subject to market condition | ||||
Expected term (in years) | 3.00 | 3.00 | ||
Weighted-average volatility | 30% | 40% | ||
Expected dividend rate | 4.3% | 2.8% | ||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.1% | 1.1% | ||
Weighted-average fair value | $47.34 | $58.31 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
StockShare-based Compensation Expense
The Company recorded $120$137 million and $137$120 million of share-based compensation during fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively. Management has made an estimate of expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest. When estimating forfeitures, the Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as analysis of actual forfeited awards.
Stock Option Activity
The Company issues new ordinary shares upon exercise of stock options. The following is a summary of option activities:
Options | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | | (In years) | (Dollars In millions) | |||||||||
Outstanding at 3 July 2015 | 4.9 | $ | 27.94 | 3.6 | $ | 110 | |||||||
Granted | 2.6 | $ | 35.86 | ||||||||||
Exercised | (1.5 | ) | $ | 8.32 | |||||||||
Forfeitures | (0.4 | ) | $ | 47.03 | |||||||||
Expirations | (0.2 | ) | 46.43 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at 1 July 2016 | 5.4 | $ | 34.91 | 4.6 | $ | 14 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest at 1 July 2016 | 5.3 | $ | 34.93 | 4.6 | $ | 14 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at 1 July 2016 | 2.5 | $ | 27.46 | 3.2 | $ | 12 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Options | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In years) | (US Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding at 1 July 2016 | 5.4 | $ | 34.91 | 4.6 | $ | 14 | ||||||||||
Granted | 2.3 | $ | 36.78 | |||||||||||||
Exercised | (1.6) | $ | 19.87 | |||||||||||||
Forfeitures | (0.3) | $ | 41.07 | |||||||||||||
Expirations | (0.1) | $ | 47.66 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at 30 June 2017 | 5.7 | $ | 39.24 | 5.0 | $ | 22 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at 30 June 2017 | 5.5 | $ | 39.28 | 5.0 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Exercisable at 30 June 2017 | 2.1 | $ | 39.82 | 3.6 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares for the options that werein-the-money at 1 July 2016.30 June 2017. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Company'sCompany’s stock option plans was $44$29 million and $92$44 million, respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise. The aggregate fair value of options vested during fiscal yearyears 2017 and 2016 waswere approximately $15 million and $18 million.million, respectively.
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the total compensation cost related to options granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $28$25 million, net of estimated forfeitures of approximately $1 million. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 2.5 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Nonvested Awards Activity
The following is a summary of nonvested award activities which do not contain a performance condition:
Nonvested Awards | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | | |||||
Nonvested at 3 July 2015 | 5.2 | $ | 39.73 | ||||
Granted | 2.4 | $ | 41.47 | ||||
Forfeitures | (0.7 | ) | $ | 45.04 | |||
Vested | (2.1 | ) | $ | 30.95 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Nonvested at 1 July 2016 | 4.8 | $ | 39.95 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Nonvested Awards | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value | ||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Nonvested at 1 July 2016 | 4.8 | $ | 39.95 | |||||
Granted | 3.1 | $ | 30.85 | |||||
Forfeitures | (0.7) | $ | 39.72 | |||||
Vested | (2.0) | $ | 37.02 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Nonvested at 30 June 2017 | 5.2 | $ | 35.75 | |||||
|
|
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the total compensation cost related to nonvested awards granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $133$135 million, net of estimated forfeitures of approximately $7$8 million. This
cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of 2.42.6 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. The aggregate fair value of nonvested awards vested during fiscal yearyears 2017 and 2016 waswere approximately $73 million and $102 million.million, respectively.
Performance Awards
The following is a summary of nonvested award activities which contain a performance condition:
Performance Awards | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | | |||||
Performance units at 3 July 2015 | 2.1 | $ | 61.12 | ||||
Granted | 0.6 | $ | 45.68 | ||||
Forfeitures | (0.2 | ) | $ | 53.99 | |||
Vested | (1.1 | ) | $ | 27.05 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Performance units at 1 July 2016 | 1.4 | $ | 47.41 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Performance Awards | Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value | ||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Performance units at 1 July 2016 | 1.4 | $ | 47.41 | |||||
Granted | 0.8 | $ | 32.16 | |||||
Forfeitures | (0.3) | $ | 41.06 | |||||
Vested | (0.4) | $ | 41.91 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Performance units at 30 June 2017 | 1.5 | $ | 41.88 | |||||
|
|
At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the total compensation cost related to performance awards granted to employees but not yet recognized was approximately $23$36 million. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining term of 3.53.29 years.
ESPP
During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the aggregate intrinsic value of shares purchased under the Company'sCompany’s ESPP was approximately $12$24 million and $15$12 million, respectively. At 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, the total compensation cost related to options to purchase the Company'sCompany’s ordinary shares under the ESPP but not yet recognized was approximately $1.7 million. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately one month. During fiscal year 2016,2017, the Company issued 2.12.0 million ordinary shares with a weighted-average purchase price of $31.54$26.68 per share.
Table of ContentsTax-Deferred
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Tax-Deferred Savings Plan
The Company has atax-deferred savings plan, the Seagate 401(k) Plan (the "40l(k) plan"“40l(k) plan”), for the benefit of qualified employees. The 40l(k) plan is designed to provide employees with an accumulation of funds at retirement. Qualified employees may elect to make contributions to the 401(k) plan on abi-weekly basis. Pursuant to the 401(k) plan, the Company matches 50% of employee contributions, up to 6% of compensation, subject to maximum annual contributions of $4,500 per participating employee. During fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company made matching contributions of $18 million and $19 million, and $18 million, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plan
On 1 January 2001, the Company adopted the SDCP for the benefit of eligible employees. This plan is designed to permit certain discretionary employer contributions, in excess of the tax limits applicable to the 401(k) plan and to permit employee deferrals in excess of certain tax limits. In the quarter ended 27 December 2013,During fiscal year 2014, the Company entered into a TRS in order to manage the equity market risks associated with the SDCP liabilities. See "Note“Note 8. Derivative Financial Instruments"Instruments” contained in this report for additional information about the TRS.
Directors'Directors’ Emolument
During thefiscal year ended 1 July 2016,2017, the Company paid $8$4.8 million to its directors in respect of duties relating to Seagate Technology plc. Ofplc, including $2.4 million paid in restricted stock units. Gains on exercise of vested options were approximately $0.2 million in fiscal year 2017.
During fiscal year 2016, the totalCompany paid $5$11.3 million was for managerial services, which included compensation forto its directors in respect of duties relating to Seagate Technology plc, including $7.3 million paid in AEPS and ROIC awards to Mr. Luczo's service as PresidentLuczo and Chief Executive Officer, and $3$1.6 million was for director services, which included compensation for all non-employeepaid in restricted stock units to other directors. Gains on exercise of vested options were approximately $1.6 million in fiscal year 2016.
During the year ended 3 July 2015, the Company paid $15 million to its directors in respect of duties relating to Seagate Technology plc. Of the total paid, $11 million was for managerial services, which included compensation for Mr. Luczo's service as President and Chief Executive Officer, and $4 million was for director services, which included compensation for all non-employee directors. Gains on exercise of vested options were immaterial in fiscal year 2015.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In millions, except per share data) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Numerator: | |||||||
Net income attributable to Seagate Technology plc | $ | 248 | $ | 1,742 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Number of shares used in per share calculations: | |||||||
Total shares for purposes of calculating basic net income per share attributable to Seagate Technology plc | 299 | 324 | |||||
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||
Employee equity award plans | 3 | 7 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total shares for purpose of calculating diluted net income per share attributable to Seagate Technology plc | 302 | 331 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Net income per share attributable to Seagate Technology plc shareholders: | |||||||
Basic | $ | 0.83 | $ | 5.38 | |||
Diluted | $ | 0.82 | $ | 5.26 |
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 772 | $ | 248 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Number of shares used in per share calculations: | ||||||||
Total shares for purposes of calculating basic net income per share | 296 | 299 | ||||||
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||
Employee equity award plans | 3 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total shares for purpose of calculating diluted net income per share | 299 | 302 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income per share | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.61 | $ | 0.83 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 2.58 | $ | 0.82 |
The following potential shares were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:
|
13. Business Segment and Geographic Information
The Company has concluded that its manufacture and distribution of electronic storage solutions constitutes one reporting segment. The Company'sCompany’s manufacturing operations are based on technology platforms that are used to produce various electronic storage and systems solutions that serve multiple applications and markets. The Company'sCompany’s main technology platforms are primarily focused around areal density of media and read/write head technologies. In addition, the Company also invests in certain other technology platforms including motors, servo formatting read/write channels, solid state and other technologies. The Company has determined that its Chief Executive Officer is the Company'sCompany’s chief operating decision maker ("CODM"(“CODM”) as he is responsible for reviewing and approving investments in the Company'sCompany’s technology platforms and manufacturing infrastructure.
In fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, Dell Inc. accounted for approximately 12%10% and 14%12% of consolidated revenue, respectively. In fiscal year 2015, Hewlett-Packard Company accounted for approximately 12% of consolidated revenue. In fiscal year 2016, HP Inc., formerly known as Hewlett-Packard Company, completed its separation with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, and each company accounted for less than 10% of ourthe Company’s consolidated revenue.revenue in both fiscal years 2017 and 2016. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated revenue in any year presented.
Other long-lived assets consist of tangible assets, other intangible assets, capital leases, equity investmentsfinancial assets and certain other debtors as recorded by the Company'sCompany’s operations in each area.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the Company'sCompany’s operations by geographic area:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Revenue from external customers(a): | |||||||
Singapore | $ | 5,354 | $ | 6,844 | |||
United States | 3,376 | 3,929 | |||||
The Netherlands | 1,813 | 2,291 | |||||
Other | 617 | 675 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Consolidated | $ | 11,160 | $ | 13,739 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Long-lived assets: | |||||||
United States | $ | 1,029 | $ | 725 | |||
Singapore | 726 | 900 | |||||
Thailand | 349 | 328 | |||||
Malaysia | 201 | 248 | |||||
China | 115 | 138 | |||||
Other | 444 | 568 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Consolidated | $ | 2,864 | $ | 2,907 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
14. Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Revenue from external customers(a): | ||||||||
Singapore | $ | 5,070 | $ | 5,354 | ||||
United States | 3,535 | 3,376 | ||||||
The Netherlands | 1,501 | 1,813 | ||||||
Other | 665 | 617 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Consolidated | $ | 10,771 | $ | 11,160 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Long-lived assets: | ||||||||
United States | $ | 920 | $ | 1,029 | ||||
Singapore | 683 | 726 | ||||||
Thailand | 414 | 349 | ||||||
Malaysia | 100 | 201 | ||||||
China | 61 | 115 | ||||||
Other | 202 | 444 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Consolidated | $ | 2,380 | $ | 2,864 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | Revenue is attributed to countries based on the shipping location. |
14. | Legal, Environmental and Other Contingencies |
The Company assesses the probability of an unfavorable outcome of all its material litigation, claims, or assessments to determine whether a liability had been incurred and whether it is probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. In the event that an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company establishes an accrual for the litigation, claim or assessment. In addition, in the event an unfavorable outcome is determined to be less than probable, but reasonably possible, the Company will disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of such loss; however, when a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the Company will provide disclosure to that effect. Litigation is inherently uncertain and may result in adverse rulings or decisions. Additionally, the Company may enter into settlements or be subject to judgments that may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially.
Intellectual Property Litigation
Convolve, Inc. ("Convolve"(“Convolve”) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT"(“MIT”) v. Seagate Technology LLC, et al.—On 13 July 2000, Convolve and MIT filed suit against Compaq Computer Corporation and Seagate Technology LLC in the U.S.US District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement of U.S.US Patent Nos.No. 4,916,635 (the "'635 patent"“‘635 patent”) and U.S.US Patent No. 5,638,267 (the "'267 patent"“‘267 patent”), misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other claims. In the complaint, the plaintiffs requested injunctive relief, $800 million in compensatory damages and unspecified punitive damages, including for willful infringement.claims On 16 January, 16, 2002, Convolve filed an amended complaint, alleging defendants infringe US Patent No. 6,314,473 (the "'473 patent"“‘473 patent”). The district court ruled in 2010 that the '267‘267 patent was out of the case.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On 16 August 2011, the district court granted in part and denied in part the Company'sCompany’s motion for summary judgment. On 1 July 2013, the U.S.US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court's
court’s summary judgment rulings that Seagate did not misappropriate any of the alleged trade secrets and that the asserted claims of the '635‘635 patent are invalid; 2) reversed and vacated the district court'scourt’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement with respect to the '473‘473 patent; and 3) remanded the case for further proceedings on the '473 patent.‘473 patent On 11 July 2014, the district court granted the Company'sCompany’s further summary judgment motion regarding Convolve's only remaining cause of action, which alleged infringement of the '473‘473 patent. The district court entered judgment in favor of the Company on 14 July 2014. Convolve filed a notice of appeal on 13 August 2014. On 10 February 2016, the U.S.US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: 1) affirmed the district court'scourt’s summary judgment of no direct infringement by Seagate because Seagate'sSeagate’s ATA/SCSI disk drives do not meet the "user interface"“user interface” limitation of the asserted claims of the '473‘473 patent; 2) affirmed the district court'scourt’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement by Compaq'sCompaq’s products as to claims 1, 3, and 5 of the '473‘473 patent because Compaq'sCompaq’s F10 BIOS interface does not meet the "commands"“commands” limitation of those claims; 3) vacated the district court'scourt’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement by Compaq'sCompaq’s accused products as to claims7-15 of the '473‘473 patent; 4) reversed the district court'scourt’s summary judgment ofnon-infringement based on intervening rights; and 5) remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings on the '473‘473 patent. In view of the rulings made by the district court and the Court of Appeals and the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded Convolve in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.
Alexander Shukh v. Seagate Technology—On 12 February 2010, Alexander Shukh filed a complaint against the Company in the U.S.US District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging, among other things, employment discrimination based on his Belarusian national origin and wrongful failure to name him as an inventor on several patents and patent applications. Mr. Shukh's employment was terminated as part of a company-wide reduction in force in fiscal year 2009. He seeks damages in excess of $75 million.certain Seagate patents. On 31 March 2014, the district court granted Seagate'sSeagate’s summary judgment motion and entered judgment in favor of Seagate.motion. Mr. Shukh filed a notice of appeal on 7 April 2014. On 2 October 2015 the courtUS Court of appealsAppeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court'scourt’s grant of summary judgment on Mr. Shukh'sShukh’s claim for correction of inventorship and affirmed the district court'scourt’s grant of summary judgment as to all other claims. On 29 October 2015, Mr. Shukh filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the court of appeals; the petition was denied on 17 December 2015. On 16 March 2016, Shukh filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S.US Supreme Court; the petition was denied on 27 June 2016. In view ofOn 30 March 2017, the uncertainty regardingparties entered into a confidential settlement to resolve this matter. This settlement did not have a material impact on the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.Company’s consolidated financial statements.
LEAP Co., Ltd. v. Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd. and Nippon Seagate Inc. —On 4 July 2012, LEAP Co., Ltd. filed a lawsuit in the Tokyo District Court of Japan against Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd., Nippon Seagate Inc. and Buffalo Inc. alleging wrongful termination of purchase agreements and other claims, and seeking approximately $38 million in damages. On 16 March 2016, the Company and LEAP reached a settlement. As a result of the settlement, this litigation between the Company and LEAP has ended. There is no damage or loss to the Company related to this matter.
Enova Technology Corporation v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al.—On 5 June 2013, Enova Technology Corporation ("Enova"(“Enova”) filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the U.S.US. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S.US Patent No. 7,136,995 "Cryptographic(the “‘995 patent”), “Cryptographic Device,"” and U.S.US Patent
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
No. 7,900,057 "Cryptographic(the “‘057 patent”), “Cryptographic Serial ATA Apparatus and Method."” The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, enhanced damages, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees,Company believes the claims are without merit and other relief.intends to vigorously defend this case. On 27 April 2015, the district court ordered a stay of the case, in view of proceedings regarding the '995‘995 and '057 Patents‘057 patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"(“PTAB”) of the U.S.US Patent and Trademark Office. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. On 2 September 2015, PTAB issued its final written decision that claims1-15 of the '995 Patent‘995 patent are held unpatentable. On 18 December 2015, PTAB issued its final written decisions that claims1-32 and40-53 of the '057 Patent‘057 patent are held unpatentable. On 4 February 2016 PTAB issued its final written decision that claims33-39 of the '057 Patent‘057 patent are held unpatentable. Enova has appealed PTAB'sPTAB’s decisions on the '995 Patent‘995 patent and the 057 Patent‘057 patent to the U.S.US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. A hearingOral argument for the appeal from PTAB’s decision on the ‘995 patent was held on 13 March 2017, at the court of appeals. On 20 March 2017, the court of appeals issued its judgment affirming PTAB’s decision on the ‘995 patent. Oral argument before the court of appeals has not yet been scheduled.for the appeal from PTAB’s decision on the ‘057 patent is scheduled for 11 August 2017. In view of the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.
Seagate Technology LLC v. Western Digital Corp.—On 8 October 2014, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the arbitration award in favor of the Company in its case against Western Digital for the misappropriation of the Company's trade secrets should be confirmed. In the arbitration award, issued on 23 January 2012, the arbitrator determined that Western Digital and its former employee had misappropriated the Company's trade secrets. The arbitrator awarded the Company $525 million in compensatory damages and, after adding interest, issued a final award of $630 million. Interest on the final award has been accruing at 10%. On 14 October 2014, the Company received a partial payment from Western Digital in the amount of $773 million. During the quarter ended 2 January 2015, the amount of the final award, less litigation and other related costs, was recorded by the Company in Gain on arbitration award, net, and the remaining amount received was recorded in Other income and charges. On 7 April 2015, the Hennepin County District Court of Minnesota ("district court") denied Seagate's motion for entry of judgment for an amount of additional interest owing on the arbitration award. On 25 January 2016, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the district court's order regarding the unpaid interest. On 27 January 2016, the Company received a further payment from Western Digital in the amount of $33 million, which was the remaining balance of interest owed on the final award. This amount was recorded in Other income and charges in the Condensed Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the three and nine months ended 1 April 2016. On 29 January 2016, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with the district court, ending the litigation.
Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al.—On 29 April 2016, Lambeth Magnetic Structures LLC filed a complaint against Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC in the U.S.US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging infringement of U.S. US
Patent No. 7,128,988, "Magnetic“Magnetic Material Structures, Devices and Methods." The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, enhanced damages, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and other relief.” The Company believes the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case. In view of the uncertainty regarding the amount of damages, if any, that could be awarded in this matter, the Company does not believe that it is currently possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the possible range of loss related to this matter.
Environmental Matters
The Company'sCompany’s operations are subject to U.S.US and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing discharges of pollutants into the air and
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Some of the Company'sCompany’s operations require environmental permits and controls to prevent and reduce air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities.
The Company has established environmental management systems and continually updates its environmental policies and standard operating procedures for its operations worldwide. The Company believes that its operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits. The Company budgets for operating and capital costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental laws. If additional or more stringent requirements are imposed on the Company in the future, it could incur additional operating costs and capital expenditures.
Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, the "Superfund"“Superfund” law) and its state equivalents, can impose liability for the cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former site owners or operators or upon parties who sent waste to these sites, regardless of whether the owner or operator owned the site at the time of the release of hazardous substances or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. The Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party at several sites. At each of these sites, the Company has an assigned portion of the financial liability based on the type and amount of hazardous substances disposed of by each party at the site and the number of financially viable parties. The Company has fulfilled its responsibilities at some of these sites and remains involved in only a few at this time.
While the Company'sCompany’s ultimate costs in connection with these sites is difficult to predict with complete accuracy, based on its current estimates of cleanup costs and its expected allocation of these costs, the Company does not expect costs in connection with these sites to be material.
The Company may be subject to various state, federal and international laws and regulations governing the environment, including those restricting the presence of certain substances in electronic products. For example, the European Union ("EU"(“EU”) enacted the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment, which prohibits the use of certain substances, including lead, in certain products, including disk drives and server storage products, put on the market after 1 July 1, 2006. Similar legislation has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, China, Japan and others. The European Union REACH Directive (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals, EC 1907/2006) also restricts substances of very high concern ("SVHCs"(“SVHCs”) in products. If the Company or its suppliers fails to comply with the substance restrictions, recycle requirements or other environmental requirements as they are enacted worldwide, it could have a materially adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s business.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings incidental to its business, and the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its
business in the future. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
15. Commitments
15. | Commitments |
Leases. The Company leases certain property, facilities and equipment undernon-cancelable lease agreements. Land and facility leases expire at various dates through 2082 and contain various
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
provisions for rental adjustments including, in certain cases, a provision based on increases in the Consumer Price Index. Also, certain leases provide for renewal of the lease at the Company'sCompany’s option at expiration of the lease. The lease term begins on the date of initial possession of the leased property for purposes of recognizing lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease inception. All of the leases require the Company to pay property taxes, insurance and normal maintenance costs.costs which are expensed as incurred.
Future minimum lease payments for operating leases substantially all of which relates to land and buildings, (including accrued lease payments relating to restructuring plans) with initial or remaining terms of one year or more were as follows at 1 July 201630 June 2017 (lease payments are shown net of sublease income):
Fiscal Years Ending | Operating Leases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| (US Dollars in millions) | |||
2017 | $ | 27 | ||
2018 | 22 | |||
2019 | 16 | |||
2020 | 12 | |||
2021 | 9 | |||
Thereafter | 82 | |||
| | | | |
$ | 168 | |||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Fiscal Years Ending | Operating Leases | |||
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||
2018 | $ | 19 | ||
2019 | 15 | |||
2020 | 11 | |||
2021 | 9 | |||
2022 | 6 | |||
Thereafter | 75 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 135 | |||
|
|
Total rent expense for all land, facility and equipment operating leases, net of sublease income, was $43$29 million and $50$43 million for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. Total sublease rental income for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 and 2015 was $3$2 million and $3 million, respectively. The Company subleases a portion of its facilities that it considers to be in excess of current requirements. As of 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, total future lease income to be recognized for the Company'sCompany’s existing subleases is approximately $12$9 million.
Capital Expenditures. The Company's Company’snon-cancelable commitments for construction of manufacturing and product development facilities and purchases of equipment approximated $110$107 million at 1 July 2016,30 June 2017, and included $27$15 million related to research and development projects.
16. GuaranteesUnconditional Purchase Obligations.During fiscal year 2017, the Company had unconditional long-term purchase obligations of approximately $1.1 billion in the aggregate, of which $900 million in the aggregate remains outstanding as of 30 June 2017, to purchase minimum quarterly amounts of inventory components at fixed and variable prices. The Company expects the commitment to total $375 million, $350 million, and $175 million for fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively with no remaining commitment thereafter.
16. | Guarantees |
Indemnifications to Officers and Directors
On 4 May 2009, Seagate Technology, an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands ("Seagate-Cayman"(“Seagate-Cayman”), then the parent company, entered into a new form of
indemnification agreement (the "Revised“Revised Indemnification Agreement"Agreement”) with its officers and directors of Seagate-Cayman and its subsidiaries (each, an "Indemnitee"“Indemnitee”). The Revised Indemnification Agreement provides indemnification in addition to any of Indemnitee'sIndemnitee’s indemnification rights under Seagate-Cayman'sSeagate-Cayman’s Articles of Association, applicable law or otherwise, and indemnifies an Indemnitee for certain expenses (including attorneys'attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in the right of Seagate-Cayman or any of its subsidiaries, arising out of his or her service as a director, officer, employee or agent of Seagate-Cayman or any of its subsidiaries or of any other entity to which he or she provides services at Seagate-Cayman'sSeagate-Cayman’s request. However, an Indemnitee shall not be indemnified under the Revised Indemnification Agreement for (i) any fraud or dishonesty in the performance of Indemnitee'sIndemnitee’s duty to Seagate-Cayman or the applicable subsidiary of Seagate-Cayman or (ii) Indemnitee'sIndemnitee’s conscious, intentional or willful failure to act honestly, lawfully and in good faith with a view to the best interests of Seagate-Cayman or the applicable subsidiary of Seagate-Cayman. In addition, the Revised Indemnification Agreement provides that Seagate-Cayman will advance expenses
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
incurred by an Indemnitee in connection with enforcement of the Revised Indemnification Agreement or with the investigation, settlement or appeal of any action or proceeding against him or her as to which he or she could be indemnified.
On 3 July 2010, pursuant to a corporate reorganization, the common shareholders of Seagate-Cayman became ordinary shareholders of Seagate Technology plc (the "Company"“Company”) and Seagate-Cayman became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, as described more fully in the Current Report on Form8-K filed by the Company on 6 July 2010 (the "Redomestication"“Redomestication”). On 27 July 2010, in connection with the Redomestication, the Company, as sole shareholder of Seagate-Cayman, approved a form of deed of indemnity (the "Deed“Deed of Indemnity"Indemnity”), which provides for the indemnification by Seagate-Cayman of any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, Seagate-Cayman or any subsidiary of the Company (each, a "Deed Indemnitee"“Deed Indemnitee”), in addition to any of a Deed Indemnitee'sIndemnitee’s indemnification rights under the Company'sCompany’s Articles of Association, applicable law or otherwise, with a similar scope to the Revised Indemnification Agreement. Seagate-Cayman entered into the Deed of Indemnity with certain Deed Indemnitees effective as of 3 July 2010 and continues to enter into the Deed of Indemnity with additional Deed Indemnitees from time to time.
The nature of these indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay on behalf of its officers and directors. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.
Intellectual Property Indemnification Obligations
The Company has entered into agreements with customers and suppliers that include limited intellectual property indemnification obligations that are customary in the industry. These guarantees generally require the Company to compensate the other party for certain damages and costs incurred as a result of third party intellectual property claims arising from these transactions. The nature of the intellectual property indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to its customers and suppliers. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.
Product Warranty
The Company estimates probable product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. The Company generally warrants its products for a period of 1 to 5 years. The Company uses estimated repair or replacement costs and uses statistical modeling to estimate product return rates in order to
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
determine its warranty
obligation. Changes in the Company'sCompany’s product warranty liability during the fiscal years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015 were as follows:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(US Dollars in millions) | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 248 | $ | 273 | |||
Warranties issued | 125 | 147 | |||||
Repairs and replacements | (152 | ) | (187 | ) | |||
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, including expirations | (17 | ) | 7 | ||||
Warranty liability assumed from acquisitions | 2 | 8 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | $ | 206 | $ | 248 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
17. Related Party Transactions
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. ("Samsung") In connection with the Company's acquisition of the Samsung HDD business, Samsung became a shareholder of the Company and appointed one of its executives to the Company's Board of Directors. On October 22, 2013, Samsung filed an amendment to its Schedule 13D indicating that it holds less than 5% of the Company's outstanding shares. Dr. Seh-Woong Jeong was appointed to our Board of Directors by Samsung and joined our Board of Directors on April 26, 2012. He retired from our Board of Directors on October 22, 2014 and ceased to be a related party.
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) |
30 June 2017 |
1 July 2016 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 206 | $ | 248 | ||||
Warranties issued | 131 | 125 | ||||||
Repairs and replacements | (114) | (152) | ||||||
Changes in liability forpre-existing warranties, including expirations | 10 | (17) | ||||||
Warranty liability assumed from acquisitions | — | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 233 | $ | 206 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") The Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also served on the board of Microsoft until March 2014 upon his resignation and Microsoft ceased to be a related party.
17. | Employees and Remuneration |
18. Employees and Remuneration
The average number of persons employed by the Company during each year was as follows:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||
Manufacturing | 38 | 42 | |||||
Product development | 6 | 7 | |||||
Sales, marketing, general & administrative | 4 | 5 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
48 | 54 | ||||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
30 June 2017 |
1 July 2016 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Manufacturing | 34 | 38 | ||||||
Product development | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Sales, marketing, general & administrative | 3 | 4 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
43 | 48 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Employee costs during each year consist of the following:
| Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||
| (US Dollars in millions) | ||||||
Salaries and wages | $ | 1,458 | $ | 1,716 | |||
Social security costs(1) | 346 | 403 | |||||
Share-based compensation | 120 | 137 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
$ | 1,924 | $ | 2,256 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
19. Auditor's Remuneration
Fiscal Years Ended | ||||||||
30 June 2017 |
1 July 2016 | |||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Salaries and wages | $ | 1,477 | $ | 1,458 | ||||
Social security costs(1) | 324 | 346 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 137 | 120 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 1,938 | $ | 1,924 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Social security costs includes social security costs, employer paid payroll taxes and other employee benefits paid by the Company. |
18. | Auditor’s Remuneration |
The fees paid to Ernst & Young Ireland in respect of the audit of the group accounts was $0.1 million for both the years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016 and 3 July 2015.2016. In addition, Ernst & Young Ireland received fees of $0.09$0.04 million and $0.05$0.09 million for other assurance services and nil for both tax and othernon-audit services for fiscal years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, respectively.
The auditor'sTotal auditor’s remuneration was $6.2$5.9 million and $6.6$6.2 million for the years ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, respectively. These amounts reflect fees for all professional services rendered by Ernst & Young and its affiliated firms.
20. Post Balance Sheet Events
19. | Post Balance Sheet Events |
Dividends
On 2 August 2016, our25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approveddeclared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 54 October 20162017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2120 September 2016.2017.
July 20162017 Restructuring Plan
On 1125 July 2016,2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the "July 2016 Plan"“July 2017 Plan”) for continued consolidation ofto reduce its global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas.cost structure. The July 20162017 Plan included reducing worldwidethe Company’s global headcount by approximately 6,500600 employees. The July 20162017 Plan, which the Company expects to be largelysubstantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2017,2018, is expected to result in total pretaxpre-tax charges of approximately $164$50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.2018. These charges are expected to consistbe comprised of cash expenditures on severance and employee-related costs.
Planned Leadership Transition
On 25 July 2017 the Company’s Board of approximately $82 millionDirectors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of employee termination coststhe Company effective 1 October 2017. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as a director of the Company, effective 25 July 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as a director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of shareholders when he is expected to stand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On 25 July 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective 1 October 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with the Company in the role of Executive Chairman effective 1 October 2017 and $51 millionwill continue to serve as Chairman of other exit costs, as well as other non-cash chargesthe Board of approximately $31 million.Directors.
TableAs previously announced on 2 June 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
21. Subsidiary UndertakingsCloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On 20 July 2017, the Company and Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of his departure will be 2 October 2017.
20. | Subsidiary Undertakings |
The subsidiary undertakings of Seagate Technology plc which have a substantial effect on the financial position of the Company are listed below. Unless noted herein, all subsidiary undertakings are ultimately wholly owned by Seagate Technology plc and their financial results are included in the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.
| Jurisdiction | Registered Address | Nature of Business | Percent Owned | ||||||
Seagate HDD Cayman | Cayman Islands | c/o Maples and Calder, P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman,KY1-1104, Cayman Islands | Holding Company | |||||||
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. | Delaware | The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, USA | Holding Company | 100% |
Company |
| |||||||||
|
| Nature of Business | Percent Owned | |||||||
Seagate Technology International | Cayman Islands | c/o Maples and Calder, P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman,KY1-1104, Cayman Islands | Designs, manufactures, markets and sells computer disk drives. | |||||||
Penang Seagate Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd. | Malaysia | 1st Floor (Rm. 102), 42 Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah, Penang 10050, Malaysia | Manufacture, market and deal in all kinds of electronics data products. | |||||||
Seagate Technology (Ireland) | Northern Ireland | c/o Maples and Calder, P. O. Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman,KY1-1104, Cayman Islands | Manufactures equipment for export | |||||||
Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. | The Netherlands | Koolhovenlaan 1, 1119 NB, Schiphol-Rijk, Netherlands | Netherlands branch office of Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd | |||||||
Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd | Singapore | 50 Raffles Place#06-00, Singapore Land Tower, 48623, Singapore | Exports products manufactured in Asia |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
100% | ||||||||||
Seagate Technology International (Wuxi) Co. Ltd | China | Export Processing Zone, B, No. 2, Xing Chuang Er Lu, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples Republic of China | Design, manufacture, service, market data storage products | |||||||
Seagate Technology LLC | Delaware | The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, USA | Dual member limited liability | |||||||
Seagate Technology (Thailand) Limited | Thailand | 1627 Moo 7, Teparuk Road, Tambol Teparuk, Amphur Muang, Samutprakarn 10270, Thailand | Manufacturer of disk drives and related peripherals | |||||||
Seagate Systems (Mexico) SA de CV | Mexico | 1A-102 Av Circunvalacion Agustin Yanez No 2613 Col. Arcos Vallarta Sur in Guadalajara Jalisco, Mexico | Mexican operations | 100% |
Company |
| Registered Address | Nature of Business | Percent Owned | ||||||
Seagate Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. | China | No. 1 Wu Xiang Road Zone A, Export Processing Zone 200 Suhong Zhong Road Suzhou Industrial Park 215021 | Factory | |||||||
Seagate International (Johor) Sdn. Bhd | Malaysia | B-11-8, Level 11 Megan Avenue II Jalan Yap Kwan Seng Kuala Lumpur 50450, Malaysia | Manufacturer of substrates | |||||||
Seagate Systems (US) Inc. | California | 10200 South DeAnza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014, | US trading activities of Seagate Systems | |||||||
Seagate Systems (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd | Malaysia | 10th Floor Wisma Havela Thakardas No.1 Jalan Tiong Nam Off Jalan Raja Laut 50350, Malaysia | Malaysia operations |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
100% | ||||||||||
Seagate Systems (UK) Limited | United Kingdom | Langstone Road Havant Hampshire PO9 1SA, United Kingdom | UK trading operations of Seagate Systems | 100% | ||||||
Seagate Cloud Systems, Inc. | The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, USA | US trading activities of Seagate Cloud Systems | 100% | |||||||
Seagate technology international (Singapore branch) | Singapore | 90 Woodlands Avenue 7 Singapore 737911 | Manufacture of computers and data processing equipment except computer peripheral equipment. | 100% |
Exemption From Statutory Audit
As detailed in Note 1 "Basis“Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies"Policies”, in producing consolidated financial statements the UK subsidiaries of the Company are eligible to take advantage of the audit exemption available to them under s479A of the UK Companies Act 2006 relating to subsidiary companies. The subsidiaries which have taken an exemption from an audit for the year ended 1 July 201630 June 2017 by virtue of s479A of the UK Companies Act 2006 are:
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the period ended 1 July 201630 June 2017
(US Dollars in millions) | 4 July 2015 to 1 July 2016 | 28 June 2014 to 3 July 2015 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Profit for the period | $ | 1,693 | $ | 992 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income for the period | $ | 1,693 | $ | 992 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | 2 July 2016 to 30 June 2017 | 4 July 2015 to 1 July 2016 | ||||||
Profit for the period | $ | 645 | $ | 1,693 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total comprehensive income for the period | $ | 645 | $ | 1,693 | ||||
|
|
|
|
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
as at 1 July 201630 June 2017
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 1 July 2016 | 3 July 2015 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Fixed assets: | ||||||||||
Financial assets—investment in subsidiary | 3 | $ | 6,792 | $ | 6,677 | |||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||
Debtors | 1 | — | ||||||||
Cash | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | $ | 6,794 | $ | 6,678 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | ||||||||||
Capital and reserves: | ||||||||||
Share capital | 5 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Share premium | 1,659 | 1,580 | ||||||||
Other reserves | 593 | 477 | ||||||||
Profit and loss account | 2,178 | 2,358 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
4,430 | 4,415 | |||||||||
Creditors—Amounts falling due within one year: | ||||||||||
Amounts due to subsidiaries | 4 | 2,364 | 2,261 | |||||||
Creditors | — | 2 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
2,364 | 2,263 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | $ | 6,794 | $ | 6,678 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | Note | 30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Fixed assets: | ||||||||||||
Financial assets – investment in subsidiary | 3 | $ | 6,925 | $ | 6,792 | |||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||
Debtors | — | 1 | ||||||||||
Cash | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 6,928 | $ | 6,794 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||||||
Capital and reserves: | ||||||||||||
Share capital | 5 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Share premium | 1,745 | 1,659 | ||||||||||
Other reserves | 728 | 593 | ||||||||||
Profit and loss account | 1,591 | 2,178 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
4,064 | 4,430 | |||||||||||
Creditors – Amounts falling due within one year: | ||||||||||||
Amounts due to subsidiaries | 4 | 2,680 | 2,364 | |||||||||
Creditors | 184 | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
2,864 | 2,364 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 6,928 | $ | 6,794 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf on 1925 August 20162017
/s/ STEPHEN J. LUCZO | /s/ DR.CHONG SUP PARK | |||
Stephen J. Luczo | Dr. Chong Sup Park |
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
PARENT COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
as at 1 July 201630 June 2017
(US Dollars in millions) | Share Capital | Share Premium | Other Reserves | Profit and Loss Account | Total | Share Capital | Share Premium | Other Reserves | Profit and Loss Account | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 27 June 2014 | $ | — | $ | 1,482 | $ | 296 | $ | 3,117 | $ | 4,895 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the period | 992 | 992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | 1,482 | 296 | 4,109 | 5,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | — | — | — | (1,087 | ) | (1,087 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | — | 98 | — | — | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | — | — | — | (664 | ) | (664 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 181 | — | 181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | — | 98 | 181 | (1,751 | ) | (1,472 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 3 July 2015 | $ | — | $ | 1,580 | $ | 477 | $ | 2,358 | $ | 4,415 | $ | — | $ | 1,580 | $ | 477 | $ | 2,358 | $ | 4,415 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit for the period | 1,693 | 1,693 | 1,693 | 1,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | 1,580 | 477 | 4,051 | 6,108 | — | 1,580 | 477 | 4,051 | 6,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | — | — | — | (1,090 | ) | (1,090 | ) | — | — | — | (1,090) | (1,090) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | — | — | — | (56 | ) | (56 | ) | — | — | — | (56) | (56) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | — | 79 | — | — | 79 | — | 79 | — | — | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | — | — | — | (727 | ) | (727 | ) | — | — | — | (727) | (727) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 116 | — | 116 | — | — | 116 | — | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | — | 79 | 116 | (1,873 | ) | (1,678 | ) | — | 79 | 116 | (1,873) | (1,678) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 1 July 2016 | $ | — | $ | 1,659 | $ | 593 | $ | 2,178 | $ | 4,430 | $ | — | $ | 1,659 | $ | 593 | $ | 2,178 | $ | 4,430 | ||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the period | 645 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | 1,659 | 593 | 2,823 | 5,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | — | — | — | (460) | (460) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | — | — | — | (27) | (27) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares in respect of share-based payment plans | — | 86 | — | — | 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders | — | — | — | (745) | (745) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 135 | — | 135 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | — | 86 | 135 | (1,232) | (1,011) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at 30 June 2017 | $ | — | $ | 1,745 | $ | 728 | $ | 1,591 | $ | 4,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO THE PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENT
STATEMENTS
1. Accounting Policies
Accounting Convention and Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements.Statements. The financial statements of Seagate Technology plc present the statement of comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity on a stand-alone basis, including related party transactions. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention except for share based payments which are stated at their fair value and in accordance with Irish law and Financial Reporting Standard 102 ("(“FRS 102"102”, The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland) issued by the Financial Reporting Council and promulgated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in Ireland).
The company transitioned from previously extant Irish GAAP to FRS 102 as at June 2014. No measurement differences were identified at the date of transition 27 June 2014 or at 3 July 2015. An explanation on how the transition to FRS 102 has affected the reported financial position and financial performance is given in Note 9. The financial statements are presented in United States dollars, which is the Company'sCompany’s functional and presentational currency and are rounded to the nearest million.
Reduced Disclosure Framework Exemptions Adopted.Adopted On transition. In accordance to FRS102, the Company has taken advantage of the following disclosure exemptions as equivalent disclosures are available in the publicly filed financial statements of the Group, Seagate Technology plc, which consolidates the results of the Company: 1) The requirements of Section 7 Statement of Cash Flows paragraph 3.17 (d); 2) requirements of Section 33 Related Party Disclosures paragraph 33.7 and 3) Section 26 Share based payment paragraph 26.18 (b), 26.19 to 26.21 and 26.23. The shareholders of the Company have been notified in writing about, and do not object to, the use of the disclosure exemptions.
In accordance with Sections 304 (1) and 304 (2) of the Companies Act 2014, the Company is availing of the exemption from presenting the individual profit and loss account. For fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and 2015, the Company'sCompany’s net profit was $1,693$645 million and $992$1,693 million, respectively.
Investment in Subsidiary. The Company'sCompany’s investment in Seagate Technology ("Seagate-Cayman"(“Seagate-Cayman”), a wholly owned subsidiary, was recorded at cost which equaled fair value on 3 July 2010, the date that the Company became the parent of Seagate-Cayman, based on the Company'sCompany’s market capitalization at that time. This initial valuation is the Company'sCompany’s cost basis for its investment in Seagate-Cayman. The investment is tested for impairment if circumstances or indicators suggest that impairment may exist. On transition to FRS 102 from previous Irish GAAP, the Company has taken advantage of transitional relief by electing to treat the carrying amount of investment in subsidiary under previous Irish GAAP at the date of transition as deemed cost on transition to FRS 102.
Amounts due to subsidiaries. Intercompany notes payable which are basic financial instruments are initially recorded at the present value of future payments discounted at a market rate of interest for a similar loan. Subsequently, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Guarantees and Contingencies. The Company has guaranteed certain liabilities and credit arrangements of group entities. The Company reviews the status of these guarantees at each reporting date and considers whether it is required to make a provision for payment on those guarantees based on the probability of the commitment being called.
The Company concluded that as the likelihood of the guarantees being called upon is remote, no provisions for any guarantees have been booked to these financial statements.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued)
Dividend Income. Dividend income is recognized when the right to receive payment is established, the amount of which can be reliably measured and it is probable that collectability is reasonably assured.
Share-based Payments. The Seagate Technology group operates several share-based payment plans. The share-based payment expense associated with the share plans is recognized as an expense by the entity which
receives services in exchange for the share-based compensation. On an individual undertaking basis, the profit and loss account is charged with the expense related to the services received by Seagate Technology plc. The remaining portion of the share-based payments represents a contribution to group entities and is added to the carrying amount of those investments.
Taxation.Corporation tax is provided on taxable profits at the current rates.
Deferred taxation is accounted for in respect of all timing differences at expected tax rates. Timing differences arise from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure in tax computations in periods different from those in which they are included in the financial statements. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits.
Foreign Currency. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the Company'sCompany’s functional currency by applying the spot rate as at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are retranslated at the rate of exchange ruling at the statement of financial position date. All differences are taken to the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
2. History and Description of the Company
Seagate Technology plc became the parent company in the Seagate Technology group following a reorganization that took place in 2010.
The principal activity of Seagate Technology plc is an investment holding company. Seagate Technology plc is the parent company of subsidiaries that design, manufacture, market and sell data storage products.
The Company, which is publicly listed, was incorporated in Ireland and its registered address is 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
3. Financial Assets—Assets – Investment in Subsidiary
(US Dollars in millions) | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
At 27 June 2014 | $ | 6,499 | ||
Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans | 178 | |||
| | | | |
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 6,677 | ||
Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans | 115 | |||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 6,792 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||
At 3 July 2015 | $ | 6,677 | ||
Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans | 115 | |||
At 1 July 2016 | $ | 6,792 | ||
Capital contribution in respect of share-based payment plans | 133 | |||
At 30 June 2017 | $ | 6,925 | ||
At 30 June 2017, the Company had the following subsidiary:
Company name | Registered office | Nature of business | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Technology | Cayman Islands | Investment holding |
The above subsidiary holding represents 100% of the common shares of the subsidiary, which is unlisted.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued)
4. Amounts Due to Subsidiaries
The balance is primarily comprised of notes due to Seagate-Cayman with no stated interest rate and that are payable on demand. During fiscal year 2017, the Company borrowed $964 million and repaid $650 million by way of applying dividends declared by Seagate-Cayman. The remaining balance outstanding as of 30 June
2017 of $2.7 billion is unsecured, interest free and due on demand. During fiscal year 2016, the Company borrowed $1.8 billion and repaid $1.7 billion by way of applying dividends declared by Seagate-Cayman. The remaining balance outstanding as of 1 July 2016 of $2.4 billion is unsecured, interest free and due on demand. During fiscal year 2015, the Company borrowed $1.6 billion and repaid $1.0 billion by way of applying dividends declared by Seagate-Cayman. The remaining balance outstanding as of 3 July 2015 of $2.3 billion was unsecured, interest free and due on demand.
5. Equity
Share Capital
30 June 2017 | 1 July 2016 | |||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Authorized: | ||||||||||||||||
40,000 deferred shares of€1 par value per share | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
1,250,000,000 ordinary shares of $.00001 par value per share | — | — | ||||||||||||||
100,000,000 undesignated preferred shares of $.00001 par value per share | — | — | ||||||||||||||
(US Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Allotted, Called Up, and Fully Paid: | ||||||||||||||||
40,000 deferred shares of€1 par value per share | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
291,799,561 (2016: 298,572,217 ) ordinary shares of $.00001 par value per share | — | — | ||||||||||||||
$ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Number of Ordinary | Shares | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In millions) | (US Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||
| 315 | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Repurchase and | (23) | — | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | |||||||||
Issuance of ordinary shares in respect of share-based payment plans | 8 | — | |||||||
Balance at 1 July 2016 | 299 | $ | — | ||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of ordinary shares | |||||||||
Tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock units | |||||||||
Issuance of ordinary shares in respect of share-based payment plans | |||||||||
Balance at 30 June 2017 | 292 | $ | — | ||||||
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued)
Share Premium
This reserve records the amount above the nominal value received for shares sold, less transaction costs.
Other Reserves
Other reserves include an amount of $2,960$3,090 and $2,720$2,960 for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, representing a Capital Redemption Reserve Fund.
Dividends
During fiscal year 2017, the Company paid cash dividends of $2.52 per share of its ordinary shares, aggregating $561 million. On 25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend
of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 4 October 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 20 September 2017. During fiscal year 2016, the Company declared and paid cash dividends of $2.43 per share of its ordinary shares, aggregating $727 million . On 2 August 2016, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share of its ordinary shares, which will be payable on 5 October 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 21 September 2016. During fiscal year 2015, the Company declared and paid cash dividends of $2.05 per share of its ordinary shares, aggregating $664 million.
6. Share-Based Payments
Total share-based payment expense in respect of share-based payment plans was $116$135 million and $181$116 million for fiscal years 20162017 and 2015,2016, of which $115$133 million and $178$115 million, respectively, was included as a capital contribution in Investment in subsidiary (Note 6)3). The share-based payment charge in the parent company balance sheet is calculated and recognized on a graded basis as opposed to a straight line basis in the Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Company has applied the requirements of Section 26 of FRS 102. Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contains relevant disclosures on the Company'sCompany’s share-based payment plans.
7. Auditor'sAuditor’s Remuneration
The fees paid to Ernst & Young Ireland in respect of the audit of the Company individual accounts was $0.03$0.04 million and $0.04$0.03 million for periods ended 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2016, and 3 July 2015, respectively. In addition, Ernst & Young Ireland received fees of $0.17$0.12 million and $0.13$0.17 million for other assurance services in those periods, respectively. Ernst & Young Ireland did not receive any fees for tax or othernon-audit services in 20162017 or 2015.2016. Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides additional information regarding auditor'sauditor’s remuneration.
8. Subsequent Events
Dividends
On 2 August 2016, our25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approveddeclared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.63 per share, which will be payable on 54 October 20162017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on 2120 September 2016.2017.
July 20162017 Restructuring Plan
On 1125 July 2016,2017, the Company committed to an additional restructuring plan (the "July 2016 Plan"“July 2017 Plan”) for continued consolidation ofto reduce its global footprint across Asia, EMEA and the Americas.cost structure. The July 20162017 Plan included reducing worldwidethe Company’s global headcount by approximately 6,500600 employees. The July 20162017 Plan, which the Company expects to be largelysubstantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2017,2018, is
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued)
expected to result in total pretaxpre-tax charges of approximately $164$50 million, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.2018. These charges are expected to consistbe comprised of cash expenditures on severance and employee-related costs.
Planned Leadership Transition
On 25 July 2017, the Company’s Board of approximately $82 millionDirectors appointed William D. Mosley to serve as Chief Executive Officer, of employee termination costs and $51 millionthe Company effective 1 October 2017. The Board of other exit costs,Directors also appointed Mr. Mosley to serve as wella director of the Company, effective 25 July 2017. Mr. Mosley will serve as other non-cash chargesa director until the Company’s next annual general meeting of approximately $31 million.
9. Transitionshareholders when he is expected to FRS 102
The Company's financial statements have been prepared in compliancestand for election by a vote of the Company’s shareholders. On 25 July 2017, the Company also announced that Stephen J. Luczo will step down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective 1 October 2017. Mr. Luczo will remain with FRS 102 (The Financial Reporting Standard applicablethe Company in the UKrole of Executive Chairman effective 1 October 2017 and Republicwill continue to serve as Chairman of Ireland). Thethe Board of Directors.
As previously announced on 2 June 2017, Philip G. Brace, President of Cloud Systems and Silicon group, will be leaving the Company. On 20 July 2017, the Company transitioned from previously extant Irish GAAP to FRS 102 as at June 2014. No measurement differences were identified atand Mr. Brace agreed that the effective date of transition (28 June 2014).his departure will be 2 October 2017.
10.9. Approval of Financial Statements
The directors approved the financial statements and authorized them for issue on 1925 August 20162017.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
1. | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| PURPOSE |
B-i
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
B-ii
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
B-iii
The Company, by meanspurpose of this Plan seeksis to provide incentivesan opportunity for Employees of Seagate Technology plc, an Irish company and its Designated Subsidiaries to purchase Ordinary Shares and thereby to have an additional incentive to contribute to the group of persons eligible to receive Share Awards to align their long-term interests with thoseprosperity of the Company's shareholders and to perform in a manner individually and collectively that enhancesCorporation. It is the successintention of the Company. TheCorporation that the Plan is further intended to provide a means by which eligible recipients of Share Awards may be givenqualify as an opportunity to benefit from increases in value“Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Ordinary Shares throughCode and the grantingPlan shall be administered in accordance with this intent(the “423 Plan”). In addition, the Plan authorizes the grant of Share Awardsoptions pursuant to sub-plans or special rules adopted by the Committee designed to achieve desired tax or other objectives in particular locations outside of the United States, which sub-plans (together such sub-plans and special rules are referred to herein as “Non-423 Sub-Plans”), which Non-423 Sub-plans shall not be required to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code or all of the specific provisions of the Plan, including but not limited to: (i) Incentive Stock Options, (ii) Nonstatutory Share Options, (iii) Restricted Share Bonuses, (iv) Share Appreciation Rights, (v) Phantom Share Units, (vi) Restricted Share Units, (vii) Performance Share Bonuses, (viii) Performance Share Units, (ix) Deferred Share Units, and (x) Other Share-Based Awards.
II. DEFINITIONS.
to terms relating to eligibility, Offering Periods, Purchase Periods or Purchase Price.
2. | DEFINITIONS |
2.1 |
2.2 | “Beneficial Owner” means the definition given in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. |
2.3 | “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Corporation. |
2.4 | “Change of Control” shall mean the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events: |
(i) | The sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation to a person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act; |
B-1
2.1 "Affiliate" means generally with respect to the Company, any entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlling or controlled by (but not under common control with) the Company. Solely with respect to the granting of any Incentive Stock Options, Affiliate means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code. Solely with respect to the granting of any Nonstatutory Share Options or Share Appreciation Rights, Affiliate means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(b)(5)(iii)(E).
2.2 "Beneficial Owner" means the definition given in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
2.3 "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.4 "Change of Control" means the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events:
(ii) | A merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving the Corporation in which the voting securities of the Corporation owned by the shareholders of the Corporation immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction; |
(i) The sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to a person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act;
(iii) | Any person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of the Corporation (including by way of merger, takeover (including an acquisition by means of a scheme of arrangement), consolidation or otherwise); or |
(ii) A merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving the Company in which the voting securities of the Company owned by the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction;
(iv) | During any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of the Corporation was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of the Corporation then still in office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office. |
(iii) Any person or group of related persons, as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of the Company (including by way of merger, takeover (including an acquisition by means of a scheme of arrangement), consolidation or otherwise);
(iv) During any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new Directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of the Company was approved by a vote of a majority of the Directors of the Company then still in office, who were either Directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office; or
(v) A dissolution or liquidation of the Company.
In addition, if a Change of Control constitutes a payment event with respect to any Share Award which provides for the deferral of compensation and is subject to Section 409A of the Code,in order to make payment upon such Change of Control,the transaction or event described above with respect to such Share Award must also constitute a "change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or a "change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets" of the Company," as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(5).), and if it does not, payment of such Share Award will be made on the Share Award's original payment schedule or, if earlier, upon the death of the Participant.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a restructuring of the CompanyCorporation for the purpose of changing the domicile of the CompanyCorporation (including, but not limited to, any change in the structure of the CompanyCorporation resulting from the process of moving its domicile between jurisdictions), reincorporation of the CompanyCorporation or other similar transaction involving the CompanyCorporation (a "“Restructuring Transaction"”) will not constitute a Change of Control if, immediately after the Restructuring Transaction, the shareholders of the CompanyCorporation immediately prior to such Restructuring Transaction represent, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving entity.
2.5 | “Code” shall mean the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Any referenceherein to a section of the Code |
2.6 | “Committee” shall mean the committee appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 15 of the Plan. |
2.7 | “Companies Act” shall mean the Companies Act 2014 of Ireland. |
B-2
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
2.8 | “Compensation” shall mean an Employee’s base cash compensation and commissions, but shall exclude such items as allowances, differentials, bonuses or premiums such as those for working shifts or overtime, payments for incentive compensation, incentive payments, bonuses, income from the exercise, vesting and/or the sale, exchange or other disposition of a compensatory share award granted to the Employee by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary, and other forms of extraordinary compensation. The Committee shall have the authority to determine and approve all forms of pay to be included in the definition of Compensation and may change the definition on a prospective basis. |
2.5 "Code" means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
2.6 "Committee" means a committee of one or more Directors (or other individuals who are not members of the Board to the extent allowed by applicable law) appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Plan.
“Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any date of determination (i.e., an Offering Date or Purchase Date, as appropriate), the value of a Share determined as follows: (i) if the Ordinary Shares are listed on any established stock exchange (including the New York Stock Exchange) or traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing per-share sales price of such Shares as reported on such date on the Composite Tape of the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading or, if no Composite Tape exists for 2.7 "Company" means Seagate Technology Public Limited Company,2.9 “Corporation” shall mean Seagate Technology plc, a public company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Ireland with limited liability under registered number 480010, or any successor thereto. 2.10 “Designated Subsidiary” shall mean a Subsidiary that has been designated by the Committee in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to its Employees. 2.11 “Effective Date” shall mean the date on which the registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act for the initial public offering of Seagate Technology common stock (the “Registration Statement”) became effective. 2.12 “Employee” shall mean an individual classified as an employee (within the meaning of Code Section 3401(c) and the regulations thereunder) by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary on the Corporation’s or such Designated Subsidiary’s payroll records. Individuals classified as independent contractors, consultants, advisers, or members of the Board or the board of directors of a Designated Subsidiary are not considered “Employees” by virtue of such station. 2.13 “Exchange Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 2.14
B-3
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
such national securities exchange on such date, then on the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading; or (ii) if the Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, then the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be determined in good faith by the Board, and, to the extent appropriate, based on the application of a reasonable valuation method. |
2.15 | “Offering Date” shall mean the first Trading Day of an Offering Period under the Plan |
2.16 | “Offering Period” shall mean a period |
2.17 | “Offering Price” shall mean the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Offering Date of an Offering Period. |
2.18 | “Officer” shall mean a person who is an officer of the Corporation within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. |
B-4
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
2.19 | “Ordinary Share” or“Share” means an ordinary share of the Corporation, nominal value US$0.00001. |
2.20 | “Participant” shall mean a participant in the Plan as described in Section 5 of the Plan. |
2.21 | “Plan” shall mean this Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated. |
2.22 | “Purchase Date” shall mean the last Trading Day of each Purchase Period. |
2.23 | “Purchase Period” shall mean |
2.24 | “Purchase Price” shall have the meaning set out in Section 8.2. |
2.25 | “Securities Act” shall mean the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
2.26 | “Shareowner” shall mean a record holder of Ordinary Shares entitled to vote such Shares under the Corporation’s by-laws. |
2.27 | “Subsidiary” shall mean any entity treated as a corporation (other than the Corporation) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Corporation, within the meaning of Code Section 424(f), whether or not such corporation now exists or is hereafter organized or acquired by the Corporation or a Subsidiary, which is also a subsidiary within the meaning of Section 155 of the Companies Act. |
B-5
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
2.28 | “Trading Day” shall mean a day on which U.S. national stock exchanges and the national market system are open for trading and the Ordinary Shares are being publicly traded on one or more of such exchanges or markets. |
3. | ELIGIBILITY |
3.1 Any individual who is an Employee on an Offering Date shall be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the Offering Period commencing on such Offering Date. The Committee may establish administrative rules requiring that an individual be an Employee for some minimum period (not to exceed 30 days) prior to an Offering Date to be eligible to participate with respect to the Offering Period beginning on that Offering Date.
3.2 The Committee may determine that a designated group of highly compensated Employees is ineligible to participate in the Plan so long as the excluded category fits within the definition of “highly compensated employee” in Code Section 414(q).
3.3 No Employee may participate in the Plan if immediately after an option is granted the Employee owns or is considered to own (within the meaning of Code Section 424(d)) Ordinary Shares, including Shares which the Employee may purchase by conversion of convertible securities or under outstanding options granted by the Corporation, possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of securities of the Corporation or of any of its Subsidiaries.
3.4 Employees who are citizens or residents of a non-U.S. jurisdiction (without regard to whether they also are citizens or residents of the United States or resident aliens within the meaning of Section 7701(b)(1)(A) of the Code) may be excluded from participation in the Plan if the participation of such Employees is prohibited under the laws of the Republic of Ireland with limited liability under registered number 480010,applicable jurisdiction or any successor thereto.
2.8 "Consultant" means any person, including an advisor engaged by the Company or an Affiliate, to render consulting or advisory services and who is compensated for such services.
2.9 "Continuous Service" means that the Participant's active serviceif complying with the Company or an Affiliate, whether as an Employee, Director or Consultant, is not interrupted or terminated. The Participant's Continuous Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders service to the Company or an Affiliate as an Employee, Consultant or Director or a change in the entity for which the Participant renders such service,provided, that there is no interruption or terminationlaws of the Participant's Continuous Service. For example, a change in status from an Employee ofapplicable jurisdiction would cause the CompanyPlan to a Consultant of an Affiliate or a Director will not constitute an interruption of Continuous Service.TheUnless otherwise determined by theBoard or the chief executive officer of the Companyviolate Code Section 423 (or, their delegate), in such party's sole discretion,may determine whetherContinuous Service shallnotbe considered interrupted in the case ofanya leave of absence approved by the Company or an Affiliate, including sick leave, military leave or any other personal leave. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no such leave may exceed ninety (90) days, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract. If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company or an Affiliate is not guaranteed, then three (3) months following the 91st day of such leave any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and shall be treated for tax purposes as a Nonstatutory Share Option.
2.10 "Covered Employee" means the chief executive officer and the three (3) other highest compensated officers of the Company (other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer) for whom total compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Exchange Act, as determined for purposes of Section 162(m), and as such definition may be amended from time to time.
2.11 "Director" means a member of the Board.
2.12 "Deferred Share Unit" means any Share Award for which a valid deferral election is made.
2.13 "Disability" means the permanent and total disability of a person within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code for all Incentive Stock Options., or to the extent a Share Award provides forpermitted under Code Section 423). In the deferralcase of compensation and is subjectanysub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan adopted pursuant to Section 409A16 which is not designed to qualify under Code Section 423, Employees may be excluded from participation in the Plan if the Committee has determined that participation of such Employees is not advisable or practicable.
3.5 All Employees who participate in the Planor in any separate offering thereunder shall have the same rights and privileges under the Plan or offering, except for differences that may be mandated bylocal lawApplicable Law and that are consistent with Code Section 423(b)(5); provided that individuals participating in asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan adopted pursuant to Section 16which is not designed to
B-6
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
qualify under Code Section 423need not have the same rights and privileges as Employees participating in theCode Section 423 Plan.
3.6 Employees may not participate in more than one Offering Period at a time.
4. | OFFERING PERIODS AND PURCHASE PERIODS |
4.1 Offering Periods. With respect to Offering Periods commencing prior to February 1, 2006, the Plan shall generally be implemented by a series of twelve (12) month Offering Periods with new Offering Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 and ending on the last Trading Day in the twelve month periods ending on January 31 and July 31 of the . With respect to Offering Periods commencing on or after February 1, 2006, the Plan shall generally be implemented by a Code,next calendar year, respectively, or on such other date as the Committee shall determine. The first Offering Period shall commence on the Effective Date and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004"disability" as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(4). For all other Share Awards, "Disability" means physical or mental incapacitation such that for a periodseries of six (6) consecutive monthsmonth Offering Periods with new Offering Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or for an aggregateafter February 1 and August 1 and ending on the last Trading Day in the six-month periods ending on the next July 31 and January 31, respectively, or on such other date as the Committee shall determine, and continuing thereafter until the Plan is terminated pursuant to Section 14 hereof. The Committee shall have the authority to change the frequency and/or duration of nine (9) months in any twenty-four (24) consecutive month period, a personOffering Periods (including the commencement dates thereof)with respect to future offeringsif such change is in accordance with Section 4.3.unable to substantially perform his or her duties. Any question asannounced at least five (5) days prior to the existencescheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafter
4.2 Purchase Periods. With respect to Offering Periods commencing prior to February 1, 2006, each Offering Period shall generally consist of two (2) consecutive Purchase Periods of six (6) months’ duration, with new Purchase Periods commencing on the first Trading Day on or after February 1 and August 1 of each year and ending on the last Trading Day in the six-month period endingon the next July 31 and January 31, respectively. With respect to Offering Periods commencing on or after February 1, 2006, each Offering Period shall generally consist of one(1) Purchase Period that person's physical or mental incapacitationruns concurrently with the Offering Period. The last Trading Day of each Purchase Period shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion.
2.14 "“Purchase Date” for such Purchase PeriodDividend Equivalent" means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Sections 7.3(iii), 7.4(iv); provided that the first Purchase Period shall commence on the Effective Date and 7.6(iv)shall end at the completion of the Plan to receiveseventh complete calendar month following the equivalent value (in cash or in Shares) of dividends paid on the Ordinary Shares.
2.15 "Eligible Individual" means any person who is an Employee, Director or Consultant, as determined by the Board.
2.16 "Employee" means any person on the payroll records of the Company or an Affiliate and actively providing services as an employee. Service as a Director or compensation by the Company or an Affiliate solely for services as a Director shall not be sufficient to constitute "employment" by the Company or an Affiliate.
2.17 "Exchange Act" means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2.18 "Fair Market Value" means, as of any date, the value of an Ordinary Share determined as follows:
(i) UnlessEffective Date unless otherwise determined by the Board Committee. The second Purchase Period of the first Offering Period shall begin on the first Trading Day following the end of the first Purchase Period and shall end on the last Trading Day on or before January 31, 2004. Subsequent Purchase Periods, if any, shall run consecutively after the termination of the preceding Purchase Period. The Committee shall have the power to change the
B-7
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
duration and/or frequency of Purchase Periods with respect to future purchasesinaccordance with Section 409A4.3.
4.3Changes to Offering Periods and Purchase Periods. The Committee will have the authority to establish additional or alternative sequential or overlapping Offering Periods than specified under Section 4.1, a different number of Purchase Periods within an Offering Period than specified under Section 4.2, a different duration for one or more Offering Periods or Purchase Periods or different commencement or ending dates for such Offering Periodswith respect to future offeringswithout shareholder approval if such change is announced at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled beginning of the Code,firstPurchaseOffering Period to be affected.thereafter, provided, however, that no Offering Period may have a duration exceeding twenty-seven (27) months. In addition, to the extent that the Committee establishes overlapping Offering Periods with more than one Purchase Period in each Offering Period, the Committee will have discretion to structure an Offering Period so that if the Ordinary Shares are listed on any established stock exchange (including the New York Stock Exchange) or traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be the closing per-share sales price of such Shares as reported on such date on the Composite Tape of the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading or, if no Composite Tape exists for such national securities exchange on such date, then on the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are listed or admitted to trading; or if the Shares are not listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, then the Fair Market Value of a Share shall be determined in good faith by the Board, and to the extent appropriate, based on thereasonableapplication of a reasonable valuation method.
(ii) For any reference to Fair Market Value in the Plan used to establish the price at which the Company shall issue Ordinary Shares to a Participant under the terms and conditions of a Share Award (such as a Share Award of Optionson any Purchase Date within an Offering Period is less than or Share Appreciation Rights), the date as of which this definition shall be applied shall be the grant date of such Share Award.
2.19 "Full-Value Share Award" shall mean any of a Restricted Share Bonus, Restricted Share Units, Phantom Share Units, Performance Share Bonus, or Performance Share Units.
2.20 "Incentive Stock Option" means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.21 "Nominal Value" means US$0.00001 per Share.
2.22 "Non-Employee Director" means a Director who either (i) is not a current Employee or Officer of the Company or its parent or a subsidiary, does not receive compensation (directly or indirectly) from the Company or its parent or a subsidiary for services rendered as a consultant or in any capacity other than as a Director (except for an amount as to which disclosure would not be
required under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act ("Regulation S-K")), does not possess an interest in any other transaction as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K and is not engaged in a business relationship as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(b) of Regulation S-K; or (ii) is otherwise considered a "non-employee director" for purposes of Rule 16b-3.
2.23 "Nonstatutory Share Option" means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.
2.24 "Officer" means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.25 "Option" means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Share Option granted pursuant to the Plan.
2.26 "Option Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and an Optionholder evidencing the terms and conditions of an Option grant. Each Option Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.27 "Optionholder" means a person to whom an Option is granted pursuant to the Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Option.
2.28 "Ordinary Share" or "Share" means an ordinary share of the Company, nominal value US$0.00001.
2.29 "Other Share-Based Award" means a Share Award (other than an Option, a Restricted Share Bonus, a Share Appreciation Right, a Phantom Share Unit, a Restricted Share Unit, a Performance Share Bonus, a Performance Share Unit or a Deferred Share Unit) subject to the provisions of Section 7.7 of the Plan.
2.30 "Other Share-Based Award Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of an Other Share-Based Award setting forth the terms and conditions of an Other Share-Based Award grant. Each Other Share-Based Award Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.31 "Outside Director" means a Director who either (i) is not a current employee of the Company or an "affiliated corporation" (within the meaning of U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated under Section 162(m)), is not a former employee of the Company or an "affiliated corporation" receiving compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a tax qualified pension plan), was not an Officer of the Company or an "affiliated corporation" at any time and is not currently receiving direct or indirect remuneration from the Company or an "affiliated corporation" for services in any capacity other than as a Director; or (ii) is otherwise considered an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m).
2.32 "Participant" means a person to whom a Share Award is granted pursuant to the Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Share Award.
2.33 "Performance Goal" means, for a Performance Period, the one or more goals established by the Committee measured by the achievement of certain results, whether financial, transactional or otherwise. Financial results may be, but are not required to be, based on Qualifying Performance Criteria.
2.34 "Performance Period" means one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping duration, as the Committee may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goals will be measured for the purpose of determining a Participant's right to, and the payment of, a Share Award determined in accordance with Article VIII of the Plan.
2.35 "Performance Share Bonus" means a grant of Ordinary Shares subject to the provisions of Section 7.5 of the Plan.
2.36 "Performance Share Bonus Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and conditions of a Performance Share Bonus grant. Each Performance Share Bonus Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.37 "Performance Share Unit" means the right to receive the value of one (1) Ordinary Share subject to the provisions of Section 7.6 of the Plan.
2.38 "Performance Share Unit Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of a Performance Share Unit setting forth the terms and conditions of a Performance Share Unit grant. Each Performance Share Unit Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.39 "Phantom Share Unit" means the right to receive the value of one (1) Ordinary Share, subject to the provisions of Section 7.3 of the Plan.
2.40 "Phantom Share Unit Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of a Phantom Share Unit setting forth the terms and conditions of a Phantom Share Unit grant. Each Phantom Share Unit Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.41 "Plan" means this Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Seagate Technology Public Limited Company, as amended from time to time.
2.42 "Predecessor Plan" means the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2004 Share Compensation Plan.
2.43 "Qualifying Performance Criteria" means any one or more of the following performance criteria, or derivations of such performance criteria, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to either the Company as a whole or to a business unit or subsidiary, and measured, including annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years' results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Committee: (a) pre- and after-tax income; (b) operating income; (c) net operating income or profit (before or after taxes); (d) net earnings; (e) net income (before or after taxes); (f) operating margin; (g) gross margin; (h) cash flow (before or after dividends); (i) earnings per share; (j) return on equity; (k) return on assets, net assets, investments or capital employed; (l) revenue; (m) market share; (n) cost reductions or savings; (o) funds from operations; (p) total shareholder return; (q) share price; (r) earnings before any one or more of the following items: interest, taxes, depreciation or amortization; (s) market capitalization; (t) economic value added; (u) operating ratio; (v) product development or release schedules; (w) new product innovation; (x) implementation of the Company's critical processes or projects; (y) customer service or customer satisfaction; (z) product quality measures; (aa) days sales outstanding or working capital management; (bb) inventory or inventory turns; (cc) pre-tax profit and/or (dd) cost reductions. Unless applicable U.S. tax and/or securities laws are amended to permit the Committee's discretion to change Qualifying Performance Criteria without shareholder approval, the Committee shall have no discretion to change Qualifying Performance Criteria without obtaining shareholder approval.
2.44 "Restricted Share Bonus" means a grant of Ordinary Shares subject to the provisions of Section 7.1 of the Plan.
2.45 "Restricted Share Bonus Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and conditions of a Restricted Share Bonus grant. Each Restricted Share Bonus Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.46 "Restricted Share Unit" means the right to receive the value of one (1) Ordinary Share at the time the Restricted Share Unit vests, subject to the provisions of Section 7.4 of the Plan.
2.47 "Restricted Share Unit Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of a Restricted Share Unit setting forth the terms and conditions of a Restricted Share Unit grant. Each Restricted Share Unit Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
2.48 "Rule 16b-3" means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor to Rule 16b-3, as in effect from time to time.
2.49 "Section 162(m)" means Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.50 "Securities Act" means the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.51 "Share Appreciation Right" or "SAR" means the right to receive an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of one (1)the Ordinary Share Shareson the dayfirst Trading Dayof that Offering Period, then (i) that Offering Period will terminate immediately as of that first Trading Day, and (ii) the Share Appreciation Right is redeemed, reducedParticipants in such terminated Offering Period will be automatically enrolled in a new Offering Period beginningon the first Trading Dayof such new Purchase Period.
4.4Separate Offerings. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee, each offering of the Plan to Employees of the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary shall be deemed exercise pricea separate offering for purposes of Section 423 of the Code, even if the dates and other terms of the applicable Offering Periods of each such offering are identical, and the provisions of the Plan will separately apply to each such separate offering. With respect to the 423 Plan, the terms of separate offerings need not be identical provided that the terms of the Plan and each separate offering together satisfy Section 423 of the Code.
5. | PARTICIPATION |
5.1 AnEmployee who is eligible to participate inthe Plan in accordance withits terms at the beginning of an Offering Period shall automatically receive an option in accordance with Section 8.1 and may become a Participant by completing and submitting, on or eligible Employee may authorize payroll deductions at the rate of any whole percentage of the Employee’s Compensation, not to exceed ten percent (10%) (or such other percentage as thebase pricebefore the date prescribed by the Committee with respect to a given Offering Period, a completed payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form provided by the Corporation or by following an electronic or other enrollment process as prescribed by the Committee. An
B-8
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
Committee may establish from time to time before an Offering Date) of such right, subjectEmployee’s Compensation on each payday during the Offering Period. All payroll deductions will be held in a general corporate account or a trust account, unless otherwise required bylocal lawApplicable Law. No interest shall be paid or credited to the Participant with respect to such payroll deductions, unless otherwise required bylocal lawApplicable Law. The Corporation shall maintain a separate bookkeeping account for each Participant under the Plan and the amount of each Participant’s payroll deductions shall be credited to such account. A Participant may not make any additional payments into such account, unless payroll deductions are prohibited underlocal lawApplicable Law, in which case the provisions of Section 7.25.25.3 of the Plan.Plan shall apply.
2.52Once an Employee becomes a Participant in an Offering Period, then such Participant will automatically participate in each subsequent Offering Period commencing immediately following the last day of such prior Offering Period at the same contribution level unless the Participant withdraws from the Offering Period as "Share Appreciation Right Agreementset forth in Section " means5.4 below or otherwise changes his or her rate of contribution as set forth in Section 5.5 below. A Participant that is automatically enrolled in a written agreement betweensubsequent Offering Period pursuant to this Section 5.2 is (i) not required to file any additional enrollment form in order to continue participation in the CompanyPlan and a holder of a Share Appreciation Right setting forth the terms and conditions of a Share Appreciation Right grant. Each Share Appreciation Right Agreement shall(ii) will be subjectdeemed to have accepted the terms and conditions of the Plan.Plan, any Non-423 Sub-Plan and enrollment form in effect at the time each subsequent Offering Period begins, subject to Participant’s right to withdraw fromthe Plan in accordance withthe withdrawal procedures in effect at the time.
5.25.3 Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to the contrary, in locations wherelocal lawApplicable Law prohibits payroll deductions, an eligible Employee may elect to participate through contributions to his or her account under the Plan in a form acceptable to the Committee. In such event, any such Employees shall be deemed to be participating in asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan, unless the Committee otherwise expressly provides that such Employees shall be treated as participating in the Plan or a separate offering thereunder.
2.53 "5.3Share Award5.4" means any Option, Restricted Share Bonus, Share Appreciation Right, Phantom Share Unit, Restricted Share Unit, Performance Share Bonus, Performance Share Unit, Deferred Share Unit, Under procedures and at times established by the Committee, a Participant may withdraw from the Plan during a Purchase Period, by completing and filing a new payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form with the Corporation or Other Share-Based Award.
2.54 "Share Award Agreement" meansby following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee. If a written agreement betweenParticipant withdraws from the Company andPlan during a holder of a Share Award setting forth the terms and conditions of a Share Award grant. Each Share Award Agreement shallPurchase Period, his or her accumulated payroll deductions will be subjectrefunded to the termsParticipant without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law), his or her right to participate in the current Offering Period will be automatically terminated and conditionsno further payroll deductions for the purchase of Ordinary Shares will be made during the Offering Period. The Committee may establish rules pertaining to the timing of withdrawals,
B-9
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
limiting the frequency with which Participants may withdraw and re-enroll in the Plan and may impose a waiting period on Participants wishing to re-enroll following withdrawal.
5.45.5 A Participant may change his or her rate of contribution through payroll deductions only during an open enrollment period or such other times specified by the Committee by filing a new payroll deduction authorization and Plan enrollment form or by following electronic or other procedures prescribed by the Committee. If a Participant has not followed such procedures to change the rate of contribution, the rate of contribution shall continue at the originally elected rate throughout the Purchase Period and future Purchase Periods (including Purchase Periods of subsequent Offering Periods). Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Plan.
2.55 "Ten Percent Shareholder" meansCode, the Committee may reduce a person who owns (or is deemedParticipant’s payroll deductions to own pursuantzero percent (0%) at any time during a Purchase Period scheduled to Section 424(d)end during the current calendar year. Payroll deductions shall re-commence at the rate provided in such Participant’s enrollment form at the beginning of the Code) shares possessing more than ten percent (10%) offirst Purchase Period which is scheduled to end in the total combined voting power of all classes of shares offollowing calendar year, unless terminated by the Company or of any of its Affiliates.
3.1 Administration by Board. The Board shall administer the Plan unless and until the Board delegates administration to a Committee,Participant as provided in Section 3.3.5.35.4.
6. | TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT |
3.2 Powers of Board6.1 Termination. The Board shall haveIn the power, subject to,event any Participant terminates employment with the Corporation and within the limitations of, the express provisions of the Plan:
(i) to determine (a) which Eligible Individuals shall be granted Share Awards; (b) when each Share Award shall be granted; (c) the type or types of Share Awards to be granted; and (d) the number of Share Awards to be granted and the number of Shares to which a Share Award shall relate;
(ii) to determine the terms and conditions ofits Designated Subsidiaries for any Share Award granted pursuantreason (including death) prior to the Plan, including, but not limited to, (a) the purchase price (if any) of Shares to be issued pursuant to any Share Award, (b) any restrictions or limitations on any Share Award or Shares acquired pursuant to a Share Award, (c) any vesting schedule or conditions applicable to a Share Award and accelerations or waivers thereof (including, but not limited to, upon a Changeinof Control), and (d) any provisions related to recovery of gain on, or forfeitureexpiration of a Share Award or Shares issued pursuant to a Share Award, based on such considerations asPurchase Period, the Board in its sole discretion determines;
(iii) to construe and interpret the Plan and Share Awards granted under it, and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for its administration. The Board, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistencyParticipant’s participation in the Plan shall terminate and all amounts credited to the Participant’s account shall be paid to the Participant or, in any Share Award Agreement, inthe case of death, to theParticipant’sParticipant’s heirs or estate, without interest. Whether a manner andtermination of employment has occurred shall be determined by the Committee.IfNotwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant’s termination of employment occurs within a certain period of time as specified by the Committee (not to exceed 30 days) prior to the extent it shall deem necessaryPurchase Date of the Purchase Period then in progress, his or expedient to makeher option for the Plan fully effective;
(iv) to amendpurchase of Ordinary Shares will be exercised on such Purchase Date in accordance with Section 9 as if such Participant were still employed by the PlanCorporation or a Share Award as providedDesignated Subsidiary. Following the purchase of Shares on such Purchase Date, the Participant’s participation in Article XIII of the Plan;
(v) to suspend or terminate the Plan at any time;provided, that suspension or termination of the Plan shall not materially impairterminate and all remaining amounts credited to the rightsParticipant’s account shall be paid to the Participant or, in the case of death, to theParticipant’sParticipant’s heirs or estate, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law).
6.2 Leaves of Absence. The Committee may also establish rules regarding when leaves of absence or changes of employment status will be considered to be a termination of employment, and obligationsthe Committee may establish termination of employment procedures for this Plan that are independent of similar rules
B-10
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
established under any Share Award granted while the Plan is in effect except with the written consentother benefit plans of the affected Participant;
(vi) to settle all controversies regarding the PlanCorporation and Share Awards granted under it;
(vii) to exerciseits Subsidiaries, provided, however, that such powers and to perform such acts as the Board deems necessary, desirable, convenient or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company thatprocedures are not in conflict with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.
6.3 Transfers. If a Participant transfers employment between the Corporation and a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan (as set forth in Appendix A to the Plan) or between Designated Subsidiaries participating in the 423 Plan, his or her participation in the Plan shall continue unless and until otherwise terminated in accordance with the Plan. Similarly, if a Participant transfers employment between Designated Subsidiaries participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan (as set forth in Appendix A to the Plan), his or her participation in the Plan shall continue unless and until otherwise terminated in accordance with the Plan.
If a Participant transfers employment from the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan to a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan, his or her participation in the Plan shall continue, provided, however, that such participation will be under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan as of the date of such transfer and all of the Participant’s accumulated payroll deductions (whether taken while the Participant was employed by the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan or while the Participant is employed by a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan) shall be used to purchase Shares under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan, subject to the Participant’s right to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with the withdrawal procedures in effect at such time.
If a Participant transfers employment from a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan to the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary participating in the 423 Plan, any accumulated payroll deductions taken while the Participant was employed by a Designated Subsidiary participating in a Non-423 Sub-Plan shall be used to purchase Shares under the applicable Non-423 Sub-Plan on the next Purchase Date following such transfer; however, no new payroll deductions shall be taken for the remainder of the Purchase Period in which the transfer occurs, and as of the next Offering Date following such transfer, the Participant shall participate in the 423 Plan and payroll deductions shall automatically resume and be used to purchase Shares under the 423 Plan, subject to the Participant’s right to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with the withdrawal procedures in effect at such time.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 6.3, the Plan;Committee may establish additional and/or different rules to govern transfers of employment among the Corporation and any Designated Subsidiary, consistent with any applicable requirements of Code Section 423 and the terms of the Plan.
(viii)
B-11
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
7. | SHARES |
Subject to establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations, including adopting sub-plans to the Plan or special terms for Share Award Agreements, for the purposes of complying with non-U.S. laws and/or taking advantage of tax favorable treatment for Share Awards granted to Participants outside the United States (as furtheradjustment as set forth in Section 5.311, the maximum number of the Plan) as itOrdinary Shares, which may deem necessary or advisablebe issued pursuant to administer the Plan.
3.3Delegation to Committee.
(i) General. The Board may delegate administration of the Plan to a Committee of one or more individuals, and the term "Committee" shall apply to any person or persons to whom such authority has been delegated. If administration is delegated to a Committee, the Committee shall have, in connection with the administration of the Plan, the powers theretofore possessed by the Board, including, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the power to delegate to a subcommittee any of the administrative powers the Committee is authorized to exercise (and references in this Plan to the Board shall thereafter be to the Committee or subcommittee, as applicable), subject, however, to such resolutions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as may be adopted from time to time by the Board. The Board may abolish the Committee at any time and revest in the Board the administration of the Plan.
(ii) Committee Composition when Ordinary Shares are Publicly Traded. So long as the Ordinary Shares are publicly traded, in the discretion of the Board, a Committee may consist solely of two or more Outside Directors, in accordance with Section 162(m), and/or solely of two or more Non-Employee Directors, in accordance with Rule 16b-3. Within the scope of such authority, the Board or the Committee may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, (a) delegate to a committee of one or more individuals who are not Outside Directors the authority to grant Share Awards to Eligible Individuals who are either (1) not then Covered Employees and are not expected to be Covered Employees at the time of recognition of income resulting from such Share Award or (2) not persons with respect to whom the Company wishes to comply with Section 162(m) and/or (b) delegate to a committee of one or more individuals who are not Non-Employee Directors the authority to grant Share Awards to Eligible Individuals who are either (1) not then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or (2) receiving a Share Award as to which the Board or Committee elects not to comply with Rule 16b-3 by having two or more Non-Employee Directors grant such Share Award.
3.4 Effect of Board's Decision. All determinations, interpretations and constructions made by the Board in good faith shall not be subject to review by any person and shall be final, binding and conclusive on all persons.
IV. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.
4.1 Share Reserve.fifty million (50,000,000) Shares. Subject to the provisions of Article XII of the Plan relating to adjustments upon changesadjustment as set forth in Ordinary Shares,Section 11, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuantgranted collectively to Share Awards underall Participants within any given Purchase Period is one and one-half million (1,500,000) Shares, unless and until the PlanBoard determines otherwise with respect to a Purchase Period. If, on a given Purchase Date, the number of Shares with respect to which options are to be exercised exceeds either maximum, the Corporation shall not exceed fifty-two million (52,000,000) Shares, plus anymake pro rata allocation of the Shares remaining available for grant under the Predecessor Planpurchase in as of the Effective Date (as defined in Section 15.1) (the "Share Reserve"). Any Shares that are subject to Options or SARs granted under the Planuniform a manner as shall be counted against the Share Reservepracticable and as one (1) Share for every one (1) Share granted, and any Shares that are subjectit shall determine to Full-Value Share Awards granted under the Plan shall be counted against the Share Reserve as two and one-half (2.5) Shares for every one (1) Share granted;provided, that Full-Value Share Awards granted under the Plan prior to October 22, 2014 shall be counted against the Share Reserve as two and one-tenth (2.1) Shares for every one (1) Share granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and subject to the provisions of Article XII, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall not exceed twenty million (20,000,000) Shares.
4.2 Adjustments to the Share Reserve. If (i) any Share Award or share award granted under the Predecessor Plan shall for any reason expire, be cancelled or otherwise terminated, in whole or in part, without having been exercised or redeemed in full, or be settled in cash, or (ii) if any Shares subject to Share Awards or share awards granted under the Predecessor Plan shall be reacquired by the Company prior to vesting, the Shares subject to such awards shall revert to the Share Reserve and again become available for issuance under the Plan. Any Shares that again become available for grant pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be added back to the Share Reserve in the applicable ratio described in Section 4.1 of the Plan;provided, that, any Shares that were outstanding under the Predecessor Plan that become available for grant shall be added back to the Share Reserve in the ratio set forth in the Predecessor Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shall not revert to the Share Reserve: (a) Shares tendered by a Participant or withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price to the Company or to satisfy any tax withholding obligation or other tax liability of the Participant,and(b) Shares repurchased by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Options or the exercise of options granted under the Predecessor Plan, and (c) Shares that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Option or SAR.
4.3 Source of Shares.equitable. The Shares subject to the Plan may be unissued Shares or reacquired Shares, bought on the market or otherwise.
V. ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION.
5.1 Eligibility. Subject For avoidance of doubt, up to the provisionsmaximum number of Ordinary Shares reserved under this Section 7 may be used to satisfy purchases of Ordinary Shares under the 423 Plan and any remaining portion of such maximum number of Ordinary Shares may be used to satisfy purchases of Ordinary Shares under any Non-423 Sub-Plans.
8. | OFFERING |
8.1 On the Offering Date of each Offering Period, each eligible Employee, whether or not such Employee has elected to participate as provided in Section 5.1, participating in the Plan shall be granted an option to purchase that number of whole Shares, not to exceed one thousand (1,000) Shares (or such other number of Shares as determined by the Committee and subject to adjustmentas set forth in Section 11), which may be purchased with the payroll deductions accumulated on behalf of such Employee during each Purchase Period at the purchase price specified in Section 8.2 below, subject to the additional limitation that no Employee participating in the Section 423 Plan shall be granted an option to purchase Shares under the Plan if such option would permit his or her rights to purchase Shares under all employee stock purchase plans (described in Section 423 of the Code) of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries to accrue at a rate which exceeds U.S. twenty-five thousand dollars (U.S. $25,000) of the Fair Market Value of such Shares (determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time. For purposes of the Plan, each Eligible Individualan option is “granted” on a Participant’s Offering Date. An option will expire upon the earlier to occur of (i) the termination of a Participant’s participation in the Plan or such Offering Period, (ii) the grant of an option to such Participant on a subsequent Offering Date, or (iii) the termination of the Offering Period. This Section 8.1 shall be eligibleinterpreted so as to receivecomply with Code Section 423(b)(8).
8.2 The Purchase Price under each option shall be with respect to a Purchase Period the lower of (i) a percentage (not less than eighty-five percent (85%))
B-12
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
established by the Committee (““Designated Percentage””) of the Offering Price, or (ii) the Designated Percentage of the Fair Market Value of a Share Awardson the Purchase Date on which the Shares are purchased; provided that the Purchase Price may be adjusted by the Committee pursuant to Sections 11 or 12 in accordance with Section 424(a) of the Code. The Committee may change the Designated Percentage with respect to any future Offering Period, but not to below eighty-five percent (85%), and the Committee may determine with respect to any prospective Offering Period that the purchase price shall be the Designated Percentage of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Purchase Date.
9. | PURCHASE OF SHARES |
Unless a Participant withdraws from the Plan as provided in Section 5.35.4 or except as provided in Sections 12 or 14 hereof, on the last Trading Day of each Purchase Period, a Participant’s option shall be exercised automatically for the purchase of that number of whole Shares which the accumulated payroll deductions credited to the Participant’s account at that time shall purchase at the applicable price specified in Section 8.2.
At the time the Shares are purchased or at the time some or all of the Shares issued under the Plan are disposed of (or at any other time that a taxable event related to the Plan occurs), the Participant must make adequate provision for any withholding obligation of the Corporation or a Designated Subsidiary with respect to federal, state, local and foreign income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, fringe benefits tax, payment on account or other tax-related items related to participation in the Plan and legally applicable to the Participant (including any amount deemed by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to be an appropriate charge to Participant even if legally applicable to the Corporation or the Participant’s employer). At any time, the Corporation or the Participant’s employer may withhold from the Participant’s wages or other cash compensation the amount necessary for the Corporation or the Participant’s employer to meet applicable withholding obligations, including any withholding required to make available to the Corporation or the Participant’s employer any tax deductions or benefits attributable to the sale or early disposition of the Shares by the Participant. In addition or in the alternative, the Corporation or the Participant’s employer may withhold from the proceeds of the sale of Shares or by any other method of withholding the Corporation or the Participant’s employer deems appropriate.
10. | PAYMENT AND DELIVERY |
As soon as practicable after the exercise of an option, the Corporation shall deliver to the Participant a record of the Ordinary Shares purchased and the balance of any amount of payroll deductions credited to the Participant’s account not used for the
B-13
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
purchase, except as specified below. The Committee may permit or require that Shares be deposited directly with a broker designated by the Committee or to a designated agent of the Corporation, and the Committee may utilize electronic or automated methods of share transfer. The Committee may require that Shares be retained with such broker or agent for a designated period of time and/or may establish other procedures to permit tracking of the disposition of such Shares. The Corporation shall retain the amount of payroll deductions used to purchase Shares as full payment for the Shares and the Shares shall then be fully paid and non-assessable. No Participant shall have any voting, dividend or other Shareowner rights with respect to Shares subject to any option granted under the Plan until the Shares subject to the option have been purchased and delivered to the Participant as provided in this Section 10. The Committee may in its discretion direct the Corporation to retain in a Participant’s account for the subsequent Purchase Period or Offering Period any payroll deductions which are not sufficient to purchase a whole Share or return such amount to the Participant. Any other amounts that may be left over in a Participant’s account after a Purchase Date shall be returned to the Participant.
11. | RECAPITALIZATION |
Subject to any required action by the Shareowners of the Corporation, if there is any change in the outstanding Ordinary Shares because of a merger, consolidation, spin-off, reincorporation, reorganization, recapitalization, dividend in property other than cash, share split, reverse share split, share dividend, liquidating dividend, extraordinary dividend or distribution, combination, exchange or reclassification of the Ordinary Shares (including any such change in the number of Shares effected in connection with a change in domicile of the Corporation), change in corporate structure or any other increase or decrease in the number of Ordinary Shares, or other transaction effected without receipt of consideration by the Corporation, provided that conversion of any convertible securities of the Corporation shall not be deemed to have been “effected without consideration,” the number of securities covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised and the number of securities which have been authorized and remain available for issuance under the Plan, as well as the maximum number of securities which may be purchased by a single Participant and by all Participants in the aggregate in a given Purchase Period, and the price per share covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised, may be appropriately adjusted by the Board, and the Board shall take any further actions which, in the exercise of its discretion, may be necessary or appropriate under the circumstances. The Board’s determinations under this Section 11 shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.
B-14
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
12. | LIQUIDATION AND CHANGE OF CONTROL |
12.1 In the event of the proposed liquidation or dissolution of the Corporation, the Offering Period will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction, unless otherwise provided by the Board in its sole discretion, and all outstanding options shall automatically terminate and the amounts of all payroll deductions will be refunded without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law) to the Participants.
12.2 In the event of a Change of Control, then in the sole discretion of the Board, (1) each option shall be assumed or an equivalent option shall be substituted by the successor corporation or parent or subsidiary of such successor entity, (2) a date established by the Board on or before the date of consummation of such Change of Control shall be treated as a Purchase Date, and all outstanding options shall be exercised on such date, (3) all outstanding options shall terminate and the accumulated payroll deductions will be refunded without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law) to the Participants, or (4) outstanding options shall continue unchanged.
13. | TRANSFERABILITY |
Neither payroll deductions credited to a Participant’s bookkeeping account nor any rights to exercise an option or to receive Shares under the Plan may be voluntarily or involuntarily assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of in any way, and any attempted assignment, transfer, pledge, or other disposition shall be null and void and without effect. If a Participant in any manner attempts to transfer, assign or otherwise encumber his or her rights or interests under the Plan, other than as permitted by the Code, such act shall be treated as an election by the Participant to discontinue participation in the Plan pursuant to Section 5.35.4.
14. | AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN |
14.1 The Plan shall continue until terminated in accordance with Section 14.2.
14.2 The Board may, in its sole discretion, insofar as permitted by Applicable Law, terminate or suspend the Plan, or revise or amend it in any respect whatsoever, except that, only Employeeswithout approval of the Shareowners, no such revision or amendment shall be eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options.
5.2 Participation. Subjectincrease the number of Shares subject to the provisionsPlan, other than an adjustment under Section 11 of the Plan, or make other changes for which Shareowner approval is required under Applicable Law. Upon a termination or suspension of the Plan, the Board may in its discretion (i) return, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law), the payroll deductions credited to Participants’ accounts to such Participants, or (ii) set an earlier Purchase Date with respect to an Offering Period and Purchase Period then in progress.
B-15
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
15. | ADMINISTRATION |
15.1 The Board or the Compensation Committee shall appoint a committee of one or more individuals to administer the Plan (the “Committee”), which, unless otherwise specified by the Board, shall consist of the members of the Corporation’s BenefitsandAdministrative Committee, as constituted from time to time selectin accordance with its charter, and generally made up of senior members of management from among Eligible Individuals thosethe Corporation’s Legal, Finance and Human Resources functions. The Committee will serve for such period of time as the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may specify and whom the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may remove at any time. The Committee will have the authority and responsibility for the day-to-day administration of the Plan, the authority and responsibility specifically provided in this Plan and any additional duty, responsibility and authority delegated to whom Share Awards shall be granted, and shall determine the nature and amountCommittee by the Board or the Compensation Committee of each Share Award. No Eligible Individualthe Board. The Committee shall have full power and authority to adopt, amend and rescind any rightrules and regulations which it deems desirable and appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan, to be granted a Share Award pursuantconstrue and interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the Plan, todesignate separate offerings under the Plan.
5.3Plan, to Non-U.S. Participants. Notwithstanding any provisionmake factual determinations relevant to Plan entitlements and to take all action in connection with administration of the Plan as it deems necessary or advisable, consistent with the delegation from the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee may delegate to one or more individuals the day-to-day administration of the Plan, to the contrary, to comply withextent permitted by Applicable Law. The Board, the laws in countries outside the United States in which the Company and its Affiliates operate or in which Eligible Individuals provide services to the Company or its Affiliates,Compensation Committee of the Board in its sole discretion, shall haveand the power and authority to: (i) determine which Affiliates shall be covered byCommittee reserve the Plan; (ii) determine which Eligible Individuals outsideright to administer the United States shall be eligible to participate in the Plan; (iii) modify the terms and conditions of any Share Award granted to Eligible Individuals outside the United States; (iv) establish sub-plans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures and rules,Plan, to the extent such actionsright otherwise exists, regardless of any delegation of authority such body may have previously made. Decisions of the Board, the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Committee, as applicable, shall be final and binding upon all participants. The Corporation shall pay all expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan.
15.2 In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board or officers or employees of the Corporation and subject to section 200 of the Companies Act, members of the Board and of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Corporation against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be necessarya party by reason of any action taken or advisable, including adoptionfailure to act under or in connection with the Plan, or any right granted under the Plan, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Corporation) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such person is liable for gross negligence, bad faith or intentional misconduct in duties;
B-16
(ESPP –January
Table of ContentsJuly 2017)
provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after the institution of such action, suit or proceeding, such person shall offer to the Corporation, in writing, the opportunity at its own expense to handle and defend the same. The Committee may adopt rules or procedures 16. COMMITTEE RULES FOR FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS or sub-plans applicablerelating to particular Affiliates or Participants residing in particular locations;provided, that no such sub-plans and/or modifications shall take precedence over Article IVthe operation and administration of the Plan or otherwise require shareholder approval;to accommodate the specific requirements oflocal lawsApplicable Laws and (v) take any action, before or after a Share Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals.procedures. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the BoardCommittee is specifically authorized to adopt rules and procedures and sub-plans with provisions that limit or modify rights on eligibility to receive a Share Award under the Plan or on death, disability, retirementregarding handling of payroll deductions or other terminationcontributions by Participants, establishment of Continuous Service, available methods of exercisebank or settlement of a Share Award,trust accounts to hold payroll deductions or other contributions, payment of income, social insurance contributions andinterest, conversion of local currency, payroll taxes, the shifting of employer tax, liability to the Participant, the withholding procedures and handling of any Shareshare certificates or other indiciawhich vary with local requirements; however, if such varying provisions are not in accordance with the provisions of ownership. NotwithstandingSection 423(b) of the foregoing,Code, including but not limited to the Board may not take any actions hereunder,requirement of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code that all options granted under the Plan shall have the same rights and no Share Awardsprivileges unless otherwise provided under the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder, then the individuals affected by such varying provisions shall be deemed to be participating under asub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan and not the423 Plan. The Committee mayalsoadoptsub-plansNon-423 Sub-Plans applicable to particular Subsidiaries or locations,which sub-plans may be designed to be outside thescope of Code Section 423. Thethe rules ofsuch sub-planswhich may take precedence over other provisions of this Plan, with the exception of Section 7, but unless otherwise superseded by the terms of such sub-plan, the provisions of this Plan shall govern the operation of suchsub-planNon-423 Sub-Plan.
17. | SECURITIES LAWS REQUIREMENTS |
17.1 No option granted that would violateunder the Plan may be exercised to any extent unless the Shares to be issued upon such exercise under the Plan are covered by an effective registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act and the Plan is in material compliance with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or foreign, including, without limitation, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, applicable state and foreign securities laws and the requirements of any securities lawstock exchange upon which the Shares may then be listed, subject to the approval of counsel for the Corporation with respect to such compliance. If on a Purchase Date in any Offering Period hereunder, the Plan is not so registered or governing statute or any other applicable law.
Each Optionin such compliance, options granted under the Plan which are not in compliance shall not be exercised on such Purchase Date, and the Purchase Date shall be evidenced bydelayed until the Plan is subject to such an Option Agreementeffective registration statement and such compliance, except that the Purchase Date shall not be delayed more than twelve (12) months and the Purchase Date shall in no event be more than twenty-
B-17
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
seven (27) months from the Offering Date. If, on the Purchase Date of any offering hereunder, as delayed to the maximum extent permissible, the Plan is not registered and in such compliance, options granted under the Plan which are not in compliance shall not be exercised and all payroll deductions accumulated during the Offering Period (reduced to the extent, if any, that such deductions have been used to acquire Shares) shall be inreturned to the Participants, without interest (unless payment of interest is required bylocal lawApplicable Law). The provisions of this Section 17 shall comply with the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code to the extent applicable.
17.2 As a condition to the exercise of an option, the Corporation may require the person exercising such formoption to represent and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. All Options shall be designated Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Share Optionswarrant at the time of grant. any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Corporation, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned provisions of Applicable Law.
18. | GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS |
This Plan and theCorporation’sCorporation’s obligation to sell and deliver Ordinary Shares under the Plan shall be subject to the approval of any governmental authority required in connection with the Plan or the authorization, issuance, sale, or delivery of Shares hereunder.
19. | NO ENLARGEMENT OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS |
Nothing contained in this Plan shall be deemed to give any Employee or other individual the right to be retained in the employ or service of the Corporation or any Designated Subsidiary or to interfere with the right of the Corporation or Designated Subsidiary to discharge any Employee or other individual at any time, for any reason or no reason, with or without notice.
20. | GOVERNING LAW |
This Plan shall be governed by applicable laws of the State of California, without regard to such state’s conflict of laws rules.
21. | EFFECTIVE DATE |
This Planshall bebecame effective on the Effective Date, subject to approval of the Shareowners of the Corporation within twelve (12) months before or after its date of adoption by the Board., which approval was obtained on December 3, 2002. The Plan, as most recently amended and restated, was adopted by the Board on July 25, 2017, subject to approval of the Shareowners of the Corporation within twelve (12) months after such date.
B-18
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
22. | REPORTS |
Individual accounts shall be maintained for each Participant in the Plan. Statements of account shall be given or made available to Participants at least annually.
23. | DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY FOR OWNED SHARES |
With respect to Ordinary Shares purchased by the Participant pursuant to the Plan and held in an account maintained by the Corporation or its assignee on theParticipant’sParticipant’s behalf, the Participant may be permitted to file a written designation of beneficiary, who is to receive any Shares and cash, if any, from the Participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such Participant’s death subsequent to the end of a Purchase Period but prior to delivery to him or her of such Shares and cash. In addition, a Participant may be permitted to file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the Participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such Participant’s death prior to the Purchase Date of an Offering Period. If a Participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent shall be required for such designation to be effective, to the extent required bylocal lawApplicable Law. The Participant (and if required under the preceding sentence, his or her spouse) may change such designation of beneficiary at any time by written notice. Subject tolocal legal requirementsApplicable Law (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), in the event of a Participant’s death, the Corporation or its assignee shall deliver any Shares and/or cash to the designated beneficiary. Subject tolocal lawApplicable Law (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion), in the event of the death of a Participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated who is living at the time of such Participant’s death, the Corporation shall deliver such Shares and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the Participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Corporation), the Corporation in its sole discretion, may deliver (or cause its assignee to deliver) such Shares and/or cash to the spouse, or to any one or more dependents or relatives of the Participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Corporation, then to such other person as the Corporation may determine. The provisions of this Section 23 shall in no event require the Corporation to violatelocal lawApplicable Law, and the Corporation shall be entitled to take whatever action it reasonably concludes is desirable or appropriate in order to transfer the assets allocated to a deceased Participant’s account in compliance withlocal lawApplicable Law.
24. | ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS OFRULE 16b-3 |
The terms and conditions of Option Agreements may change from timeoptions granted hereunder to, time and the terms and conditionspurchase of separate Option Agreements need not be identical, but each Option shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereofOrdinary Shares by, reference in the Option Agreement or otherwise) the substance of eachpersons subject to Section 16 of the following provisions:Exchange Act shall comply with the applicable provisions of Rule16b-3. This Plan shall be deemed to contain,
B-19
and such options shall contain, and the All notices or other communications by a Participant to the Corporation under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Corporation at the location, or by the person, designated by the Corporation for the 26.1Code Sections 409A and 457A. Options granted under the 423 Plan are exempt from the application of Section 409A and Section 457A of the 6.1 Incentive Stock Option $100,000 Limitation. Toextent thatShares issued upon exercise thereof shall be subject to, such additional conditions and restrictions, if any, as may be required by Rule16b-3 to qualify for the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of grant)maximum exemption from Section 16 of the Ordinary SharesExchange Act with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisablePlan transactions.25. NOTICES first time by any Optionholder during any calendar year (under all plansreceipt thereof.26. CODE SECTION 409A AND 457A; TAX QUALIFICATION CompanyCode. In furtherance of the foregoing and its Affiliates) exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000),notwithstanding any provision in the Options or portions thereof which exceed such limit (accordingPlan to the order in which they were granted) shallcontrary, if the Committee determines that an option granted under the Plan may be treated as Nonstatutory Share Options.
6.2 Term. No Option shall be exercisable aftersubject to Section 409A or Section 457A of the expiration of seven (7) years from the date it was granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder shall be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date it was granted.
6.3 Vesting. The Board shall determine the criteria under which Options may vest and become exercisable; the criteria may include Continuous Service and/Code or the achievement of Performance Goals and inthat any event such criteria shall be set forthprovision in the Option Agreement.
6.4 Exercise PricePlan would cause an option under the Plan to be subject to Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code, the Committee may amend the terms of the Plan and/or of an Option. The exercise price ofoutstanding option granted under the Plan, or take such other action the Committee determines is necessary or appropriate, in each Option shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) ofcase, without the Fair Market Value of the Ordinary Shares on the date the Option is granted;provided,Participant’s consent, to exempt any outstanding option or future option that an Option may be granted with an exercise price lower than that set forth above ifunder the Plan from or to allow any such Option is granted pursuantoptions to an assumption or substitution for another option in a manner satisfying the provisions ofcomply with Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code, andbut only to the extent any such amendments or action by the Committee would not violate Section 424(a)409A or Section 457A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exercise price of each Incentive Stock Option grantedCorporation shall not have any obligation to a Ten Percent Shareholder shall be at least one hundred ten percent (110%) ofindemnify or otherwise protect the Fair Market Value of the Ordinary Shares on the date the Option is granted.
6.5 Consideration. The purchase price of Ordinary Shares acquired pursuantParticipant from any obligation to an Option shall be paid, to the extent permitted by applicable statutes and regulations, either (i) in cashpay any taxes, interest or by check at the time the Option is exercised or (ii) at the discretion of the Board at the time of the grant of the Option (or subsequently in the case of a Nonstatutory Share Option) and pursuant to procedures established by the Company from time to time: (a) by delivery to the Company of other Shares, (b) according to a deferred payment or other similar arrangement with the Optionholder, including use of a promissory note, (c) pursuant to a "same day sale" program, or (d) by some combination of the foregoing.
6.6 Termination of Continuous Service. In the event an Optionholder's Continuous Service terminates (other than upon the Optionholder's death or Disability), the Optionholder may exercise his or her Option (to the extent that the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of termination or as otherwise set forth in the Option Agreement) but only within such period of time ending on the earlier of (i) the date three (3) months following the termination of the Optionholder's Continuous Service (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement), or (ii) the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If, after termination, the Optionholder does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified in the Option Agreement, the Option shall terminate.
6.7 Extension of Option Termination Date. An Optionholder's Option Agreement may also provide that if the exercise of the Option following the termination of the Optionholder's Continuous Service (other than upon the Optionholder's death or Disability) would be prohibited at any time because the issuance of Shares would violate either the registration requirements under the Securities Act (or other applicable securities law) or the Company's insider trading policy, then the Option shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of the Option set forth in the Option Agreement or (ii) the expiration of a period of three (3) months after the termination of the Optionholder's Continuous Service during which the exercise of the Option would not be in violation of either such registration requirements (or other applicable securities law) or the Company's insider trading policy.
6.8 Disability of Optionholder. In the event that an Optionholder's Continuous Service terminates as a result of the Optionholder's Disability, the Optionholder may exercise his or her Option (to the extent that the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of termination), but only within such period of time ending on the earlier of (i) the date twelve (12) months following such termination (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement) or (ii) the expiration of the term of the Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If after termination, the Optionholder does not exercise his or her Option within the time specified herein, the Option shall terminate.
6.9 Death of Optionholder. In the event (i) an Optionholder's Continuous Service terminates as a result of the Optionholder's death or (ii) the Optionholder dies within the period (if any) specified in the Option Agreement after the termination of the Optionholder's Continuous Service for a reason other than death, then the Option may be exercised (to the extent the Optionholder was entitled to exercise such Option as of the date of death) by the Optionholder's estate, by a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance or by a person designated to exercise the Option upon the Optionholder's deathpenalties pursuant to Section 6.10409A or 6.11 of the Plan, but only within the period ending on the earlier of (a) the date twelve (12) months following the date of death (or such longer or shorter period specified in the Option Agreement) or (b) the expiration of the term of such Option as set forth in the Option Agreement. If, after death, the Option is not exercised within the time specified herein, the Option shall terminate.
6.10 Transferability of an Incentive Stock Option. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the
lifetime of the Optionholder only by the Optionholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if provided in the Option Agreement, the Optionholder may, by delivering written notice to the Company, in a form satisfactory to the Company, designate a third party who, in the event of the death of the Optionholder, shall thereafter be entitled to exercise the Option.
6.11 Transferability of a Nonstatutory Share Option. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, a Nonstatutory Share Option shall not be transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the Optionholder only by the Optionholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if provided in the Option Agreement, the Optionholder may, by delivering written notice to the Company, in a form satisfactory to the Company, designate a third party who, in the event of the death of the Optionholder, shall thereafter be entitled to exercise the Option.
VII. SHARE AWARDS PROVISIONS OTHER THAN OPTIONS.
7.1 Restricted Share Bonus Awards. Each Restricted Share Bonus shall be evidenced by a Restricted Share Bonus Agreement which shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. Restricted Share Bonuses shall be paid by the Company in Ordinary Shares. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a Restricted Share Bonus award in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the Restricted Share Bonus award shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant. The terms and conditions of Restricted Share Bonus Agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate Restricted Share Bonus Agreements need not be identical, but each Restricted Share Bonus Agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Vesting. Restricted Share Bonus awards shall be subject to a vesting schedule and vesting shall generally be based on the Participant's Continuous Service. Upon failure to meet the vesting conditions, Shares awarded under the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement shall be subject to a share reacquisition right in favor of the Company in accordance with the vesting schedule;provided, that any such Shares shall be reacquired without the payment of any consideration to the Participant.
(ii) Termination of Participant's Continuous Service.InExcept as may otherwise be provided in the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement, in the event a Participant's Continuous Service terminates, the Company shall reacquire (without the payment of any consideration) any of the Shares held by the Participant that have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement.
(iii) Transferability. Rights to acquire Shares under the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long as Ordinary Shares awarded under the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement remain subject to the terms of the Restricted Share Bonus Agreement.
(iv) Dividends. Any dividends payable with respect to the Ordinary Shares underlying a Restricted Share Bonus award shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as such Shares; dividends, if any, that may become payable upon the vesting of such Shares shall be distributed to the Participant, at the discretion of the Board, in cash or in Ordinary Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends;provided, that, if such Shares are forfeited, the Participant shall have no right to such dividends (except as otherwise set forth in the applicable Restricted Share Bonus Agreement).
7.2 Share Appreciation Rights. Two types of Share Appreciation Rights (or SARs) shall be authorized for issuance under the Plan: (1) stand-alone SARs and (2) stapled SARs. Each SAR shall be evidenced by a Share Appreciation Right Agreement (or, if applicable, the underlying Option Agreement) which shall be in such form and shall contain such additional terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a SAR in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the SAR shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant. The additional terms and conditions of Share Appreciation Right Agreements (and/or underlying Option Agreements, as applicable) may change from time to time, and the additional terms and conditions of separate Share Appreciation Right Agreements (and/or underlying Option Agreements) need not be identical.
(i) Stand-Alone SARs. The following terms and conditions shall govern the grant and redeemability of stand-alone SARs:
(a) The stand-alone SAR shall cover a specified number of underlying Shares and shall be redeemable upon such terms and conditions as the Board may establish. Upon redemption of the stand-alone SAR, the holder shall be entitled to receive a distribution from the Company in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value (on the redemption date) of the Shares underlying the redeemed right over (ii) the aggregate base price in effect for those Shares.
(b) The number of Shares underlying each stand-alone SAR and the base price in effect for those Shares shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion at the time the stand-alone SAR is granted. In no event, however, may the base price per Share be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per underlying Share on the grant date.
(c) The distribution with respect to any redeemed stand-alone SAR may be made in Shares valued at Fair Market Value on the redemption date, in cash, or partly in Shares and partly in cash, as the Board shall in its sole discretion deem appropriate.
(ii) Stapled SARs. The following terms and conditions shall govern the grant and redemption of stapled SARs:
(a) Stapled SARs may only be granted concurrently with an Option to acquire the same number of Shares as the number of such Shares underlying the stapled SARs.
(b) Stapled SARs shall be redeemable upon such terms and conditions as the Board may establish and shall grant a holder the right to elect among (1) the exercise of the concurrently granted Option for Shares, whereupon the number of Shares subject to the stapled SARs shall be reduced by an equivalent number, (2) the redemption of such stapled SARs in exchange for a distribution from the Company in an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value (on the redemption date) of the number of vested Shares which the holder redeems over the aggregate base price for such vested Shares, whereupon the number of Shares subject to the concurrently granted Option shall be reduced by any equivalent number, or (3) a combination of (1) and (2).
(c) The distribution to which the holder of stapled SARs shall become entitled under this Section 7.2 upon the redemption of stapled SARs as described in Section 7.2(ii)(B) above may be made in Shares valued at Fair Market Value on the redemption date, in cash, or partly in Shares and partly in cash, as the Board shall in its sole discretion deem appropriate.
7.3 Phantom Share Units. Each Phantom Share Unit shall be evidenced by a Phantom Share Unit Agreement which shall be in such form and shall contain such additional terms and conditions as
the Board shall deem appropriate. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a Phantom Share Unit award in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the Phantom Share Unit award shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant. The additional terms and conditions of Phantom Share Unit Agreements may change from time to time, and the additional terms and conditions of separate Phantom Share Unit Agreements need not be identical. The following terms and conditions shall govern the grant and redeemability of Phantom Share Units:
(i) Phantom Share Unit awards shall be redeemable by the Participant to the Company upon such terms and conditions as the Board may establish. The value of a single Phantom Share Unit shall be equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share, unless the Board otherwise provides in the terms of the Phantom Share Unit Agreement.
(ii) The distribution with respect to any Phantom Share Unit award may be made in Shares valued at Fair Market Value on the redemption date, in cash, or partly in Shares and partly in cash, as the Board shall in its sole discretion deem appropriate.
(iii) Dividend Equivalents may be credited in respect of Shares covered by Phantom Share Units, as determined by the Board and set forth in the Phantom Share Unit Agreement. At the sole discretion of the Board, such Dividend Equivalents may be paid in cash or converted into additional Shares covered by the Phantom Share Units in such manner as determined by the Board. Any cash payment or additional Shares covered by the Phantom Share Units credited by reason of such Dividend Equivalents will be subject to all the terms and conditions, including vesting, of the Phantom Share Units to which they relate.
7.4 Restricted Share Units. Each Restricted Share Unit shall be evidenced by a Restricted Share Unit Agreement which shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. A Restricted Share Unit is the right to receive the value of one (1) Ordinary Share at the time the Restricted Share Unit vests. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a Restricted Share Unit award in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the Restricted Share Unit award shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant.
To the extent permitted by the Board in the terms of his or her Restricted Share Unit agreement, a Participant may elect to defer receipt of the value of the Shares otherwise deliverable upon the vesting of Restricted Share Units, so long as such deferral election complies with applicable law, including Section 409A457A of the Code. Such deferred Restricted Share Units will be treated as Deferred Share Units hereunder. When the Participant vests in such Restricted Share Units, the Participant will be credited with a number of Deferred Share Units equal to the number of Shares for which delivery is deferred.
Restricted Share Units and Deferred Share Units may be paid by the Company by delivery of Shares, in cash, or a combination thereof, as the Board shall in its sole discretion deem appropriate, in accordance with the timing and manner of payment elected by the Participant on his or her election form, or ifThe Corporation makes no deferral election is made, as soon as administratively practicable following the vesting of the Restricted Share Units.
The terms and conditions of Restricted Share Unit Agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate Restricted Share Unit Agreements need not be identical, but each Restricted Share Unit Agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Vesting. Restricted Share Units shall be subject to a vesting schedule and vesting shall generally be based on the Participant's Continuous Service.
(ii) Termination of Participant's Continuous Service.InExcept as may otherwise be provided in the Restricted Share Unit Agreement, in the event a Participant's Continuous Service terminates, any of the Restricted Share Units held by the Participant that have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the Restricted Share Unit agreement shall be forfeited.
(iii) Transferability. Rights to acquire the value of Shares under the Restricted Share Unit Agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Restricted Share Unit Agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long as any Ordinary Shares awarded under the Restricted Share Unit Agreement remain subject to the terms of the Restricted Share Unit Agreement.
(iv) Dividend Equivalents. Dividend Equivalents may be credited in respect of Shares covered by Restricted Share Units, as determined by the Board and set forth in the Restricted Share Unit Agreement. At the sole discretion of the Board, such Dividend Equivalents may be paid in cash or converted into additional Shares covered by the Restricted Share Units in such manner as determined by the Board. Any cash payment or additional Shares covered by the Restricted Share Units credited by reason of such Dividend Equivalents will be subject to all the terms and conditions, including vesting, of the Restricted Share Units to which they relate.
7.5 Performance Share Bonus Awards. Each Performance Share Bonus shall be evidenced by a Performance Share Bonus Agreement which shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. Performance Share Bonuses shall be paid by the Company in Ordinary Shares. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a Performance Share Bonus award in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the Performance Share Bonus award shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant. The terms and conditions of Performance Share Bonus Agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate Performance Share Bonus Agreements need not be identical, but each Performance Share Bonus Agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Vesting. Performance Share Bonus awards shall be subject to a vesting schedule and vesting shall be based on the achievement of certain Performance Goals or on a combination of the achievement of certain Performance Goals and the Participant's Continuous Service, as set forth in the Performance Share Bonus Agreement. Upon failure to meet Performance Goals or other vesting conditions, Shares awarded under the Performance Share Bonus Agreement shall be subject to a share reacquisition right in favor of the Company in accordance with the vesting schedule;provided,representation that any such Shares shall be reacquired without the payment of any considerationoption to the Participant.
(ii) Termination of Participant's Continuous Service.InExcept as may otherwise be provided in the Performance Share Bonus Agreement, in the event a Participant's Continuous Service terminates, the Company may reacquire (without the payment of any consideration) any of the Shares held by the Participant that have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the Performance Share Bonus Agreement.
(iii) Transferability. Rights to acquire Shares under the Performance Share Bonus Agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Performance Share Bonus Agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long aspurchase Ordinary Shares awarded under the Performance Share Bonus Agreement remain subject to the terms of the Performance Share Bonus Agreement.
(iv) Dividends. Any dividends payable with respect to the Ordinary Shares underlying a Performance Share Bonus award shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as such Shares;
dividends, if any, that may become payable upon vesting of such Shares shall be distributed to the Participant, at the discretion of the Board, in cash or in Ordinary Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends;provided, that, if such Shares are forfeited, the Participant shall have no right to such dividends (except as otherwise set forth in the applicable Performance Share Bonus Agreement).
7.6 Performance Share Units. Each Performance Share Unit shall be evidenced by a Performance Share Unit Agreement which shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board shall deem appropriate. A Performance Share Unit is the right to receive the value of one (1) Ordinary Share at the time the Performance Share Unit vests. Should Shares be issued pursuant to a Performance Share Unit award in circumstances where they are not otherwise fully paid up, the Board may require the Participant to pay the aggregate Nominal Value of the Shares on the basis that such Shares underlying the Performance Share Unit award shall then be allotted as fully paid to the Participant.
To the extent permitted by the Board in the terms of his or her Performance Unit Share Agreement, a Participant may elect to defer receipt of the value of Shares otherwise deliverable upon the vesting of an award of Performance Share Units, so long as such deferral election complies with applicable law, including Section 409A of the Code. Such deferred Performance Share Units will be treated as Deferred Share Units hereunder. When the Participant vests in such Performance Share Units, the Participant will be credited with a number of Deferred Share Units equal to the number of Shares for which delivery is deferred. Performance Share Units and Deferred Share Units may be paid by the Company by delivery of Shares, in cash, or a combination thereof, as the Board shall in its sole discretion deem appropriate, in accordance with the timing and manner of payment elected by the Participant on his or her election form, or if no deferral election is made, as soon as administratively practicable following the vesting of the Performance Share Units.
The terms and conditions of Performance Share Unit Agreements may change from time to time, and the terms and conditions of separate Performance Share Unit Agreements need not be identical, but each Performance Share Unit Agreement shall include (through incorporation of provisions hereof by reference in the agreement or otherwise) the substance of each of the following provisions:
(i) Vesting. Performance Share Units shall be subject to a vesting schedule and vesting shall be based on the achievement of certain Performance Goals or on a combination of the achievement of certain Performance Goals and the Participant's Continuous Service, as set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement.
(ii) Termination of Participant's Continuous Service.InExcept as may otherwise be provided in the Performance Share Unit Agreement, in the event a Participant's Continuous Service terminates, any of the Performance Share Units held by the Participant that have not vested as of the date of termination under the terms of the Performance Share Unit Agreement will be forfeited.
(iii) Transferability. Rights to acquire the value of Shares under the Performance Share Unit Agreement shall be transferable by the Participant only upon such terms and conditions as are set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement, as the Board shall determine in its discretion, so long as Ordinary Shares awarded under the Performance Share Unit Agreement remain subject to the terms of the Performance Share Unit Agreement.
(iv) Dividend Equivalents. Dividend Equivalents may be credited in respect of Shares covered by Performance Share Units, as determined by the Board and set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement. At the sole discretion of the Board, such Dividend Equivalents may be paid in cash or converted into additional Shares covered by the Performance Share Units in such manner as determined by the Board. Any cash payment or additional Shares covered by the Performance Share Units credited by reason of such Dividend Equivalents will be subject to all the terms and conditions, including vesting, of the Performance Share Units to which they relate.
7.7 Other Share-Based Awards. The Board is authorized under the Plan to grant Other Share-Based Awards to Participants subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement and such other terms and conditions as may be specified by the Board that are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, and that by their terms involve or might involve the issuance of, consist of, or are denominated in, payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise relate to, Shares. The Board may establish one or more separate programs under the Plan for the purpose of issuing particular forms of Other Share-Based Awards to one or more classes of Participants on such terms and conditions as determined by the Board from time to time.
VIII. QUALIFYING PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION.
8.1 General. The BoardAs used in this Article VIII, "Committee" shall mean a Committee constituted in accordance with Section 162(m) as described in Section 3.3(ii) hereof to the extent the Share Award is intended to be "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m). The Committee may establish Performance Goals and the level of achievement versus such Performance Goals that shall determine the number of Shares to be granted, retained, vested, issued or issuable under or in settlement of or the amount payable pursuant to a Share Award (including a Restricted Share Bonus, Restricted Share Unit, Performance Share Bonus or Performance Share Unit), which criteria may be based on Qualifying Performance Criteria or other standards of financial performance and/or personal performance evaluations. In addition, theBoardCommittee may specify that a Share Award or a portion of a Share Award is intended to satisfy the requirements for "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m);provided, that the Performance Goals for such Award or portion of a Share Award that is intended by theBoardCommittee to satisfy the requirements under Section 162(m) shall be a measure based only on one or more Qualifying Performance Criteria selected by theBoardCommittee and specified at the time the Award is granted, or no later than the earlier of (i) the date that is ninety (90) days after the commencement of the applicable Performance Period or (ii) the date on which twenty-five percent (25%) of the Performance Period has elapsed, and, in any event, at a time when the outcome of the Qualifying Performance Criteria remains substantially uncertain.The BoardThe Committee, as constituted in accordance with Section 162(m) and described in Section 3.3(ii) hereof, shall certify the extent to which any Qualifying Performance Criteria has been satisfied and the amount payable as a result thereof, prior to payment, settlement or vesting of any Share Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements for "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m).
8.2 Adjustments. To the extent consistent with Section 162(m), theBoardCommittee may determine to adjust Qualifying Performance Criteria as determined in writing at the time the Performance Goal(s) is established, including the following adjustments: as follows:
(i) to exclude restructuring and/or other nonrecurring charges;
(ii) to exclude exchange rate effects, as applicable, for non-U.S. dollar denominated net sales and operating earnings;
(iii) to exclude the effects of changes to generally accepted accounting principles required by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board, as well as changes in accounting standards promulgated by other accounting standards setters to the extent applicable (for example, resulting from future potential voluntary or mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards);
(iv) to exclude the effects of any statutory adjustments to corporate tax rates;
(v) to exclude the effects of any "extraordinaryunusual or nonrecurring items" as determined under generally accepted accounting principles;
(vi) to exclude any other unusual, non-recurring gain or loss or other extraordinary item;
(vii) to respond to any unusual or extraordinary transaction, event or development;
(viii) to respond to changes in applicable laws, regulations, and/or accounting principles;
(ix) to exclude the dilutive or accretive effects of dispositions, acquisitions or joint ventures;
(x) to exclude the effect of any change in the outstanding shares by reason of any share dividend or split, share repurchase, reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change, or any distributions to shareholders other than regular cash dividends;
(xi) to reflect the effect of a corporate transaction, such as a merger, consolidation, separation (including a spinoff or other distribution of stock or property by a corporation), or reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such terms of Section 368 of the Code); and (l) to reflect the effect of any partial or completed corporate liquidation.
8.3 Discretionary Adjustments and Limits. Subject to the limits imposed under Section 162(m) for Share Awards that are intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation," notwithstanding the satisfaction of any Performance Goals, the number of Shares granted, issued, retainable and/or vested under a Performance Share Bonus award or Performance Share Unit may, to the extent specified in the Share Award Agreement, be reduced, but not increased, by theBoardCommittee on the basis of such further considerations as theBoardCommittee shall determine.
8.4 Annual Section 162(m) Limitation. The following limits shall apply to the grant of any Share Award if, at the time of grant, the company is a "publicly held corporation" within the meaning of Section 162(m).
(i)Full-Value Share Awards. Subject to the provisions of Article XII of the Plan relating to adjustments upon changes in Ordinary Shares, no Employee shall be eligible to be grantedFull-ValueShare Awards covering more than ten million (10,000,000) Shares during any fiscal yearor Options and/or SARs covering more than eight million (8,000,000) Shares during any fiscal yearof the Company.
(ii)Options and SARs. Subject to the provisions of Article XII of the Plan relating to adjustments upon changes in Ordinary Shares, no employee shall be eligible to be granted Options and/or SARs covering more than eight million (8,000,000) Shares during any fiscal year of the Company.
IX. USE OF PROCEEDS FROM SHARES.
Proceeds from the sale of Ordinary Shares pursuant to Share Awards shall constitute general funds of the Company.
X. CANCELLATION AND RE-GRANT OF OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.
10.1 Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have the authority to effect, at any time and from time to time, (i) the repricing of any outstanding Options and SARs under the Plan and/or (ii) with the consent of the affected Participants, the cancellation of any outstanding Options and SARs under the Plan in exchange for a cash payment and/or the grant in substitution therefor of new Options and SARs under the Plan covering the same or different number of Shares, but having an exercise or redemption price per Share not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value (or, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder, not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value) per Share on the new grant date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may grant a Share Award with an exercise or redemption price lower than that set forth above if such Share Award is granted pursuant to an assumption or substitution for another
award in a manner satisfying the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and/or Section 424(a) of the Code, as applicable.
10.2 Prior to the implementation of any such repricing or cancellation of one or more outstanding Options or SARs, the Board shall obtain the approval of the shareholders of the Company.
10.3 Shares subject to an Option or SAR canceled under this Article X shall continue to be counted against the Share Reserve described in Section 4.2 of the Plan. The repricing of an Option or SAR under this Article X, resulting in a reduction of the exercise or redemption price, as applicable, shall be deemed to be a cancellation of the original Option or SAR and the grant of a substitute Option or SAR; in the event of such repricing, both the original and the substituted Options or SARs shall be counted against the Share Reserve described in Section 4.2 of the Plan. The provisions of this Section 10.3 shall be applicable only to the extent required by Section 162(m).
11.1 Shareholder Rights. No Participant shall be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any Shares subject to a Share Award except to the extent that the Company has issued the Shares relating to such Share Award.
11.2 No Employment or other Service Rights. Nothing in the Plan or any instrument executed or Share Award granted pursuant thereto shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue to serve the Company or an Affiliate in the capacity in effect at the time the Share Award was granted or shall affect the right of the Company or an Affiliate to terminate (i) the employment of an Employee with or without notice and with or without cause to the extent permitted under local law, (ii) the service of a Consultant pursuant to the terms of such Consultant's agreement with the Company or an Affiliate or (iii) the service of a Director pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company, and any applicable provisions of the corporate law of the state or other jurisdiction in which the Company is domiciled, as the case may be.
11.3 Investment Assurances. The Company may require a Participant, as a condition of exercising or redeeming a Share Award or acquiring Shares under any Share Award, (i) to give written assurances satisfactory to the Company as to the Participant's knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and/or to employ a purchaser representative reasonably satisfactory to the Company who is knowledgeable and experienced in financial and business matters and that he or she is capable of evaluating, alone or together with the purchaser representative, the merits and risks of acquiring the Shares; (ii) to give written assurances satisfactory to the Company stating that the Participant is acquiring the Shares subject to the Share Award for the Participant's own account and not with any present intention of selling or otherwise distributing the Shares; and (iii) to give such other written assurances as the Company may determine are reasonable in order to comply with applicable law. The foregoing requirements, and any assurances given pursuant to such requirements, shall be inoperative if (1) the issuance of the Shares under the Share Award has been registered under a then currently effective registration statement under the Securities Act or (2) as to any particular requirement, a determination is made by counsel for the Company that such requirement need not be met in the circumstances under the then applicable securities laws, and in either case otherwise complies with applicable law. The Company may, upon advice of counsel to the Company, place legends on Share certificates issued under the Plan as such counsel deems necessary or appropriate in order to comply with applicable laws, including, but not limited to, legends restricting the transfer of the Shares.
11.4 Withholding Obligations. To the extent provided by the terms of a Share Award Agreement, the Participant may satisfy any federal, state, local, or foreign tax withholding obligation or employer tax liability assumed by the Participant in connection with a Share Award or the acquisition, vesting, distribution or transfer of Ordinary Shares under a Share Award by any of the following means
(in addition to the Company's right to withhold from any compensation paid to the Participant by the Company or an Affiliate) or by a combination of such means: (i) tendering a cash payment; (ii) subject to approval from the Board, authorizing the Company to withhold Shares from the Shares otherwise issuable to the Participant; or (iii) subject to approval from the Board, delivering to the Company owned and unencumbered Shares. The Participant may also satisfy such tax withholding obligation or employer tax liability assumed by the Participant by any other means set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement.
11.5 Forfeitureand RecoupmentProvisions. Pursuant to its general authority to determine terms and conditions of Share Awards under the Plan, the Board may specify in a Share Award Agreement that the Participant's rights, payments and/or benefits with respect to the Share Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of such Share Award. Such events shall include, but shall not be limited to, termination of employment for cause, violation of any applicable Company policy or code of conduct (including without limitation, engaging in "Fraud" or "Misconduct" within the meaning of the Company's Compensation Recovery for Fraud or Misconduct Policy), breach of any agreement between the Participant and the Company or any Affiliate, or any other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business interests or reputation of the Company or any Affiliate. Furthermore, all Share Awards (including Share Awards that have vested in accordance with the Share Award Agreement) shall be subject to any recoupment requirement imposed under applicable laws, rules, regulations or stock exchange listing standards, including, without limitation, recoupment requirements imposed pursuant to Section 954 of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or any regulations promulgated thereunder, or recoupment requirements under the laws of any other jurisdiction, as well as to the terms and conditions of any recoupment policy adopted by the Company from time to time to implement such requirements or to facilitate corporate governance, or for such other purpose as may be set forth in a Share Award Agreement.
11.6 Compliance with Laws. The Plan, the granting and vesting of Share Awards under the Plan and the issuance and delivery of Shares and the payment of money under the Plan or under Share Awards granted or awarded hereunder are subject to compliance with all applicable Irish, U.S. (federal, state and local) and foreign laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by any listing, regulatory or governmental authority as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be necessary or advisable in connection therewith. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver Shares prior to obtaining any approvals from listing, regulatory or governmental authority that the Company determines are necessary or advisable. The Company shall be under no obligation to register pursuant to the Securities Act, as amended, any of the Shares paid pursuant to the Plan. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Plan and Share Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such laws, rules and regulations.
11.7Section 409A.Except as provided in Section 11.8 hereof, to the extent that the Board determines that any Share Award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Share Award Agreement evidencing such Share Award shall incorporate the terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the Code. To the extent applicable, the Plan and Share Award Agreements shall be interpreted in accordancecompliant with Section 409A or Section 457A of the Code and U.S. Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance issued thereunder, including without limitation any such regulations or other guidance that may be issued after the date the Plan became effective. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that following the date a Share Award is granted the Board determines that the Share Award may be subject to Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury guidance (including such Department of Treasury guidance as may be issued after the date the Plan became effective), the Board may adopt such amendments to the Plan and the applicable Share Award Agreement or adopt other policies and procedures (includingCode.
amendments, policies and procedures with retroactive effect), or take any other actions, including amendments or actions that would result in a reduction to the benefits payable under a Share Award, in each case, without the consent of the Participant, that the Board determines are necessary or appropriate to (i) exempt the Share Award from Section 409A of the Code and/or preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided with respect to the Share Award, or (ii) comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury guidance and thereby avoid the application of any penalty taxes under such Section or mitigate any additional tax, interest and/or penalties or other adverse tax consequences that may apply under Section 409A of the Code if compliance is not practical.26.2
11.8No Representations or Covenants with respect to Tax Qualification.Although the CompanyCorporation may endeavor to (i) qualify a Share Awardan option for favorable or specific tax treatment under the laws of the United States or jurisdictions outside of the United States or (ii) avoid adverse tax treatment (e.g., under Section 409A of the Code), the CompanyCorporation makes no representation to that effect and expressly disavows any covenant to maintain favorable or avoid unfavorable tax treatment, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, including Section 11.727.1 hereof. The CompanyCorporation shall be unconstrained in its corporate activities without regard to the potential negative tax impact on holders of Share AwardsParticipants under the Plan. Nothing in this Plan or in a Share Award Agreement shall provide a basis for any person to take any action against the Company or any Affiliate based on matters covered by Section 409A of the Code, including the tax treatment of any Share Awards, and neither the Company nor any Affiliate will have any liability under any circumstances to the Participant or any other party if a Share Award that is intended to be exempt from, or compliant with, Section 409A of the Code, is not so exempt or compliant or for any action taken by the Board with respect thereto.
B-20
(ESPP –JanuaryJuly 2017)
XII. ADJUSTMENTS UPON CHANGES IN SHARES.
APPENDIX A
12.1 Capitalization Adjustments. If any change is made in the Ordinary Shares subject to the Plan, or subject to any Share Award, without the receipt of consideration by the Company (through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, share dividend, spinoff, dividend in property other than cash, share split, liquidating dividend, extraordinary dividends or distributions, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or other transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company), the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted in the class(es)), kind and maximum number of securities subject to the Planorand the maximum number of securities that may be made subject to award to any person pursuant to Section 8.4 above, and the outstanding Share Awards shall be appropriately adjusted in the class(es)), kind and number of securities and price per share of the securities subject to such outstanding Share Awards, and the. The Board's determination regarding such adjustments shall be final, binding and conclusive. (The conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as a transaction "without receipt of consideration" by the Company.)
An adjustment under this provision may have the effect of reducing the price at which Ordinary Shares may be acquired to less than their Nominal Value (the "Shortfall"), but only if and to the extent that the Board shall be authorized to capitalize from the reserves of the Company a sum equal to the Shortfall and to apply that sum in paying up that amount on the Ordinary Shares.
12.2 Adjustments Upon a Change of Control.
(i) In the event of a Change of Control as defined in Sections 2.4(i) through 2.4(iv) hereof, then any surviving entity or acquiring entity shall assume or continue any Share Awards outstanding under the Plan or shall substitute similar share awards (including an award to acquire substantially the same consideration paid to the shareholders in the transaction by which the Change of Control occurs) for those outstanding under the Plan. In the event any surviving entity
or acquiring entity refuses to assume or continue such Share Awards or to substitute similar share awards for those outstanding under the Plan, then with respect to any or all outstanding Share Awards held by Participants, the Board in its sole discretion and without liability to any person may (a) provide for the payment of a cash amount in exchange for the cancellation of a Share Award which, in the case of Options and SARs, may be equal to the product of (x) the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value per Share at such time over the exercise or redemption price, if any, times (y) the total number of Shares then subject to such Share Award (and otherwise, the Board may cancel such Share Awards for no consideration if the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the Share Awards is less than or equal to the aggregate exercise or redemption price of such Share Awards), (b) continue the Share Awards, or (c) notify Participants holding an Option, Share Appreciation Right or Phantom Share Unit that they must exercise or redeem any portion of such Share Award (including, at the discretion of the Board, any unvested portion of such Share Award) at or prior to the closing of the transaction by which the Change of Control occurs, and that the Share Awards shall terminate if not so exercised or redeemed at or prior to the closing of the transaction by which the Change of Control occurs. With respect to any other Share Awards outstanding under the Plan, such Share Awards shall terminate if not exercised or redeemed prior to the closing of the transaction by which the Change of Control occurs. The Board shall not be obligated to treat all Share Awards, even those that are of the same type, in the same manner.
(ii) In the event of a Change of Control as defined in Section 2.4(v) hereof, all outstanding Share Awards shall terminate immediately prior to such event.
XIII. AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN AND SHARE AWARDS.
13.1 Amendment of Plan. The Board at any time, and from time to time, may amend the Plan. However, except as provided in Article XII of the Plan relating to adjustments upon changes in the Ordinary Shares, no amendment shall be effective unless approved by the shareholders of the Company to the extent shareholder approval is necessary to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, any New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ Global Select Market or other securities exchange listing requirements, or other applicable law or regulation;provided, thatunless otherwise required or advisable under applicable law (as determined by the Board),rights under any Share Award granted before an amendment to the Plan shall not be materially impaired by any such amendment unless (i) the Company requests the consent of the Participant and (ii) the Participant consents in writing.
13.2 Shareholder Approval. The Board may, in its sole discretion, submit any other amendment to the Plan for shareholder approval, including, but not limited to, amendments to the Plan intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder regarding the exclusion of performance-based compensation from the limit on corporate deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers.
13.3 Contemplated Amendments. It is expressly contemplated that the Board may amend the Plan in any respect the Board deems necessary or advisable to provide eligible Employees with the maximum benefits provided or to be provided under the provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to Incentive Stock Options and/or to bring the Plan and/or Incentive Stock Options granted under it into compliance therewith.
13.4 Amendment of Share Awards. The Board at any time, and from time to time, may amend the terms of any one or more Share Awards;provided, that, unless otherwise required or advisable under applicable law (as determined by the Board), the rights under any Share Award shall not be materially impaired by any such amendment unless (i) the Company requests the consent of the Participant and (ii) the Participant consents in writing.
XIV. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE PLAN.
14.1 Termination or Suspension. The Board may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. No Share Awards may be granted under the Plan while the Plan is suspended or after it is terminated.
14.2 No Material Impairment of Rights. Suspension Unless otherwise required or advisable under applicable law (as determined by the Board), suspension or termination of the Plan shall not materially impair rights and obligations under any Share Award granted while the Plan is in effect except with the written consent of the Participant.
XV. EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATE OF PLAN.
15.1 Effective Date. The Plan shall become effective on the date that it is approved by the shareholders of the Company (the "Effective Date"), which approval shall be within twelve (12) months before or after the date the Plan is adopted by the Board. No Share Awards may be granted under the Plan prior to the time that the shareholders have approved the Plan. The approval or disapproval of the Plan by the shareholders of the Company shall have no effect on any other equity compensation plan, program or arrangement sponsored by the Company or any of its Affiliates;provided, that upon shareholder approval of this Plan, no new awards may be granted under the Predecessor Plan. Awards granted under the Predecessor Plan shall continue to be governed by the terms of the Predecessor Plan in effect on the date of grant of such award.
15.2 Expiration Date. The Plan shall expire, and no Share Awards shall be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date, except that no Incentive Stock Option shall be granted under the Plan after the earlier of the tenth (10th) anniversary of (i) the date the Plan is approved by the Board or (ii) the Effective Date. Any Shares Awards that are outstanding on the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date shall remain in force according to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Share Award Agreement.
The law of the State of California shall govern all questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Plan, without regard to such state's conflict of laws rules.If any provision of the Plan or the application of any provision hereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Plan and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected, and the provisions so held to be unenforceable shall be reformed to the extent (and only to the extent) necessary to make it enforceable and valid.
RULES OF THE
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLANFOR SHARE AWARDS GRANTED TO PARTICIPANTS IN FRANCE
I.GENERAL. PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS
1. Introduction. 423 Plan
The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Seagate Technology plc (the "Company") has established the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "U.S. Plan")(US) Holdings, Inc.
Seagate US LLC
Seagate Cloud Systems, Inc.
Lyve Minds, Inc.
Seagate Federal, Inc.
Seagate Systems (US) Inc. (US employees)
Countries Covered by Non-423 Sub-Plan for the benefit of certain eligible persons, including employees of the Company and its Affiliates, including its Affiliates in France (each, a "French Entity"), of which the Company holds directly or indirectly at least 10% of the share capital.Contractors (See Appendix B)
Sections 3.2(viii) and 3.2(vii) of the U.S. Plan specifically authorize the Board to adopt sub-plans and/or special terms applicable to Share Awards granted to participants outside the United States and to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as the Board deems necessary, desirable, convenient or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company that are not in conflict with the provisions of the U.S. Plan. Pursuant to Section 3.3(i) of the U.S. Plan, the Board has delegated administration of the U.S. Plan to a committee (the "Committee") which has delegated certain of its administrative powers to a subcommittee (the Benefits Administrative Committee or the "Committee's Delegate"), including the power to adopt sub-plans for the purpose of taking advantage of certain tax treatment available to participants outside the U.S. The Committee's Delegate has determined that it is appropriate and desirable to establish a sub-plan for the purposes of permitting share options, restricted share units and performance share units granted to qualifying participants of a French Entity that qualify for specific tax and social security treatment in France. The Committee's Delegate, therefore, intends to establish a sub-plan to the U.S. Plan for the purpose of granting Options (as defined in Section I.2(f) below) that qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment in France applicable to stock options granted under Sections L. 225-177 to L. 225-186-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended ("French-qualified Options"), and Restricted Share Units (as defined in Section I.2(g) below) and Performance Share Units (as defined in Section I.2(h) below) that qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment in France applicable to shares granted for no consideration under Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended (such Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units collectively referred to herein as "French-qualified RSUs"), to qualifying participants of a French Entity who are resident in France for French tax purposes and/or subject to the French social security regime (the "French Participants").Turkey
The terms of the U.S. Plan applicable to Nonstatutory Share Options (as defined in the U.S. Plan), Restricted Share Units (as defined in the U.S. Plan) and Performance Share Units (as defined in the U.S. Plan), as set out inNon-423 Sub-Plan (See Appendix 1 hereto, subject to the limitations set forth herein, shall constitute the Rules of the C)
Seagate Technology PublicAustralia Pty. Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for Share Awards Granted to Participants in France (the "French Sub-Plan").
Seagate Technology Canada Inc.
Seagate Technology SAS
Seagate Technology GmbH
Seagate Technology HDD (India) Private Limited
Seagate Technology (Hong Kong) Limited
Seagate Technology Manufacturing (Hong Kong) Limited
Seagate Technology (Ireland)
Nippon Seagate Inc.
Seagate Technology (Netherlands) B.V.
Seagate Technology AB
Seagate Technology Taiwan Ltd.
Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (including Dublin branch)
Seagate Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
Seagate Technology International (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.
Penang Seagate Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Seagate International (Johor) Sdn. Bhd.
Seagate Singapore International Headquarters Pte. Ltd.
Seagate Technology International, Singapore Branch
Seagate Technology (Thailand) Limited
Seagate Technology Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Seagate Global Business Services (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Dot Hill Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Under the French Sub-Plan, qualifying participants selected at the Committee's discretion will be granted Options, Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units only as such terms are defined in Section I.2 hereunder. The provisions of the U.S. Plan permitting the grant of Restricted Share Bonus awards, Share Appreciation Right awards, Phantom Share Unit awards, Performance Share Bonus awards, Deferred Share Unit awards and Other Share-Based Awards and all other provisions related exclusively to these types of awards are not applicable to grants made under this French Sub-Plan. The Options, Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units granted under this French Sub-Plan will be granted solely with respect to ordinary shares of the Company.
Table of ContentsDot Hill Systems Services (Foshan) Limited
The provisions under Parts I and IV of this French Sub-Plan shall apply both to French-qualified Options and to French-qualified RSUs. The provisions under Part II of this French Sub-Plan apply only to the grant of French-qualified Options, and the provisions under Part III of this French Sub-Plan apply only to French-qualified RSUs.Seagate Cloud Systems Japan Ltd.
2. Definitions. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the U.S. Plan. The terms set out below will have the following meanings:Dot Hill Systems Germany GmbH
(a) For French-qualified Options, the term "Closed Period" shall mean, as set forth in Section L. 225-177 of the French Commercial Code: (i) ten quotation days preceding and following the disclosure to the public of the consolidated financial statements or the annual statements of the Company, or (ii) the period as from the date the corporate management of the Company possesses confidential information which, if disclosed to the public, could significantly impact the quotation price of the Ordinary Shares, until ten quotation days after the day such information is disclosed to the public, or (iii) twenty quotation days following a distribution of a dividend (i.e., the ex-dividend date) or of a general right to subscribe to Ordinary Shares (i.e., a rights offering).LaCie SPRL
LaCie Group S.A.S.
LaCie SAS
LaCie AB
LaCie GmbH
LaCie Electronique D2, S.A.
LaCie AG
LaCie Ltd. (UK employees)
Seagate Systems (Canada) Limited
Seagate Systems (Mexico) S.A. de C.V.
Seagate Systems (UK) Limited
Seagate Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.
Seagate Systems (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
For French-qualified RSUs, the term "Closed Period" shall mean, as set forth in Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code: (i) ten quotation days preceding and following the disclosure to the public of the consolidated financial statements or the annual statements of the Company, or (ii) the period as from the date the corporate management of the Company possesses confidential information which, if disclosed to the public, could significantly impact the quotation price of the Ordinary Shares, until ten quotation days after the day such information is disclosed to the public.
If French law or regulations are amended after adoption of this French Sub-Plan to modify the definition and/or applicability of the Closed Period to French-qualified Options and/or French-qualified RSUs, such amendment shall become applicable to any French-qualified Options and French-qualified RSUs granted under this French Sub-Plan, to the extent permitted or required by French law.
APPENDIX B
(b) The term "Disability" shall mean disability as determined in categories 2 and 3 under Section L. 341-4 of the French Social Security Code, as amended, and subject to the fulfillment of related conditions.
(c) The term "Effective Grant Date" shall mean the date on which the Option is effectively granted (i.e., the date on which the condition precedent of the expiration of a Closed Period applicable to the Option, if any, is satisfied, which is the first day following any Closed Period). Such condition precedent shall be satisfied when the Board, Committee or other authorized corporate body shall determine that the grant of Options is no longer prevented because of the existence of a Closed Period. If the Grant Date does not occur within a Closed Period, the "Effective Grant Date" shall be the same day as the "Grant Date."
(d) The term "Forced Retirement" shall mean forced retirement as determined under Section L. 1237-5 of the French Labor Code, as amended, and subject to the fulfillment of related conditions.
(e) The term "Grant Date" shall be the date on which the Committee both (i) designates the French Participants, and (ii) specifies the material terms and conditions of the French-qualified Options or French-qualified RSUs, including the number of Shares subject to the French-qualified Options or French-qualified RSUs, the conditions for vesting of the French-qualified Options or French-qualified RSUs, the conditions for exercising the French-qualified Options and any restrictions on the sale of the Shares subject to the French-qualified Options or French-qualified RSUs.
(f) The term "Option" shall mean a Nonstatutory Share Option (as defined in the U.S. Plan) that includes both:
(i) purchase share options (rights to acquire Shares repurchased by the Company prior to the date on which the Options become exercisable); and
(ii) subscription share options (rights to subscribe for newly-issued Shares).
(g) The term "Restricted Share Unit" shall mean an award, pursuant to which the Company will deliver one Share for each Restricted Share Unit granted to a French Participant for no consideration (excepting a Nominal Value payment for such Share where required by Irish corporate law which shall be within the limits set forth by French tax regulations applicable to French-qualified RSUs), provided that any conditions established by the Committee for the lapse of restrictions with respect to such Restricted Share Unit have been satisfied, and for which any dividend and voting rights attach only upon the issuance of Shares.
(h) The term "Performance Share Unit" shall mean an award, pursuant to which the Company will deliver a number of Shares to a French Participant for no consideration (excepting a Nominal Value payment for such Share where required by Irish corporate law which shall be within the limits set forth by French tax regulations applicable to French-qualified RSUs), provided that any conditions established by the Committee for the lapse of restrictions with respect to such Performance Share Unit have been satisfied, and for which any dividend and voting rights attach only upon the issuance of Shares.
(i) The term "Vesting Date" shall mean the date on which the Shares subject to the French-qualified RSUs become non-forfeitable.
3. Eligibility to Participate.
(a) Subject to Section I.3(c) below, any individual who, on the Grant Date of the French-qualified Option or the French-qualified RSU, as applicable, and to the extent required under French law, is a current salaried employee employed under the terms and conditions of an employment contract ("contrat de travail") by a French Entity or who is a corporate officer of a French Entity (subject to Section I.3(b) below) shall be eligible to receive, at the discretion of the Committee, French-qualified Options and/or French-qualified RSUs under this French Sub-Plan, provided he or she also satisfies the eligibility conditions of Article V of the U.S. Plan.
(b) Neither French-qualified Options nor French-qualified RSUs may be issued to an officer of a French Entity, other than the managing corporate officers ("mandataires sociaux,"i.e.,Président du Conseil d'Administration,Directeur Général,Directeur Général Délégué,Membre du Directoire,Gérant de Sociétés par actions), unless the officer is employed under the terms and conditions of an employment contract ("contrat de travail") with a French Entity, as defined by French law. The Committee, in its discretion, may impose additional restrictions upon the exercise of the French-qualified Options and upon the holding and sale of Shares issued upon the vesting of the French-qualified RSUs or the exercise of the French-qualified Options granted to a French Participant who qualifies as a managing corporate officer of the Company as defined under French law (i.e., "mandataires sociaux" as set forth above).
(c) French-qualified Options and French-qualified RSUs may not be issued under the French Sub-Plan to French Participants who own more than ten percent (10%) of the Company's share capital or to individuals other than employees and corporate officers of a French Entity. Grants of French-qualified Options and French-qualified RSUs under this French Sub-Plan may not result in any French Participant's owning more than ten percent (10%) of the Company's share capital.
4. Delivery of Shares Only. Only Shares, and not the cash equivalent in lieu of such Shares, may be delivered to any French Participant pursuant to the French-qualified Options and French-qualified RSUs granted under this French Sub-Plan.
5. Non-Transferability. Except in the case of death, neither French-qualified Options nor French-qualified RSUs may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered to a party other than the French Participant to whom the Award is granted. The French-qualified Options are exercisable only by the French Participant during his or her lifetime, subject to Sections II.3(c) and II.4 below. The Shares underlying the French-qualified RSUs shall be issued only to the French Participant during his or her lifetime, subject to Sections III.1(a) and III.3 below.
6. Disqualification of French-Qualified Options and French-Qualified RSUs. If, following the grant, changes are made to the terms and conditions of the French-qualified Options and/or French-qualified RSUs due to any applicable legal requirements or a decision of the Company's shareholders, the Board or the Committee, the Options, Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units may no longer qualify as French-qualified Options and French-qualified RSUs. If the Options, Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units no longer qualify as French-qualified Options and/or French-qualified RSUs, the Committee may determine, in its sole discretion, to lift, shorten or terminate certain restrictions applicable to the vesting or exercisability of the Options, the vesting of the Restricted Share Units or Performance Share Units or to the sale of the Shares underlying the Options, Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units, which restrictions have been imposed under this French Sub-Plan or in the applicable Share Award Agreement delivered to the French Participant.
7. Employment Rights. The adoption of this French Sub-Plan (a) shall not confer any employment rights upon the French Participants or any employees of a French Entity, and (b) shall not be construed as a part of any employment contracts that a French Entity has with its employees.
8. Amendments. Subject to the terms of the U.S. Plan, the Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate this French Sub-Plan at any time in accordance with applicable French law.
II. FRENCH-QUALIFIED OPTIONS.
1. Closed Period. French-qualified Options may not be granted during a Closed Period to the extent that such Closed Periods are applicable to French-qualified Options granted by the Company. If the Grant Date were to occur during an applicable Closed Period, the Effective Grant Date shall be the first date following the expiration of a Closed Period on which the Company would not be prohibited from granting French-qualified Options under the rules of the U.S. Plan and the French Sub-Plan and the exercise price per Share shall be set as of the Effective Grant Date.
2. Conditions of French-Qualified Options.
(a) The exercise price and number of underlying Shares shall not be modified after the Grant Date, except as provided in Sections II.5 of this French Sub-Plan, or as otherwise authorized by French law. Any other modification permitted under the U.S. Plan may result in the Option no longer qualifying as a French-qualified Option.
(b) The French-qualified Options will vest and become exercisable pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the U.S. Plan, this French Sub-Plan, and the applicable Share Award Agreement delivered to each French Participant.
(c) The exercise price per Share payable pursuant to French-qualified Options granted under this French Sub-Plan shall be fixed by the Committee on the Grant Date (or the Effective Grant Date). In no event shall the exercise price per Share be less than the greatest of the following:
(i) with respect to purchase share options, the higher of either 95% of the average of the quotation price of the Shares during the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Grant
Date (or the Effective Grant Date) or 95% of the average purchase price paid for such Shares by the Company;
(ii) with respect to subscription share options, 95% of the average of the quotation price of such Shares during the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Grant Date (or the Effective Grant Date); and
(iii) the minimum exercise price permitted under the U.S. Plan.
3. Exercise of French-Qualified Options.
(a) Exercisability. When a French-qualified Option is granted, the Committee shall fix the period within which the Option vests and may be exercised and shall determine any conditions that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised. Specifically, the Committee, in order to obtain the specific tax and social security treatment pursuant to the relevant Section of the French Tax Code, as amended, or the relevant Section of the French Social Security Code, as amended, may provide for a holding period measured from the Effective Grant Date for the vesting or exercise of a French-qualified Option or for the sale of Shares acquired pursuant to such exercise. Such holding period for the vesting or exercise of a French-qualified Option or the sale of Shares, if any required, shall be set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement. The holding period restricting the sale of Shares shall not exceed three years from the exercise date of a French-qualified Option.
(b) Payment of Exercise Price and Withholding. Upon exercise of a French-qualified Option, the full exercise price and any required withholding tax and/or social security contributions shall be paid by the French Participant as set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement. Under a "same day sale" program, the French Participant may give irrevocable instructions to a broker to sell the Shares otherwise deliverable upon the exercise of the Option and to deliver promptly to the Company an amount equal to the aggregate exercise price. No delivery of other Shares already owned by the French Participant may be used to pay the exercise price.
(c) Death. In the event of the death of a French Participant, his or her French-qualified Options thereafter shall be immediately vested and exercisable in full under the conditions set forth by Section II.4 of this French Sub-Plan.
(d) Termination (Other than Disability or Forced Retirement). If a French Participant is terminated or ceases to be employed by the Company or a French Entity, his or her French-qualified Options will be exercisable in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Share Award Agreement.
(e) Account for Shares. The Shares acquired upon exercise of a French-qualified Option will be recorded in an account in the name of the French Participant with the Company or a broker or in such manner as the Company otherwise may determine in order to ensure compliance with applicable laws, including any requisite holding periods.
4. Death. Upon the death of a French Participant during active employment, all French-qualified Options shall become immediately vested and exercisable and may be exercised in full by the French Participant's heirs or the legal representative of his or her estate for the six (6)-month period following the date of the French Participant's death. Upon the death of a French Participant after termination of active employment, the treatment of French-qualified Options will be as set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement and, to the extent vested at the time of the French Participant's death, the French-qualified Options may be exercised in full by the French Participant's heirs or the legal representative of his or her estate for the six (6)-month period following the date of the French Participant's death. In any case, any French-qualified Option that remains unexercised shall expire six (6) months after the French Participant's date of death. The six (6)-month exercise period shall apply
without regard to the term of the French-qualified Options as described in Section II.6 of this French Sub-Plan.
5. Adjustments and Change of Control. Adjustments of the French-qualified Options granted hereunder may be made to preclude the dilution or enlargement of benefits under the French-qualified Options in the event of a transaction by the Company as set forth in Section L. 225-181 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and in case of a repurchase of Shares by the Company at a price higher than the share quotation price in the open market, and according to the provisions of Section L. 228-99 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, as well as according to specific decrees. Should adjustments be made in the case of a transaction for which adjustments are not recognized under such French laws, the Options may no longer qualify as French-qualified Options.
In the event of capitalization adjustments or adjustments upon a Change of Control as set forth in Article XII of the U.S. Plan, the Options may no longer qualify as French-qualified Options unless the adjustments are recognized under applicable French legal and tax rules. The Board or Committee, at its discretion, may make adjustments to the Options, notwithstanding that the adjustment is not recognized under French law; however, in such case, the Options may no longer qualify as French-qualified Options. Finally, if the French-qualified Options are assumed or substituted or if vesting or exercisability is accelerated due to a Change of Control, the Options may no longer be considered as French-qualified Options.
6. Term of French-Qualified Options. French-qualified Options granted pursuant to this French Sub-Plan will expire no later than six (6) years and six (6) months after the Grant Date (or Effective Grant Date), unless otherwise specified in the applicable Share Award Agreement. The Option term will be extended only upon the death of a French Participant, but in no event will any French-qualified Option be exercisable beyond six (6) months following the French Participant's date of death.
7. Interpretation. The Options granted under this French Sub-Plan are intended to qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment applicable to stock options granted under Sections L. 225-177 to L. 225-186-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax law and the French tax administration, but the Company does not undertake to maintain this status. The terms of this French Sub-Plan shall be interpreted accordingly and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws and relevant guidelines published by French tax and social security administrations and subject to the fulfillment of legal, tax, and reporting obligations, to the extent applicable. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this French Sub-Plan and the U.S. Plan, the provisions of this French Sub-Plan shall control for any grants of Options made hereunder to French Participants.
III. FRENCH-QUALIFIED RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS.
1. Conditions of the French-Qualified RSUs.
(a) Vesting of French-Qualified RSUs. French-qualified RSUs shall not vest and the Shares underlying the French-qualified RSUs shall not be delivered to the French Participants prior to the expiration of the specific period calculated from the Grant Date as may be required to comply with the minimum mandatory vesting period applicable to French-qualified RSUs under Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, or under the relevant sections of the French Tax Code or the French Social Security Code, as amended, to benefit from the specific tax and social security treatment in France. However, notwithstanding the vesting requirements described above, upon the death of a French Participant, all of his or her outstanding French-qualified RSUs shall become transferable under the conditions set forth in Section III.3 of this French Sub-Plan. In the event of Disability (as defined in this French Sub-Plan), the French Participant's outstanding French-qualified RSUs may become vested without regard to the
minimum mandatory vesting period described above, if so determined by the Company and set forth in the applicable Share Award Agreement.
(b) Holding of Shares. The sale or transfer of Shares issued pursuant to the French-qualified RSUs may not occur prior to the relevant anniversary of the Vesting Date specified by the Committee as may be required to comply with the minimum mandatory holding period applicable to French-qualified RSUs under Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, or the relevant sections of the French Tax Code or the French Social Security Code, as amended, to benefit from the specific tax and social security regime, even if the French Participant is no longer an employee or corporate officer of a French Entity. In addition, the Shares issued pursuant to the French-qualified RSUs may not be sold or transferred during a Closed Period, so long as those Closed Periods are applicable to Shares underlying French-qualified RSUs.
(c) French Participant's Account. Shares issued pursuant to the French-qualified RSUs shall be recorded and held in an account in the name of the French Participant with the Company or a broker or in such other manner as the Company may determine in order to ensure compliance with applicable laws, including any required holding periods.
2. Adjustments and Change of Control. In the event of capitalization adjustments or adjustments upon a Change of Control as set forth in Article XII of the U.S. Plan, the Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units may no longer qualify as French-qualified RSUs unless the adjustments are recognized under applicable French legal and tax rules. The Board or Committee, at its discretion, may make adjustments to the Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units, notwithstanding that the adjustments are not recognized under French law, in which case the Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units may no longer qualify as French-qualified RSUs. Finally, if the French-qualified RSUs are assumed or substituted or if vesting or the holding period is accelerated due to a Change of Control, the Restricted Share Units and/or Performance Share Units may no longer be considered as French-qualified RSUs.
3. Death and Disability. Upon the death of a French Participant, any French-qualified RSUs held by the French Participant at the time of death shall become immediately transferable to the French Participant's heirs. The Company shall issue the Shares to the French Participant's heirs, at their request, provided the heirs contact the Company and request such transfer of the shares within six (6) months following the death of the French Participant. If the French Participant's heirs do not request the issuance of the Shares underlying the French-qualified RSUs within six (6) months after the French Participant's death, the French-qualified RSUs will be forfeited. The French participant's heirs shall not be subject to the restrictions on the transfer of Shares set forth in Section III.1(b) of this French Sub-Plan. If a French Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or a French Entity by reason of his or her Disability (as defined in this French Sub-Plan), the French Participant shall not be subject to the restrictions on the transfer of Shares set forth in Section III.1(b) of this French Sub-Plan.
4. Interpretation. The Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units granted under this French Sub-Plan are intended to qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment applicable to shares granted for no consideration under Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws, but the Company does not undertake to maintain this status. The terms of this French Sub-Plan shall be interpreted accordingly and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws and relevant guidelines published by French tax and social security administrations and subject to the fulfilment of certain legal, tax, and reporting obligations, to the extent applicable. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this French Sub-Plan and the U.S. Plan, the provisions of this French Sub-Plan shall control for any grants of Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units made hereunder to French Participants.
IV. ADOPTION.
The French Sub-Plan, in its entirety, was adopted by the Committee's Delegate and became effective July 25, 2016.
Note: the amendments set out in this Appendix D are reflected as a comparison to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company as of the date of this proxy statement. Additional amendments will be made to the provisions of the Articles of Association included in this Appendix D if shareholders approve Proposal 7.
Companies Acts1963 to 20122014
A PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATIONCONSTITUTION
of
SUBPLAN UNDER THE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
(Aas amendedand restated by Specialby allRresolutionsdated 1 July 2010passed up to andincluding19 October2016)
Incorporated the 22nd day of January 2010
DUBLIN
Cert. No. 480010
Companies Acts 1963 to 2012 2014A PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARESMEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATIONofSeagate Technology Public Limited CompanySEAGATE TECHNOLOGYPUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
As amendedand restatedbyallSpecial Rresolutionsdated 1 July 2010passed up to and including 19 October 2016
1. | |||||
2. | Terms of the | ||||
WE, the several persons whose names, addresses and descriptions are subscribed, wish to be formed into a Company in pursuance of this memorandum of association, and we agree to take the number of Shares in the capital of the Company set opposite our respective names.
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
| ||
| ||||
| ||||
Cert. No. 480010
Companies Acts1963 to20124A PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARESARTICLES OF ASSOCIATIONofSeagate Technology Public Limited CompanySEAGATE TECHNOLOGYPUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
(Aas amendedand restated by Specialby allRresolutionsdated 30 October 2013passed up to andincluding 19 October·2016)
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Subplan shall have the same meaning | |
|
| |
|
|
3. | Definition of |
| Subplan Countries. The Committee shall have the | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
5. | Terms of | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SHARE CAPITAL; ISSUE OF SHARES
The Directors are, for the purposes of section 20 of the 1983Companies Acts, generally and unconditionally authorised to exercise all powers of the Company to allot and issue relevant securities (as defined by the said section 20Companies Acts) up to the amount of Company's authorised share capital as at the date of adoption of these Articles and to allot and issue any Shares purchased by the Company pursuant to the provisions of Part XI of the 1990Companies Acts and held as treasury shares and this authority shall expire five years from the date of adoption of these Articles.
Notwithstanding the fixing of the number of Preferred Shares constituting a particular series upon the issuance thereof, the Board at any time thereafter may authorise the issuance of additional Preferred Shares of the same series subject always to the Companies Acts, the Memorandum and these Articles.
the proceeds thereof, shall be distributed among the holders of each such series of the Preferred Shares ratably in accordance with the sums which would be payable on such distribution if all sums payable were discharged in full.
on the Shares on which stamp duty has been paid by the Company or its subsidiary for the amount of stamp duty paid. The Company's lien shall extend to all dividends paid on those Shares.
REDEMPTION AND REPURCHASE OF SHARES
Shares. The rights of holders of Ordinary Shares shall not be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of Shares with preferred or other rights which may be effected by the Board as provided in these Articles without any vote or consent of the holders of Ordinary Shares.
hereinafter provided, elect either to be registered himself as holder of the Share or to make such transfer of the Share to such other person nominated by him and to have such person registered as the transferee thereof, but the Board shall, in either case, have the same right to decline or suspend registration as they would have had in the case of a transfer of the Share by that Member before his death or bankruptcy as the case may be.
AMENDMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION;CHANGE OF LOCATION OF REGISTERED OFFICE; ANDALTERATION OF CAPITAL
Table of ContentsAPPENDIX C
CLOSING REGISTER OF MEMBERS OR FIXING RECORD DATE
For as long as Shares are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act and the Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, in the event that any annual general meeting is held outside of the United States of America, the Board shall provide Members and proxies entitled to attend such meeting with access to such meeting by way of Remote Communication.
PROCEEDINGS AT GENERAL MEETINGS
Unless a poll is so demanded, a declaration by the Chairman that a resolution has, on a show of hands, been carried or carried unanimously, or by a particular majority, or lost, and an entry to that effect in the book containing the minutes of the proceedings of the Company, shall be conclusive evidence of the fact without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded in favour of or against such resolution. The demand for a poll may be withdrawn.
entitled to nominate persons for election to the Board at annual general meetings or at general meetings called specifically for the purpose of electing directors.
in accordance with the procedures set forth in Articles93929293 and94939394 shall be eligible to serve as directors of the Company. If the Chairman of a general meeting determines that a proposed nomination was not made in compliance with Articles93929293 and94939394, he shall declare to the meeting that nomination is defective and such defective nomination shall be disregarded. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of these Articles, if the Member (or a qualified representative of the Member) does not appear at the general meeting to present his nomination, such nomination shall be disregarded.
approve. A proxy need not be a member of the Company. The appointment of a proxy in electronic or other form shall only be effective in such manner as the Directors may approve.
DIRECTORS'AND OFFICERS'INTERESTS
profit realised by any such contract or transaction by reason of such Directoror officerof the Company holding office or of the fiduciary relation thereby established; provided that:
POWERS AND DUTIES OF DIRECTORS
DELEGATION OFSUBPLAN UNDER THE BOARD'S POWERS
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS; DUTIES OF OFFICERS
period and upon such terms as it thinks fit and upon such terms as to remuneration as it may decide in accordance with these Articles. Such officers need not also be a Director.
present within five (5) minutes after the time appointed for holding the same, the Directors present may choose one of their number to be a Chairman of the meeting.
VACATION OF OFFICE OF DIRECTOR
APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND RESERVE
to Members in the proportions in which such sum would have been divisible amongst them had the same been a distribution of profits by way of dividend and to apply such sum on their behalf in paying up in full unissued Shares for allotment and distribution credited as fully paid up to and amongst them in the proportion aforesaid. In such event the Board shall do all acts and things required to give effect to such capitalisation, with full power to the Board to make such provisions as they think fit for the case of Shares becoming distributable in fractions (including provisions whereby the benefit of fractional entitlements accrue to the Company rather than to the Members concerned). The Board may authorise any person to enter on behalf of all of the Members interested into an agreement with the Company providing for such capitalisation and matters incidental thereto and any agreement made under such authority shall be effective and binding on all concerned.
BOOKS OF ACCOUNT; RIGHTS OF INSPECTION
accounts, balance sheets, group accounts (if any) and such other reports and accounts as may be required by law.
and copies of those documents shall also be treated for the purposes of the Companies Acts, as sent to a person where:
Where copies of documents are sent out pursuant to this Article 16866over a period of days, references elsewhere in the Companies Act to the day on which those copies are sent out shall be read as references to the last day of that period.
on the same day that it was transmitted. Where a notice is given by e-mail service shall be deemed to be effected by transmitting the e-mail to the e-mail address provided by the intended recipient and shall be deemed to have been received on the same day that it was sent, and it shall not be necessary for the receipt of the e-mail to be acknowledged by the recipient. Where a notice was published as an electronic record on a website, at the time that the notification of such publication shall be deemed to have been delivered to such Member, and in proving such service or delivery, it shall be sufficient to prove that the notice or document was properly published on a website in accordance with and provisions of these Articles.
distributed so that, as nearly as may be, the losses shall be borne by the Members in proportion to the nominal value of the Shares held by them. If in a winding up the assets available for distribution amongst the Members shall be more than sufficient to repay the whole of the share capital at the commencement of the winding up, the surplus shall be distributed amongst the Members in proportion to the nominal value of the Shares held by them at the commencement of the winding up. This Article is without prejudice to the rights of the holders of Shares issued upon special terms and conditions.
the business of the Company or invested in such investments (other than Shares of the Company or its holding company if any) as the Directors may from time to time think fit.
with the defense or settlement thereof, except that no indemnification for expenses shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such Covered Person shall have been finally adjudged to be liable for fraud or dishonesty in the performance of his duty to the Company, or for conscious, intentional or wilful breach of his obligation to act honestly, lawfully and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company, unless and only to the extent that the Court or the court in which such proceeding was brought shall determine upon application that despite the adjudication of liability, but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such Covered Person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court shall deem proper. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, this section shall not extend to any matter that would render it void pursuant to the Companies Acts or to any person holding the office of auditor in relation to the Company.
Company, to the same extent and in the same situations and subject to the same determinations as are hereinabove set forth with respect to a Covered Person.
SALE, LEASE OR EXCHANGE OF ASSETS
CONSENT TO JURISDICTION; CHOICE OF LAW
further agrees that if sued in these jurisdictions, it will agree to the application of that court's rules of procedure and will not argue, under choice of law principles, that procedural rights granted by the laws of Ireland should be applied in these fora.
and in the event that any action, suit or proceeding of the type described in Article191190191 is brought against the Company in any Delaware-Based Court, the Company will provide a notice to such court specifying with which of the three foregoing provisions of this Article193192193 the Company has complied.
WE, the several persons whose names, addresses and descriptions are subscribed, wish to be formed into a Company in pursuance of this memorandum of association, and we agree to take the number of Shares in the capital of the Company set opposite our respective names.
Dated the 21 day of January 2010
Witnesses to the above signatures:
Companies Acts, 1963 to 20142MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OFASSOCIATIONOF
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY
PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES
Summary of Optional Provisions in the Companies Act 2014 from which the Company Proposes to Opt-Out
Sections of the Companies Act 2014 from which the Company proposes to opt-out | Relevant section of current Articles of Association | Company's reason for opting-out of the section | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
43(2) and 43(3) | 126 and 149 to 151 | Sections 43(2) and (3) deal with the use of the common seal of a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections as equivalent provisions for the use of the Company's common seal are set out in Article 149 to 151 and in Article 126, which is being amended accordingly and moved to a new Article 150. | ||
65(2) to 65(7) | N/A | Sections 65(2) to 65(7) deal with the power of a company to convert shares into stock and reconvert stock into shares. We propose to opt-out of these sections as they are not contemplated in the Company's existing Articles of Association and the intention is to preserve the status quo. | ||
66(4) | 7 and 32 | Section 66(4) deals with the allotment of redeemable shares. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Article 7 and Article 32. | ||
77 to 81 | 39 to 58 | Sections 77 to 81 deal with the making of calls in respect of unpaid amounts due on shares issued by a company, liens on shares and forfeiture of shares. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matters are already provided for in Articles 39 to 58. | ||
94(8) | 27 | Section 94(8) deals with the instrument of transfer for shares and the regulation of such instruments under the Stock Transfer Act 1963. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Article 27. | ||
95(1) | 28 to 31 | Section 95(1) deals with restrictions on the transfer of shares. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Articles 28 to 31. |
Sections of the Companies Act 2014 from which the Company proposes to opt-out | Relevant section of current Articles of Association | Company's reason for opting-out of the section | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
96(2) to 96(11) and 97(3) | 61 to 64 | Sections 96(2) to 96(11) and 97(3) deal with transmission of shares in a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matter is already provided for in Articles 61 to 64. | ||
124 and 125 | 152 to 161 | Sections 124 and 125 deal with the declaration and payment of dividends by a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matters are already provided for in Articles 150 to 159. | ||
126 | 162 | Section 126 deals with the capitalisation of a company's reserves for the purposes of making bonus issues of shares. We propose to opt-out of this section and Article 160 is being amended accordingly. | ||
144(3) | 107 and 144 to 147 | Section 144(3) deals with the appointment of directors. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Article 107 and Articles 144 to 147. | ||
148(2) | 143 | Section 148(2) deals with how the office of a director may be vacated before the end of the appointed term. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Article 143. | ||
157 to 165 (excluding 161(7) which is not applicable to the Company) | 121 to 126 and 128 to 142 | Sections 157 to 165 deal with a board's power of management and delegation, the appointment of a managing director, the establishment of board committees, matters relating to board procedure and the appointment of alternate directors. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matters are already provided for in Articles 121 to 126 and Articles 128 to 142. | ||
178(1) and (2) | N/A | Section 178(1) and (2) deal with the convening of extraordinary general meetings by shareholders. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matter is not contemplated in the Company's existing Articles of Association and the intention is to preserve the status quo. |
Sections of the Companies Act 2014 from which the Company proposes to opt-out | Relevant section of current Articles of Association | Company's reason for opting-out of the section | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
180(5), 181(1) and 181(6) | 74 to 79 | Sections 180(5), 181(1) and 181(6) deal with how notices of general meetings are given, the timing of such notices and who is entitled to receive such notices. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matter is already provided for in Articles 74 to 79. | ||
182(2), (4) and (5) | 81 and 82 | Sections 182(2), (4) and (5) deal with the quorum requirements for a general meeting of a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matters are already provided for in Articles 81 and 82. | ||
183(3) | 102 | We propose to opt-out of Section 183(3) as the appointment of multiple proxies is already provided for in Article 102. | ||
183(6) | 103(2) | Article 103(2) is being amended to cater for changes introduced by sections 183 and 184 of the Companies Act 2014 relating to the time and place for delivery of proxies. Article 103(2) is being amended to provide that an instrument or other form of communication appointing a proxy may be returned to the address or addresses stated in the notice of meeting by such time as may be specified in the notice of meeting, or (if no such time is specified) at any time prior to the holding of the relevant meeting at which the appointee proposes to vote, and subject to the Companies Act 2014, if not so delivered the appointment shall not be treated as valid. | ||
186(c) | 80 | Section 186(c) deals with certain aspects of the business of the annual general meeting. We propose to opt-out of this section and Article 80 is being amended accordingly. | ||
187 and 188 | 81 to 91 | Sections 187 and 188 deal with the conduct of general meetings and voting at such meetings. We propose to opt-out of these sections as provision for such matters are already provided for in Articles 81 to 91. | ||
218(1), 218(3), 218(4) and 218(5) | 171 to 173 | Sections 218(1), (3), (4) and (5) deal with the service of notice on members of a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections as such matter is already provided for in Articles 171 to 173. |
Sections of the Companies Act 2014 from which the Company proposes to opt-out | Relevant section of current Articles of Association | Company's reason for opting-out of the section | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
229(1), 230 and 1113 | 112 to 120 | Sections 229(1), 230 and 1113 deal with potential conflicting interests of directors. We propose to opt-out of these sections such matters are provided for in Articles 112 to 120. | ||
338(5), 338(6) and 339(7) | New Article 168 | Sections 338(5) and (6) and 339(7) deal with delivery of financial statements via the website of a company. We propose to opt-out of these sections and such matter will be provided for in a new Article 168. | ||
618(1)(b) | 174 to 176 | Section 618(1)(b) deals with the distribution of property on a winding up of a company. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Articles 174 to 176. | ||
620(8) | 161 | Section 620(8) stipulates the timeframe for claiming dividends. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is already provided for in Article 161. | ||
1090 | 107 and 144 to 147 | Section 1090 deals with the rotation of directors. We propose to opt-out of this section as such matter is provided for in Article 107 and Articles 144 to 147. | ||
1092 | 108 to 110 | Sections 1092 deals with the remuneration of directors. We propose to opt-out of this section as this matter is already provided for in Articles 108 to 110. |
Part IISummary of Optional Provisions in the Companies Act 2014 From Which the Company Does Not Propose to Opt-Out
1. | ||
Part IIISummary of other amendments being made relating to the passing of the Companies Act 2014 or for administrative or housekeeping reasons
3. | Eligibility. Employees of Seagate Technology UK Ltd. (“Seagate UK”) or any |
Plurality Voting in Contested Elections and Board Size Amendments to Articles of Association
Note: the amendments set out in this Appendix F are reflected as a comparison to the Articles of Association of the Company as of the date of this proxy statement. Additional amendments will be made to the provisions of the Articles of Association included in this Appendix if shareholders approve Proposals 5A and 5B.
Part A—Plurality Voting in Contested Election Amendments
Part B—Board Size Amendments
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC
38/39 FITZWILLIAM SQUARE
DUBLIN 2, IRELAND
VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:6:59 PM Eastern Time on October 16, 2016.17, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC 38/39 FITZWILLIAM SQUARE DUBLIN 2, IRELAND
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials, including notices of shareholder meetings, electronically in future years.
SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:6:59 PM Eastern Time on October 16, 2016.17, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, which must be received by October 16, 2016. 17, 2017.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E13293-P81659 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
E31920-P96669 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC (the "Company") The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: Any shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may appoint one or more proxies, who need not be a shareholder(s) of the Company. A proxy is required to vote in accordance with any instructions given to him. Completion of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting at the meeting in person. 1. Election of Directors Nominees: For ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Against ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. Stephen J. Luczo For ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Against ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5. To ratify, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors' remuneration. To amend the Company’s Articles of Association to make certain administrative amendments. (Special Resolution) To amend the Company’s Memorandum of Association to make certain administrative amendments. (Special Resolution) To amend the Company’s Articles of Association to provide for a plurality voting standard in the event of a contested director election. (Special Resolution) To amend the Company’s Articles of Association to grant the Board sole authority to determine its size. (Special Resolution) To grant the Board the authority to issue shares under Irish law. 1b. Frank J. Biondi, Jr. 6A. 1c. Michael R. Cannon 6B. 1d. Mei-Wei Cheng 7A. 1e. William T. Coleman 7B. 1f. Jay L. Geldmacher 8. 1g. Dr. Dambisa F. Moyo 9. To grant the Board the authority to opt-out of statutory pre-emption rights under Irish law. (Special Resolution) 1h. Dr. Chong Sup Park 10. To determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it holds as treasury shares. (Special Resolution) 1i. Stephanie Tilenius You can instruct your proxy not to vote on a resolution by inserting an "x" in the box under "Abstain". Please note that an abstention is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the calculation of the proportion of the votes for and against a resolution. 1j. Edward J. Zander 2. To approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. To approve an amendment and restatement of the Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance. To approve the Rules of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for Share Awards Granted to Participants in France. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. 3. Yes ! No ! 4. Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date V.1.1
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC (the “Company”) | Any shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may appoint one or more proxies, who need not be a shareholder(s) of the Company. A proxy is required to vote in accordance with any instructions given to him. Completion of a form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting at the meeting in person. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1a.
1b.
1c.
1d.
1e.
1f.
1g.
1h.
1i.
1j.
| Stephen J. Luczo
Mark W. Adams
Michael R. Cannon
Mei-Wei Cheng
William T. Coleman
Jay L. Geldmacher
William D. Mosley
Dr. Chong Sup Park
Stephanie Tilenius
Edward J. Zander
| ☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
| ☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
| ☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 1 year on the following proposal: | 1 Year | 2 Years | 3 Years | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
Approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes.
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:
| For
| Against
| Abstain
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Approve an amendment and restatement of the Seagate Technology Public Limited Company Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance.
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. | Ratify, in a non-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) to set the auditors’ remuneration.
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. | Grant the Board the authority to allot and/or issue shares under Irish law.
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Grant the Board the authority to opt-out of statutory pre-emption rights under Irish law.
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”). | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 8. | Determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||
You can instruct your proxy not to vote on a resolution by inserting an “x” in the box under “Abstain”. Please note that an abstention is not a vote in law and will not be counted in the calculation of the proportion of the votes for and against a resolution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. | Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.
| ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date |
Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
V.1.1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K and Irish Statutory Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2016 are available at www.proxyvote.com. E13294-P81659 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC Annual General Meeting of Shareholders October 19, 2016 9:30 AM Local Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) C.S. Park and Regan J. MacPherson, or each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby further authorizes such proxies to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before such Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. In the event of a vote on a show of hands on any proposal or other matter properly coming before the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, C.S. Park and Regan J. MacPherson, or each of them, shall be entitled to vote the undersigned's shares, as designated on the reverse side hereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF THIS PROXY IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, BUT NO VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN HEREIN, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B, 8, 9 AND 10, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE 2016 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE The signer(s) hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying proxy statement. Continued and to be signed on reverse side V.1.1
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
E31921-P96669
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC Annual General Meeting of Shareholders October 18, 2017 9:30 AM Local Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors | ||||||||||||||
The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the ordinary shares of Seagate Technology plc that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby further authorizes such proxies to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before such Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. In the event of a vote on a show of hands on any proposal or other matter properly coming before the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, Michael R. Cannon and Katherine E. Schuelke, or each of them, shall be entitled to vote the undersigned’s shares, as designated on the reverse side hereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF THIS PROXY IS DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, BUT NO VOTING DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN HEREIN, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, FOR “ONE YEAR” FOR PROPOSAL 3, AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES, UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE 2017 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE The signer(s) hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of the 2017 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying Proxy Statement. | ||||||||||||||
Continued and to be signed on reverse side |